:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Conventionalization of Lexical Meanings and the Role of Metaphoricity: Processing of Metaphorical Polysemy Using a Cross-modal Lexical Priming Task
書刊名:語言暨語言學
作者:張有鈞林千哲安可思
作者(外文):Chang, YuchunLin, Charles Chien-jerAhrens, Kathleen
出版日期:2015
卷期:16:4
頁次:頁587-614
主題關鍵詞:語境效應約定俗成詞彙歧義隱喻多義詞詞義頻率Contextual effectConventionalizationLexical ambiguityMetaphorical polysemySense frequency
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:56
詞義的約定俗成與隱喻性:以跨模式詞彙促發作業探討隱喻多義詞之心理處理歷程 中文摘要:已往的詞彙歧義研究雖常探討詞義的相對頻率對其在偏向語境中解歧的影響,但卻較少注意不同類型歧義詞之區分或詞義本身語意性質(如:字面義或隱喻義)與其約定俗成程度的影響;過去實驗中大多使用以具體意義為主要意義的實驗材料,忽略了以抽象意義為主要意義的詞彙。本研究聚焦於中文裡同時具字面義與隱喻義的多義詞,藉由線上跨模式詞彙促發作業,檢驗字面義強勢詞彙(即含有強勢字面詞義與次要隱喻詞義的多義詞,如「廢物」:“失去原有使用價值的東西;比喻沒有用的人”)與隱喻義強勢詞彙(即含有強勢隱喻詞義與次要字面詞義的多義詞,如「角度」:“兩直線或平面相交所形成的空間;比喻觀察特定事件的觀點”)在偏向字面義、偏向隱喻義及中性語境中的意義激發模式。結果發現,字面義強勢詞彙的兩詞義無論語境偏向為何皆被激發,而隱喻義強勢詞彙只有隱喻義在相容語境中被激發。本文於是就字面義與隱喻義約定俗成程度之不同,以及此二類詞彙意義激發的時間進程,討論實驗結果。
Decades of lexical ambiguity research has rigorously studied effects of relative sense frequency on sense disambiguation in biased contexts, while fundamental semantic issues such as distinction of different types of ambiguities, or influences from lexical meanings' semantic nature (e.g., literal or metaphorical) as well as these meanings' degrees of conventionalization, have received less attention. In particular, while previous experimental works tend to focus on stimuli having dominant concrete meanings, a large amount of words having dominant abstract meanings are overlooked. This study focused on lexemes that contain related literal and metaphorical senses (i.e., metaphorical polysemies) in Mandarin Chinese, and examined meaning activation patterns of literaldominant lexemes (having dominant literal senses and subordinate metaphorical senses, e.g., 廢物 fèiwù 'waste; a good-for-nothing') and metaphor-dominant lexemes (having dominant metaphorical senses and subordi nate literal senses, e.g., 角度 jiǎodù 'spatial angle; viewpoint’) in literally-biased, metaphorically-biased, and control neutral contexts in an online cross-modal lexical priming task. While both senses of literal-dominant lexemes appeared to be accessed regardless of contextual bias, only metaphorical senses of metaphor-dominant lexemes showed signs of activation in compatible contexts. The results are discussed in terms of influences from different degrees of conventionalization of literal and metaphorical senses as well as time course of meaning activation for these two types of lexemes.
