:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣工藝之家在設計與行銷上的轉型問題分析
書刊名:科技學刊. 人文社會類
作者:黃世輝 引用關係劉秋雪
作者(外文):Hwang, Shyh-HheiLiu, Chiu-hsueh
出版日期:2013
卷期:22:2
頁次:頁121-133
主題關鍵詞:臺灣工藝之家品牌行銷創新設計Taiwan Crafts WorkshopBrand markingInnovative design
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:30
工藝經過長久累積而成為文化資產,也是全球化進展下文化差異的符碼識別所在,足以展現台灣文化特色;同時,工藝也是為設計產業創意應用的源頭,可能發展為微型產業,並創造在地就業人口。國立台灣工藝研究發展中心為健全工藝人才認證機制,並協助行銷工藝家,分別在 2004、2006、2007、2010、2012年舉辦台灣工藝之家的評選,共評選出 148家台灣工藝之家,並給予多方面的協助。但工藝之家從傳統工藝逐漸轉型的過程中,在設計、行銷與體驗上仍有許多有待改善的地方,故本研究透過問卷調查,研究工藝之家的問題,包括設計與品牌問題、展覽與行銷問題、產品與體驗問題、經營與盈虧問題等。獲得研究結論如下: 1. 設計與品牌層面: (1) 成為工藝之家對知名度與地位與產品價格與盈餘皆有正面效果。 (2) 工藝之家對於投入創新設計的風險感頗高。 2. 展覽與行銷層面:(1) 工藝之家城鄉地區皆有,但結合鄉村社區可為特色行銷。(2) 工藝之家的社教特質也是特色行銷。 (3)工藝之家對於行銷通路缺乏多方嘗試的經驗。 3. 產品與體驗的收入層面: (1)工藝之家以產品銷售為主要收入來源,創造手創感動的產品價值。(2) 工藝之家體驗服務的收入佔年度營業額的比例仍低。4.經營與盈虧層面:(1) 材料成本上漲是工藝之家經營上最主要的問題。(2) 多數工藝之家有獲利,但營業額多在一百萬以內。
The physical knowledge of crafts only becomes cultural assets after a period of time. It is also the identifier code of cultural differences under the development of globalization that can fully demonstrate the cultural characteristics of Taiwan; in the meanwhile, craft is the origin of innovative applications for design industry that can possibly develop into a micro-industry and create job opportunities in local. To complete an authentication mechanism for craft talents, National Taiwan Craft Research and Development Institute has assisted to market craft artists by holding the Taiwan Crafts Workshop evaluations in 2004, 2006, 2007, 2010 and 2012 respectively. There were totally 148 workshops selected as the Taiwan Crafts Workshop and have received supports from the institute. However, the operation status of Crafts Workshops still needs to be evaluated. Therefore, this research, based on a questionnaire survey, has investigated problems suffered by Crafts Workshops including designing and branding issues, exhibition and marketing issues, product and DIY experience issues as well as operation, profit and loss issues. The research conclusions are: 1. Design and Branding Level: (1) Becoming a Crafts Workshop can make a positive impact on one’s reputation, product price and profit. (2) Crafts Workshops are aware of the high-level risk of putting investment in innovative designs. (3) Crafts Workshops need to strengthen their concepts regarding the culture and creative industry; 2. Exhibition and Marketing Level: (1) Crafts Workshops can be found in towns and villages. However, they are also integrated with features of local villages as a characteristic marketing. (2) Instead of running business in cities, Crafts Workshops are normally situated in villages as a characteristic. (3) Craft Workshops seem to lack of experiences in trying diversified marketing and sales channels; 3. Product and DIY Experience Level: (1) Crafts Workshop mainly sells products as its major income and builds “hand-made attachment” as its product value. (2) Crafts Workshop’s income in DIY experience service is still quite low in terms of the annual turnover; 4 Operation, Profit and Loss Level: (1) The increasing material cost is the major operation issue for Crafts Workshops. (2) Most of the Crafts Workshops have gained profit. Nevertheless, their turnovers are usually within one million NTD.
期刊論文
1.林明卿、薛恭貴(20081100)。鑽探文化創意的活水源頭--從社區著手醞釀工藝美學能量。臺灣工藝,31,6-11。  延伸查詢new window
2.藍麗春、邱重銘、王俊傑(20091200)。文化政策下的臺灣文化產業嬗變。嘉南學報. 人文類,35,437-451。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.廖世璋(20021000)。國家治理下的文化政策:一個歷史回顧。建築與規劃學報,3(2),160-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.夏學理(20110700)。文化藝術之「直接」效益產出--文化創意產業觀點。研習論壇,127,13-28。  延伸查詢new window
5.孫華翔(20080500)。臺灣工藝產業轉型之路--從社區營造出發的經營模式探討。臺灣工藝,29,16-21。  延伸查詢new window
6.賀豫惠(20110800)。臺灣文創的新亮點--工藝產業的區域經濟發展。臺灣工藝,42,26-31。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃世輝、高宜淓(20100400)。臺灣工藝產業再發展與轉型之研究。科技學刊. 人文社會類,19(1),49-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Chartrand, H. H.(1988)。The Crafts in the Post-Modern Economy。Journal of Cultural Economics,12(2),39-66。  new window
9.Ferraro, E.、White, R.、Cox, E.、Bebbington, J.、Wilson, S.(2011)。Craft and sustainable Development: Reflections on Scottish Craft and Pathways to Sustainability。Craft+ Design Enquiry,3。  new window
10.Jarzabkowski, P.、Wilson, D. C.(2006)。Actionable strategy knowledge: A practice perspective。European Management Journal,24(5),348-367。  new window
11.Johannisson, B.(2011)。Towards a Practice Theory of Entrepreneuring。Small Business Economics,36(2),135-150。  new window
12.Shackleton, C.、Shackleton, S.(2004)。The Importance of Non-Timber Forest Products in Rural Livelihood Security and as Safety Nets: a Review of Evidence from。South Africa, South African Journal of Science,100,658-664。  new window
13.Bassett, Keith(1993)。Urban cultural strategies and urban regeneration: A case study and critique。Environment and Planning A,25(12),1773-1788。  new window
會議論文
1.黃世輝(2004)。觀光木作產業的發展策略探討--以台灣工藝產業與日本木作產業為例。林業文化產業與空間發展國際學術研討會。台中縣文化局。78-88。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃世輝、姚怡欣、吳俊儀(20091212)。台灣百年工藝的分期與問題。2009兩岸非物質文化遺產論壇,文建會文化資產總管理處籌備處 (會議日期: 2009年12月12日)。台中:文建會文化資產總管理處。65-76。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴孟玲、吳俊儀、黃世輝(2008)。泰國工藝觀光發展機制初探--以觀光工廠為例。2008文化創意產業發展新趨勢國際研討會,實踐大學 (會議日期: 2008年12月05)。高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.楊裕富(2008)。以國家政策探討台灣工藝發展史 (計畫編號:NSC-96-2411-H-224-003)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林韶怡(2012)。探究台灣民宿創業中的身體知識:風格化知識的創造歷程(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡美麗(2001)。文化政策與台灣工藝發展(1979-1999)(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.UNCTAD、UNDP(2010)。The creative economy report 2010。New York:UNCTAD。  new window
2.黃世輝(2008)。97工藝產業資源調查規畫暨執行結案報告書。南投:國立台灣工藝研究發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃世輝(2009)。98工藝產業資源調查規畫暨執行結案報告書。南投:國立台灣工藝研究發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃世輝(2010)。台灣百年工藝展規劃結案報告書。南投:國立台灣工藝研究發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.諸葛正(2009)。「台灣工藝文化研究」期末報告計畫書--台灣各地方工藝產業史。南投:國立台灣工藝研究發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
6.McAuley, A.、Fillis, I.(2007)。Crafts Businesses in Scotland: A study for the Scottish Arts。Edinburgh:Council, Scottish Arts Council。  new window
7.李仁芳(2011)。2011臺灣文化創意產業發展年報。臺北市:行政院文化建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.聯合國貿易與發展會議、林炎旦、林義斌、林詠能(2011)。2010創意經濟報告。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
9.行政院文化建設委員會、國立台灣工藝研究發展中心(2008)。工藝產業旗艦計畫:97-102年。台北:行政院文化建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bianchini, F.、Parkinson, Michael(1993)。Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: The West European Experience。Manchester:New York:Manchester University Press。  new window
11.Aaker, David A.、Equity, M. B.(1991)。Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name。Free Press。  new window
其他
1.經濟部工業局(2012)。經濟部服務業發展藍圖,http://idac.tier.org.tw/DFiles/20120313100518.pdf, 2012/10/15。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林崇宏(2010)。品牌策略與管理。文化創意MIT‧時尚新台灣。南投:國立台灣工藝研究發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃世輝、高宜淓(2009)。工藝產值的現況與潛在能量。視界‧2008臺灣工藝創意產業。南投:國立台灣工藝研究發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Andrew, J.、Spoehr, J.(2011)。Beyond the Creative Quick Fix Conceptualising Creativity's Role in a Regional Economy, Drivers of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Regional Dynamics Advances in Spatial Science。Drivers of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Regional Dynamics Advances in Spatial Science。Heidelberg:Springer Berlin Heidelberg。  new window
4.林榮泰(2010)。工藝思路的文化創意。文化創意MIT‧時尚新台灣。南投:國立台灣工藝研究發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE