:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學實施節能減碳教育之行動研究--以反怠速方案教學為例
書刊名:師資培育與教師專業發展期刊
作者:陳淑美林啟超 引用關係王文科 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Shwu-meeiLin, Chi-chauWang, Wen-ke
出版日期:2014
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁77-96
主題關鍵詞:方案教學反怠速節能減碳教育Project-based teaching approachAnti-idlingEnergy saving and carbon emission reduction education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
全球暖化的議題,各國教育努力推動節能減碳教育,鼓勵依校園情境提供「節能減碳」課程,提升學生節能減碳的素養能力。本研究以臺中市一所國小校園情境,規劃反怠速方案教學計劃,透過混合研究法搜集行動方案教學的文件資料、研究團隊手札、四年級學生訪談資料、以及「節能減碳之認知、態度及行為量表」前後測驗統計資料,揭露行動方案教學之研究過程與描述研究結果,藉以了解如何在國小校園推動節能減碳教育,提升學童節能減碳之素養。研究結果指出校園本位化方案教學有助於節能減碳教育之實施、教師參與研究團隊促進教師教育專業發展並有利行動方案教學推動、多元化的方案教學活動引起學生對節能減碳的學習興趣、及教學後學童節能減碳之素養有顯著差異,顯示該方案教學能提升學生節能減碳之素養。本研究依據取得之結論,對後續之研究提出建議。
Energy saving and carbon emission reduction education has become an important issue in education because of global warming. It is necessary that energy saving and carbon emission reduction education be situated in school context to practice into teaching and learning. This study aims to explore how implementing anti-idling project in an elementary school affects students' knowledge, attitude, and behavior regarding saving energy and carbon emission reduction education. The project was implemented in an elementary school and 107 fourth-grade students were studied. By conducting mixed methods research, teaching materials, interview data, and surveys were collected through the project. First, situated learning would have crucial influences on energy saving and carbon emission reduction teaching project. Second, research community would affect the success of this project. Third, the students' knowledge, attitude, and behavior toward energy saving and carbon emission reduction education have changed after the anti-idling teaching project. Based on the findings, suggestions for energy saving and carbon emission reduction education in schools are provided.
期刊論文
1.Watts, H.(1985)。When teachers are researchers, teaching improves。Journal of Staff Development,6(2),118-127。  new window
2.Weiner, G.(1989)。Professional self-know-ledge versus social justice: A critical analysis of the teacher-researcher movement。British Educational Research Journal,15(1),41-51。  new window
3.于寧、梁永瑩(20070600)。「能源之星」標章計畫發展現況。能源報導,5-7。  延伸查詢new window
4.Somekh, B.(1995)。The contribution of action research to development in social endeavors: A position paper on action research methodology。British Educational Research Journal,21(3),339-355。  new window
5.Wals, A.、Beringer, A.、Stapp, W.(1990)。Education in action: A community problem solving program for schools。Journal of Environmental Education,21(4),13-19。  new window
6.呂翠夏(19931200)。方案教學又一章--方案教學與傳統教學之比較。國教之友,45(3)=531,18-21。  延伸查詢new window
7.林明瑞、包沛然(20041200)。國小綠色消費教學之行動研究。師大學報. 科學教育類,49(2),1-34。  延伸查詢new window
8.呂錫民、陳發林、張憶琳(20080400)。臺灣應有的能源政策建議。能源季刊,38(2),75-86。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃月純(20090800)。節能減碳教育實施之探析。臺灣教育,658,14-21。  延伸查詢new window
10.Layrargues, P. P.(2000)。Solving local environmental problems in environmental education: A Brazilian case study。Environmental Education Research,6(2),167-178。  new window
11.周儒(20000100)。行動研究與教師環境教育能力之發展。臺灣教育,589,22-28。  延伸查詢new window
12.馬衛華、柳娟(2007)。臺灣大專院校的能源教育。中國電力教育月刊,42(1),23-24。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林啓超、陳淑美、陳玎慧、許文馨、沈佳憶(201005)。節能減碳教育核心內涵與能力指標之建構:以東海大學附屬實驗中小學為例。第二屆教育專業學術研討會。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cohen, L.、Manion, L.、Morrison, K.(2011)。Research methods in education。Routledge Falmer。  new window
2.簡楚瑛(2001)。方案課程之理論與實務。臺北市:文景。  延伸查詢new window
3.Borg, W.(1981)。Applying educational research: A practical guide for teachers。New York, NY:Longman。  new window
4.Chard, S. C.(1998)。The project approach: Making curriculum come alive (Book one)。New York, NY:Scholastic。  new window
5.Henning, J. E.、Stone, J. M.、Kelly, J. L.、王文科、王智弘(2011)。精進教學使用的行動研究。臺北市:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
6.Noffke, S. E.、Stevenson, R. B.(1995)。Educational action research: Becoming practically critical。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
7.Mills, G. E.(2011)。Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher。Pearson Education。  new window
8.Elliott, J.(1991)。Action research for education change。Open University Press。  new window
9.Schön, Donald A.、夏林清、鄭村棋(2004)。反映的實踐者:專業工作者如何在行動中思考。台北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
10.Katz, L. G.、Chard, S. C.(2000)。Engaging children's minds: The project approach。Stamford, CT:Ablex。  new window
11.Altrichter, Herbert、Posch, Peter、Somekh, Bridget、夏林清、蕭幸玲、林益民、黃宜敏、中華民國基層教師協會(1997)。行動研究方法導論--教師動手作研究。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
12.林素卿(2012)。教師行動研究導論。麗文文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Kemmis, S.、McTaggart, R.(1982)。The action research planner。Deakin University Press。  new window
14.Oja, S. N.、Smulyan, L.(1989)。Collaborative action research: A developmental approach。New York:The Falmer Press。  new window
15.Dewey, John(1933)。How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process。D. C. Heath and Company。  new window
16.陳伯璋(1998)。教育研究方法的新取向:質的研究方法。南宏。  延伸查詢new window
17.蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.Creswell, John W.、Plano Clark, Vicki L.(2007)。Designing and conducting mixed methods research。Sage Publications。  new window
其他
1.行政院環境保護署(2012)。機動車輛停車怠速管理辦法,http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/epalaw/index.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ferrance, E.(2000)。Action research,http://www.brown.edu/academics/education-alliance/sites/brown.edu.academics.education-alliance/files/publications/act_research.pdf。  new window
3.uShip(2008)。Negative consequences of antiidling legislation,http://blog.uship.com/us/2008/12/negative-consequences-of-anti-idling-legislation.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.McFarland, K. P.、Stansell, J. C.(1993)。Historical perspectives。Teachers are researchers: Reflection and action。Newark, DE:International Reading Association。  new window
2.Ebbutt, D.(1985)。Issue in action research。Issues in teaching for understanding。London, UK:Longman。  new window
3.成虹飛(2001)。行動研究中閱讀/看的問題:一篇重寫的稿子。行動研究與課程教學革新。臺北市:揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE