官僚組織課責行為模式之研究：理論建構與實務驗證__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	官僚組織課責行為模式之研究：理論建構與實務驗證
作者：	陳菁雯
作者(外文)：	Chen, Ching-Wen
校院名稱：	中國文化大學
系所名稱：	政治學研究所
指導教授：	江炳倫江明修
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2006
主題關鍵詞：	官僚組織；課責；法律課責；層級課責；政治課責；專業課責；理性選擇；bureaucracy；accountability；legal accountability；hierarchical accountability；political accountability；professional accountability；rational choice
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:0 點閱:73

官僚組織往往須面對眾多不同來源、不同內容的課責要求（稱為課責困境），而官僚組織將如何回應互相衝突的課責要求，乃一有趣、值得探究的問題。本論文基於理性選擇的假設，將官僚組織內的行為主體視為一「理性」的個人，主張個人將會先求其個人私的動機之滿足，再設法滿足公的動機。故官僚組織在面對課責困境時，首先將設法利用資訊上的優勢，採取欺瞞策略，逃脫外部的有效課責，如不能採取欺瞞策略時，在違法性沒有疑慮的前提下，官僚組織將以遵從層級課責為優先，政治課責次之，最後才會顧及到專業課責。建構出理論後，本論文再以我國實際發生過有關官僚組織課責行為的爭議個案為例，進行理論的驗證工作，以確定該理論是否成立，而其解釋實際案例的能力如何。

以文找文

Facing various sources of accountability and conflicting demands, bureaucracy needs to response in a way that minimizes the unfavorable consequences of its actions. How bureaucracy acts is an interesting question and worthy of inquiry. Based on the paradigm of rational choice, this dissertation seeks to formulate a theory which treats actors within bureaucracy as a “rational” individual who tend to pursue his personal private goals first and place organizational public goals secondly. When the actors are in a position of accountability paradox, they seek to escape external accountability by means of superior information. If this cannot be achieved, they place legal accountability first, followed by hierarchical accountability, then political accountability, and with professional accountability the least desirable. This dissertation then verifies the theory by means of applying it to several concrete cases in order to test its validity and capability of interpretation.

以文找文

壹、中文部分
王輝煌，2000，〈官僚制度與民主政治：以美日台的結構性比較分析為例〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，12卷2期，頁347-386。 new window

史美強譯，Ralph P.Hummel原著，1997，《官僚經驗：對現代組織方式之批評》，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
江明修譯，2002，H. George Frederickson原著，《公共行政精義》，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
江明修，2003，〈公務人力培訓新趨勢〉，《公務人員月刊》，81期，頁2-3。
江明修、蔡金火，2003，〈人事行政研究的五種途徑：兼論我國文官制度的問題及其改革方向〉，《人事月刊》，132期，頁54-67。
呂育誠，2000，〈課責觀點下行政中立的意涵與落實途徑〉，《考詮季刊》，23期，頁68－80。 new window

吳定，1996，〈邁入新世紀、健全文官制度〉，《人事月刊》，4期，頁1。
吳庚，1993，《韋伯的政治理論及其哲學基礎》，台北：聯經出版社。 new window

吳友明譯，Eva Etzioni-Halevy著，1998，《官僚政治與民主》，台北：桂冠圖書公司。
吳英明，1992，〈威權政治體制民主化過程中公共行政的發展〉，《中國行政評論》，1卷第2期，頁1-26。 new window

吳瓊恩，2006，《行政學》，台北：三民書局。
───，1998，〈官僚組織的異化問題: 理論與方法背景初探〉，《考銓》，13期，頁35-38。
───，2000，〈公共行政學發展趨勢的探究：三種治理模式的互補關係及其政治理論的基礎〉，《公共行政學報》，第7期，頁173-220。
吳瓊恩、劉慧娥，1999，〈現代文官制度的衝擊〉，《國立政治大學公共行政學報》，3期，頁277-299。 new window

余致力，2000，〈論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色：黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示〉，《公共行政學報》，4期，頁1-2。 new window

林鐘沂，2001，《行政學》，台北：三民書局。
竺乾威，1994，《官僚政治》，香港：三聯書店有限公司。
施能傑，2002，〈文官中立：從概念化到法制化〉，《人事月刊》，第19卷第6期，頁19-26。
孫本初，1999年，〈課責與績效管理〉，《人事月刊》，29卷第3期，頁28-32。
───1999，《公共部門中課責問題之研究》，國科會專題研究計畫，計畫編號 89-2414-H-004-012，台北：國科會。。
───編著（A）， B. Guy Peters著，2001，《政府未來的治理模式》，台北：智勝文化出版社。
───（B），2001，〈公部門課責問題之探究〉，《人事月刊》，33卷3期，頁10-21。
徐仁輝，1995，〈制度與官僚的預算行為〉，《空中行政學報》，5期，頁43-66。 new window

陳敦源，2002，《民主與官僚：新制度論的觀點》，台北：韋伯出版社。 new window

湯京平，2001，〈災難、官僚與民主：台灣九二一震災援救行政的政治與制度分析〉，《中國行政評論》，11卷1期，頁67-98。 new window

張世杰等譯，R. B. Denhardt原著，1994，《公共組織理論》，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
張金鑑，1969，〈官僚制度與民主的控制〉，《中國行政》，7期，頁1-8。
彭文賢，1988，《行政生態學》，台北：三民書局。
───，1996，《組織結構》，台北：三民書局。
楊泰順.廖峰香編著，1995，《民主與社會》，台北：國立空中大學。
詹中原，2003，《新公共政策》，台北：華泰書局。
蔡允棟（A），2001，〈官僚組織回應力之研究―個案實證分析〉，《政治科學論叢》，15期，頁209-240。 new window

───（B），2001，〈官僚組織回應的概念建構評析―新治理的觀點〉，《中國行政評論》，10卷2期，頁89-134。
蔡金火，2005，《我國當前行政倫理法制化發展之研究》，台北：國立政治大學公共行政研究所。 new window

蔡玫芬，1997，〈公共選擇途徑對官僚的行為模式分析介紹〉，《國立政治大學公共行政學報》，1期，頁239-255。 new window

鄭樂平譯，Beeyham. D. 原著，1992，《科層制》，台北：桂冠圖書公司。
顧慕晴，1995，〈官僚組織與行政人員民主責任〉，《人事管理》，32期，頁4-17。

貳、英文部分
Aberbach, J. D. 1990. Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Aberbach, J. D. and B. A. Rockman. 1997. “Bureaucracy: Control. Responsiveness. Performance.” In Designs for Democratic Stability: Studies in Viable Constitutionalism. A. I. Baaklini and H. Desfosses. eds. Armonk. NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Almond, G. A. 1990 . “Rational Choice Theory and the Social Science.” In A Discipline Divided– Schools and Sects in Political Science. Sage Publication.
───. “The Early Impact of Down’s An Economic Theory of Democracy on American Political Science.” In Information. Participation and Choice. B. Grofman. ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Arrow, K. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven: Yale University Press.
───. K. 1970. “The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market Versus Non-market Allocation.” In Public Expenditures and Polic Analysis. R. Haveman and J. Margolis. eds. Chicago: Markham Book.
───. K. 1985. “The Economics of Agency.” In Principals and Agents: The Struteure of Business. J. Pratt and R. J. Zeckhauser. eds.. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Bank. J. S. 1995. “The Design. of Institutions: An Agency Theory Perspective.” In Institutional Design. D. L. Weimer. ed..Boston. MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bamey, J. B. and W. G. Ouchi. eds. 1986. Organizational Economics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Barry, B. 1970. Economists and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Barth, T. J. 1996. “Administering in the Public Interest : the Facilitative Role for Public Administrators. ” Refounding Democratic Public Administration : Modern Paradoxes. Postmodern Challenges. Thousand Oaks. C.A.:Sage Publications. pp. 168-197.
Behn, R. D. 2001. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington. DC: Brookings Institute.
Brehm, J. and S. Gates. 1999. Working Shirking and Sabotage: Burearucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Abbor: University of Michigan Press.
Brennan, G. 1998. “Democratic Trust: A Rational-Choice Theory View.” In Trust and Governance. Valerie Braithwaite and Margaret Levi. eds.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
───. G. and J. M. Buchanan. 1988. “Is Public Choice Immoral? The Case for the ‘Nobel’ Lie.” Virginia Law Review. Vol. 74 . pp. 179-89.
Brndor, J. 1988. “Review Article: Formal Models of Bureaucracy.” British Journal of Political Science. Vol. 18. pp. 353-395.
Bruce, W. M. 2000.”Public Administrator Attitudes about Spirituality: An Exploratory Study.” American Review of Public Administration. Vol.30.No.4. pp. 460-472.
Bryner, G. C. 1987. Bureaucratic Discretion: Law and Policy in Federal Regulatory Agencies. New York: Pergamon Press.
Caiden, G. E. 1996. “The Concept of Neutrality.” In Democratization and Bureaucratic Neutrality. H. K. Asmerom and E. P. Reis. eds.. New York: MaCmillan Press LTD.
Calvert, R. L. 1995. “The Rational Choice Theory of Social Institutions: Cooperation. Coordination and Communication.” In Modern Political Economy. J. S. Banks and E. A. Hanushek. eds.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
───. R. L. M. D. McCubbins. and B. R. Weingast. 1989. “A Theory of Political Control and Agency Discretion.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 33. No. 3 . pp. 588-611.
Chandler, J. A. ed. 2000. Comparative Public Administration. London: Routledge.
Cheng, S. Haggard and D. Kang. 1998. “Institutions and Growth in Korea and Taiwan: The Bureaucracy.” East Asian Development. Vol. 34. No. 6. pp. 87-111.
Clay, J.A. 1996. “Public-Institutional Processes and Democratic Governance .” Refounding Democratic Public Administration : Modern Paradoxes. Postmodern Challenges. Thousand Oaks. C.A. : Sage. pp. 92-113.
Clegg, S. R. 1994. “Max Weber and Contemporary Sociology of Organizations. ” Organizing Modernity. N. Y. :Routledge . pp. 46-80.
Cole, R. and D. Caputo. 1979. “Presidential Control of the Senior Civil Service: Assessing the Strategies of the Nixon Years.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 73. No.1. pp. 399-413.
Copper, Terry L. 1998. The Responsible Administrator.4th ed. San Francisvo: Jossey-Bass.
Crosby, N. Kelly. J.M. & Schaefer. P. 1986.“Citizen Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation. ”Public Administaration Review. Vol.46. No.2. pp. 170-178.
Dahl, R. A. 1999. On Democracy.New Haven: Yale University Press.
Denhardt, Robert B. and Janet V. Denhard, 2000. ”The New Public : Serving Rather Than Steering,” Public Adminstration Review,60(6),pp. 549-559.
Denhard, Janet V. and Robert B. Denhardt, 2003. ”The New Public : Serving Rather Than Steering,” New York:M.E.sharpe, Inc.
Derthick, M. 1990, Agency under Stress: The Social Security Administration in American Government ,Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
Desveaux, J. A. 1995. Designing Bureaucracies: Institutional Capacity and Large-Scale Problem Solving.Stanford. CA: Stanford University Press.
Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper ＆ Row.
───. A. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy.Boston: Scott. Foresman and Company.
Dunleavy, P. 1991. Democracy. Bureaucracy and Public Choice : Economic Explanations in Political Science. New York : Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Farmer, D. J. 1995. The Language of Public Administration : Bureaucracy . Modernity and Postmodernity . Tuscaloosa. Alabama : University of Alabama Press.
Finer, H. 1941. “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government.” Public Administrative Review. Vol. 1. pp. 335-350.
Fiorina. M. P. 1975. “Formal Models in Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 19 . pp. 133-159.
───. 1979. “Control of Bureaucracy: A Mismatch of Incentives and Capabilities.” In The Presidency and Congress: A Shifting Balance. W. S. Livingston. L. C. Dodd. and R. L Schott. eds.. Austin. TX: LBJ School of Public Affairs.
───. 1986. “Congress and Bureaucracy: A Porfitable Partnership.” In Bureaucratic Power in National Policy Making. F. E. Rourke. ed.4th ed.. Boston: Little. Brown and Company.
───. 2nd ed. 1996. Divided Government. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Fiorina, M. and K. A. Shepsle. 1989. “Formal Theories of Leadership: Agents. Agenda Frederickson. H.G..“Minnowbrook II : Changing Epochs of Public Administration.” Public Admonistration Review. Vol. 49. No. 2. pp. 95-100.
Frederickson, H.G. 1996.“Comparing the Reinventing Government with the New Public Administration.” Public AdmonistrationReview.Vol.56.No.3. pp. 263-270.
───. H. G. 1999. “The Repositioning of American Public Administration.” PS: Political Science and Politics. Vol. 32. No. 4. pp. 701-12.
Friedrich, C. J. 1940. “Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility.” In Pubic Policy. C. J. Friedrich and A. M. Mason. eds.. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Perss.
Fry, B. R. 1989. Mastering Public Administration: Form Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. Chatham. NJ: Chatham House Publishers. Inc.
Fudenberg, D. and Tirole. 1991. Game Theory. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Garston, N. 1993. Bureaucracy : Three Paradigms. Norwell. Massachusetts : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Garvey, G. 1933. Facing the Bureaucracy : Living and Dying in a Public Agency. San Francisco. C. A. : Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Gill, J. “Formal Models of Legislative/ Administrative Interaction: A Survey of the Subfield.” Public Administration Review. Vol. 55. No. 1 (1995). pp. 99-106.
Gillroy, J. M. and M. Wade. eds. 1992. The Moral Dimensions of Public Policy Choice: Beyond the Market Paradigm. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh press.
Goodsell, C. T. 1994. The Case for Bureaucracy : Public Administration Polemic. 3rd ed. Chatham. N. J. : Chatham House Publishers. Inc..
Grafstein, R. 1991. “Rational Choice: Theory and Institutions.” In The Economic Approach to Politics: A Critical Reassessment of the Theory of Rational Action. K. R. Monroe. ed. New York: Harper Collins.
Gruber, J. E. 1988. Controlling Bureaucracies: Dilemmas in Democratic Governance. Berkeley. CA: University of California Press.
Hammond, T. H. and J. H. Knott. 1996. “Who Controls the Bureaucracy? Presidential Power. Congressional Dominance. Legal Constraints and Bureaucratic Autonomy in a Model of Multi-Institutional Policy-Making.” The Journal of Law .Economics. & Organization. Vol. 12. No. 1 . pp. 119-166.
Hammond, T. H. and P. Thomas. 1989. “The Impossibility of a Neurtral Hierarchy.” Journal of Law. Economics. & Organizations. Vol. 5.. pp. 155-183.
Hay, C. and D. Wincott. 1998. “Structure. Agency and Historical Institutionalism.” Political Studies. Vol. 46. No. 5. pp. 951-957.
Heckscher, C. and A. Donnellon. 1994. The Post-Bureaucratic Organization. Newbury Park. C. A.:Sage Publications Ltd.
Hill, L. B. 1992.The State of Public Bureaucracy . N. Y. : M. E. Sharpe. Inc.
Holedn, M. Jr. 1966. “Imperialism’ in Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 60. pp.943-951.
Hummel, R.P. 1990.“Bureaucracy Policy: Toward Public Discourse on Organizing Public Administration.” Policy Studies Journal. Vol. 18. No.4. p. 907.
Hyneman, C. S. 1950. Bureaucracy in a Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.
Kelman, S. 1987. “Public Choice and Public Spirit.” The Public Interest. Vol. 87. pp. 80-94.
Lipset, S. M. 1993. “The Centrality of Political Culture.” In The Global Resurgence of Democracy. Larry Diamond and Mare F. Plattner. eds.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Marini, F. 1971. Toward a New Public Administration:the Minnowbrook Perspective. New York. N.Y.:Chandler Publishing Co.
Marini, F. 1971. “The Minnowbrook Perspective and the Future of Public Administration Education. ” Toward a New Public Administration:the Minnowbrook Perspective.New York.N.Y.:Chandler Publishing Co..pp. 346-367.
Meier, K. J. 1997.“Bureaucracy and Democracy: he Case for More Bureaucracy and Less Democracy.” Public Administration Review. Vol. 57. No. 3.). pp. 193-199.
Mezzetti, C. 1997. “Common Agency with Horizontally Differentiated Principals.” Rand Journal of Economics. Vol. 28. No. 2. pp. 323-345.
Moe, T. M. and M. Caldwell. 1994. “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. Vol. 150. No.1. pp. 171-195.
Mosher, F. 1968. Democracy and the Public Service.New York: Oxford University Press.
Mueller, D. C. 1989. Public Choice II. (New York: Cambridge University Press.
Niskanen, W. A.1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine
Ogul, M. S. 1976. Congress Oversees the Bureaucracy: Studies in Legislative Supervision. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Osborne, D. and P. Plastrik. 1998. Banishing Bureaucracy.New York: A Plume Book.
Ostrom, E. L.1986. “An Agenda for the Study of Institutions.” Public Choice. Vol. 48. No. 1. pp. 3-25.
Ostrom, E. L. and S. Wynne. 1993. Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development. Boulder: Westview Press.
Peters, B. G. 1995. The Politics of Bureaucracy. New York: Longman.
───. 2000. “Is Democracy a Substitute for Ethics?” In Ethics in Public Service for the New Millennium. R. A. Chapman. ed. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Presyon, L. M. 1987. “Freedom and Bureaucracy.” American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 31. No. 4. pp. 773-795.
Riggs, F. W. 1963. “Bureaucrats and Political Development: A Paradoxical View.” In Bureaucracy and Political Development. J. LaPalombara. ed..Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
───. 1997. “Bureaucracy and Viable Constitutionalism.” In Designs for Democratic Stability: Studies in Viable Constitutionalism. A. I. Baaklini and H. Desfosses. eds..Armork. NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Ross, S. 1973. “The Economic Theory of Agency: the Principal’s Problem.” American Economic Review. Vol. 63. No. 2. pp.134-9.
Rourke, F. E. 1984.3rd. Bureaucracy. Politics. and Public Policy.Boston: Little. Brown.
Thompson, V. A. 1965. “Bureaucracy in a Democratic Society.” In Public Administration and Democracy: Essays in Honor of Paul H. Appleby. R. C. Martin. ed..New York: Syracuse University Press.
Waldo, D. 1984. The Administration State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. New York. N.Y.:Holmes & Meier.
Wamsley, G. L. 1990.”The Agency Perspective: Public Administration as AgentialLeaders. ”Refounding Public Administration. NewburyPark. C.A.:sage. pp. 19-29.
Weber. M, 1958. “Bureaucracy.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills. eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
───. 1992.“Bureaucracy”. Classic of Public Administration.3rd Ed.Pacific Grove. C.A.: Book/Cole Publishing Company. pp. 248-268.
Weimer, D. L. and A. R. Vining. 1999. 3rd Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice.
───. 1996. “Economics.” In The State of Public Management. D. F. Kettle and H. B. Milward. eds.(Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Weingast, B. R. 1981. “Regulation. Reregulayion. and Deregulation: The Political Foundations of Agency Clientele Relationships.” Law and Contemporary Problems. Vol. 44 . pp. 147-77.
───. B. R. 1984. “The Congressional-Bureaucratic System: A Principal-Agent Perpective (with Applications to the SEC).” Public Choice. Vol. 44. pp. 147-91.
Weingast, B. R. 1996. “Political Institutions: Rational Choice Perspectives.” In A New Handbook of Political Science. Robert E. Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. eds.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weingast, B. R. and M. Moran. 1983. “Bureaucrayic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission.” Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 91. No. 5. pp. 765-800.
West, W. F. and J. Cooper. 1989-90. “Legislative Influence vs. Presidential Dominance: Competing Models of Bureaucratic Control.” Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 104. pp. 581-606.
Wilson, J. Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.
───. 1994.“Reinventing Public Administration.” Political Science & Politics. Vol. 27. No. 4. pp. 667-678.
───. 1995. Political Organizations. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wilson, W. 1887.“The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly. No. 2.
Wood, B. D. and R. W. Waterman. “The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy. 1991.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 85. pp. 801.28.
Yates, D. 1982. Bureaucratic Democracy: The Search for Democracy and Efficiency in American Government. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	開發案與地方的韌性治理：以芳苑鄉、二林鎮為例
2.	教育治理之跨域途徑與協力策略
3.	司法審查下的官僚裁量權：從交易成本觀點檢視大法官解釋對違法行政命令修訂的影響
4.	立法院委員會「護航」行政院的政策？2018年所得稅法及公司法修正觀察
5.	公共行政研究的議題定位與理論趨勢：以TASPAA第一個10年(2003~2012)之年會論文為例
6.	回顧2020年政府因應新冠肺炎疫情的「紓困之亂」--「效率」與「公平／平等」觀點的檢視
7.	員工幸福感的意涵與影響因素之探討
8.	被害人訴訟參與結合修復式司法的應用--安全理念的建構
9.	地方國教輔導團運作之網絡治理探究
10.	臺灣地方基層官僚推動參與式預算的治理模式：桃園市案例研究
11.	民眾電子連署內容與政府回應方式：以提點子平臺為例
12.	警察權有多大？讀〈影響警察鎮壓聚眾活動因素之研究〉有感
13.	不同制度論觀點下的制度起源問題：公務人員保障暨培訓委員會的個案研究
14.	相當因果關係與社會科學方法論--由韋伯以及賴德布魯赫談起
15.	政府於環境污染事件之多元角色評析

1.	環境治理之資訊不對稱及制度依賴相關性實證研究-社會實驗之應用
2.	花東發展條例下的台東永續發展治理預應
3.	中國大陸城市社區治理之實踐研究——以廣東省深圳市為例
4.	臺灣政策執行中多階層否決之研究—以核四興建與中科三期開發案為例
5.	行政院組織改造之研究─歷史制度主義的觀點
6.	教師專業發展評鑑之政策變遷探究
7.	政策溝通行為之研究--以原能會為例
8.	我國精兵政策發展之研究：歷史制度論分析
9.	政治甄補與地方治理：金門縣的個案分析
10.	ECFA及服貿協議審議過程之比較分析
11.	我國公務人員保障事件決定之研究—以1997年至2012年公務人員保障事件為例
12.	社區參與災後重建推動模式之研究
13.	台灣地方自治民主化之研究：歷史制度主義觀點
14.	治理系統之研究－以全國新住民火炬計畫為例
15.	我國半總統制的形成與少數政府憲政困境—歷史制度主義的觀點

1.	官僚回應性：臺灣經驗的觀察與省思
2.	公民政治參與觀點論臺灣民主鞏固
3.	公務倫理的後設分析：現代與後現代思維
4.	從價值差異到夥伴關係：政務官事務官的互動管理
5.	東亞金融政治 : 日韓臺金融體制的形成、發展與轉變
6.	公益的價格：非營利行銷的理論與案例
7.	臺灣客家公共事務的理論與實踐：治理的觀點
8.	民主治理 : 公共行政與民主政治的制度性調和
9.	英國政府治理 : 歷史制度的分析
10.	全球化與臺灣社會 : 人權、法律與社會學的觀照
11.	戰爭傳播：一個「傳播者」取向的研究
12.	跨界永續治理 : 生活政治取向之永續體制演化研究
13.	邁向府際合作治理 : 理論與實踐
14.	公共政策行銷理論之研究 : 應然面與實然面的對話
15.	政府業務委外經營 : 理論、策略與經驗

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