:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:心理空間理論與《莊子》「用」的隱喻
書刊名:語言暨語言學
作者:張榮興 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Jung-hsing
出版日期:2012
卷期:13:5
頁次:頁999-1027
主題關鍵詞:心理空間理論融合理論隱喻框架理論莊子Mental space theoryBlending theoryMetaphorFrame theoryZhuangzi
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:193
  • 點閱點閱:54
本文以心理空間理論 (Fauconnier 1994, 1997, Fauconnier & Turner 2002)為基礎,探討《莊子》故事中有關「用」的隱喻,以期了解語言結構如何促發背景框架,有系統的詮釋隱喻的一系列認知過程。本文根據 Pustejovsky(1995) 的屬性結構將來源域之語意項的語意特徵予以系統呈現,說明其與目標域之語意項的映射關係。此外,透過 Fillmore (1982, 1985)的框架理論,說明如何將未出現在字裡行間的相關概念誘導出來,作為概念融合之用。最後應用心理空間理論,完整說明隱喻融合的過程以及欲表達喻意的認知系統。
This paper uses Mental Space Theory (Fauconnier 1994, 1997, Fauconnier & Turner 2002) to discuss the relation of metaphors to ‘usefulness’ in the stories of Zhuangzi, and to explain how linguistic structures in the source domain provide a trigger for a series of complex cognitive procedures in the interpretations of metaphors. We use Pustejovsky’s (1995) qualia structure to describe how the attributes of an element (e.g., tree) in the source domain are structured and then linked to the attributes of an element (e.g., Zhuangzi’s thought) in the target domain. In addition, we use Fillmore’s (1982, 1985) frame theory to illustrate how the coherent package of knowledge is activated for conceptual blending. Finally, we use Mental Space Theory to account for the conceptual blending and the cognitive procedures for the metaphorical interpretations.
期刊論文
1.張榮興(2008)。華語篇章中的攝取角度。Journal of Chinese Language Teaching,5(2),47-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張榮興、黃惠華(2006)。從心理空間理論看「最短篇」小說中之隱喻。Journal of Chinese Language Teaching,3(1),117-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.賴錫三(2008)。論道家的逍遙美學--與羅蘭‧巴特的「懶惰哲學」之對話。Humanitas Taiwanica,69,1-37。  延伸查詢new window
4.賴錫三(2010)。從《老子》的道體隱喻到《莊子》的體道敘事--由本雅明的說書人詮釋莊周的寓言哲學。Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series,40(1),67-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Wang, Youru(2004)。The strategies of "goblet words": indirect communication in the Zhuangzi。Journal of Chinese Philosophy,31(2),195-218。  new window
6.吳佩晏、張榮興(20100400)。心理空間理論與《論語》中的隱喻分析。華語文教學研究,7(1),97-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Fillmore, Charles J.(1985)。Frames and the Semantics of Understanding。Quaderni di Semantica,6(2),222-254。  new window
8.張榮興、黃惠華(20051000)。心理空間理論與「梁祝十八相送」之隱喻研究。語言暨語言學,6(4),687-705。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.楊儒賓(20020300)。吐生與厚德--土的原型象徵。中國文哲研究集刊,20,383-445。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Saeed, John I.(2009)。Semantics。Wiley-Blackwell。  new window
2.陳鼓應(1992)。莊子哲學。臺北:台灣商務。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.封思毅(1971)。莊子詮言。Taipei:The Commercial Press。  延伸查詢new window
4.林耀川(1985)。逍遙的自由人:莊子。Taipei:Changchunshu Shufang。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉君祖(2011)。一次看懂四書:孔子教你齊家安天下。Taipei:China Times Publishing Company。  延伸查詢new window
6.Renkema, Jan(2004)。Introduction to Discourse Studies。Amsterdam:Philadelphia:John Benjamins。  new window
7.司馬遷(1956)。史記。Taipei:Er Shi Wu Shi Bian Kan Guan.。  new window
8.姚曼波(2008)。莊子探奧。Beijing:People's Publishing House。  延伸查詢new window
9.譚宇權(1998)。莊子哲學評論。臺北:Wenjin Publishing House。  延伸查詢new window
10.Fauconnier, Gilles、Turner, Mark(2002)。The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
11.王邦雄(20100000)。莊子道。臺北:里仁。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Fauconnier, Gilles(1994)。Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language。Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.董小蕙(19930000)。莊子思想之美學意義。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Fauconnier, Gilles(1997)。Mappings in thought and language。Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.王熙元(1981)。論語通釋。臺北市:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.莊周、陳鼓應(1999)。莊子今註今譯。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
17.Pustejovsky, James(1995)。The Generative Lexicon。MIT Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fauconnier, G.、Turner, M.(1996)。Blending as a central process of grammar。Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language。CSLI。  new window
2.Glucksberg, Sam、Keysar, Boaz(1993)。How metaphors work。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Linell, Per(2002)。Perspectives: implicitness and recontextualization。Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse。Amsterdam:Philadelphia:John Benjamins。  new window
4.Fillmore, Charles J.(1982)。Frame semantics。Linguistics in the Morning Calm。Seoul:Hanshin Publishing Co。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE