:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:資訊科學期刊的主題分布與多樣性研究
書刊名:圖書資訊學研究
作者:林頌堅 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Sung-chien
出版日期:2014
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁171-200
主題關鍵詞:主題模型方法研究主題確認多樣性指標Topic modelingTopic identificationIndex of diversity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:7
本研究利用資訊科學領域重要期刊的論文內容,運用主題模型方法,確認領域的主題,分析各種期刊重視的研究主題,並且將期刊在主題分布的差異視覺化。本研究使用的資料是資訊科學的六種期刊於 2007到 2013年發表論文的題名與摘要,運用主題模型方法所產生的 20個主題,可以進一步歸類為資訊搜尋與檢索研究和資訊計量學兩個群組。雖然本研究的分析範圍和研究方法都與先前的研究不同,但主題確認的結果與先前研究類似,顯示資訊科學的研究主題發展大致上穩定。此外,主題確認完成後,本研究也利用各種指標測量期刊的主題多樣性。各種指標對期刊的主題多樣性測量結果相當一致,有較廣泛研究主題的 Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology與 Journal of Information Science具有較大的主題多樣性。
In this study, we used the text content of papers published in important journals of the field of Information Science as the data resource and the method of topic modeling to identify research topics in the examined field to analyze the important topics of each journal and to map the journals according the disparities between their topic distribution into a graph. The input text data used in this study were the title and abstract of articles published between 2007 and 2013 in six important journals of the field of Information Science. The results of topic modeling were 20 topics, which can be further classified into two groups, “information search and retrieval” and “informetrics”. Although the scope of analysis and the research methods in this study and previous studies are different, the results are similar. It means that the development of research topics in the examined field are generally stable. Based on the results of topics identification, we also measured the topic diversity of the journals using various indicators. The measure results of different diversity indicators are quite consistent. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology and Journal of Information Science, which had broad distribution over research topics, both obtained a larger topic diversity among all the examined journals.
期刊論文
1.Waltman, L.、Van Eck, N. J.、Noyons, E. C. M.(2010)。A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks。Journal of Informetrics,4(4),629-635。  new window
2.Griffiths, T. L.、Steyvers, M.(2004)。Finding scientific topics。Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,101(suppl 1),5228-5235。  new window
3.Lu, K.、Wolfram, D.(2012)。Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word ‐ based, topic ‐ based, and author cocitation approaches。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,63(10),1973-1986。  new window
4.Zheng, B.、McLean, D. C.、Lu, X.(2006)。Identifying biological concepts from a protein-related corpus with a probabilistic topic model。Bmc Bioinformatics,7(58)。  new window
5.林頌堅(20140600)。以主題模型方法為基礎的資訊計量學領域研究主題分析。教育資料與圖書館學,51(4),499-523。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Bonnevie-Nebelong, E.(2006)。Methods for journal evaluation: journal citation identity, journal citation image and internationalization。Scientometrics,66(2),411-424。  new window
7.Huang, M. H.、Chang, Y. W.(2012)。A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science。Scientometrics,91(3),789-803。  new window
8.Liu, Y.、Rafols, I.、Rousseau, R.(2012)。A framework for knowledge integration and diffusion。Journal of Documentation,68(1),31-44。  new window
9.Moya-Anegón, F.、Herrero-Solana, V.、Jiménez-Contreras, E.(2006)。A connectionist and multivariate approach to science maps: the SOM, clustering and MDS applied to library and information science research。Journal of Information Science,32(1),63-77。  new window
10.Porter, A. L.、Rafols, I.(2009)。Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time。Scientometrics,81(3),719-745。  new window
11.Rafols, I.、Meyer, M.(2010)。Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience。Scientometrics,82(2),263-287。  new window
12.Rzeszutek, R.、Androutsos, D.、Kyan, M.(2010)。Self-organizing mapsfor topic trend discovery。Signal Processing Letters, IEEE,17(6),607-610。  new window
13.Stirling, A.(2007)。A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society。Journal of the Royal Society Interface,4(15),707-719。  new window
14.White, Howard D.、McCain, Katherine W.(1998)。Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,49(4),327-355。  new window
15.Åström, F.(2007)。Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,58(7),947-957。  new window
16.Janssens, F.、Leta, J.、Glänzel, W.、De Moor, B.(2006)。Towards mapping library and information science。Information Processing and Management,42(6),1614-1642。  new window
17.Blei, David M.、Ng, Andrew Y.、Jordan, Michael I.(2003)。Latent Dirichlet allocation。Journal of Machine Learning Research,3(4/5),993-1022。  new window
18.Leydesdorff, Loet、Rafols, Ismael(2011)。Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality and citations。Journal of Informetrics,5(1),87-100。  new window
會議論文
1.Bache, K.、Newman, D.、Smyth, P.(2013)。Text-based measures of document diversity。The 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining。New York, NY:ACM。23-31。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE