臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：當責型資訊科技治理架構之個案研究
書刊名：商管科技季刊
作者：孫嘉明 引用關係／吳建明／紀文章
作者(外文)：Sun, Chia-ming／Wu, Chien-ming／Jih, Kenny Wen-jang
出版日期：2015
卷期：16:3
頁次：頁291-334
主題關鍵詞：資訊科技治理；權責關係；治理結構；治理程序；Information technology governance；Accountability relationships；Governance structure；Governance procedure
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:117
資訊科技治理（簡稱 IT治理）日益重要；但從學者與實務專家對 IT治理相關之治理結構與治理程序議題各有看法，乃至於治理理念與機制之歧異，反映該議題仍有深究發展空間。循此，本研究揭櫫一家快速成長且績效卓著的華人跨國企業之 IT治理模式，希望藉該案例反思現有 IT治理問題與因應方式。本研究透過參與觀察、深度訪談與次級資料收集，以詮釋個案研究方法進行個案公司的 IT治理模式與背後治理理念的分析、辯證與討論。從而建構以權責關係為運作核心之「當責 IT治理架構」。研究發現：個案公司「當責 IT治理架構」其特徵在強調參與而非監督、提供諮詢而不涉入、依專業授權而非以階層權責要求、鼓勵主動當責且容許犯錯、減少事前防範但要求即時回饋。與各種 IT治理類型比較：「控制型 IT治理」核心為「階層權責」，「合作型 IT治理」則為「個人權責」，本研究的「當責型 IT治理」則是「當責權責」；居間不同的權責關係反映出不同的 IT治理的效應。
Information technology (IT) governance is an important issue in today’s corporations. Current corporate practices either embrace the notion of governance structure or endorse the governance process view. The distinct natures of these two schools of thought and their applicability provide opportunities for systematic research in IT governance. This paper reports a case study of a fast-growing and high performance, Chinese-owned multinational company regarding its IT governance model and related issues. We conducted the study through on-site observations, in-depth interviews as well as secondary data collection. The purpose of the study is to examine and analyze the IT governance model and the underpinning governance concepts of the case company. Among the findings, the case company was found to bridge governance structure and governance process with the accountability relationships at the core of its implementation framework. This integration leads to the format of accountability for results. Its main characteristics include the emphasis of participation rather than supervision, consultation rather than involvement, and delegation based on professionalism instead of organizational hierarchy, encourages proactive accountability, tolerating mistakes, de-emphasizing before-implementation error prevention, but relying more on real-time feedback. When contrasted with the control-oriented and the collaboration-oriented governance styles, the accountability for Result governance model is characterized by authority by accountability, whereas the control-based IT governance has hierarchical authority and collaborative governance style has personal authority as cores. The case company’s Accountability for Result model as identified by this study represents a good balance.
期刊論文
1.Romzek, Barbara S.(2000)。Dynamics of public sector accountability in an era of reform。International Review of Administrative Sciences，66(1)，21-44。  new window
2.Westphal, J.(1999)。Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties。Academy of Management Journal，42(1)，7-24。  new window
3.Duh, R.-R.、Chow, C. W.、Chen, H. L.(2006)。Strategy, IT applications for planning and control, and firm performance: The impact of impediments to IT implementation。Information & Management，43(8)，939-949。  new window
4.Sinclair, A.(1995)。The Chameleon of Accountability: Forms and Discourses。Accounting Organizations and Society，20(2/3)，219-237。  new window
5.Moller, J.(2009)。School leadership in an age of accountability: Tensions between managerial and professional accountability。Journal of Educational Change，10(1)，37-46。  new window
6.Sundaramurthy, C.、Lewis, M.(2003)。Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance。Academy of Management Review，28(3)，397-415。  new window
7.Stratopoulos, T.、Etehning, B.(2000)。Does Successful Investment in Information Technology Solve the Productivity Paradox?。Information & Management，38(2)，103-117。  new window
8.吳建明、劉文良(20080300)。以代理理論探討跨國企業資訊科技治理之個案研究。電子商務學報，10(1)，255-273。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bovens, M.(2007)。Analyzing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework。European Law Journal，13(4)，447-468。  new window
10.Brennan, N. M.、Solomon, J.(2008)。Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: An overview。Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal，21(7)，885-906。  new window
11.Brown, A. E.、Grant, G. G.(2005)。Framing the frameworks: A review of IT governance research。Communications of The Association for Information Systems，15，696-712。  new window
12.De Haes, S.、Van Grembergen, W.(2004)。IT governance and its mechanisms。Information Systems Control Journal，1，27-33。  new window
13.Roberts, J.、McNulty, T.、Stiles, P.(2005)。Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom。British Journal of Management，16，S5-S26。  new window
14.Roepke, R.、Agarwal, R.、Ferratt, T. W.(2000)。Aligning the IT human resource with business vision: The leadership initiative at 3M。MIS Quarterly，24(2)，327-353。  new window
15.Sambamurthy, V.、Zmud, R. W.(1999)。Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies。MIS Quarterly，23(2)，261-290。  new window
16.Trites, G.(2004)。Director responsibility for IT governance。International Journal of Accounting Information Systems，5(2)，89-99。  new window
17.Xue, Y.、Liang, H.、Boulton, W. R.(2008)。Information technology governance in information technology investment decision processes: The impact of investment characteristics, external environment, and internal context。MIS Quarterly，32(1)，67-96。  new window
18.Brynjolfsson, Erik(1993)。The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology。Communications of the ACM，36(12)，67-77。  new window
19.Peterson, Ryan(2004)。Crafting Information Technology Governance。Information Systems Management，21(4)，7-23。  new window
20.Weill, P.(2004)。Don't Just Lead, Govern: How Top-Performing Firms Govern IT。MIS Quarterly Executive，3(1)，1-17。  new window
21.Lerner, J. S.、Tetlock, P. E.(19990300)。Accounting for the effects of accountability。Psychological Bulletin，125(2)，255-275。  new window
22.Lewis, Marianne W.(2000)。Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide。Academy of Management Review，25(4)，760-776。  new window
23.Fenny, D. F.、Edwards, B. R.、Simpson, K. M.(1992)。Understanding the CEO/CIO Relationship。MIS Quarterly，16(4)，435-448。  new window
24.Dewett, Todd、Jones, Gareth R.(2001)。The Role of Information Technology in the Organization: A Review, Model, and Assessment。Journal of Management，27(3)，313-346。  new window
25.Smith, N. C.(1990)。The Case Study: A Useful Research Method for Information Management。Journal of Information Technology，5(2)，123-133。  new window
26.Mulgan, Richard(2000)。Accountability: An Ever-Expanding Concept?。Public Administration，78(3)，555-573。  new window
27.Raisch, S.、Birkinshaw, J.、Probst, G.、Tushman, M. L.(2009)。Organizational Ambidexterity: Balance Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Pexfonnaxice。Organization Science，20(4)，685-695。  new window
28.O'Reilly, Charles A. III、Tushman, Michael L.(2004)。The ambidextrous organization。Harvard Business Review，82(4)，74-81。  new window
29.Poole, M. S.、Van De Ven, A. H.(1989)。Using paradox to build management and organization theories。Academy of Management Review，14(4)，562-578。  new window
30.Baets, W.(1992)。Aligning information systems with business strategy。Journal of Strategic Information Systems，1(4)，205-213。  new window
31.Davis, James H.、Schoorman, F. David、Donaldson, Lex(1997)。Toward a stewardship theory of management。The Academy of Management Review，22(1)，20-47。  new window
32.Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1997)。A survey of corporate governance。Journal of Finance，52(2)，737-783。  new window
33.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1989)。Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review。The Academy of Management Review，14(1)，57-74。  new window
34.侯勝宗(20120200)。見所未見：詮釋性個案研究方法探索。組織與管理，5(1)，111-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Jensen, Michael C.、Meckling, William H.(1976)。Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure。Journal of Financial Economics，3(4)，305-360。  new window
36.Gibson, Cristina B.、Birkinshaw, Julian(2004)。The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity。Academy of Management Journal，47(2)，209-226。  new window
37.Donaldson, L.、Davis, J. H.(1991)。Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns。Australia Journal of Management，16，49-64。  new window
38.Tiwana, A.、Konsynski, B.、Bush, A. A.(2010)。Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics。Information Systems Research，21(4)，675-687。  new window
39.Frink, D. D.、Ferris, G. R.(1998)。Accountability, Impression Management, and Goal Setting in the Performance Evaluation Process。Human Relations，51，1259-1284。  new window
40.Buchanan, S.、Gibb, F.(2007)。The Information Audit: Role and Scope。International Journal of Information Management，27(3)，159-172。  new window
41.MaManus, J.(2004)。Working towards an Information Governance Strategy。Management Services，48(8)，8-13。  new window
42.Sohal, A. S.、Fitzpatrick, P.(2002)。IT Governance and Management in Large Australian Organization。International Journal of Production Economics，75(1/2)，97-112。  new window
43.Brown, C. V.(1997)。Examining the Hybrid IS Governance Solutions: Evidence from a Single Case Study。Information Systems Research，8(1)，69-94。  new window
44.Robert, J.(1991)。The possibilities of accountability。Accounting, Organizations and Society，16(4)，355-368。  new window
45.Bahli, B.、Rivard, S.(2003)。The information technology outsourcing risk: A transaction cost and agency theory-based perspective。Journal of Information Technology，18(3)，211-221。  new window
46.Tiwana, A.、Konsynski, B.(2010)。Complementarities between Organizational IT Architecture and Governance Structure。Information Systems Research，21(2)，288-304。  new window
會議論文
1.Webb, P.、Pollard, C.、Ridley, G. J.(2006)。Attempting to define IT governance: Wisdom or folly。The 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science。IEEE。  new window
圖書
1.O’Neill(2002)。A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Artley, W.、Ellison, D. J.、Kennedy, B.(2001)。The Performance-Based Management Handbook - Volume I: Establishing and Maintaining A Performance-Based Management Program。Washington, DC。  new window
3.IT Governance Institute(2008)。IT Governance Global Status Report。ISACA。  new window
4.Monks, R. A.、Minow, N.(1991)。Power and Accountability。Harper collins publishers。  new window
5.Van Grembergen, W.、De Haes, S.(2009)。Enterprise Governance of Information Technology: Achieving Strategic Alignment and Value。Springer。  new window
6.Weill, Peter D.、Ross, Jeanne W.(2004)。IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
7.張文隆(2006)。當責。臺北：中國生產力中心。  延伸查詢new window
8.Weill, P.、Broadbent, M.(1998)。Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
9.Miles, Matthew B.、Huberman, A. Michael、Newman, G.(1994)。Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook。Sage Publications。  new window
10.Yin, Robert K.(2003)。Applications of Case Study Research。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
11.Brown, C. V.、Sambamurthy, V.(1999)。Repositioning the IT Organization to Enable Business Transformation。Repositioning the IT Organization to Enable Business Transformation。Cincinnati, OH：Pinnaflex Educational Resources。  new window
12.Demb, A.、Neubauer, F. F.(1992)。The corporate Board: Confronting the paradoxes。Oxford, Eng.：Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.iThome(2011)。2011年IT投資總覽，http://www.ithome.com.tw/itadm/article.php?c=65457&s=2， 2012/12/11。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：629（臺灣：618，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1430120 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67238583
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上