:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高階主管國籍與管理態度及領導基礎之相關分析--歐洲在臺多國籍企業之實證
書刊名:臺大管理論叢
作者:曾柔鶯
作者(外文):Tseng, Jou-Ying
出版日期:1992
卷期:3:1
頁次:頁127-148
主題關鍵詞:歐洲在臺多國籍企業高階主管管理態度領導
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:40
本研究旨在探討歐洲在台多國籍企業高階主管,因其國籍之不同,所可能影響我國籍高階主管在工作態度、對員工的照顧,以及管理方式等的差異。由本研究結論中可知,雙方高階主管均認為對方應更加努力去暸解自己,才能增加管理和辦事效率,並且藉由不同國籍成員間的社交活動,將可降低彼此間的文化隔闕,並激勵其學習動機。 再者,本研究之結論亦發現:歐洲文化強調個人主義、理性主義及平等的精神,因此在員工福利及工作的保障上,較能顧及員工個人的利益,也由於強調經濟上的理性,故在管理制度上較能制定明確的規則。而中國文化較重視團體主義與人際關係的和諧,因此在牽涉到中國籍的上司或成員時,容易受到人際因素之影響,而看不出較明確的規則。此外,因為權力差距較大,重要決策大都由上司做全權定奪。故若以公司績效為經學方針,則必須以『中國的和諧闢係』為基礎,應用『西方的理性』,彼此相輔相成,始有助於管理績效之提升。
This research is an attempt to pinpoint the differences in the aspects of overall working attitude, job satisfaction, care for subordinates and the underlying leadership among executives of different nationalities in the multinational European corporations in Taiwan. Due to difference in nationalities and diversity in cultures, Chinese and European corporate executives differ both in their management concepts and practice. The findings from this study amount to the messages that each of the executives took the attitude that the others should attempt to understand himself more in order to enhance management efficiency and performance; and the social activities among members of different nationalities would remove cultural barriers and trigger members into learning from each other. In essence, western culture emphases individualism, rationalism and equality, therefore, the interests of employees in welfare and jobs are more protected. In addition, as rationalism is featured in European economics, specific rules and regulations can be enacted for management system. On the other hand, Chinese culture stresses more on collectivism and the harmony of interpersonal relationship; therefore, when a Chinese superior or member is involved, the issue is more likely to be influenced by the factor of human nature, thus, no specific rules can be easily defined. Moreover, as there is much disparity in authority. important decisions are usually made by upper executives. Hence, if corporate management policy is aimed for the overall achievement of the company, it must be laid on the bases of Western or European rationalism as well as Chinese harmonious relationship to help promote management performance.
期刊論文
1.Tung, R. L.(1981)。Selection and training of personnel for overseas assignments。Columbia Journal of World Business,16(1),68-78。  new window
2.Dowling, P. J.(1986)。Nationality and Work Attitudes: A Study of Australian and American Business Majors。Journal of Management,12,121-128。  new window
3.Aldemir, M. C.(1986)。The Impact of Cultural Values Upon Managers' Choice of Social Power Base。International Journal of Manpower,7,13-19。  new window
4.England, G. W.、Lee, R.(1974)。Relationship Between Managerial Success in the U.S., Japan, India, Australia。Journal of Applied Psychology,59(4),411-419。  new window
5.Boyacigiller, Nakiye(1990)。The Role of Expatriates in the Management of Interdependence Complexity and Risk in Multinational Corporations。Journal of International Business StudiesQuarter,21(3),357-375。  new window
6.Misa, K. F.、Fabricatore, J. M.(1979)。Return on Investment of Overseas Personnel。Financial Executive,47,42-46。  new window
7.Zerira, Y.(1979)。Ethnocentrism in Host Country Organizations。Business Horizons,22,66-75。  new window
8.Kobrin, Stephen J.(1988)。Expatriate Reduction And Strategic Control In American Multinational Corporations。Human Resource Management,27(1),63-75。  new window
9.Lawler, Edward E. III、Hall, Douglas Tim(1970)。Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation。Journal of Applied Psychology,54(4),305-312。  new window
10.Black, J. Stewart(1988)。Work Role Transitions: A Study of American Expatriate Managers in Japan。Journal of International Business Studies,19(2),277-294。  new window
圖書
1.Copeland, L.、Griggs, L.(1985)。Going International。New York:Random House。  new window
2.Simon, H. A.(1964)。Public Administration。N.Y.:Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
3.Etzioni, A.(1975)。A comparative analysis of complex organizations。New York:The Free Press。  new window
4.Hersey, P.、Blanchard, K.(1982)。Management of Organizational Behavior。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
5.Zimbardo, P. G.、Ebbesen、Maslach、李政茂(1980)。影響態度與改變行為。台北市:黎明文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Fiedler, Fred E.(1967)。A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fiedler, F. E.(1978)。The Contingency Model and the Dynamics of the Leadership Process。Advances in Experimental Social Psychology。New York:Academic Press。  new window
2.French, John R. P.、Raven, B.(1967)。The basis of Social Power。Group dynamics: Research and theory。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
3.Steers, R. M.、Mowday, R. T.(1981)。Employee Turnover in Organizations。Research in Organizational Behavior。Greenwich, CT:JAI Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE