:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小師資生在自然領域的專業成長--以探究式教學為例
書刊名:師資培育與教師專業發展期刊
作者:盧秀琴徐于婷
作者(外文):Lu, Chow-chinHsu, Yu-ting
出版日期:2016
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁115-142
主題關鍵詞:5Why鷹架式提問教學POE教學案例教學影片師資生教師事業成長5Why scaffolding guided questioning teachingPOE teachingVideo of teaching examplePre-service teachersTeacher professional development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:244
本研究旨在觀察國小師資生修習「自然科教材教法、教育實習」課程,是否能獲得探究式教學法的專業成長,並探討其發展歷程。本研究利用詮釋性研究法以某國立教育大學自然科學教育學系的13 位師資生為研究對象,利用5Why 鷹架式提問教學和POE 教學等教學理論配合案例教學影片介紹,探討師資生在教案設計、實際教學活動與班級經營的改變歷程。師資生先學習理論課程,接著觀摩教學案例,然後設計教案、微型教學及到國小實地試教,研究者蒐集學習歷程檔案、教案、教學回饋單、上課錄影及晤談資料,進行分析形成主張。研究結果顯示:1. 師資生上完理論課程能初步了解5Why 鷹架式提問教學和POE 教學,而案例教學影片幫助師資生更清楚的將這些教學法實施於教學活動中。2. 師資生所設計之教案,融入生活事件引起學習動機,以學童為中心,給予學童更多的參與,自行建構屬於自己的知識。3. 師資生在經過兩種探究式教學法的教學活動後,普遍認為自己的提問技巧有待加強,且能找出自己的缺失,尋求改進之道。4. 所有師資生都認為案例教學影片有助於他們在教案設計及實際教學活動的專業成長。根據研究結果建議:案例教學影片應該上網,讓師資生自由取用,師資生可多利用機會至國小現場見習國小教師教學,學習班級經營技巧。
The purpose of this study is to observe whether pre-service teachers can successfully develop inquiry-based teaching knowledge and skills through the "methods course and educational practicum for teaching natural science" curriculum. Based on the curriculum, to explore the processes of their professional development. The subjects of this study were thirteen pre-service teachers majoring in Nature Science Education in a University of Education. Based on instructional theories, and with the use of case teaching videos, the authors attempted to observe and understand pre-service teachers’ changes in their designs of teaching plans, classroom teaching activities, and classroom management. Throughout the course, the pre-service teachers studied at first theoretical foundations of inquiry-based teaching, followed by watching case teaching videos, designing lesson plans, micro-teaching, and finally practice teaching in elementary schools. Meanwhile, the researchers collected data from a range of sources, including pre-service teachers learning portfolios, lesson plans, feedback sheets, videos of their classroom teaching, and interviews. These data were then analyzed, leading to the following assertions. First, pre-service teachers gained basic understanding of 5Why scaffolding guided questioning teaching and POE teaching method after studying the theoretical part in this course. They understand more about teaching after watching videos of examples on how to use inquiry-based teaching method during class. Second, pre-service teachers were able to design lesson plans, which were student-centered and relevant to students’ real life. Such inquiry-based teaching invoked students’ motivation and participation, enabling them to construct knowledge by themselves. Third, most of pre-service teachers considered their skills in asking good questions still lacking, even after they went through the teaching activities on inquiry science teaching methods. However, they were able to identify their shortcomings and to explore ways for further improvement. Fourth, all of the participating pre-service teachers agreed that studying inquiry-based teaching through watching videos of teaching examples could help them on the design of lesson plans and on science teaching practice. According to the results obtained, it is suggested that the video clips of teaching examples should be uploaded on the internet, making them easily accessible for pre-service teachers to use. In addition, pre-service teachers are encouraged to visit elementary schools to observe classroom teachers’ teaching, in order to improve their own classroom management skills.
期刊論文
1.Gunstone, R. F.、White, R. T.(1981)。Understanding of gravity。Science Education,65(3),291-299。  new window
2.Champagne, A. B.、Klopfer, L. E.、Anderson, J. H.(1980)。Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics。American Journal of Physics,48(12),1074-1079。  new window
3.呂錘卿(19960600)。國民小學教師專業成長指標初探。臺中師院學報,10,63-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Palmer, D.(1995)。The POE in the primary school: An evaluation。Research in Science Education,25(3),323-333。  new window
5.盧秀琴、柯琳耀、洪榮昭(20091200)。運用社區資源實施5Why鷹架式提問教學活動。教育實踐與研究,22(2),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lu, C. C.(2013)。How to build a 5Why scaffolding guided questioning teaching case film? Campus insects unit as an example。Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching,14(1),1-16。  new window
7.Bencze, L.、Hewitt, J.、Pedretti, E.(2007)。Personalizing and contextualizing multimedia case methods in university based teacher education: An important modification for promoting technological design in school science。Research in Science Education,39(1),93-109。  new window
8.周水珍(20031100)。師院生集中實習的教學轉化歷程之研究。花蓮師院學報,17(教育類),31-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.洪榮昭(19971000)。精釋(Hermeneutic)研究法在政策評量的應用。中等教育,48(5),39-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Gibson, H. L.、Chase, C.(2002)。Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science。Science Education,86(5),693-705。  new window
11.盧秀琴、洪榮昭、蔡春微(20080800)。"5 Why"鷹架式提問提升國小學生學習成就與科學探究學習能力之研究--以「如何做麵包?」教學模組為例。科學教育學刊,16(4),395-413。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.謝甫佩、洪振方(20041200)。國小學生科學探究活動的課程設計及實施成果之個案研究。師大學報. 科學教育類,49(2),61-86。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Lu, C. C.、Hong, J. C.、Tseng, Y. C.(2007)。Research on using D. I. Y. bread making course as Inquiry-based teaching module in the elementary school。The Asian Conference on Creativity Development。National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan。  new window
2.Lu, C. C.、Wu, H. S.(2010)。How to create teaching cases under the POE teaching strategies from senior elementary mentor teachers。Global Chinese Conference on Science Education 2010 (GCCSE2010)。Hong Kong, China:The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology。  new window
3.盧秀琴、廖秀娟(2010)。5Why 鷹架式提問教學案例應用於自然科教材教法之實驗教學。中華民國第二十六屆科學教育學術研討會,國立東華大學 。花蓮市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.廖秀娟(2011)。理論課程結合案例教學培育國小自然科職前教師之專業成長~運用5Why鷹架式提問教學為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡宜君(2000)。案例教學法在中等學校師資培育之應用:教學案例之發展(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Shulman, L. S.(2004)。The wisdom of practice: essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.王美芬、熊召弟(2006)。國小階段自然與生活科技教材教法。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃政傑(1999)。課程設計。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.王美芬(1998)。兒童科學觀的理論與研究。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
5.Wassermann, Selma(1994)。Introduction to case method teaching: A guide to the galaxy。Teachers College Press。  new window
6.Shulman, Judith H.(1992)。Case methods in teacher education。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
7.Ellis, Rod(1984)。Classroom second language development。Pergamon。  new window
8.教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要「自然與生活科技學習領域」。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.張民杰(2001)。案例教學法:理論與實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.饒見維(2003)。教師專業發展:理論與實務。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.White, R.、Gunstone, R. F.(1992)。Prediction-observation-explanation。Probing Understanding。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
2.洪志成(2000)。九年一貫課程與教學革新。九年一貫課程:從理論、政策到執行。高雄市:復文書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE