:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:飲食份量拼圖介入對糖尿病患飲食控制之成效探討
書刊名:醫務管理期刊
作者:賴淑惠林麗鳳 引用關係
作者(外文):Lai, Shu-huiLin, Li-feng
出版日期:2014
卷期:15:3
頁次:頁228-242
主題關鍵詞:飲食份量拼圖第二型糖尿病飲食控制之知識飲食控制之態度與行為糖化血色素Diet portion mappingType 2 diabetes mellitusKnowledge of dietary controlAttitude and practice of dietary controlHbA1C
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:111
目的:現行糖尿病飲食衛教在飲食份量和飲食代換的教材對個案來說是抽象且不易理解的,為改善飲食衛教的成效,研究者研發飲食份量拼圖,並取得專利,將飲食份量與代換具象化且易於操作的拼圖,實際應用於第二型糖尿病患,並探討成效。方法:本研究採類實驗研究法,以台中某基層診所第二型糖尿病患為對象,進行立意取樣,並隨機分為實驗組及對照組各30名。實驗組以飲食份量拼圖為工具,進行為期12週之介入;對照組接受糖尿病醫療品質照護改善方案照護,以糖尿病飲食問卷評量了解介入成效。結果:實驗組對糖尿病飲食份量和代換等知識63.4分顯著高於對照組49.1分(p<.05);實驗組對糖尿病飲食控制的態度85.9分顯著高於對照組80.8分(p<.05),實驗組對飲食代換、分配等行為81.1分顯著高於對照組67.5分(p<.05)。糖化血色素實驗組介入前、後,由7.58±1.40降至7.14±1.00,達顯著差異(p<.05),對照組則無顯著差異。結論:研究結果顯示飲食份量拼圖在介入後,實驗組在糖尿病控制的知識、態度、行為和糖化血色素的控制均顯著優於對照組。此結果可提供未來臨床衛教之參考。
Objectives: Currently, the materials involving portions and exchanges in diabetes dietary education are abstract and difficult to comprehend. To improve the efficacy of dietary education, a figurative and easy-to-use dietary portion mapping was designed. Moreover, a patent was registered on the design, then the design was applied to type 2 diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this research is to explore the efficacy of dietary portion mapping. Methods: Research design and methods were purposive sampling and quasi-experimental methods. Sixty volunteers were recruited to participate in this study from a clinic in Taichung City, and divided into experimental and control groups by random assignment. There were 30 patients in each group. The experimental group followed dietary portion mapping for 12 weeks. The control group had access to regular primary care. A diabetic dietary KAP questionnaire was the assessment tool used to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention. Results: The knowledge score was 63.4 in the experimental group and 49.1 in the control group (P<.05). The attitude score was 85.9 in the experimental group and 80.8 in the control group (P<.05). The practice score was 81.1 in the experimental group and 67.5 in the control group (P<.05). The HbA1C was improved in the experimental group. The average HbA1c was reduced from 7.58±1.40 to 7.14±1.00 (P<.05) in the experimental group, but there was no significant difference in the control group (P>.05). Conclusion: The intervention was effective with respect to knowledge, attitude, and practice of dietary control, and HbA1C control in the experimental group. The implication of this research can provide a reference for diabetes dietary education in the future.
期刊論文
1.郝立智、馬瀰嘉、趙海倫、簡崇仁、楊純宜、林興中、李鎮堃、奚明德、葛光中、柴國樑、鄭錦翔、吳天成(20070700)。某地區教學醫院糖尿病門診病患個案管理照護之成效探討。中華民國內分泌暨糖尿病學會會刊,20(4)=81,11-33。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chandalia, M.、Garg, A.、Lutjohann, D.、von Bergmann, K.、Grundy, S. M.、Brinkley, L. J.(2000)。Beneficial effects of high dietary fiber intake in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus。The New England Journal of Medicine,342(19),1392-1398。  new window
3.衛生福利部中央健康保險署(2011)。挑戰2025糖尿病醫療國際論壇。全民健康保險雙月刊,92(7)。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃蘭菁、李貫廷、李育霖、楊偉勛、黃國晉(20130300)。2013年美國糖尿病學會臨床治療指引摘要。臺北市醫師公會會刊,57(3),23-31。  延伸查詢new window
5.American Diabetes Association(2012)。Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus。Diabetes Care,35(1),64-71。  new window
6.American Association of Diabetes Educators(2008)。AADE 7TM Self-care behaviors。The Diabetes Education,34(3),445-449。  new window
7.Ben-Avraham, S.、Harman-Boehm, I.、Schwarzfuchs, D.、Shai, I.(2009)。Dietary strategies for patients with type 2 diabetes in the era of multi-approaches; review and results from the Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial (DIRECT)。Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice,86(1),41-48。  new window
8.Haas, L.、Maryniuk, M.、Beck, J.、Cox, C. E.、Duker, P.、Edwards, L.、Yoyssef, G.(2012)。National standards for diabetes self-management education and support。Diabetes Care,35(11),2393-2401。  new window
9.Takahashi, M.、Araki, A.、Ito, H.(2004)。Development of a new method for simple dietary education in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus。Geriatrics & Gerontology International,4(2),111-119。  new window
10.Scavone, G.、Manto, A.、Pitocco, D.、Gagliardi, L.、Caputo, S.、Mancini, L.、Ghirlanda, G.(2010)。Effect of carbohydrate counting and medical nutritional therapy on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetic subjects: A pilot study。Diabetic Medicine,27(4),477-479。  new window
11.Yeh, M. C.(2009)。Diabetes Case Management。The Journal of Clinical Nursing,56(2),22-27。  new window
12.Mellor, D.、Phillips, A.(2012)。A review of the current nutritional guidelines for diabetes。Practice Nursing,23(5),234。  new window
13.Norris, S. L.、Engelgau, M. M.、Narayan, K. V.(2001)。Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes a systematic review of randomized controlled trials。Diabetes Care,24(3),561-587。  new window
14.黃秋玲、陳淑芬、唐善美、戴研光(20060600)。探討糖尿病患者衛生教育介入措施前後之成效。福爾摩莎醫務管理雜誌,2(1),28-35。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃美娟、林秋菊(20060800)。飲食行為修正方案對一位第一型糖尿病患者血糖控制成效之初探。護理雜誌,53(4),83-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.連淑菁(2007)。糖尿病患者營養知識、態度、飲食行為與營養諮詢相關性之探討--以某地區醫院第2型糖尿病患者為例(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李復惠、林麗鳳、阮玉梅(2011)。社區公共衛生護理。台北:華杏。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾秀娟(2007)。外食技巧手冊--中式點心熱量篇。台中:台中市衛生局:台中市北區精英社區健康營造中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭玉文、曾秀娟、張嘉斐(2008)。營養衛教手冊食物份量代換指引。台中:台中市衛生局:台中市北區精英社區健康營造中心。  延伸查詢new window
4.莊立民、蘇玲華(2004)。糖尿病建康生活指南。台北:健康文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡世澤、游俊能(2010)。糖譜。台北:天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
6.彭巧珍、蔡玲貞(2005)。慢性病營養諮詢工作手冊。台北:行政院衛生署食品衛生處。  延伸查詢new window
7.中華民國糖尿病衛教學會(2010)。醣類計算--食品營養圖鑑。台北:中華民國糖尿病衛教學會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.桃園縣政府衛生局(2010)。健康餐盤,http://www1.tychb.gov.tw/promotion/form_tychb/index-1.asp?m=99&ml=28&m2=400&gp=398&id-2475。  new window
2.國民健康署(2010)。新版「國民飲食指標」及「每日飲食指南」,http://health99.hpa.gov.tw/Hot_News/h_NewsDetailN.aspx?TopIcNo=6257。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE