:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:威權政治體制民主化過程中公共行政的發展
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:吳英明 引用關係
出版日期:1992
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁1-26
主題關鍵詞:公共行政民主化威權政治過程體制
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(4) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:53
一般政治學者認為中華民國76年戒嚴法解除後正經歷從威權政體轉型到民主政體的階段。在探討威權政體的文獻中得知,政府行政的體系經常受到統治者過渡使用或控制而造成政治生態的不平衡,公共行政在威權體制的政治生態中,其發展自然受到限制。公共行政的發展與其所運作的政治環境有密不可分的關係。面對民主化的挑戰,公共行政的思維及運作必需能符合民主化的潮流及明白民主化對公共行政的隱意,進而提出改革措施。 本論文的重點在探討威權政體民主化過程中公共行政發展的展望。其主要的目的在於強調時「責任政治」的理念落實在公共行政的影響。首先,本文將舊文獻探討威權政體的特徹及其對公共行政的影響。再者,本文將針對我國當前民主化幾個重點潮流 (例如政治民主化、憲政改革、及政治多元化),從去共行政的架構提出討論及闡述。最後,本文將討論上述民主化潮流封對公共行政民主化的隱意及公共行政因應的措施。
The R.O.C. government was considered as an aurhoritarian regime in the past. However, this country is now in its transition period toward political democratization since the lift of Martial Law in 1987. In theory and parctice, the development of public administration cannot be detached from surrounding political environment. Facing the challenges of demorcratization, the mentality and practices of public management need to cope with major trends (such as political dcmocratization, constitutional reform, and political plurality) and grasp there implications in the contemporary political environment This paper is to discuss the perspectives for the development of public administration in a democratizing political environment which evolves from an authoritarian regime. The purpose of the paper is to reinforce the concept of accountability in the development of public administration. First, this paper explores the literature on the characteristics of authoritarian regime and there inf1uences on the practices of public administration. Secondly, some major trends of the demoeralization from the authoritarian political ecology are identified, discussed, and interpreted with the theories of public administration. Finally, this paper suggests some perspectives and required practices for the democratization of public administration.
期刊論文
1.Ouchi, W. G.、Jaeger, A. M.(1978)。Type Z organization: Stability in the midst of mobility。Academy of Management Review,3(2),305-314。  new window
2.蕭全政(19900300)。政治民主化與經濟自由化下的政府角色調整。政治科學論叢,1,31-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Riggs, F. W.(1965)。Relearning and Old Lesson: The Political Context of Development Administration。Public Administration Review,25(1),70-79。  new window
4.Sigelman, Lee(1972)。Do Modern Bureaucracies Dominate Underdeveloped Polities? A Test of the Imbalance Thesis。American Political Science Review,66(2),525-528。  new window
5.Sigelman, Lee(1974)。Bureaucratic Development and Dominance: A New Test of the Imbalance Thesis。Western Political Quarterly,27(2),308-313。  new window
6.Smith, M. P.(1976)。Barriers to Organizational Democracy in Public Administration。Administration and Society,18,275-317。  new window
7.Van Riper, Paul P.(1983)。The Ideal of an Administrative State。Public Administration Review,43,477。  new window
8.Wilson, J. Q.(1975)。The Rise of the Bureaucratic State。The Public Interest,41(Fall),77-103。  new window
9.Winckler, Edwin A.(1994)。Institutionalization and Participation on Taiwan: From Hard to Soft Authoritarianism?。China Quarterly,99,481-499。  new window
學位論文
1.顏宏斌(1990)。從公法學觀點論公務員之政治活動(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.LaPalombara, Joseph(1963)。Bureaucracy and Political Development。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
2.田弘茂(1989)。大轉型:中華民國的政治和社會變遷。台北:時報文化出版企業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kautsky, John H.(1972)。The Political Consequences of Modernization。N. Y.:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
4.呂亞力(1988)。政治發展與民主。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.呂亞力(1990)。政治學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.林紀東(1979)。憲法總論。東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉慶瑞(1973)。中華民國憲法要義。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.蕭新煌(1989)。壟斷與剝削--權威主義的政治經濟分析。臺北:臺灣研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
9.Almond, G. A.、Powell, G. Bingham Jr.(1988)。Comparative Politics Today: A World View。Boston:Little, Brown and Company。  new window
10.Cayer, N. J.、Weschler, L. F.(1988)。Public Administration: Social Change and Adaptive Management。New York:St. Martin's Press。  new window
11.Cooper, Phillip J.(1988)。Public Law And Public Administration。New Jersey:Prentice Hall。  new window
12.Denhardt, Robert B.(1984)。Theory of Public Organization。Monterey, Califomia:Cole Publishing Company。  new window
13.Frederickson, H. G.(1980)。New Public Administration。The University of Alabama Press。  new window
14.Gmber, J. E.(1987)。Controlling Bureaucracy: Dilemmas in Democratic Governance。Berkeley, California:University of California Press。  new window
15.Harmon, Michael M.。Action Theory for Public Administration。New York:Longman Publishing Company。  new window
16.Heady, F.(1988)。Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective。New York:Marcel Dekker, Inc.。  new window
17.Henry, Nicholas(1989)。Public Administration and Public Affairs。Prentice-Hall International Inc.。  new window
18.Inkeles, Alex、Smith, David H.(1974)。Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries。Cambridge:Harvard Univ. Press。  new window
19.Jabbra, J. G.、Dwivedi, O. P.(1988)。Public Service Accountability: A Comparative Perspective。Kumarian Press, Inc.。  new window
20.Marini, Frank(1971)。Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective。Scranton, PA:Chandler。  new window
21.Mosher, F. C.(1982)。Democracy and the Public Service。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
22.Ostroom, Vincent(1974)。The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration。University of Alabama Press。  new window
23.Peters, B. G.(1984)。The Politic of Bureaucracy。New York:London:Longman。  new window
24.Pickles, Dorothy、朱堅章(1970)。民主政治。臺北:幼獅文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
25.Riggs, Fred W.(1970)。Frontiers of Development Administration。Durham, N. C.:Duke University Press。  new window
26.Rilev, D. D.(1987)。Controlling the Federal Bureaucracy。Philadelphia:Temple University Press。  new window
27.Rosen, B.(1982)。Holding Government Bureaucracies Accountable。New York:Praeger Publishers。  new window
28.Rowat, Donald C.(1988)。Public Administration in Developed Democracies: A Comparative Study。New York:Basel:Marcel Dekker, Inc.。  new window
29.Whicker, M. L.、Sloan, Anne T.(1990)。Comparative Administration: Hierarchical Goals and National。New York:Praeger。  new window
30.薩孟武(1974)。中國憲法新論。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
31.Krislov, Samuel(1974)。Representative Bureaucracy。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
32.Waldo, Dwight(1984)。The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration。New York:Holmes & Meier Publishers, Inc.。  new window
單篇論文
1.Wu, Eing Ming(1987)。Political Neutrality in Civil Service: A Comparative Study of The United States and the Great Britain,University of Georgia, Political Science Department。  new window
圖書論文
1.李鴻禧(1990)。當前憲政問題--行政權與立法權之關係。改革憲政。國家政策研究資料中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡佛(1990)。當前政治民主化與憲政結構。改革憲政。台北:國家政策研究資料中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.若林文丈(1988)。政治體制的轉戾點。中日會診臺灣:轉型期的政治。臺北:故鄉出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳德禹(1990)。行政中立問題之探討。重建行政體制。臺北:國家政策研究資料中心:財團法人張榮發基金會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Braibanti, R.(1961)。The Relevance of Political Science to the Society of Underdeveloped Areas。Tradition, Values, and Social-Economic Development。Duke University Press。  new window
6.Diamant, A.(1962)。The Bureaucratic Model: Max Weber Rejected, Rediscovered, Reformed。Papers in Comparative Public Administration。Ann Arbor, Mich:Institute of Public Administration, The University of Michigan。  new window
7.Heis, F. W.(1990)。Public Administration: Past, Present, and Future Paradigms。Whicker and Areson: Public Sector Management。New York:Praeger。  new window
8.Pye, Lucian(1963)。The Political Context of National Development。Development Administration: Concepts and Problems。Syracuse, N. Y.:Syracuse University Press。  new window
9.Riggs, F. W.(1963)。Bureaucrats and Political Development: A Paradoxical View。Bureaucracy and Political Development。Princeton, N. J.:Princeton University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE