:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Curricula as Bridges: A Learner-based Integrating Arts Framework
書刊名:國際藝術教育學刊
作者:陳怡倩
作者(外文):Cooper, Yichien
出版日期:2013
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁165-199
主題關鍵詞:藝術統整課程教育隱喻以學習者為中心課程設計全人教育Arts integrationLearner-centeredMetaphorsCurriculum designHolistic education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:20
藝術統整課程長久以來一直被用來補充核心學習科目。雖然這種方法很普 遍,但作者認爲,若從學習科目之間是否是密切聯繫的關點來看,這種階級式 的教育的品質將會面臨危機。作者認爲面對生活環境的快速變化,藝術統整課 程應該追求一個具有連貫性、連續性、全面性的教學方針才能對學生的學習有 長遠的影響。要做到這一點,我們需要一個新的概念來闉述如何從藝術和生活 經驗中獲取並了解知識的變動性。 作者在這篇文章中:1)用隱喻將常見的美術課程計劃進行分析歸納、 從設計的結構和教學方法中探討它們對美術教學和學生學習的影響;2)闉述 爲什麼藝術是課程設計中不可缺少的一環;3)檢視教師、學生和學習科目之 間的關係;4)提出「橋樑型的教案設計」爲有效地統整藝術課程的理論架 構;5)提供應用的實例來總結「橋樑型的教案設計」是藝術教育與普通教育 課程設計的基礎架構。
The practice of arts integration has a long history of applying hierarchical methods where arts are supplemental to the core learning subjects. While this approach has been commonly adopted by teachers in the field, the author argues that the quality of education may be in jeopardy and questions whether the learning subjects are strongly connected. Facing the rapid changes of our daily surroundings, the author recognizes that arts integrations should pursue a coherent, sequential, and holistic approach that makes meaningful and long-term impacts on students’ learning. To do so, a new model is needed to address the dynamic nature of how knowledge can be obtained in relation to arts and life experiences. In this article, the author: 1) applies metaphors to analyze and examine existing art lesson plans and their pedagogical implications in learning; 2) gives an overview on why arts are essential in curricula design; 3) examines the relationship between teachers, learners, and learning subjects; 4) suggests Curricula as Bridges as a new model for effective integrating arts into curricula; and 5) provides an example to conclude with the implications that such a curriculum design model is fundamental to the field of arts education and general education.
期刊論文
1.Duncum, P.(2010)。Seven principles for visual culture education。Art Education,63(1),6-10。  new window
2.Belief, L.(2009)。Van Gogh for all students。School Arts,108(6),10。  new window
3.Cavicchi, E., et al.(2009)。Introductory paper on critical explorations in teaching art, science, and teacher education。The New Educator,5(3),189-204。  new window
4.Chung, S. K.、Kirby, M.(2009)。Media literary in art education: Logos, culture jamming, and activism。Art Education,62(1),34-40。  new window
5.Dissanayake, E.(1982)。Aesthetic experience and human evolution。Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,41(2),145-155。  new window
6.Hubbet, B.(2008)。Multicultural masks exzravangamza!。School Arts,107(5),23-25。  new window
7.Lai, A.(2010)。Image of women in visual culture。Art Education,62(1),14-19。  new window
8.O'Brien, G.(2009)。Metaphors and the pejorative framing of marginalized groups: Implications for social work education。Journal of Social Work Education,45(1),29-34。  new window
9.Peralta, A.(2010)。The art of storytelling: the co-construction of cultural knowledge。Art Education,63(2),25-30。  new window
10.Roland, C.(2010)。Animals in contemporary art。School Arts,109(7),24。  new window
11.Schneider, B.(1995)。Family。School Arts,94(6),37-38。  new window
12.Shin, R.(2010)。Why does the Buddha laugh? Exploring ethnic visual culture。Art Education,63(3),33-39。  new window
13.Strand, K.(2006)。The heart and the journey: Case studies of collaboration for arts integrated curricula。Arts Education Policy Review,108(1),29-40。  new window
14.Villeneuve, P.、Sheppard, D.(2009)。Close to home: Studying art and your community。Art Education,62(1),6-13。  new window
15.Lyddon, W. J.、Clay, A. L.、Sparks, C. L.(2001)。Metaphor and change in counseling。Journal of Counseling and Development,79(3),269-274。  new window
會議論文
1.Parsons, M.(2012)。Metaphors in art: Interpretation and creativity。The 3rd world Chinese art education symposium,Q. Yang (Ed.) 。Hangzhou:China Academy of Art Press。90-99。  new window
2.Steers, J.(2012)。Globalization, visual culture and art education。The 3rd world Chinese art education symposium,Q. Yang (Ed.) 。Hangzhou:China Academy of Art Press。2-18。  new window
圖書
1.Zakia, R. D.(2002)。Perception and imaging。Wobum, MA:Focal Press。  new window
2.Darras, B.(2012)。The culture and digital turning point in contemporary art education。Paper Compilation on the 3rd world Chinese art education symposium。Hangzhou:China Academy of Art Press。  new window
3.Mitchell, W. J. T.(2006)。What do pictures want?。Chicago:University Of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Anderson, R. L.(1990)。Calliope's Sisters: A comparative study of philosophies of art。Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice Hall。  new window
5.Dissanayake, Ellen(1998)。What is art for?。Seattle, WA:University of Washington Press。  new window
6.Robinson, K.(2011)。Out of our mind: Learning to be creative。United Kingdom:Capstone。  new window
7.Tollefson, K.、Osborn, M. K.(2008)。Cultivating the learner-centered classroom: From theory to practice。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
8.Price, Sally(1989)。Primitive art in civilized places。University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.George, E. M.、Fisher, M. M.(1999)。Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human science。University of Chicago Press。  new window
10.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark、Chou, Shizhen(1980)。Metaphors We Live By。University of Chicago Press。  new window
11.Borg, W. R.、Gall, M. D.(1989)。Educational research: An introduction。White Plains, NY。  new window
12.Dewey, John(1980)。Art as experience。Perigee Books。  new window
圖書論文
1.Greenblatt, Stephan(1991)。Resonance and Wonder。Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display。Washington:Smithsonian Institution。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top