:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論現代漢語補語可能構式
書刊名:語言暨語言學
作者:蕭惠貞 引用關係林倩如
作者(外文):Hsiao, S. Hui-chenLin, Chien-ju
出版日期:2012
卷期:13:5
頁次:頁963-998
主題關鍵詞:補語可能構式構式語法漢語潛能補語(V得/不C)Potential complement constructionsConstruction grammarMandarinPotential complement "V de/bu C"
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:90
本文旨在從構式語法的角度重新探討漢語以「結果語」為主之補語可能構式的類型,並定義出各類「補語可能構式」的結構、語義以及其組成成分之間的選擇限制。本文以構式語法為基礎,輔以語料庫的實際語料分析與「頻率」統計,找出補語可能構式的基礎中心句式義與多義連結。研究結果發現補語可能構式可分為兩大類:「目標達成補語可能構式」表達「施事執行動作達成目標的可能性」,此構式的語義選擇限制主要是「施事的自願性」與「論元的意外結果限制性」。「中動補語可能構式」的主要意義為表達「對象的固有特質」,此特質會影響動作的結果。
In this paper, we adopt the framework of Construction Grammar (CG) to discuss the potential complement (PC) constructions, and investigate the types, structures, meanings, and semantic constraints of PC constructions in Mandarin. Taking a corpus-based approach and taking type/token frequency into consideration, we claim that the central meaning of the PC is “GOAL-achieving”. The results show that there are two kinds of PC constructions. One is “GOAL-achieving” PC construction, which expresses “the potential of achieving the goal by carrying out the action”. The other subtypes of PC constructions are related to the main type via polysemous or instance links. The semantic constraints of the construction include “volitionality of the agent” and “predictability of result”. The other kind of PC construction is “MIDDLE-type” (Adjectival) PC construction, which describes the trait of the theme, the trait that is responsible for the result of the action.
期刊論文
1.張群(2007)。華語反覆性事件格式V+來+V+去的探索:從格式語法的角度談起。Journal of Chinese Language Teaching,4(1),31-53。  延伸查詢new window
2.何文忠(2005)。中動結構的界定。外語教學,2005(4),9-14。  延伸查詢new window
3.何文忠(2007)。中動構句選擇限制的認知闡釋。外語研究,2007(1),6-11。  延伸查詢new window
4.杉村博文(1982)。V得C、能VC、能V得C。漢語學習,6,23-33。  延伸查詢new window
5.Teng, Shou-hsin(1977)。A grammar of verb-particles in Chinese。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,5(1),1-25。  new window
6.吳褔祥(2002)。漢語能性述補結構V得/不C的語法化。中國語文,2002(1),29-40。  延伸查詢new window
7.趙琪(2008)。從動結式來看現代漢語的構式性。復旦外國語言文學論叢,2008(2),113-122。  延伸查詢new window
8.趙琪(2009)。英漢動結式的共性與個性。外語教學與研究,2009(4),258-265。  延伸查詢new window
9.Teng, Shou-hsin(1974)。Verb classification and its pedagogical extensions。Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association,9(2),84-92。  new window
10.吳褔祥(2002)。能性述補結構瑣議。語言教學與研究,2002(5),19-27。  延伸查詢new window
11.Goldberg, Adele E.(2003)。Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language。Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7(5),219-224。  new window
學位論文
1.Huang, Han-Chun(2008)。Resultative Verb Compounds in Mandarin Chinese: A Constructional Approach(碩士論文)。National Tsing Hua University,Hsinchu。  new window
2.莊舒文(2002)。時相與時態的搭配關係(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,Taipei。  延伸查詢new window
3.永石繪美(2004)。現代漢語結果補語之語義與教學探析:以日籍學習者為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,Taipei。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐芝潁(2005)。漢語動詞後置成分「好」與「到」之語法研究與教學排序:以韓籍學習者為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,Taipei。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃琡華(2005)。現代漢語動助詞之語義與教學(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,Taipei。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳怡靜(2004)。現代漢語動詞後置成分之語法意義與教學排序(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.何文忠(2004)。中動結構的認知闡釋。Shanghai:Shanghai International Studies University dissertation。  延伸查詢new window
2.Teng, Shou-Hsin(1975)。A semantic study of transitivity relations in Chinese。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
3.劉月華、潘文娛、故韡(2001)。實用現代漢語語法。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.朱德熙(1982)。語法講義。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.Li, Charles Na、Thompson, Sandra Annear(1981)。Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar。University of California Press。  new window
6.丁聲樹、呂叔湘、李榮、孫德宣、管燮初、傅婧、黃勝璋、陳治文(1961)。現代漢語語法講話。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.Goldberg, Adele Eva(1995)。Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure。University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.趙元任、呂叔湘(1979)。漢語口語語法。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.Goldberg, Adele E.(2006)。Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language。Oxford University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.劉月華(1989)。可能補語用法的研究。漢語語法論集。北京:現代出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.張旺熹(1999)。V不C結構實現的語義條件。漢語特殊句法的語義研究。Beijing:Beijing Language and Culture University Press。  延伸查詢new window
3.Taylor, John R.(1998)。Syntactic constructions as prototype categories。The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure。Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top