:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:清初蘇州崑劇劇壇研究
作者:盧柏勳
作者(外文):Lu, Po-Hsun
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:中國文學系
指導教授:曾永義
羅麗容
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2019
主題關鍵詞:清代戲曲蘇州劇壇蘇州曲家崑劇崑曲崑山腔戲曲理論戲曲史李玉朱素臣朱佐朝張大復Chinese opera of Qing DynastyChinese opera circle of SuzhouSuzhou composerKunqu OperaKunquKunshan tonetheory of Chinese operahistory of Chinese operaYu LeeSu-chen ChuTso-Chao ChuDa-Fu Chang
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:5
清初是相當關鍵的過渡時期,崑劇藝術歷經晚明與明末之發展滋長,至此時已呈現鼎盛之態勢。而蘇州始終是崑劇藝術發展之核心重鎮,這地匯聚大批的崑劇作家、曲律家、表演藝術家,因此別具研究的價值與意義。本論文延續以往對晚明蘇州戲曲的研究經驗,以劇壇研究之宏觀視角進行研究,包括靜態的劇作家與理論、劇作、相關文學作品;以及動態的優伶、劇團、職業班社、家樂戲班等各種與場上演出相關的項目。以此來重新探究清初蘇州崑劇劇壇在戲曲史上的意義與定位。茲將本論文各章節大綱略述於後:
第一章〈清初蘇州劇壇之聲腔與劇種探究〉:考察清初蘇州各聲腔與劇種之發展概況,再緊扣論文主題,將論述焦點集中在崑山腔之上。經過探究,可發現清初蘇州所盛行者,大部份以聲腔為主。腔調劇種方面,則以崑劇最為風行,此外則多為民間小戲,如灘簧或花鼓之類,尚未臻於成熟之境。
第二章〈清初蘇州崑劇劇壇之作家及作品考察〉:針對活躍於清初蘇州崑劇劇壇之代表性作家,及其重要劇作進行探討,並歸結出清初蘇州作家群與劇作之成就與影響,為戲曲史及前輩學者補充論述。考察蘇州作家群的劇作存佚,逐一為十四位曲家繪製專屬的「劇作著錄與存佚表」與「清初蘇州作家群存世劇作簡介表」,進一步舉例證分析重要劇作之文學造詣、主題思想等問題。若論及清初蘇州作家群及其劇作在戲曲史上所取得的成就與影響,則可區分為三項:其一,案頭場上並重—講求兩擅其美;其二,反思歷史興亡—以劇寫史特徵;其三,開創時事新題—寫實觀照人生。
第三章〈清初蘇州作家群之交遊互動探究〉:觀照之主題有三:其一,論蘇州作家群之群體內部交遊;其二,論蘇州崑劇作家群之群體外部交遊;其三,論整體交遊互動對於清初蘇州崑劇劇壇產生的影響,及其貢獻與意義。經由探討可歸結出三項交遊之下,反映出的貢獻與意義:其一,劇本數量之多產;其二,聲律概念之建立;其三,場上演出之推展。由於清初蘇州作家群多數為職業劇作家,彼此間又經常互動往來切磋曲藝,故而形成一個創作群體。他們合作增益劇本,不僅維繫共同的創作意識,也促進清初蘇州崑劇劇壇發展蓬勃。與沈自晉、紐少雅、馮夢龍等人頻繁緊密的交遊過程中,建立起李玉等蘇州作家群之聲律概念,同時影響他們製譜的態度及規範。與清初蘇州作家群往來者,多為名流士大夫,或者家班主人、梨園子弟,故而交遊便作為一種媒介,使劇作能夠在反覆演出後,不斷修正完善,並達到流傳廣佈之效果;優伶亦可在一次次演出中,鍛鍊、提升場上技藝。
第四章〈清初蘇州崑劇劇壇之戲曲理論建構〉:針對清初蘇州崑劇劇壇進行三項主題研究,分別為:其一,文律雙美說之發展與延續考察;其二,北曲譜與南曲譜之沿革探究;其三,清初蘇州崑劇劇壇藝術創作論探析。清初蘇州之文律雙美理論獲得階段性之總結,劇作曲文及賓白之語言,採取雅俗並陳、巧妙融通的方式,以回應普羅大眾之觀劇需求,既維繫基本的文學修飾,又能顧及通俗化的場上效果。在北曲譜與南曲譜之沿革探究方面,《北詞廣正譜》之曲學貢獻,在於重建清初蘇州之北曲格律,該譜雖對其後北曲譜之編纂影響甚鉅,然而亦存在著三項缺失。《寒山堂曲譜》對於清初蘇州之聲律制定及演唱貢獻良多,同時也有過度講求簡明實用,而刪削過度之弊病。在清初蘇州崑劇劇壇藝術創作論方面,本章則區分為曲文賓白論、本事思想論、關目情節論、排場結構論四個項目進行探究。
第五章〈論清初蘇州崑劇劇壇之職業戲班及其優伶〉:主要關注之問題,集中於清初蘇州崑劇劇壇之職業戲班與優伶之上,經過探討可知入清之後,民間職業戲班之盛行,與私人家班衰弱,其實有密切關連。蘇州自來是名伶薈萃之地,清初蘇州崑劇劇壇之重要優伶,就類型而言,可大致區分為演員、曲藝家、串客三型。清初蘇州優伶之貢獻主要有三,其一,促進崑劇藝術傳播;其二,融入日常生活文化;其三,有助劇本流傳通行。
第六章〈論清初蘇州崑劇劇壇之家樂戲班與民間演劇活動〉:此處主要探討兩大問題,其一,清初蘇州崑劇劇壇之家樂戲班;其二,清初蘇州崑劇劇壇之各項演劇活動。細按清初蘇州崑劇劇壇家樂戲班之類型,大致有三類:其一,仕宦貴族型;其二,縉紳文人型;其三,家族傳承型。考察蘇州官方演劇與文人曲集之情況,可知官署內演劇在清初,可謂相當普遍。而文人在結社活動之宴集中,所點之劇目,則深刻地反映文人特定的心態與思想,藉此一方面緬懷故國,二方面彰顯忠義氣節。至於清初蘇州崑劇劇壇民俗節慶之演劇活動,則可區分為「迎神賽社演劇」與「節令慶典演劇」兩條線索。
Early Qing period is an extremely critical time of transition. After the development of late Ming period, Kunqu Opera became flourishing at the time. Suzhou has always been the important base of development of Kunqu Opera. Great number of Kunqu Opera playwrights, composers and artists gathered in the place. Thus, it shows research value and significance. Based on past research on Suzhou Chinese opera in late Ming period, this study adopts the broad perspective of Chinese opera circle research, including static playwrights and theories, plays and related literary work as well as dynamic parts related to the performance such as actors, troupes, professional Chinese opera companies and private troupes. Thus, this study reviews the significance and position of the circle of Suzhou Kunqu Opera in early Qing period in the history of Chinese opera. Outline of the chapters in this study is shown in the following:
Chapter 1 “Study on Tone and Types of Suzhou Chinese Opera Circle in Early Qing Period”: it explores the general development of various tones and types of Chinese opera of Suzhou in early Qing period. Based on the topic, it focuses on Kunshan tone. After the exploration, it shows that the tones were mostly popular in Suzhou of early Qing period. As to the type of Chinese opera, Kunqu Opera was the most prevailing at the time. The rest were folk dramas, such as Tan Huang or Hua Gu, which were not mature.
Chapter 2 “Study of Playwrights and Work in the Circle of Suzhou Kunqu Opera in Early Qing Period”. This study explores the representative playwrights and important plays in the circle of Suzhou Kunqu Opera in early Qing period and generalizes the achievement and influence of Suzhou playwrights and plays in early Qing period as the complementary arguments of history of Chinese opera and the previous scholars. It investigates the presence of Suzhou playwrights’ work and designs “list of plays and table of presence” and “introduction of remained plays of Suzhou playwrights in early Qing period” for 14 composers and analyzes the literary content and thematic thoughts of important plays by examples. Achievement and influence of Suzhou playwrights and plays in early Qing period in history of Chinese opera are classified below: first, equal importance in writing: fulfillment of both sides; second, reflection of history: history writing by plays; third, creation of new topics of the time: realistic writing of life.
Chapter 3 “Study of Interaction Among Suzhou Playwrights in Early Qing Period”: first, it elaborates the internal interaction among Suzhou playwrights; second, it explores external interaction among Suzhou Kunqu Opera playwrights; third, it explores the effect of overall interaction and exchange on the circle of Suzhou Kunqu Opera in early Qing period, the contribution and the significance. This study thus generalizes the following contribution and significance: first, productive number of plays; second, construction of melody concept; third, promotion of performance on the stage. Since Suzhou playwrights in early Qing period were mostly the professional ones and they frequently interacted with each other, they became a group of creation. They cooperated with each other to create the plays. It not only maintained collaborative creation consciousness, but also reinforced the development of the circle of Suzhou Kunqu Opera in early Qing period. By frequent interaction with Tzu-chin Shen, Shao-Ya Niu, Meng-long Feng et al., melody concept of Suzhou playwrights such as Yu Lee was constructed and it influenced their attitude and rules of composition. Those who interacted with Suzhou playwrights in early Qing period were mostly celebrities, literati or hosts of troupes and the descendants of the circle. Thus, the interaction became the medium and after repetitive performance, the plays could be constantly improved in order to be spread; the actors’ skills could be strengthened in the performances.
Chapter 4 “Theoretical Construction of Chinese Opera in the Circle of Suzhou Kunqu Opera in Early Qing Period”. It conducts three thematic research on the circle of Suzhou Kunqu Opera in early Qing period: first, development of refined writing and melody and continuous investigation; second, study of evolution of northern and southern musical composition; third, study of creation theory of Suzhou Kunqu Opera circle in early Qing period. Theory of refined writing and melody of Suzhou in early Qing period is concluded of the stage. Writing of the play and language of the dialogues are both classical and colloquial in order to meet the demand of the general public. It maintains basic literary polishing and popular effect on the stage. As to the study of evolution of northern and southern musical composition, contribution of Standard Notations of Northern Arias was to reconstruct the meter of northern arias of Suzhou in early Qing period. Although the notation significantly influenced the composition of the following northern ones, there are still three deficiencies. Han Shan Tang Arias considerably contributed to meter construction and singing of Suzhou in early Qing period. However, it emphasized the simplicity and practicability and the content might be overly reduced. As to the creation theory of Suzhou Kunqu Opera circle in early Qing period, in this chapter, it is classified into four dimensions: dialogue of writing, thoughts, plots and structure of performance.
Chapter 5 “Study of Professional Troupes and the Actors in Suzhou Kunqu Opera Circle of Early Qing Period”. It focuses on professional troupes and actors in Suzhou Kunqu Opera circle of early Qing period. After the exploration, it shows that in Qing Dynasty, prevalence of private professional troupes was associated with the declination of private companies. Suzhou gathered renowned actors and in early Qing period, important actors in Suzhou Kunqu Opera circle can be classified into three types: actors, singing experts and amateurs. In early Qing period, the main contributions of Suzhou actors are below. First, they enhanced the spread of Kunqu Opera; second, they were engaged in daily life culture; third, they enhanced the prevalence of the plays.
Chapter 6 “Study of Private Companies and Private Dramas in Suzhou Kunqu Opera Circle of Early Qing Period”. It mainly explores two issues. First, private companies of Suzhou Kunqu Opera circle in early Qing period; second, various dramas in Suzhou Kunqu Opera circle of early Qing period. There are three types of private companies of Suzhou Kunqu Opera circle in early Qing period: first, officials and nobles; second, scholars; third, family. This study investigates official dramas and the literati’s arias of Suzhou and shows that official dramas were prevailing in early Qing period. The types of plays selected by the literati in the group activities significantly reflected their attitude and thoughts. They recalled the ancient history and reveals their loyalty and righteousness. Dramas of folk festivals of Suzhou Kunqu Opera circle in early Qing period can be divided into “dramas of idolatrous processions” and “dramas of seasonal festivals”.
一、古籍文獻(依照年代排列,同年代再依照出版年份排列)
(一)經部
〔漢〕毛亨注,〔唐〕孔穎達疏,〔清〕阮元輯校:《詩經》,《十三經注疏》,台北:藝文印書館,2007年8月。
〔漢〕鄭玄注,〔唐〕賈公彥疏,〔清〕阮元輯校:《周禮》,《十三經注疏》,台北:藝文印書館,2007年8月。
〔漢〕鄭玄注,〔唐〕孔穎達疏,〔清〕阮元輯校:《禮記》,《十三經注疏》,台北:藝文印書館,2007年8月。
〔晉〕杜預注,〔唐〕孔穎達疏,〔清〕阮元輯校:《左傳》,《十三經注疏》,台北:藝文印書館,2007年8月。
〔清〕孔廣森:《大戴禮記補注》,《續修四庫全書》,上海:上海古籍出版社,2002年7月。

(二)史部
〔周〕左丘明著,〔三國吳〕韋昭注:《國語.周語下》,台北:漢京文化,1983 年12 月。
〔漢〕司馬遷著,〔日〕瀧川資言考證:《史記會注考證》,台北:萬卷樓圖書股份有限公司,2006年2月。
〔漢〕班固著,〔唐〕顏師古注:《漢書》,台北:臺灣商務印書館,2010年12月。
〔晉〕陳壽著,〔宋〕裴松之注:《三國志》,台北:臺灣商務印書館,2010年12月。
〔南朝宋〕范曄著:《後漢書》,台北:台灣商務印書館,1988年1月。
〔梁〕沈約:《宋書》,台北:台灣商務印書館,1988年1月。
〔北齊〕魏收著,楊家駱主編:《魏書》,台北:鼎文書局,1980年3月。
〔唐〕劉知幾著,〔清〕浦起龍釋:《史通通釋》,台北:世界書局,1957年9月。
〔唐〕房玄齡等:《晉書》,台北:臺灣商務印書館,2010年12月。
〔宋〕周密:《武林舊事》,《叢書集成新編》,台北:新文豐出版公司,1989年6月。
〔宋〕吳自牧:《夢粱錄》,《叢書集成新編》,台北:新文豐出版公司,1989年6月。
〔宋〕范成大,陸振岳校點:《吳郡志》,《江蘇地方文獻叢書》,南京:江蘇古籍出版社,1999年8月。
〔宋〕孟元老《東京夢華錄》,台北:三民書局,2004年1月。
〔宋〕無名氏,李勇先主編:《西湖老人繁勝錄》,《宋元地理史料匯編》,成都:四川大學出版社,2007年12月。
〔元〕馬端臨:《文獻通考》,《文淵閣四庫全書》,台北:台灣商務印書館,1983年7月。
〔元〕脫脫等:《宋史》,台北:臺灣商務印書館,2010年12月。
〔明〕史仲彬編,焦竑、錢士升訂,〔清〕史冊釋:《致身錄》,《廣百川學海》,台北:新興書局,1970年7月。
〔明〕田汝成:《西湖游覽志餘》,《文淵閣四庫全書》,台北:台灣商務印書館,1983年7月。
〔明〕董倫等修,黃彰健校勘:《明實錄》,台北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所,1984年5月。
〔明〕史玄:《舊京遺事》,《四庫禁燬書叢刊》,北京:北京出版社,2000年1月。
〔明〕張國維:《撫吳疏草》,《四庫禁燬書叢刊》北京:北京出版社,2000年1月。
〔明〕祁彪佳著,俞冰主編:《祁忠敏公日記》,《歷代日記叢鈔》,北京:學苑出版社2006年6月。
〔明〕馮夢禎著,丁小明點校:《快雪堂日記》,南京:鳳凰出版社,2010年1月。
〔清〕施若霖:《道光璜涇志稿》,台北:國家圖書館善本書室藏,民國間排印璜水叢書本。
〔清〕孔繼鑅撰,瞿穎宜編纂:《心向往齋日記》,《中國社會史料叢鈔》,台北:台灣商務印書館,1938年6月。
〔清〕夏燮:《明通鑒》,北京:中華書局,1959年2月。
〔清〕姚廷遴:《歷年記》,《上海史料叢編》,上海:上海市文物保管委員會,1962年3月。
〔清〕顧彩:《容美記遊》,收入〔清〕王錫祺編,王挺之等主編:《小方壺齋輿地叢鈔》,台北:廣文書局,1962年4月。
〔清〕沈寓撰,賀長齡輯:《皇朝經世文編》,台北:世界書局,1964年6月。
〔清〕勒德洪等:《大清聖祖仁皇帝實錄》,台北:華聯出版社,1964年9月。
〔清〕王祖畲:《太倉州志》,《中國方志叢書》,台北:成文出版社,1965年,月不詳。
〔清〕無名氏著,汪康年輯,沈雲龍主編:《聖駕五幸江南恭錄》,收入《振綺堂叢書》,《近代中國史料叢刊》,台北縣:文海出版社,1966年10月。
〔清〕李銘皖等修,馮桂芬等纂:《蘇州府志》,《中國方志叢書》,台北:成文出版社,1970年5月。
〔清〕陳
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE