資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.223.136.26)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
以概念圖方法探討網路群組學習者的知識建構
書刊名:
資訊管理學報
作者:
游佳萍
/
張玲星
/
黃冠男
作者(外文):
Yu, Chia-ping
/
Chang, Christina Ling-hsing
/
Huang, Kuan-nan
出版日期:
2015
卷期:
22:1
頁次:
頁31-53
主題關鍵詞:
知識建構過程
;
概念圖
;
內容分析
;
Knowledge construction process
;
Concept map
;
Content analysis
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:50
研究問題與目的-知識建構論主要分析學習者在學習過程中,如何參與學習過程,以及對議題的瞭解程度。本研究主要藉由觀察討論的過程,發掘出成員如何建構知識,以探討學習者在討論互動過程中的行為模式。研究方法-為了分析討論過程中所共同建構產出的知識,與比較學習者對於學習內容的認知與瞭解程度,本研究利用概念圖與內容分析方法,評量學習者的學習質。研究發現-首先,研究結果顯示大部份的學習者在網路群組學習環境下,採用「階層」及「關係」等縱向聯結的思考模式,較少有發揮聯想力的「舉例」及橫向聯結「交叉聯結」的思考模式。因此,建議教學者在授課時,除了維持學習者對於議題的「階層」及「關係」的討論技巧,需要更進一步鼓勵學習者發展或練習使用概念關係聯結與舉例的技巧。其次,學習者在網路群組的學習過程中,討論活動主要出現在知識建構第一階段的資訊分享或比較,較少有第四階段的共識測試或修改。研究價值-本研究說明了,以概念圖作為觀察網路學習者知識建構的過程,是極為重要的研究工具。再者,從豐富的觀察資料得知,實際應用於網路群組互動學習上的知識建構活動中,缺乏知識的驗證與運用。這說明了,網路群組學習的方式並沒有促進學習者投入知識建構的過程。這個現象,對於日後研究如何提升網路學習者之學習成效,將是關鍵的問題。
以文找文
Purpose-Through observation of learners' involvement and knowledge presentation in the virtual context, this study examines and clarifies the knowledge construction process in cumputer supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Design/methodology/approach-Analyzing discussions among learners in the virtual context, the study describes the knowledge construction process and investigates the learning models used in the interaction process. A concept map and content analysis approach is adopted to analyze the knowledge construction and interactive learning processes as well as to measure learning performance. Findings-Our first finding is that most virtual learners adopt a "hierarchies" and "relationships" mode to link relevant knowledge, and seldom use "cross-links" and "examples" to construct their knowledge. In light of this finding, the study advises that instructors should allow learners to continue to utilize the "hierarchies" and "relationships" ode and at the same time, encourage learners to adopt the "Cross-links" and "examples" learning mode. Secondly, our data reveals that a considerable number of learning activities in the virtual space consist of information sharing and comparison. Originality/value-This paper provides a concept mapping technology as a valuable tool to observe the knowledge construction process in the virtual context. Our data also shows only few learning activities involve knowledge verification or manipulation, indicating that CSCL may not help learners to engage in the learning or knowledge construction processes.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Bagley, C.、Hunter, B.(1992)。Restructuring, constructivism, and technology: for going a new relationship。Educational Technology,32(7),22-27。
2.
Beers, P. J.、Boshuizen, H.、Kirschner, P. A.、Gijselaers, W. H.(2005)。Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments。Computers in Human Behavior,21(4),623-643。
3.
Gunawardena, C. N.、Jennings, B.、Ortegano-Layne, L.、Frechette, C.、Carabajal, K.、Lindemann, K.、Mummert, J.(2004)。Building an online wisdom community: a transformational design model。Journal of Computing in Higher Education,15(2),40-62。
4.
Gunawardena, C. N.、Lowe, C. A.、Anderson, T.(1997)。Building an online wisdom community: a transformational design model。Journal of Educational Computing Research,17(3),397-431。
5.
Gunawardena, C. N.、Ortegano-Layne, L.、Carabajal, K.、Frechette, C.、Lindemann, K.、Jennings, B.(2006)。New model, new strategies: instructional design for building online wisdom communities。Distance Education,27(2),217-232。
6.
Sutherland, S.、Katz, S.(2005)。Concept mapping methodology: A catalyst for organizational learning。Evaluation and Program Planning,28(3),257-269。
7.
Goodman, P. S、Darr, E. D.(1998)。Computer-Aided Systems and Communities: Mechanisms for Organizational Learning in Distributed Environments。MIS Quarterly,22(4),417-440。
8.
Pena-Shaff, J. B.、Nicholls, C.(2004)。Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions。Computers and Education,42(3),243-265。
9.
von Glasersfeld, Ernst(1989)。Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching。Synthese,80(1),121-140。
10.
Alavi, Maryam、Wheeler, Bradley C.、Valacich, Joseph, S.(1995)。Using IT to Reengineer Business Education: An Exploratory Investigation of Collaborative Telelearning。Management Information Systems Quarterly,19(3),293-312。
11.
Garrison, D. R.(2007)。Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues。Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,11(1),61-72。
12.
Jonassen, D. H.、Reeves, T. C.、Hong, N.、Harvey, D.、Peters, K.(1998)。Concept mapping as cognitive learning and assessment tools。Journal of Interactive Learning Research,8(3/4),298-308。
13.
Acton, W. H.、Johnson, P. J.、Goldsmith, T. E.(1994)。Structural knowledge assessment: comparison of referent structures。Journal of Educational Psychology,86(2),303-311。
14.
Novak, J. D.(1991)。Clarify with concept maps。The Science Teacher,58(7),44-49。
15.
Okebukola, P. A.、Jegede, O. J.(1988)。Cognitive preference and learning model as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping。Science Education,72(4),232-241。
16.
Novak, Joseph D.(1990)。Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27(10),937-949。
17.
Newman, D. R.、Webb, B.、Cochrane, C.(1995)。A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer-supported group learning。Interpersonal Computing and Technology,3(2),56-77。
會議論文
1.
Gunawardena, C. N.、Lowe, C. A.、Anderson, T.(1998)。Transcript analysis of computer-mediated conferences as a tool for testing constructivist and social-constructivist learning theories。Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning,(會議日期: 1998/08/05-08/07)。Madison, WI。139-145。
2.
Jeong, H.、Chi, M. T. H.(2000)。Does collaborative learning lead to the construction of common knowledge?。Twenty-second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society,(會議日期: 2000/08/13-08/15)。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。699-704。
3.
Veerman, A.、Veldhuis-Diermanse, E.(2001)。Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education。The first European Perspectives on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning,(會議日期: 2001/03/22-03/24)。Maastricht, NL:McLuhan institute, University of Maastricht。625-632。
4.
Zhu, E.(1996)。Meaning negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course。Selected Research and Development Presentations at the1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology,397-849。
學位論文
1.
Weinberger, A.(2003)。Scripts for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Effects of Social and Epistemic Cooperation Scripts on Collaborative Knowledge Construction(-)。Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat。
圖書
1.
Lockhorst, D.、Admiraal, W.、Pilot, A.、Veen, W.(2003)。Analysis of electronic communication using 5 different perspectives。ORD, Kerkrade:The Netherlands。
2.
Weber, Robert Philip(1985)。Basic Content Analysis。Sage Publications Inc.。
3.
Ausubel, David Paul(1968)。Educational Psychology: a cognitive view。New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.。
4.
Neuendorf, K. A.(2002)。The Content Analysis Guidebook。Sage。
5.
McGrath, J. E.(1984)。Groups: Interaction and Performance。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。
6.
Ausubel, David Paul(1963)。The psychology of meaningful verbal learning: an introduction to school learning。Grune & Stratton, Inc.。
7.
Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。
8.
Krippendorff, Klaus H.(1980)。Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology。Sage。
圖書論文
1.
Henri, F.(1992)。Computer conferencing and content analysis。Collaborative learning through computer conferencing。Berlin, DE:Springer-Verlag。
2.
von Glasersfeld, E.(1987)。Learning as a constructive activity。Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
以網路國際交流重構學習者教材知識的契機與實例
2.
中國報人的「報國情」與「報國路」--評《文人論政》與《報人報國》
3.
Extending the Conception of Horizon Content Knowledge: Fundamental Mathematical Knowledge and Its Sample Assessment Item
4.
The Effect of Political Campaign Activities on the Knowledge Gap in Taiwan: A Case Study on the 2008 and 2012 Presidential Elections
5.
金融知識與股票市場參與關聯性之研究--臺灣地區的驗證
6.
校長知識領導、教師專業發展與學校智慧資本關係之研究
7.
信仰、記憶與建構:談六房媽過爐
8.
臺灣性別與情感教育研究之回顧分析:知識生產的挑戰與展望
9.
福島危機中臺灣民眾對核能的風險感知與態度:政黨傾向、核能知識、信任與科學傳播的角色
10.
公民身分社會學的理論企圖:規範性與經驗性研究的整合
11.
透過知識創新教學理念與學習平臺以培養國小學生自然課合作學習與翻新想法的習慣
12.
數位學習平臺「第二生命」(Second Life)研究的知識結構與發展趨勢
13.
指數或量表?以TEDS的政治知識測量為例
14.
線上產品評論對消費者購買意圖之影響:認知需求與產品知識調節效果之探討
15.
Lollardy and Political Community: Vernacular Literacy, Popular Preaching, and the Transformative Influence of Lay Power
QR Code