臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：資訊管理學域中「實務研究」之意涵與實例探討
書刊名：商管科技季刊
作者：羅德興／王明雯 引用關係
作者(外文)：Luo, Der-shing／Wang, Ming-wern
出版日期：2015
卷期：16:3
頁次：頁335-356
主題關鍵詞：資訊管理；實徵性研究；資訊系統；實務研究；質性研究；Information management；Empirical research；Information system；Practical research；Qualitative research
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:130
本文旨在探究實務研究的意涵與列舉實例，以期為紓解資訊管理學域中研究與實務脫節、空洞化的危機，指出可行的方向與作法。文中首先闡述資訊管理學域中「實務研究」的旨趣；繼而探討「實務研究」的內涵，包括其意義與特性、哲學立場與理論取向、以及其類型；最後就國外實務研究期刊 MIS Quarterly Executive中的論文，探討「實務研究」的研究主題、研究類型、研究方法以及理論援用與發展。研究發現：資訊管理學域中「實務研究」主要目的在找出新的資訊科技之管理原則或模式；常見的類型為「評估型」與「揭露性個案型」；常使用的方法大多為「個案研究」，在理論的發展上則較少見，近年來對理論的援用已有逐漸增加的趨勢；文末整理「實務研究」的趨勢，並建議資訊管理學域中「實務研究」的做法與方向。
This study aims to disclosure the meaning of “practical research” and illustrates with some classical examples. After description of the goal, we discuss the following issues about practical researches: (1) the meaning and characteristics, (2) the philosophy foundations and theoretical perspective, and (3) their types. Finally, we illustrate with a journal of practical researches MIS Quarterly Executive. We depict its research themes, types, research methods, and the theory employed and development. The results are four-fold: (1) the research theme of “practical research” in the discipline of information management is to find out new governance principles or organizing models, (2) the common models are “evaluation”, “revelatory cases”, (3) the usually used methods are “case study,” (4) the theory development is seldom done, while the theory employments are increasing lately. We also depict the directions and suggest ways of the practical researches in the discipline of information management.
期刊論文
1.Markus, M. L.(1994)。Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work。ACM Transactions on Information Systems，12(2)，119-149。  new window
2.Alt, R.、Österle, H.(2014)。Editorial 24/1: Electronic markets and practiceorientation。Electron Markets，24，1-3。  new window
3.Alter, S.(2001)。Recognizing the relevance of IS research and broadening the appeal and applicability of future publications。Communications of AIS，6。  new window
4.Applegate, L. M.(1999)。Rigor and relevance in MIS research-introduction。MIS Quarterly，23(1)，1-2。  new window
5.Chiasson, M.、Davidson, E.(2012)。Reconsidering deconstruction in information systems research。European Journal of Information Systems，21(2)，192-206。  new window
6.Gherardi, S.(2009)。Knowing and learning in practice-based studies: An introduction。Learning and Organization，16(5)，352-359。  new window
7.Glass, R. L.(2001)。Rigor vs. relevance: A practitioner's eye view of an explosion of IS opinions。Communications of AIS，6。  new window
8.Hirschheim, R.、Klein, H. K.(2003)。Crisis in the IS Field? A critical reflection on the state of the discipline。Journal of The Association for Information Systems，4(5)，237-293。  new window
9.Ho, J. K. K.(2014)。A review of the multi-perspective, systems-based (MPSB) research with an MPSB knowledge supply chain framework。European Academic Research，2(1)，705-729。  new window
10.Lyytinen, K.(1999)。Empirical research in information systems: On the relevance of practice in thinking of IS research。MIS Quarterly，23(1)，25-28。  new window
11.Manian, A.、Jamporazmey, M.、Sherkat, M. H.(2014)。Positivism in information systems: Investigating paradox between theory and practice in IS researches。International Journal of Business Information Systems，16(1)，72-88。  new window
12.Malone, T. W.(1983)。How do people organize their desks? Implications for the design of office information systems。ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems，1，99-112。  new window
13.Teubner, R. A.(2013)。Information systems strategy theory, practice, and challenges for future research。Business and Information Systems Engineering，4，243-257。  new window
14.Venkatesh, V.、Brown, S. A.、Bala, H.(2013)。Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidenes for conducting mixed methods research in information systems。MIS Quarterly，37(1)，21-54。  new window
15.Ward, J. M.(2012)。Information systems strategy: Quo vadis。Journal of Strategic Information Systems，21(2)，165-171。  new window
16.Worrall, L.、Lubbe, S.、Klopper, R.(2007)。Academic research and management practice: Is the relevance gap closing。Alternation，14(1)，292-316。  new window
17.Benbasat, I.、Zmud, R. W.(1999)。Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance。MIS Quarterly，23(1)，3-16。  new window
18.Lee, A. S.(1999)。Rigor and relevance in MIS research: beyond the approach of positivism alone。MIS Quarterly，23(1)，29-33。  new window
19.Markus, M. Lynne(1983)。Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation。Communications of the ACM，26(6)，430-444。  new window
20.Applegate, L.、King, J.(1999)。Rigor and Relevance: Careers on the Line。MIS Quarterly，23(1)，18-19。  new window
21.Galliers, R. D.、Land, F. F.(1987)。Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Methodologies。Communications of the ACM，30(11)，900-902。  new window
22.Orlikowski, W. J.、Baroudi, Jack J.(1991)。Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions。Information Systems Research，2(1)，1-28。  new window
23.Orlikowski, Wanda J.(2000)。Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations。Organization Science，11(4)，404-428。  new window
24.Orlikowski, W. J.、Gash, D. C.(1994)。Technology Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations。ACM Transactions on Information Systems，12(2)，174-207。  new window
25.Chan, Y. E.(2002)。Why Haven't We Mastered Alignment? The Importance of the Informal Organization Structure。MIS Quarterly Executive，1(2)，97-112。  new window
26.Markus, M. Lynne、Davenport, Thomas H.(1999)。Rigor vs. Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud。MIS Quarterly，23(1)，19-23。  new window
會議論文
1.Corradi, G.、Gherardi, S.、Verzelloni, L.(2008)。Ten Good Reasons for Assuming A "Practice Lens" in Organization Studies。The International Conference on Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities，(會議日期: 27-30/4 2008)。Copenhagen。  new window
2.Heiskanen, A.、Newman, M.(1997)。Bridging The Gap Between Information Systems Research and Practice: The Reflective Practitioner as A Researcher。Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems，DeGross, J. I., & Kumar, K. (Eds.) 。Atlanta, Georgia。121-132。  new window
3.LeBaron, C.(2011)。Sense Shaping in Strategy: A Video Ethnography。Annual conference on strategy, entrepreneurship, and international business，Oxford University, Said Business School 。  new window
4.Lee, A. S.(1999)。Five Challenges to The Information Systems Field。Keynote address at BITWorld'99，(會議日期: July 1, 1999)。Cape Town。  new window
5.Lee, A. S.(2000)。Reframing The "Rigor and Relevance" Issue in Information Systems Research。Plenary Session Doctoral Consortium, International Conference on Information Systems，(會議日期: December 9, 2000)。Brisbane。  new window
6.Orlikowski, W. J.(1989)。Division among the Ranks: The Social Implications of CASE Tools for Systems Developers。The Tenth International Conference on Information Systems。Boston, MA。  new window
圖書
1.林尚平、胡哲生(2003)。推動技職本位專業實作性之拓展指導手冊期末報告。  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭瑞麟(2006)。不用數字的研究：鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究。台北：台灣培生教育。  延伸查詢new window
3.張紹勳(2007)。研究方法。台中：滄海文化。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Dobson, P. J.(2006)。The Philosophy of Critical Realism: An Opportunity for Information System Research，http://www.business.ecu.edu.au/schools/mis/media/pdf/0004.pdf， 2014/02/01。  new window
圖書論文
1.胡哲生(2003)。社會科學研究典範與質性研究類別。推動技職本位專業實作性之拓展指導手冊期末報告。  延伸查詢new window
2.Markus, M. L.(1997)。The qualitative difference in is research and practice。Information Systems and Qualitative Research。London：Chapman and Hall。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1479（臺灣：1435，外國：44） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1451226 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67253926
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上