期刊論文
1.Tyler, Andrea、Evans, Vyvyan(2001)。Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over。Language,77(4),724-765。  new window
2.Huang, Chu-ren、Ahrens, Kathleen、Chang, Li-li、Chen, Keh-jiann、Liu, Mei-chun、Tsai, Mei-chi(20000200)。The Module-Attribute Representation of Verbal Semantics: From Semantics to Argument Structure。International Journal of Computational Linguistics & Chinese Language Processing,5(1),19-46。new window  new window
3.Kawamoto, A.(1993)。Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account。Journal of Memory and Language,32(4),474-516。  new window
4.Frazier, L.、Rayner, K.(1990)。Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. Multiple senses。Journal of Memory and Language,29(2),181-200。  new window
5.Nunberg, Geoffrey、Sag, Ivan A.、Wasow, Thomas(1994)。Idioms。Language,70(3),491-538。  new window
6.Simpson, Greg、Burgess, Curt(1985)。Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,11(1),28-39。  new window
7.Locker, L.、Hoffman, L.、Bovaird, J. A.(2007)。On the use of multilevel modeling as an alternative to items analysis in psycholinguistic research。Behavior Research Methods,39(4),723-730。  new window
8.Barr, Dale J.、Levy, Roger、Scheepers, Christoph、Tily, Harry J.(2013)。Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal。Journal of Memory and Language,68(3),255-278。  new window
9.Peleg, Orna、Giora, Rachel、Fein, Ofer(2001)。Salience and context effects: two are better than one。Metaphor and Symbol,16(3/4),173-192。  new window
10.Ahrens, Kathleen(2003)。Verbal integration: the interaction of participant roles and sentential argument structure。Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,32(5),497-516。  new window
11.Ahrens, Kathleen(2012)。Finding what you expect to see: theoretical modeling in psycholinguistics。Journal of Social Sciences,8(3),372-380。  new window
12.Ahrens, Kathleen、Liu, Ho-Ling、Lee, Chia-Ying、Gong, Shu-Ping、Fang, Shin-Yi、Hsu, Yuan-Yu(2007)。Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese。Brain and Language,100(2),163-171。  new window
13.Alario, F.-Xavier、Segui, Juan、Ferrand, Ludovic(2000)。Semantic and associative priming in picture naming。Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology,53(3),741-764。  new window
14.Balota, David A.、Paul, Stephen T.(1996)。Summation of activation: evidence from multiple primes that converge and diverge within semantic memory。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,22(4),827-845。  new window
15.Barber, Horacio A.、Otten, Leun J.、Kousta, Stavroula-Thaleia、Vigliocco, Gabriella(2013)。Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task。Brain and Language,125(1),47-53。  new window
16.Blank, Glenn David(1988)。Metaphors in the lexicon。Metaphor and Symbol,3(1),21-36。  new window
17.Bueno, Steve、Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl(2008)。The activation of semantic memory: effects of prime exposure, prime-target relationship, and task demands。Memory and Cognition,36(4),882-898。  new window
18.Chen, Lillian、Boland, Julie E.(2008)。Dominance and context effects on activation of alternative homophone meanings。Memory and Cognition,36(7),1306-1323。  new window
19.Forster, Kenneth I.、Bednall, Elizabeth S.(1976)。Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access。Memory and Cognition,4(1),53-61。  new window
20.Forster, Kenneth I.、Dickinson, Rod G.(1976)。More on the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: Monte Carlo estimates of error rates for F1, F2, F3 and min F。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,15(2),135-142。  new window
21.Geiger, Odie、Ward, Lawrence M.(1999)。Metaphors and the mental lexicon。Brain and Language,68(1/2),192-198。  new window
22.Gelman, Andrew、Hill, Jennifer、Yajima, Masanao(2012)。Why we (usually) don't have to worry about multiple comparisons。Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness,5(2),189-211。  new window
23.Gilquin, Gaëtanelle、Gries, Stefan Th.(2009)。Corpora and experimental methods: a state-of-the-art review。Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory,5(1),1-26。  new window
24.Gries, Stefan Th.、Hampe, Beate、Schönefeld, Doris(2005)。Converging evidence: bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions。Cognitive Linguistics,16(4),635-676。  new window
25.Grondin, Ray、Lupker, Stephen J.、McRae, Ken(2009)。Shared features dominate semantic richness effects for concrete concepts。Journal of Memory and Language,60(1),1-19。  new window
26.Hino, Yasushi、Lupker, Stephen J.、Sears, Chris R.(1997)。The effects of word association and meaning frequency in a cross-modal lexical decision task: is the priming due to 'semantic' activation?。Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,51(3),195-211。  new window
27.Hirshman, Elliot、Durante, Richard(1992)。Prime identification and semantic priming。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,18(2),255-265。  new window
28.Jones, Machael N.、Kintsch, Walter、Mewhort, Douglas J. K.(2006)。High-dimensional semantic space accounts of priming。Journal of Memory and Language,55(4),534-552。  new window
29.Joordens, Steve、Becker, Suzanna(1997)。The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,23(5),1083-1105。  new window
30.Klepousniotou, Ekaterini、Baum, Shari R.(2005)。Unilateral brain damage effects on processing homonymous and polysemous words。Brain and Language,93(3),308-326。  new window
31.Klepousniotou, Ekaterini、Baum, Shari R.(2007)。Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: an advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words。Journal of Neurolinguistics,20(1),1-24。  new window
32.Klepousniotou, Ekaterini、Pike, G. Bruce、Steinhauer, Karsten、Gracco, Vincent(2012)。Not all ambiguous words are created equal: an EEG investigation of homonymy and polysemy。Brain and Language,123(1),11-21。  new window
33.Love, Tracy、Swinney, David A.(1996)。Coreference processing and levels of analysis in objectrelative constructions: demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm。Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,25(1),5-24。  new window
34.Lupker, Stephen J.(1984)。Semantic priming without association: a second look。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,23(6),709-733。  new window
35.McKoon, Gail、Ratcliff, Roger(1994)。Sentential context and on-line lexical decision。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,20(5),1239-1243。  new window
36.McRae, Ken、Boisvert, Stephen(1998)。Automatic semantic similarity priming。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,24(3),558-572。  new window
37.Moseley, Rachel L.、Pulvermüller, Friedemann(2014)。Nouns, verbs, objects, actions, and abstractions: local fMRI activity indexes semantics, not lexical categories。Brain and Language,132,28-42。  new window
38.Nelson, Douglas L.、McEvoy, Cathy L.、Dennis, Simon(2000)。What is free association and what does it measure?。Memory and Cognition,28(6),887-899。  new window
39.Nelson, Douglas L.、McEvoy, Cathy L.、Schreiber, Thomas A.(2004)。The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms。Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers,36(3),402-407。  new window
40.Nicol, Janet L.、Fodor, Janet Dean、Swinney, David A.(1994)。Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,20(5),1229-1238。  new window
41.Nicol, Janet L.、Swinney, David A.、Love, Tracy、Hald, Lea(2006)。The on-line study of sentence comprehension: an examination of dual task paradigms。Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,35(3),215-231。  new window
42.Ortony, Andrew、Vondruska, Richard J.、Foss, Mark A.、Jones, Lawrence E.(1985)。Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity。Journal of Memory and Language,24(5),569-594。  new window
43.Peleg, Orna、Giora, Rachel、Fein, Ofer(2008)。Resisting contextual information: you can't put a salient meaning down。Lodz Papers in Pragmatics,4(1),13-44。  new window
44.Raaijmakers, Jeroen G. W.(2003)。A further look at the 'language-as-fixed-effect fallacy'。Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,57(3),141-151。  new window
45.Rubenstein, Herbert、Garfield, Lonnie、Millikan, Jane A.(1970)。Homographic entries in internal lexicon。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,9(5),487-494。  new window
46.Stringaris, Argyris K.、Medford, Nicholas C.、Giampietro, Vincent、Brammer, Michael J.、David, Anthony S.(2007)。Deriving meaning: distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal, and non-meaningful sentences。Brain and Language,100(2),150-162。  new window
47.Svanlund, Jan(2007)。Metaphor and convention。Cognitive Linguistics,18(1),47-89。  new window
48.Swinney, David A.、Onifer, William、Prather, Penny、Hirshkowitz, Max(1979)。Semantic facilitation across sensory modalities in the processing of individual words and sentences。Memory and Cognition,7(3),159-165。  new window
49.Taler, Vanessa、Klepousniotou, Ekaterini、Phillips, Natalie A.(2009)。Comprehension of lexical ambiguity in healthy aging, mild cognitive impairment, and mild Alzheimer's disease。Neuropsychologia,47(5),1332-1343。  new window
50.Traxler, Matthew J.、Tooley, Kristen M.(2007)。Lexical mediation and context effects in sentence processing。Brain Research,1146,59-74。  new window
51.Vitevitch, Michael S.(2002)。The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,28(4),735-747。  new window
