:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公民團體對國家人權委員會之意見
書刊名:臺灣人權學刊
作者:黃嵩立公民團體代表
作者(外文):Huang, Song-lihDelegates of Taiwan Civil Society Organizations
出版日期:2014
卷期:2:3
頁次:頁81-95
主題關鍵詞:國家人權委員會巴黎原則監察院國家人權委員會之調查權National human rights commissionParis principlesThe Control YuanThe power of investigation of national human rights commissions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:62
本文由作者及公民團體代表經多次討論與諮詢後寫成,嘗試點出公民團體對國 家人權委員會功能的構想,並回覆過去十年來各方對該委員會提出之質疑,包 括設立之必要性、委員會是否應有調查權、以及委員會之獨立性等。本文無意 對國家人權委員會相關文獻做完整的回顧或理論上的探討,毋寧是公民社會對 於目前在國內成立國家人權委員會的期待以及提醒。
This report is written after the author’s discussions and consultations with the delegates from the civil society organizations. It presents the opinion of the civil society on the function of a national human rights commission replies to the challenges to the commission in the past decade, including the necessity of havign a commission, its possession of the power of investigation and its independence. This report is not intended as a theoretical review or discussion, but presents civil society's desire to see a national human rights commission established in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Ah, K. W.(2013)。The National Human Rights Commission of Korea: a Decade of Glories and Disgraces (2001-2011)。台灣人權學刊,2(1),3-20。  new window
2.Atupare, A. P.(2008)。The Pillars and Kernel of Independence of National Human Rights Institutions: A Comparative Analysis of Canada, Ghana and South Africa Human Rights Commissions。Inquiry & Insight, The Waterloo Graduate Journal of Political Science,1(1),1-24。  new window
3.Sunstein, C.(2005)。Why does the American Constitution Lack Social and Economic Guarantees。Syracuse Law Review,56,1。  new window
4.台灣人權促進會(2009)。TAHR報夏季號。  延伸查詢new window
5.李念祖(20121200)。論依巴黎原則於監察院設置國家人權委員會。臺灣人權學刊,1(3),125-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.鍾麗娜、徐世榮(2013)。大埔毀稻事件的忌日與重生--再探土地徵收之結構性問題。土地問題研究季刊,12(3)=47,2-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.魏千峯(20121200)。我們為什麼需要國家人權委員會?。臺灣人權學刊,1(3),97-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Sunstein, Cass(1993)。Against Positive Rights: Why Social and Economic Rights Don’t Belong in the New Constitutions。EAST EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW,2,35。  new window
9.蘇友辰(20021200)。論國家人權委員會的角色與地位。國家政策季刊,1(2),1-32。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃默(20031200)。臺灣「國家人權委員會」的倡導、爭論與展望:一個非政府組織的觀點。全國律師,7(12),4-10。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Sunstein, C.(2001)。Social and Economic Rights? Lessons from South Africa。The University of Chicago。  new window
圖書
1.United Nations(2010)。National Human Rights Institutions: History, Principles, Roles and Responsibilities。United Nations Press。  new window
2.廖福特(20110000)。國家人權委員會。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Beitz, Charles R.(2009)。The Idea of Human Rights。Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE