臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：應用爭議導向之探究式學習於資訊素養課程：培養國小五年級學生議論能力
書刊名：圖書資訊學研究
作者：林菁 引用關係／陳耀輝
作者(外文)：Chen Lin, Ching／Chen, Yaw-huei
出版日期：2015
卷期：9:2
頁次：頁67-109
主題關鍵詞：議論能力；爭議導向；資訊素養；Argumentative skills；Argument-driven；Information literacy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:207
Other
1.楊裕貿(20131030)。兒童寫作觀察報告。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.Midgette, E.、Haria, P.、MacArthur, C.(2008)。The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth and eighth-grade students。Reading and Writing，21(1/2)，131-151。  new window
2.Wolfe, C. R.、Britt, M. A.、Butler, J. A.(2009)。Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation。Written Communication，26(2)，183-209。  new window
3.林菁(20110600)。資訊素養融入國小一年級「校園生物大搜索」主題探究：以Super3模式為例。教育資料與圖書館學，48(4)，539-570。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林菁(20120300)。資訊素養融入國小二年級社會學習領域「我們的社區」主題探究：以Super3模式為例。教育資料與圖書館學，49(3)，447-478。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林菁、謝欣穎、謝文峰(20140600)。資訊素養融入國小三年級自然學習領域「樹朋友」主題探究。圖書資訊學研究，8(2)，57-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林菁、顏仁德、黃財尉(20140600)。探究式資訊素養融入課程成效之四年長期研究。教育資料與圖書館學，51(4)，561-595。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張緯文、林樹聲(20140500)。實施議論文寫作活動提升國小學生論證與寫作能力。科學教育月刊，368，2-19。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bruce, D. L.(2009)。Writing with visual images: Examining the video composition processes of high school students。Research in the Teaching of English，43(4)，426-450。  new window
9.Chu, S. K.、Tse, S. K.、Loh, E. K.、Chow, K.(2011)。Collaborative inquiry porject-based learning: Effects on reading ability and interests。Library & Information Science Research，33(3)，236-243。  new window
10.Crisco, V.(2009)。Activating activist literacy: Discovering dispositions for civic identity development。Composition Studies，37(2)，31-51。  new window
11.Felton, M. K.、Herko, S.(2004)。From dialogue to two-sided argument: Scaffolding adolescents'€™ persuasive writing。Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy，47(8)，672-683。  new window
12.Ferretti, Ralph P.、MacArthur, Charles A.、Dowdy, Nancy S.(2000)。The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers。Journal of Educational Psychology，92(4)，694-702。  new window
13.Hillocks, G. Jr.(2010)。Teaching argument for critical thinking and writing: An introduction。English Journal，99(6)，24-32。  new window
14.Mason, L.、Scirica, F.(2006)。Prediction of students' argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding。Learning and Instruction，16(5)，492-509。  new window
15.Means, M. L.、Voss, J. F.(1996)。Who reason well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels。Cognition and Instruction，14，139-178。  new window
16.Newell, G. E.、Beach, R.、Smith, J.、Van Der Heide, J.(2011)。Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research。Reading Research Quarterly，46(3)，273-304。  new window
17.Sampson, V.、Grooms, J.、Walker, J.(2009)。Argument-driven inquiry: A way to promote learning during laboratory activities。The Science Teacher，76(8)，42-47。  new window
18.Sandoval, W. A.、Millwood, K. A.(2005)。The quality of students' used of evidence in written scientific explanations。Cognition and Instruction，23，23-55。  new window
19.Santana Arroyo, S.(2013)。Information literacy for health professionals: Teaching essential information skills with the Big6 information literacy。Community & Junior College Libraries，19(3/4)，77-91。  new window
20.Ward, M. Sr.(2009)。Squaring the learning circle: Cross-classroom collaboration and the impact of audience on student outcomes in professional writing。Journal of Business and Technical Communication，23(1)，61-82。  new window
21.Kuhn, D.、Udell, W.(2003)。The development of argument skills。Child Development，74(5)，1245-1260。  new window
22.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.、Monk, M.(2001)。Enhancing the quality of argument in school science。School Science Review，82(301)，63-70。  new window
學位論文
1.許佩琦(2001)。爭議性文章的閱讀理解研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李琬蓉(2009)。結合思辯練習的寫作教學研究：以六年級議論文體為例(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.梁崇輝(2005)。九年一貫語文領域第二學習階段國語教科書說明文與議論文篇章結構分析研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.American Association of School Librarians(2009)。Standards for the 21stcentury learner in action。Chicago, IL：American Association of School Librarians。  new window
2.Bruce, C.(2008)。Informed learning。Chicago, IL：Association of College and Research Libraries。  new window
3.Eisenberg, M. B.、Robinson, G. A.(2007)。The Super3: Information skills for young learners。Worthington, OH：Linworth。  new window
4.National Research Council、Schweingruber, H.、Keller, T.、Quinn, H.(2012)。A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas。National Academies Press。  new window
5.Council of Chief State School & National Governors Association(2015)。Chief State School & National Governors Association (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects。Washington, DC：Council of Chief State School & National Governors Association。  new window
6.Flower, L.(2008)。Community literacy and the rhetoric of public engagement。Carbondale：Southern Illinois University Press。  new window
7.Fulton, C.(2010)。Information Pathways: A problem-solving approach to information literacy。Lanham, UK：The Scarecrow。  new window
8.Gunning, T. G.(2012)。Creating literacy instruction for all students in grades 4-8。Boston, MA：Pearson。  new window
9.Harrison Group(2010)。Kids and family reading report。New York：Scholastic。  new window
10.Hepworth, M.、Walton, G.(2009)。Teaching information literacy for inquiry-based learning。Oxford, UK：Chandos。  new window
11.Hillocks, G.(2011)。Teaching argument writing, grades 6-12: Supporting claims with relevant evidence and clear reasoning。Portsmouth, NH：Heinemann。  new window
12.Kuhn, D.(2008)。Education for thinking。Harvard University Press。  new window
13.Larson, B. E.、Keiper, T. A.(2011)。Instructional strategies for middle and secondary social studies: Methods, assessment, and classroom management。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
14.Llewellyn, D.(2013)。Teaching high school science inquiry and argumentation。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin。  new window
15.New Literacies Research Team(2006)。Results summary reports 1-6 from the survey of Internet usage and online reading。Storrs, CT：Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut。  new window
16.Eisenberg, M. B.、Berkowitz, R. E.(1999)。Teaching information & technology skills: The big6 in elementary schools。Linworth。  new window
17.Flint, A. S.(2008)。Literate lives: Teaching reading & writing in elementary classrooms。Hoboken, NJ：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
18.Kuhlthau, C. C.、Maniotes, L. K.、Caspari, A. K.(2007)。Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century。Westport, CT：Libraries Unlimited。  new window
19.Springer, K.(2010)。Educational research: A contextual approach。Hoboken, NJ：Wiley。  new window
20.Merriam, Sharan B.(1998)。Qualitative research and case study applications in education。Jossey-Bass。  new window
其他
1.State of Delaware(2013)。Argumentation/opinion text-based writing rubrics，http://www.doe.k12.de.us/Page/508， 2015/03/23。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kurbanoglu, S.、Grassian, E.、Mizrachi, D.、Catts, R.、Spiranec, S.(2013)。Worldwide commonalities and challenges in information literacy research and practice。Communication in Computer and Information Science。New York：Springer。  new window
2.林佩璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。質的研究方法。麗文。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：478（臺灣：438，外國：40） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1451226 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67249557
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上