臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：大法官解釋中的歷史與傳統--女性主義觀點的批判
書刊名：中研院法學期刊
作者：陳昭如 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Chao-ju
出版日期：2010
卷期：7
頁次：頁81-140
主題關鍵詞：大法官；司法審查；歷史；傳統；法律東方主義；婦運；女性主義法學；女性主義立場論；女性主義認識論；Grand justice；Judicial review；History；Tradition；Legal orientalism；Women’s movement；Feminist legal theory；Feminist Standpoint theory；Feminist epistemology
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:82
  • 點閱點閱:122
期刊論文
1.Ruskola, Teemu(2002)。Legal Orientalism。Michigan Law Review，101(1)，179-234。  new window
2.陳昭如(200510)。在法律中看見性別，在比較中發現權力--從比較法的性別政治談女性主義法學。律師雜誌，313，61-72。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳宜倩(20060500)。法律體系中性別平等論述的生產與實踐初探--以大法官解釋為例。全國律師，10(5)，44-58。  延伸查詢new window
4.王泰升(2010)。創新版的「法學緒論」：秉持社會關懷的法學。台灣法學雜誌，148，1-26。  延伸查詢new window
5.Scott, Joan W.(1991)。The Evidence of Experience。Critical Inquiry，17(4)，773-797。  new window
6.Reitman, Oonagh(2005)。Multiculturalism and Feminism: Incom patibility, Compatibility, or Synonymity?。Ethnicities，5(2)，216-247。  new window
7.Crenshaw, Kimberlé(1989)。Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics。University of Chicago Legal Forum，1989(1)，139-167。  new window
8.姜貞吟(20091200)。女性作為政治行動者：臺灣女性參政圖像的反思。臺灣社會研究，76，277-316。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳昭如(20091200)。在棄權與爭產之間 : 超越被害者與行動者二元對立的女兒繼承權實踐。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，38(4)，133-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.李南海(19980200)。制憲時期婦女爭取代表名額始末--以國民大會代表之選舉為例。近代中國，123，170-190。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃長玲(20010500)。從婦女保障名額到性別比例原則--兩性共治的理論與實踐。問題與研究，40(3)，69-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Collins, Patricia Hill(1986)。Learning From The Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought。Social Problems，33(6)，S14-S32。  new window
13.陳昭如(20020300)。創造性別平等，抑或與父權共謀﹖--關於臺灣法律近代西方法化的女性主義考察。思與言，40(1)，183-248。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.李立如(20080300)。司法審查之表述功能與社會變革：以性別平等原則在家庭中的落實為例。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，37(1)，31-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.俞彥娟(1991)。婦女運動，女性主義，婦女史研究—從席爾斯公司的性別歧視案談起。美國研究，21(1)，1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳昭如(2008)。法律東方主義陰影下的近代化。台灣社會研究季刊，72，93-135。  延伸查詢new window
17.Balkin, Jack M.、Reva B. Siegel(2003)。The American Civil Rights Tradition: Anticlassification or Antisubordination。U. Miami L. Rev.，58，9-34。  new window
18.Bartlett, Katharine T.(1995)。Tradition, Change, and the Idea of Progress in Feminist Thought。Wis. L. Rev.，1995，303-344。  new window
19.Basu, Amrita(1997)。The Many Faces of Asian Feminism。Asian Women，5，1-17。  new window
20.Bernstein, Richard B.(1987)。Charting the Bicentennial。Colum. L. Rev.，87，1565-1624。  new window
21.Briggs, Charles L.(1996)。The Politics of Discursive Authority in Research on the 'Invention of Tradition'。Anthropology，11(4)，435-469。  new window
22.Chauncey, George(2004)。‘What Gay Studies Taught the Court’: The Historians' Amicus Brief in Lawrence v. Texas。GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies，10(3)，509-538。  new window
23.Chauncey, George(2008)。How History Mattered: Sodomy Law and Marriage Reform in the United States。Public Culture，20(1)，27-37。  new window
24.Chemerinsky, Erwin(1993)。History, Tradition, the Supreme Court, and the First Amendment。Hastings L. J.，44，901-920。  new window
25.Eskridge, William N.(2004)。Lawrence’s Jurisprudence of Tolerance: Judicial Review to Lower the Stakes of Identity Politics。Minn. L. Rev.，88，1021-1102。  new window
26.Festa, Mathew J.(2009)。Applying a Usable Past: The Use of History in Law。Seton Hall L. Rev.，38，479-554。  new window
27.Garcia, Bonifacio(1987)。The Uses of History in Law: Some Aspects of the Process。Law & Just. – Christian L. Rev.，92-93，27-41。  new window
28.Gordon, Robert(1976)。Introduction: J. Willard Hurst and the Common Law Tradition in American Legal Historiography。Law & Soc’y Rev.，10，9-56。  new window
29.Gordon, Robert W.(1984)。Critical Legal Histories。Stanford Law Review，36，57-125。  new window
30.Grossberg, Michael(1991)。Social History Update: “Fighting Faiths” And The Challenges Of Legal History。J. of Soc. Hist.，25，191-201。  new window
31.Hall, Jacquelyn Dowd、Sandi E. Cooper(1986)。Women's History Goes on Trial: EEOC vs. Sears Roebuck and Co.。Signs，11，751-779。  new window
32.Haskell, Thomas、Sanford Levinson(1988)。Academic Freedom and Expert Witnessing: Historians and the Sears Case。Tex. L. Rev.，66，1629-1660。  new window
33.Kalman, Laura(1997)。Border Patrol: Reflections on the Turn to History in Legal Scholarship。Fordham L. Rev.，66，87-124。  new window
34.Kelly, Alfred H.(1965)。Clio and the Court: An Illicit Love Affair。Sup. Ct. Rev.，119-158。  new window
35.Kessler-Harris, Alice(1987)。EEOC vs. Sears Roebuck: A Personal Account。Feminist Rev.，25，45-69。  new window
36.Kurland, Philp B.(1986)。The Origins of the Religion Clauses of Constitution。Wm. & Mary L. Rev.，27，839-862。  new window
37.Mayeri, Serena(2001)。A Common Fate of Discrimination: Gender-Race Analogy in Legal and Historical Perspective。Yale L. J.，110，1045-1088。  new window
38.Melton Jr., Buckner F.(1999)。Clio at the Bar: A Guide to Historical Method for Legists and Jurist。Minn. L. Rev.，83，377-472。  new window
39.Milkman, Ruth(1986)。Women's History and the Sears Case。Feminist Stud.，12，375-400。  new window
40.Minh-ha, Trinh T.(1987)。Difference: A special Third World Women Issue。Feminist Rev.，25，5-22。  new window
41.Nader, Laura(2005)。Law and the Theory of Lack。Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev.，28，191-204。  new window
42.Scott, Joan W.(1988)。Deconstructing Equality-versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism。Feminist Studies，14(1)，33-50。  new window
43.Siegel, Reva(2002)。She the People: The Nineteenth Amendment, Sex Equality, Federalism and the Family。Harv. L. Rev.，115，948-1046。  new window
44.Volpp, Leti(2000)。Blaming Culture for Bad Behavior。Yale J.L. & Human，12，89-116。  new window
45.Volpp, Leti(2000)。Feminism Versus Multiculturalism。Colum. L. Rev.，10，1181-1218。  new window
會議論文
1.蔡宗珍(2006)。性別平等與女性保障名額制度。司法院大法官95年度學術研討會，(會議日期: 2006年12月9日)。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李建良(2007)。面對中華民國憲法：思索台灣憲改之路。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張喬婷(2010)。民意代表選出方式的性別積極平權措施：談憲法上的性別平等與民主理論(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳雅琪(2008)。臺灣婦女團體的長青樹--臺灣省婦女會 (1946-2001)(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林伊倫(2009)。誰近/禁女色? ：戰後臺灣法律再現系統中之色情圖像(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Novick, P.(1988)。That Noble Dream: The 'Objectivity Question' and the American Historical Profession。That Noble Dream: The 'Objectivity Question' and the American Historical Profession。Cambridge/ New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.DuBois, W. E. B.(1903)。The Souls of Black Folk: Essays and Sketches。Harmondswroth。  new window
3.(1998)。大法官釋憲史料。大法官釋憲史料。臺北：司法院。  延伸查詢new window
4.Miller, Charles A.(1969)。The Supreme Court and the Uses of History。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty(1987)。In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
6.Collins, Patricia Hill(2000)。Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment。Routledge。  new window
7.雷震、薛化元(2009)。中華民國制憲史--制憲的歷史軌跡(1912-1945)。  延伸查詢new window
8.江文瑜、曾秋美(1995)。消失中的臺灣阿媽。臺北：玉山社。  延伸查詢new window
9.姉齒松平(1938)。本島人のみに関する親族法並びに相続法の大要。台法月報發行所。  延伸查詢new window
10.MacKinnon, Catharine A.(1987)。Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law。Harvard University Press。  new window
11.江文瑜編(1998)。阿母的故事。台北：玉山社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Collins, Patricia Hill(1998)。Fighting Words: Black Women and the Search for Justice。Minneapolis：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
13.Mani, Lata(1998)。Contentious Traditions: The Debate on Sati in Colonial India。Berkeley：Los Angeles：University of California Press。  new window
14.司法行政部民法研究修正委員會(1976)。中華民國民法制定史料彙編。臺北市：司法行政部總務司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Harding, Sandra G.(1991)。Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives。Cornell University Press。  new window
16.Tamanaha, Brian Z.(2001)。A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society。Oxford University Press。  new window
17.國民大會袐書處(1946)。制憲國民大會實錄。國民大會秘書處。  延伸查詢new window
18.Narayan, Uma(1997)。Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions, and third world feminism。Routledge。  new window
19.Shachar, Ayalet(2001)。Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women's Rights。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
20.蘇芊玲、蕭昭君、台灣性別平等教育協會(2005)。大年初一回娘家：習俗文化與性別教育。臺北：女書文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
21.法務部(2004)。臺灣民事習慣調查報告。法務部。  延伸查詢new window
22.Chow, Rey(1991)。Women and Chinese Modernity: the Politics of Reading between West and East。Princeton：Princeton Univ. Press。  new window
23.MacKinnon, Catharine A.(1989)。Toward a Feminist Theory of the State。Cambridge, MA：London：Harvard University Press。  new window
24.Wolf, Margery(1972)。Women and the Family in Rural Taiwan。Stanford, California：Stanford University Press。  new window
25.Hobsbawm, Eric、Ranger, Terence(2000)。The Invention of Tradition。Cambridge University Press。  new window
26.王泰升(2002)。變遷中的臺灣人民法律觀。臺灣法的斷裂與延續。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
27.外省台灣人協會編(2008)。遇合。臺北縣中和市。  延伸查詢new window
28.林紀東(1983)。大法官會議憲法解釋析論。台北。  延伸查詢new window
29.陳昭如(2007)。受害者或加害者？初探女性主義法學中的受害者政治。自由主義與新世紀台灣。台北。  延伸查詢new window
30.蔡靜茹(2009)。女生正步走—牽手催生女主祭。台北。  延伸查詢new window
31.薛化元(2010)。導論：雷震與《中華民國制憲史》。中華民國制憲史—制憲的歷史軌跡(1912-1945)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
32.蕭昭君(2005)。爭取參與祭祖，女生正步走！。大年初一回娘家：習俗文化與性別教育。台北。  延伸查詢new window
33.北川東子(2007)。道徳の暴力とジェンダー。法と暴力の記憶—東アジアの歴史経験。東京。  延伸查詢new window
34.金惠淑(2007)。近代韓国における女性主体の形成—東アジア的近代経験の多層性。法と暴力の記憶─東アジアの歴史経験。東京。  延伸查詢new window
35.Cossman, Brenda(2000)。Turning the Gaze Back on Itself: Comparative Law, Feminist Legal Studies, and the Postcolonial Project。Global Critical Race Feminism: An International Reader。New York。  new window
36.Eagleton, Terry(1997)。Saint Oscars, and Other Plays。Cambridge, Mass.。  new window
37.Eskridge, William N.(2008)。Dishonorable Passions: Sodomy Laws in America 1861-2003。New York：Viking。  new window
38.Freedman, Estelle B.(2006)。When Historiography Meets Legal Advocacy: Abortion, Sodomy, and Same-Sex Marriage。Feminism, Sexuality & Politics。Chapel Hill。  new window
39.Haskell, Thomas L.(2000)。Objectivity is Not Neutrality: Explanatory Schemes in History。Baltimore。  new window
40.Kalman, Laura(1996)。The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism。New Haven。  new window
41.Kapur, Ratna(2005)。Erotic Justice: Law and the New Politics of Postcolonialism。London。  new window
42.Litzinger, Ralph(2002)。Tradition and the Gender of Civility。Chinese Femininities, Chinese Masculinities: A Reader。Berkeley。  new window
43.Lyon, Lenore(2004)。State of Ambivalence: The Feminist Movement in Singapore。Boston。  new window
44.MacKinnon, Catharine A.(2005)。‘Freedom from Unreal Loyalties’: On Fidelity in Constitutional Interpretation, in Women’s Lives, Men’s Laws。Cambridge, Mass。  new window
45.Nader, Laura、Ugo Mattei(2008)。Plunder: When the Rule of Law is Illegal。Malden, MA。  new window
46.Narayan, Uma(2000)。Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist Critique of Cultural Essentialism。Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural,Postcolonial, and Feminist World。Indianapolis。  new window
47.Narayan, Uma(2004)。The Project of a Feminist Epistemology: Perspective from a Nonwestern Feminist。The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies。New York。  new window
48.Nelson, William E.、John Phillip Reid(1985)。The Literature of American Legal History。New York。  new window
49.Ong, Aihwa(2001)。Colonialism and Modernity: Feminist Re-Presentations of Women in Non-Western Societies。Feminism and ‘Race’。Oxford。  new window
50.Rich, Adrienne(1986)。Resisting Amnesia: History and Personal Life。Blood, Bread and Poetry: Selected Prose 1979-1985。New York。  new window
51.Sarat, Austin、Thomas R. Kearns(2002)。History, Memory, and the Law。Ann Arbor。  new window
52.Siegel, Reva(2002)。Collective Memory and the Nineteenth Amendment: Reasoning about “the Woman Question” in the Discourse of Sex Discrimination。History, Memory and the Law。Ann Arbor。  new window
53.Uitz, Renata(2005)。Constitutions, Courts and History。New York。  new window
54.Williams, Patricia(1991)。The Alchemy of Race and Rights。Cambridge, Mass.。  new window
其他
1.立法院(1954)。立法院公報，台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.雷文玫(2000)。性別平等的違憲審查－從美國女性主義法學看我國大法官幾則有關男女實質平等的解釋。憲法解釋之理論與實務，第二輯。臺北：中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳昭如(2007)。台湾における法の近代化とフェミニズムの視点--平等追求とジェンダー喪失。法と暴力の記憶　東アジアの歴史経験。東京：東京大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Harding, S.(1993)。RETHINKING STANDPOINT EPISTEMOLOGY: WHAT IS "STRONG OBJECTIVITY" ?。Feminist epistemologies。New York。  new window
4.邱貴芬(20030000)。落後的時間與台灣歷史敘述--試探現代主義時期女作家創作裡另類時間的救贖可能。後殖民及其外。臺北：麥田。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：416（臺灣：399，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67418532
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上