52.Wike, Edward L.、Church, James D.(1976)。Comments on Clark's 'the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy'。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,15(3),249-255。  new window
53.Williams, John N.(1996)。Is automatic priming semantic?。European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,8(2),113-161。  new window
54.Ahrens, Kathleen(20060700)。The Effect of Visual Target Presentation Times on Lexical Ambiguity Resolution。語言暨語言學,7(3),677-696。new window  new window
55.Beretta, Alan、Fiorentino, Robert、Poeppel, David(2005)。The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study。Cognitive Brain Research,24(1),57-65。  new window
56.Clark, Herbert(1973)。The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12(4),335-359。  new window
57.Gernsbacher, Morton Ann(1984)。Resolving 20 Years of Inconsistent Interactions between Lexical Familiarity and Orthography, Concreteness, and Polysemy。Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113,256-281。  new window
58.Kintsch, Walter、Mross, Ernest F.(1985)。Context effects in word identification。Journal of Memory and Language,24(3),336-349。  new window
59.Klein, Devorah E.、Murphy, Gregory L.(2001)。The representation of polysemous words。Journal of Memory and Language,45(2),259-282。  new window
60.Klepousniotou, Ekaterini(2002)。The processing of lexical ambiguity: homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon。Brain and Language,81(1-3),205-223。  new window
61.Klepousniotou, Ekaterini、Baum, Shari R.(2005)。Processing homonymy and polysemy: effects of sentential context and time-course following unilateral brain damage。Brain and Language,95(3),365-382。  new window
62.Onifer, William、Swinney, David A.(1981)。Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias。Memory and Cognition,9(3),225-236。  new window
63.Perea, Manuel、Rosa, Eva(2002)。The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task。Psychological Research,66(3),180-194。  new window
64.Raaijmakers, Jeroen G. W.、Schrijnemakers, Joseph M. C.、Gremmen, Frans(1999)。How to deal with 'the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy': common misconceptions and alternative solutions。Journal of Memory and Language,41(3),416-426。  new window
65.Rodd, J. M.、Gaskell, M. G.、Marslen-Wilson, W. D.(2002)。Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access。Journal of Memory and Language,46(2),245-266。  new window
66.Shelton, Jennifer R.、Martin, Randi C.(1992)。How semantic is automatic semantic priming?。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,18(6),1191-1210。  new window
67.Simpson, Greg B.(1981)。Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,20(1),120-136。  new window
68.Tabossi, Patrizia(1988)。Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts。Journal of Memory and Language,27(3),324-340。  new window
69.Tabossi, P.、Zardon, F.(1993)。Processing ambiguous words in context。Journal of Memory and Language,32(3),359-372。  new window
70.Williams, John N.(1992)。Processing polysemous words in context: evidence for interrelated meanings。Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,21(3),193-218。  new window
71.Seidenberg, Mark S.、Tanenhaus, Michael K.、Leiman, James M.、Bienkowski, Marie(1982)。Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: some limitations of knowledge-based processing。Cognitive Psychology,14(4),489-537。  new window
72.Ahrens, Kathleen、Chang, Li-li、Chen, Ke-jiann、Huang, Chu-ren(19980200)。Meaning Representation and Meaning Instantiation for Chinese Nominals。International Journal of Computational Linguistics & Chinese Language Processing,3(1),45-60。  new window
73.Lin, Charles Chien-Jer、Ahrens, Kathleen(2010)。Ambiguity advantage revisited: two meanings are better than one when accessing Chinese nouns。Journal of psycholinguistic research,39(1),1-19。  new window
74.Swinney, David A.(1979)。Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)consideration of context effects。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,18(6),645-659。  new window
75.Hutchison, Keith A.(2003)。Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review。Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,10(4),785-813。  new window
76.Lucas, Margery(2000)。Semantic priming without association: a meta-analytic review。Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,7(4),618-630。  new window
77.Rumelhart, David E.、McClelland, James L.(1981)。An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: An Account of Basic Findings。Psychological Review,88(5),375-407。  new window
78.黃居仁、莊元珣、Ahrens, Kathleen(20030700)。Sense and Meaning Facets in Verbal Semantics: A MARVS Perspective。語言暨語言學,4(3),469-484。new window  new window
79.Baayen, R. Harald、Davidson, Doug J.、Bates, Douglas M.(2008)。Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items。Journal of Memory and Language,59(4),390-412。  new window
80.Ahrens, K.(2001)。On-line sentence comprehension of ambiguous verbs in Mandarin。Journal of East Asian Linguistics,10(4),337-358。  new window
81.Tanenhaus, M.、Leiman, J.、Seidenberg, Mark S.(1979)。Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,18(4),427-440。  new window
82.Klepousniotou, E.、Titone, D.、Romero, C.(2008)。Making sense of word senses: The comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,34(6),1534-1543。  new window
圖書
1.Barcelona, A.(2000)。Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective。Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
2.Giora, Rachel(2003)。On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Cruse, D. Alan(2011)。Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics。Oxford:New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.National Languages Committee(1994)。Revised Dictionary of Mandarin Chinese。Taipei:Ministry of Education。  new window
5.Harald, Baayen R.(2008)。Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Deese, James(1965)。The Structure of Associations in Language and Thought。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins Press。  new window
7.Geeraerts, Dirk、Grondelaers, Stefan、Bakema, Peter(1994)。The Structure of Lexical Variation: A Descriptive Framework for Cognitive Lexicology。Berlin:New York:Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
8.Croft, William A.、Cruse, D. Alan(2004)。Cognitive Linguistics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Fodor, Jerry A.(1983)。The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
10.Schmid, Hans-Jörg(2000)。English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition。Mouton De Gruyter。  new window
11.Boring, E. G.(1950)。A History of experimental psychology。New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts。  new window
其他
1.Bates, Douglas M.,Maechler, Martin,Walker, Steven(2014)。lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R package version 1.1-7),http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4。  new window
2.Kuznetsova, Alexandra,Brockhoff, Per Bruun,Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen(2014)。lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models (R package version 2.0-20),http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ahrens, Kathleen(2010)。Mapping principles for conceptual metaphors。Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World。John Benjamins。  new window
2.Ahrens, Kathleen(2015)。Semantic processing: access, ambiguity, and metaphor。The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics。New York:Oxford & Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Gries, Stefan Th.、Hampe, Beate、Schönefeld, Doris(2010)。Converging evidence II: more on the association of verbs and constructions。Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/ Functional Research。Stanford:CSLI。  new window
4.Schmid, Hans-Jörg(2007)。Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels。The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Schmid, Hans-Jörg(2010)。Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system?。Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven Approaches。De Gruyter Mouton。  new window
6.Schmid, Hans-Jörg(2014)。Lexico-grammatical patterns, pragmatic associations and discourse frequency。Constructions Collocations Patterns。Berlin:Boston:De Gruyter Mouton。  new window
7.Schmid, Hans-Jörg。Introduction: a framework for understanding linguistic entrenchment and its psychological foundations in memory and automatization。Entrenchment, Memory and Automaticity: The Psychology of Linguistic Knowledge and Language Learning。Boston:APA:Walter de Gruyter。  new window
8.Vigliocco, Gabriella、Vinson, David P.(2007)。Semantic representation。The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Ahrens, Kathleen(1999)。The mutability of noun and verb meaning。Chinese Languages and Linguistics, Vol. 5: Interactions in Language。Taipei:Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica。new window  new window
10.Ahrens, Kathleen(2002)。Timing issues in lexical ambiguity resolution。Sentence Processing in East Asian Languages。Stanford:CSLI。  new window
11.Rosch, Eleanor H.(1973)。On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories。Cognitive development and the acquisition of language。New York:Academic Press。  new window
12.Lakoff, George(1993)。The contemporary theory of metaphor。Metaphor and thought。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE