:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:培育國小在職教師使用「POE & 科學解釋文字鷹架」設計實驗以因應十二年國教的改革
書刊名:國立屏東大學學報.教育類
作者:盧秀琴蔡幸如
作者(外文):Lu, Chow-chinTsai, Hsing-ju
出版日期:2019
卷期:3
頁次:頁145-180
主題關鍵詞:POE & 科學解釋文字鷹架預測-觀察-解釋 & 科學解釋文字鷹架教學評量表微型教學學習單評量Predictive-observation-explanation & scientific explanations with text scaffoldingPOE & scientific explanations with text scaffoldingTeaching assessmentMicro-teachingLearning sheet assessment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:4
我國十二年國教強調「核心素養」的培養,著重探究與實作,但國小學生在探究與實作過程中科學解釋能力普遍不足,教師必須扮演關鍵性引導的角色,故培育在職教師相關的教學能力是重要的。本研究選擇某教育大學修習「昆蟲學特論」課程的14位在職教師為研究對象,培育他們使用「POE & 科學解釋文字鷹架」設計實驗與微型教學,包含:講授昆蟲學總論以奠定昆蟲學的概念,講授「POE & 科學解釋文字鷹架」理論與示範教學,每組在職教師模仿設計實驗與微型教學,每組在職教師再自行尋找材料進行設計實驗與微型教學。本研究以「POE & 科學解釋文字鷹架」教學評量表(TAPS )和學習單評量表(LAPS)進行評量。研究結果顯示:1. 共7組在職教師模仿設計實驗與微型教學,發現有5組符合「POE & 科學解釋文字鷹架」教學法,有2組成效不佳;主要原因為設計的預測題目過多或引導實驗教學不佳。2.共7組在職教師模仿設計實驗微型教學的TAPS評量,平均得67.50分(滿分為100分),自行設計實驗微型教學的TAPS評量,平均得75.00分,進步7.5分,主要是設計的學習單更完整,引導實驗教學進步很多。3. 共7組在職教師撰寫模仿實驗的學習單之LAPS評量,平均得29.7分(滿分為36分),撰寫自行實驗的學習單之LAPS評量平均得31.9分,進步2.2分。
It emphasizes cultivate core literacy and focuses inquiry and implementation of the 12-year national education. Primary students are generally lacking in scientific explanations skills in process of inquiry and implementation, and it is important to cultivate in-service teachers for playing a guiding role. In this study, 14 in-service teachers took "Advanced Entomology" course at an education university were selected as research subjects, and they were trained to use "POE & scientific explanations with text scaffolding" to design experiments and micro-teaching. This study was conducted using the Teaching Assessment of "POE & Scientific explanations with text scaffolding" Scale (TAPS) and Learning sheet Assessment (LAPS). This study showed that: 1. there are 7 groups of teachers’ imitated experimental design and micro-teaching, and found that 5 groups to reach the goal, and 2 groups were ineffective because there are too many prediction problems in the design or poor experimental lead teaching. 2. The average score of TAPS assessments of 7 groups imitating experimental design micro-teaching was 67.50 (out of 100), and the TAPS assessments of self-experimental design micro-teaching averaged 75.00 points and improved by 7.5 points. 3. The average score of LAPS assessments of 7 groups who wrote the learning sheet with imitating experiment was 29.7 points (out of 36 points), and the LAPS assessments of 7 groups who wrote the learning sheet with the self-experiment averaged 31.9 points and improved by 2.2 points.
期刊論文
1.McNeill, K. L.、Lizotte, D. J.、Krajcik, J.、Marx, R. W.(2006)。Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials。Journal of the Learning Sciences,15(2),153-191。  new window
2.Bowen, G. M.、Roth, W. M.(2002)。Why students may not learn to interpret scientific inscriptions。Research in Science Education,32(3),303-327。  new window
3.許良榮、羅佩娟(20090900)。以序列性POE探究學生的科學解釋能力:以「大氣壓力與表面張力」為例。屏東教大科學教育,30,42-55。  延伸查詢new window
4.盧秀琴、徐于婷(20160400)。國小師資生在自然領域的專業成長--以探究式教學為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,9(1),115-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Pallrand, G. J.(1996)。The relationship of assessment to knowledge development of science education。Phi Delta Kappan,78(4),315-318。  new window
6.Abungu, H. E.、Okere, M. I. O.、Wachanga, S. W.(2014)。The effect of science process skills teaching approach on secondary school students' achievement in chemistry in Nyando district, Kenya。Journal of Educational and Social Research,4(6),359-371。  new window
會議論文
1.盧秀琴、劉蓓娟(2017)。培育國小在職教師設計「POE結合科學解釋理論」的教學。第3屆「國小自然領域教材教法之創新與實踐」學術研討會,(會議日期: 2017/01/07)。臺北市:國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.巫少岑(2007)。以序列性POE探究國小科學教師之科學解釋的研究--以「大氣壓力與表面張力」為例(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.簡錦鳳(2008)。文字鷹架對七年級學生科學解釋能力的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃贊樺(2011)。探討科學解釋文字鷹架融合POE策略對概念改變與科學解釋能力影響之研究--以光學單元為例(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.周偉苓(2014)。以序列性POE探究國小教師之科學解釋的研究--以「重心、平衡」為例(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃惠鈺(2009)。科學解釋寫作策略融入探究教學對五年級學童科學解釋的影響(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉月智(2007)。以序列性POE探究大學生之科學解釋的研究--以「大氣壓力與表面張力」為例(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.White, R. T.、Gunstone, R. F.(1992)。Probing understanding。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
2.Toulmin, Stephen Edelston(1958)。The Uses of Argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.國家教育研究院(2014)。十二年國民基本教育自然領域綱要內容之前導研究報告,http://www.naer.edu.tw/sod.ncl.edu.tw/.../newbook.jspx。  延伸查詢new window
2.PISA(2015)。PISA results for focus,https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Driver, R.、Guesne, E.、Tiberghien, A.(1985)。Some features of children's ideas and their implications for teaching。Children's ideas in science。Open University Press。  new window
2.Gunstone, R. F.(1995)。Constructivist learning and teaching of science。Teaching and Learning in Science: The Constructivist Classroom。Sydney:Harcourt Brace。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top