Professor Gerald Rosenberg at the University of Chicago argued whether the U.S. Supreme Court could actually promote social change in his famous book, “The Hollow Hope”. In this book, Professor Rosenberg pointed out that in Civil rights, abortion and women’s right cases, the Supreme Court were just part of the social trend, it did not create any new fashion. This amazing discovery shocks law school students, but is Taiwan’s Constitutional Court the same? Is Taiwan’s Constitutional Court “a promoter of social reform”? This article tries to use empirical analysis to discuss whether Judicial Interpretation No. 666 could lead social change, and it adopts both Quantitative Research and Qualitative Research methods to find the answer. At First, it explains why Judicial Interpretation No. 666 declared “Punish sex-workers, but do not punish whoremasters” provision unconstitutional is in my concern, and then introduces the method this article adopts. Secondly, it analyzes Judicial Interpretation No. 666 and finds out the Interpretation implies “sex-workers and whoremasters all shall not be punished” and “sexual transaction should be legal”. Then, in part three and four, it discusses the Executives, legislators, social reform groups, sex-workers, and society’s attitude toward “sexual transaction” issue before and after the Interpretation was made. At Last, this article concludes that before Judicial Interpretation No. 666 made, the Executives already changing their policy sexual tranwas saction, inclined to abolish thwere e punishment of sexual transaction . on At the same time, legislatures proposed a bill to abolish the punishment of sex-workers, and the value of society was changing. All of these shall attribute the success to the social reform group, “Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters (COSWAS)”, Judicial Interpretation No. 666 was only part of the social trend, it did not really do much thing to it. Besides, it is because Interpretation No. 666 used “right of equality” instead of “freedom of occupation” to review the constitutionality of related provisions, legislature passed a regulation which punish both sex-workers and wholemasters outside the sex-trade center, and till now the public still do not accept the idea that “sexual transaction shall be legal”. After all, Interpretation No. 666 did not promote any social change at all.