:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「剩水殘山」視域下的尋親實踐--論李玉《萬里圓》中的黍離之悲
書刊名:東海中文學報
作者:李佳蓮
作者(外文):Lee, Chia-lian
出版日期:2016
卷期:31
頁次:頁77-112
主題關鍵詞:李玉萬里圓黃向堅尋親實踐清初蘇州明清鼎革Li Yu's WanliyuanHuang XiangjianParents seekingSuzhou in early Qing DynastyMing's fall and Qing's rule
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:3
本文認為清初蘇州劇作家李玉《萬里圓》乃以「剩水殘山」的視域書寫黃向堅的尋親時事,「時空(明清鼎革)共感之下,人(蘇州人、乃至於天下人)的行為」實為劇作之思考核心,分為四個層次進行論述:首先全劇以「黃氏家族的悲歡離合」為出發點,表面上是「完整-殘缺-完整」的回歸過程,實際上卻是「圓而未圓」的人生理想與家國大義;往外推展到黃孔昭、黃府與政治社會上的關係,全劇設置了「蘇州黃宅、南京小朝廷、雲南黃宅」等地理位置,隱含著蘇州/故鄉/故國、南京/亡鄉/失土、雲南/荒土/淨土的空間隱喻與政治意涵;往上擴充到黃向堅尋親時與天地自然之間的關係,以山水為代表,劇中所描述的險山惡水與破碎山河,盡是連年征戰與朝代鼎革之意象;並以黃家人物為基準,對照出明清鼎革之後社會上脫序失控、扭曲變異之人物百態。這樣的書寫視域,使得《萬里圓》沒有尋親故事中常見的神蹟、神話,充滿了戰火摧殘、百姓流離之現實色彩,此亦《萬里圓》異於其他黃向堅尋親故事文本之意義與價值。
This study discusses Wanliyuan, a play by an early Qing Dynasty playwright Li Yu. It was written in the perspective of "Shengshui Canshan" to express Huang Xiangjian's parents seeking, in which the act of characters (Suzhou folks, or even all the people) under the space-time (Ming's fall and Qing's rule) is the core of the play. It is divided into four levels for discussion: at first, the play begins with the "joys and sorrows of the Huang's family"; on the appearance, it is the process of "complete - incomplete - complete", but in fact it is the ideal life of "round but not round". Next, it extends to the relationship between Huang Kongzhao (Huang's family) and the political society. The play sets its geographical locations in "Suzhou Huang's House, Nanjing Royal Court, Yunnan Huang's House, etc.,", which indicate the spatial metaphors and political implications of Suzhou / hometown / homeland, Nanjing / perished state / lost land, Yunnan / deserted land / pure land. Thirdly, it expands to discuss the relationship between Huang's parents-seeking and the landscape. The landscape is described as broken mountains and rivers which reflect the successive years of war and the image of dynasty perishing. Finally, the condition of Huang's family should be contrasted to the out-of-order society and the distortion of people's characters and attitudes in that era. This perspective of writing makes Wanliyuan full of realistic descriptions of war damages and homeless people rather than miracles and myths appearing in many other writings, which marks the significance and value of the play.
期刊論文
1.呂妙芬(20070600)。明清中國萬里尋親的文化實踐。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,78(2),359-406。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉勇強(2000)。歷史與文本的共生互動--以「水賊占妻(女)型」和「萬里尋親型」為中心。文學遺產,2000(3),85-99+144。  延伸查詢new window
3.巫仁恕(19990600)。明清之際江南時事劇的發展及其所反映的社會心態。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,31,1-3+5-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.郭英德(1985)。明清之際時事劇的藝術特色。中州學刊,2。  延伸查詢new window
5.余新忠(2006)。明清時期孝行的文本解讀--以江南方志記載為中心。中國社會歷史評論,2006(7),33-60。  延伸查詢new window
6.范紅娟(2011)。明清尋親戲曲情節模式初探。求是學刊,38(3),107-112。  延伸查詢new window
7.郭英德(2013)。多重空間的形構、並置與演繹--李玉《萬里圓》傳奇的「空間」解讀。文學評論,2013(4)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳雅君(2012)。時代、地域與戲曲生產--清初李玉戲曲研究(碩士論文)。香港中文大學,香港。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.顏長珂、周傳家(1985)。李玉評傳。北京:中國戲劇出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.李玫(2000)。明清之際蘇州作家群研究。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃向堅(1985)。黃孝子尋親紀程。臺北:新興書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃向堅。黃端木萬里尋親圖冊。  延伸查詢new window
5.李玉(1957)。萬里圓。北京:文學古籍刊行社。  延伸查詢new window
6.王抃(1994)。王巢松年譜。上海:上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳古虞、陳多、馬聖貴(2004)。李玉戲曲集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.司徒琳(2007)。南明史:1644-1662。上海:上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
9.康保成(1993)。蘇州劇派研究。廣州:花城出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.徐扶明(1986)。《萬里圓》傳奇的時代特色。元明清戲曲探索。杭州:浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂長生(1993)。黃向堅初論。吳門畫派研究。北京:紫禁城出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.王璦玲(2008)。摭實用虛,如在心目--論明末清初時事劇中之當代意識、社會視野與文本建構。史蹟・文獻・歷史。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE