:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:偵查機關調取歷史性行動電話基地臺位置資訊之合憲性審查--從美國聯邦最高法院判決檢視我國法制
書刊名:政大法學評論
作者:溫祖德
作者(外文):Wen, Tzu-te
出版日期:2021
卷期:167
頁次:頁171-256
主題關鍵詞:第三人調取令提出文書命令調取歷史性行動電話基地臺位置紀錄第三人原則合理隱私期待國家監視Subpoena duces tecumThird-party doctrineReasonable expectation of privacyCell-site location informationNation's surveillance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:55
  • 點閱點閱:3
期刊論文
1.林鈺雄(20131200)。通訊監察之修法芻議--通訊保障及監察法之部份修正條文。萬國法律,192,25-39。  延伸查詢new window
2.李榮耕(20100600)。論偵查機關對通信紀錄的調取。政大法學評論,115,115-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張麗卿(20140600)。通訊保障及監察法之修正與評析。月旦法學,229,25-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李榮耕(20150900)。科技定位監控與犯罪偵查:兼論美國近年GPS追蹤法制及實務之發展。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,44(3),871-969。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Solove, Daniel J.(2010)。Fourth Amendment Pragmatism。Boston College Law Review,51,1511-1538。  new window
6.Kerr, Orin S.(2009)。The Case for the Third-Party Doctrine。Michigan Law Review,107(4),561-602。  new window
7.林裕順(20180200)。GPS偵查法治化研究。月旦裁判時報,68,12-23。  延伸查詢new window
8.溫祖德(20180700)。從Jones案論使用GPS定位追蹤器之合憲性--兼評馬賽克理論。東吳法律學報,30(1),121-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Ohm, Paul(2019)。The many revolutions of carpenter。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology,32(2),357-416。  new window
10.Kerr, Orin S.(2012)。The Mosaic Theory of the Fourth Amendment。Michigan Law Review,111(3),311-354。  new window
11.Blanke, Jordan M.(2018)。Carpenter v. United States Begs for Action。University of Illinois Law Review,2018,260-267。  new window
12.Freiwald, Susan、Smith, Stephen Wm.(2018)。The Carpenter Chronicle: A Near-Perfect Surveillance。Harvard Law Review,132(1),205-235。  new window
13.溫祖德(20200200)。調取歷史性行動電話基地臺位置資訊之令狀原則--自美國Carpenter案之觀察。月旦法學,297,130-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Brenner, Susan W.、Clarke, Leo L.(2006)。Fourth Amendment Protection for Shared Privacy Rights in Stored Transactional Data。Journal of Law and Policy,14。  new window
15.Gatewood, Jace C.(2013)。It's Raining Katz and Jones: The Implications of United States v. Jones--A Case of Sound and Fury。Pace Law Review,33(2),683-715。  new window
16.Gee, Harvey(2020)。Last Call for the Third-Party Doctrine in the Digital Age After Carpenter?。Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law,26(2),286-323。  new window
17.Harris, Douglas(2018)。Carpenter v. United States: How Many Cell Phone Location Points Constitute a Search Under the Fourth Amendment?。Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar,13,101-118。  new window
18.Henderson, Stephen E.(2011)。The Timely Demise of the Fourth Amendment Third Party Doctrine。Iowa Law Review Bulletin,96,39。  new window
19.Henderson, Stephen E.(2017)。Carpenter v. United States and the Fourth Amendment: The Best Way Forward。William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal,26(2),495-531。  new window
20.Ormerod, Peter C.、Trautman, Lawrence J.(2018)。A Descriptive Analysis of the Fourth Amendment and the Third-Party Doctrine in the Digital Age。Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology,28。  new window
21.Park, Eunice(2019)。Objects, Places and Cyber-Spaces Post-Carpenter: Extending the Third-Party Doctrine Beyond CSLI: A Consideration of IoT and DNA。Yale Journal of Law & Technology,21,1-58。  new window
22.De Zayas, Daniel(2019)。Carpenter v. United States and the Emerging Expectation of Privacy in Data Comprehensiveness Applied to Browsing History。American University Law Review,68(6)。  new window
23.劉靜怡(20140900)。只是勉強及格而已--二○一四年通保法修正評析。月旦法學,232,5-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.溫祖德(2019)。GPS定位追蹤監視之立法論224-253。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃政龍(2016)。新型態科技偵查作為之法規範研究(博士論文)。中央警察大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Clancy, Thomas K.(2008)。The Fourth Amendment: Its History and Interpretation。Carolina Academic Press。  new window
2.Slobogin, Christopher(2007)。Privacy at Risk: The New Government Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment。University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Allen, Ronald Jay、Stuntz, William J.、Hoffmann, Joseph L.、Livingston, Debra A.、Leipold, Andrew D.(2011)。Comprehensive Criminal Procedure。Wolters Kluwer Law & Business。  new window
4.李榮耕(2018)。通訊保障及監察法。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃朝義(2017)。刑事訴訟法。  延伸查詢new window
6.林鈺雄(2019)。刑事訴訟法。  延伸查詢new window
7.Gray, David(2017)。The Fourth Amendment in an Age of Surveillance。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Kamisar, Yale、LaFave, Wayne R.、Israel, Jerold H.、King, Nancy J.、Kerr, Orin S.、Primus, Eve Brensike(2019)。Modern Criminal Procedure Cases, Comments, and Questions。West Academic Publishing。  new window
9.Kerr, Orin S.(2020)。2020 Caselaw and Statutory Supplement to Computer Crime Law。West Academic Publishing。  new window
10.LaFave, Wayne R.、Israel, Jerold H.、King, Nancy J.、Kerr, Orin S.(2017)。Criminal Procedure。West Academic Publishing。  new window
11.Miller, Marc L.、Wright, Ronald F.、Turner, Jenia I.、Levine, Kay L.(2019)。Criminal Procedures: The Police: Cases, Statutes, and Executive Materials。Wolters Kluwer。  new window
12.Murphy, Maria Helen(2019)。Surveillance and the Law。Routledge。  new window
13.Simmons, Ric(2019)。Smart Surveillance: How to Interpret the Fourth Amendment in the Twenty-first Century。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.Harrington, Ben(2018)。Update: Supreme Court Takes Fourth Amendment Case about Cell Phone Location Data,Congressional Research Service。,https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10157。  new window
2.Thompson, Richard M. II(2014)。The Fourth Amendment Third Party Doctrine,Congressional Research Service。  new window
圖書論文
1.李佳玟(2014)。在場人錄音之證據能力。程序正義的鋼索。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳運財(2014)。由強制處分法定原則與令狀主義論搜索法制。偵查與人權。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE