:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以比較法觀點規範網路服務提供者於防制性隱私內容外流之責任與義務
書刊名:政大法學評論
作者:蕭郁溏
作者(外文):Hsiao, Yu-tang
出版日期:2018
卷期:154
頁次:頁151-237
主題關鍵詞:復仇式色情違反本人意願散布性隱私內容隱私權著作權網路服務提供者通知-移除程序被遺忘權刪除權個人資料保護法數位通訊傳播法草案Revenge pornNon-consensual pornographyPrivacy rightCopyrightInternet service providerNotice-and-takedown procedureThe right to be forgottenThe right of ErasurePersonal Information Protection ActBill of Digital Communication Act
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:5
期刊論文
1.Bartow, Ann(2008)。Pornography, Coercion, and Copyright Law 2.0。Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law,10,799。  new window
2.郭戎晉(20110400)。網路言論傳播中介者責任與其免責規範之研究--以美國通訊端正法實務發展為中心。科技法律透析,23(4),20-44。  延伸查詢new window
3.許炳華(20150700)。被遺忘的權利:比較法之觀察。東吳法律學報,27(1),125-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.邱忠義(20141200)。談個人資料保護法之間接識別。月旦裁判時報,30,95-103。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊智傑(20150700)。個人資料保護法制上「被遺忘權利」與「個人反對權」:從2014年西班牙Google v. AEPD案判決出發。國會月刊,43(7)=507,19-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.范姜真媺(20160500)。網路時代個人資料保護之強化--被遺忘權利之主張。興大法學,19,61-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.紀珮宜(2017)。由歐盟資料保護規則論被遺忘權之爭議。經貿法訊,214,8-24。  延伸查詢new window
8.林思惟(2016)。歐盟新規:個人資料保護規則--數位防護的新縱深。金融聯合徵信,29,14-22。  延伸查詢new window
9.張志偉(20170300)。記憶或遺忘,抑或相忘於網路--從歐洲法院被遺忘權判決,檢視資訊時代下的個人資料保護。政大法學評論,148,1-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張志偉(20170200)。從資訊自決與資訊隱私的概念區分,檢視被遺忘權的證立問題。萬國法律,211,2-15。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊柏宏、陳鋕雄(20160800)。被遺忘權之研析--以歐盟法院Google Spain SL案及歐盟個資保護規章為中心。萬國法律,208,98-120。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃文哲(2017)。數位通訊傳播法對網際網路服務提供者責任規範。NCC NEWS,10(11),15-20。  延伸查詢new window
13.Ambrose, Meg Leta、Ausloos, Jef(2013)。The Right to Be Forgotten Across the Pond。Journal of Information Policy,3,1。  new window
14.顏于嘉(20170200)。由美國資訊隱私法制觀察被遺忘權在美國的發展。萬國法律,211,25-33。  延伸查詢new window
15.蕭郁溏(20171100)。網路掃黃行動--英國創設年齡驗證監管機制加強監管網路色情。科技法律透析,29(11),18-26。  延伸查詢new window
16.蕭郁溏(20170200)。日本情色報復受害防治法之評析。科技法律透析,29(2),21-28。  延伸查詢new window
17.蕭郁溏(20161000)。性隱私內容外流風波--從美國立法例論我國違反本人意願散布性隱私內容之入罪化。科技法律透析,28(10),27-55。  延伸查詢new window
18.Chu, Natasha(2015)。Protecting Privacy after Death。Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property,13,255。  new window
19.Cecil, Amanda L.(2014)。Taking Back the Internet: Imposing Civil Liability on Interactive Computer Services in an Attempt to Provide an Adequate Remedy to Victims of Nonconsensual Pornography。Washington and Lee Law Review,71,2513。  new window
20.Brown, Brandon(2008)。Note, Fortifying the Safe Harbors: Reevaluating the DMCA in a Web 2.0 World。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,23,437。  new window
21.Bambauer, Derek E.(2014)。Exposed。Minnesota Law Review,98,2025。  new window
22.Folderauer, Kaitlan M.(2015)。Not All is Fair (Use) in Love and War: Copyright Law and Revenge Porn。University of Baltimore Law Review,44,321。  new window
23.Defterderian, Varty(2009)。Fair Housing Council v. Roommates.com: A New Path for Section 230 Immunity。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,24,563。  new window
24.Cooper, Peter W.(2016)。The Right to Be Virtually Clothed。Washington Law Review,91,817。  new window
25.Citron, Danielle Keats、Franks, Mary Anne(2014)。Criminalizing Revenge Porn。Wake Forest Law Review,49,345-391。  new window
26.Levendowski, Amanda(2014)。Using Copyright to Combat Revenge Porn。N.Y.U.J. Intell. Prop. & Ent. L.,3,422。  new window
27.Haskel, David(2008)。A Good Value Chain Gone Bad: Indirect Copyright Liability in Perfect 10 v. Visa。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,23,405。  new window
28.Goldnick, Layla(2015)。Coddling the Internet: How the CDA Exacerbates the Proliferation of Revenge Porn and Prevents a Meaningful Remedy for Its Victims。Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender,21,583。  new window
29.Franklin, Zak(2014)。Justice for Revenge Porn Victims: Legal Theories to Overcome Claims of Civil Immunity by Operators of Revenge Porn Websites。California Law Review,102,1303。  new window
30.McClurg, Andrew J.(2006)。Kiss and Tell: Protecting Intimate Relationship Privacy through Implied Contracts of Confidentiality。University of Cincinnati Law Review,74,887。  new window
31.Maxeiner, James R.(1995)。Freedom of Information and the EU Data Protection Directive。Federal Communications Law Journal,48,93。  new window
32.Maxeiner, James R.(1995)。Business Information and "Personal Data": Some Common-Law Observations about the EU Draft Data Protection Directive。Iowa Law Review,80,619。  new window
33.Matsui, Shigenori(2015)。The Criminalization of Revenge Porn in Japan。Washington International Law Journal,24,289-308。  new window
34.Linkous, Taylor(2014)。It's Time for Revenge Porn to Get a Taste of Its Own Medicine: An Argument for the Federal Criminalization of Revenge Porn。Richmond Journal of Law & Technology,20,14。  new window
35.Tamò, Aurelia、George, Damian(2014)。Oblivion, Erasure and Forgetting in the Digital Age。Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law,13,71。  new window
36.Rybka, Laura(2001)。ALS Scan, Inc. v. Remarq Communities, Inc.: Notice and ISPS' Liability for Third Party Copyright Infringement。DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law,11,479。  new window
37.Ronneburger, Ariel(2009)。Sex, Privacy, and Webpages: Creating a Legal Remedy for Victims of Porn 2.0。Syracuse Science and Technology Law Reporter,21,1。  new window
38.Poole, Emily(2015)。Comment, Fighting Back Against Non-Consensual Pornography。University of San Francisco Law Review,49,181。  new window
39.Otero, Dalisi(2016)。Confronting Nonconsensual Pornography with Federal Criminalization and a "Notice-and-Takedown" Provision。University of Miami Law Review,70,585。  new window
40.Zieglowsky, Ali G.(2010)。Immoral Immunity: Using a Totality of the Circumstances Approach to Narrow the Scope of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act。Hastings Law Journal,61,1307。  new window
41.Victor, Jacob M.(2013)。The EU General Data Protection Regulation: Toward a Property Regime for Protecting Data Privacy。Yale Law Journal,123(2),513-528。  new window
42.Urist, Joshua(2006)。Note, Who's Feeling Lucky? Skewed Incentives, Lack of Transparency, and Manipulation of Google Search Results under the DMCA。Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law,1,209。  new window
43.Urban, Jennifer M.、Quilter, Laura(2006)。Efficient Process or "Chilling Effects"? Takedown Notices under Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act。Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal,22(4),621-693。  new window
44.Tariq, Salina(2014)。Comment, Revenge: Free of "Charge?"。SMU Science and Technology Law Review,17,227。  new window
45.劉靜怡(20120300)。社群網路時代的隱私困境:以Facebook為討論對象。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,41(1),1-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.財團法人資訊工業策進會科技法律中心(2003)。網際網路服務提供者法律責任與相關法制之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Citron, Danielle Keats(2014)。Hate crimes in cyberspace。Harvard University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.馮震宇(2014)。歐盟著作權指令體制與相關歐盟法院判決之研究。國際比較下我國著作權法之總檢討。  延伸查詢new window
2.Leiter, Brian(2010)。Cleaning Cyber-Cesspools: Google and Free Speech。The Offensive Internet: Speech, Privacy, and Reputation。MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.李治安、劉孔中(2014)。網路服務提供者民事免責事由之要件分析。國際比較下我國著作權法之總檢討。中央研究院法律研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE