:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺北市民間工商企業機構僱用殘障者意願調查研究
書刊名:特殊教育研究學刊
作者:吳武典 引用關係蔡崇建黃淑芬王華沛 引用關係廖永堃 引用關係
出版日期:1994
卷期:10
頁次:頁75-101
主題關鍵詞:臺北市民間工商企業機構僱用殘障者
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:73
     本調查研究旨在探討臺北市民營企業機構在修訂殘障福利法(民79)頒布之後,對僱用殘障者的意願。以臺北市二百家民間工商企業機構為對象,發出問卷進行調查,獲得有效問卷109份,經過逐題分析,主要發現如下: 1.在執行強制僱用殘障者之規定方面~大多數 (約八成) 受調查單位已了解並支持「定額僱用」之規定,並表示願依規定執行;尚未僱用殘障者之受調查單位,大多數表示並非不願僱用,而有事實上之困難。惟亦有少數 (約一成) 表示排斥態度。 2.對僱用殘障者的態度方面~已有僱用經驗者大多數對於殘障員工之工作態度與表現,表示滿意,並認為有助提升企業形象。多數雇主表示殘障者之職業技能若符合工作要求,願比照常人僱用,甚至優先僱用;其主要疑慮則為:(1)職能不符;(2)工作環境配合不夠;(3)擔心發生意外。資料顯示雇主對殘障者之就業仍有刻板印象存在,肢體殘障者之就業機會最多,而視覺障礙、智能不足、自閉症與多重障礙者之就業機會非常有限。 3.雇主希望政府配合措施方面~工商企業機構有望於政府者之要求為:(1)提供殘障者就業的供需資料,並舉辦就業輔導座談;(2)加強殘障者的職能評估與鑑定;(3)協助改善工作環境;(4)依法提供改善環境及補助超額僱用之人事費。 一般而言,由於臺北市強力執行殘障福利法定額僱用之規定,已有相當成果顯現,包括僱用率提高,雇主態度趨向積極。研究者建議此項規定,仍應貫徹執行,賞罰並進,加強宣導與職訓,協助解決實際困難,並推展「支持性就業」措施。
     The Law of Welfare for the Disabled, Republic of China, was first promulgated in 1980 and then revised in 1990. The revised one adopted the quota-levy-grant systems which was considered a "big shock" to the industry. The purpose of this study was to explore the attitudes and concerns of non-goverment industries regarding employment of persons with disabilities in Taipei city one and a half years after the revised Law was implemented. Two-hundred employers with employees over 100 were investigated by a survey inventory. Data from 109 employers (54% of the sample) were successfully collected and analyzed. The major findings were as the follow- ing: 1. Regarding enforcement of the quota system - The system was supported by the majority (approxmately 80%) of the employers; only a few (about 10%) showed negative attitude. Those who haven't yet employed the disabled showed "in fact" difficulties rather than rejection. 2. Attitudes toward hiring the disabled - Those who already employed persons with disabilities were in general satisfied with their working attitude and job performance. It was also considered beneficial to the enterprise's public image. Moreover, most of the employers indicated they would be happy to employ the disabled provided that they were qualified workers. The major concerns, however, were (1) the job skills, (2) a suitable working environment, and (3) the unexpected accident. It was found that there did exist .job stereotypes - there were unequal job opportunities among different disabilities. It was obvious that the physically disabled had the most, whereas the visually impaired, the mentally retarded, the autistic, and the multiple handicapped, had less. 3. Expectations of assistance from the government - Data showed that the industry was in need of assistance from the government, especially in the following areas: (1) providing a job information network to match the mutual needs of both the employer and the disabled; (2) va-cational evaluation on job-fitness for the disabled; and (S) the improvement of working environment and file grant for over-guota employment. In general, ever since the enforcement of the Revised Welfare Law for Disabled Persons in Taipei City, conditions of the employment of persons with disabilities have been considerably improved. It is hoped that the quota-levy-grant systems be enforced continuously and the sup- ported employment be adopted as the major force.
期刊論文
1.王天苗(19910300)。美國障礙者法案。特殊教育季刊,38,23-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.天下雜誌編輯部(1990)。一千大‧三百大企業調查〜願助學校一臂之力。天下雜誌教育季刊,1990(Nov.),27-29。  延伸查詢new window
3.伊甸園月刊(1990)。殘障人權,「美」夢成真。伊甸園月刊,48,6-7。  延伸查詢new window
4.伊甸園月刊(1991)。7月1日開始實施定額雇用案,須依比例雇用殘障者,決無例外。伊甸園月刊,52,13-14。  延伸查詢new window
5.伊甸園月刊(1991)。落實殘障福利法定額雇用案。伊甸園月刊,54,6-7。  延伸查詢new window
6.林寶貴(19901200)。殘障者的人力發展。特殊教育季刊,37,1-6。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃淑芬(19880700)。中美「傷殘職能鑑定」與「復健諮商」做法之比較。就業與訓練,6(4),25-34。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃淑芬(19910300)。從廿一世紀的人力觀點談復健諮商專業的新挑戰。特殊教育季刊,38,1-10。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Acton, N.(1981)。Employment of disabled persons: Where are we going?。International Labour Review,120(1),1-14。  new window
10.Baker, T.(1988)。The future of rehabilitation in the workplace: drug abuse, AIDS & disability management。Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling,19(2),38-41。  new window
11.Bordieri, J. E.、Comninel, M. E.(1987)。Competitive employment for workers with disabilities: An international perspective。Journal of rehabilitation,53(3),51-57。  new window
12.Brown, D.(1990)。Facing the future: Readying rehabilitation for the year 2000。Journal of Rehabilitation,56(2),17-20。  new window
13.Greenwood, R.、Johnson, V. A.(1987)。Employer Perspectives on Workers with Disabilities。Journal of Rehabilitation,53(3),37-45。  new window
14.Greenwood, R.、Johnson, V. A.、Schriner, K. F.(1988)。Employer perspectives on employer-Rehabilitation partnerships。Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling,19(1),8-12。  new window
15.Greenwood, R.、Schriner, K. F.、Johnsons, V. A.(1991)。Employer concerns regarding workers with disabilities and the business--Rehabilitation partnership: The PWI practitioners perspective。Journal of Rehabilitation,57(1),21-25。  new window
16.Molinaro, D.(1977)。A placement system develops and settles: The Michigan model。Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin,21,121-129。  new window
17.Schloss, P. J.、Soda, S. L.(1989)。Employer attitudes concerning training time and on the job success for the mentally handicapped in low and high Unemployment Areas。Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Bulletin,22(4),129-132。  new window
18.Wehman, P.、Moon, M. S.(1987)。Critical values in employment programs for persons with developmental disabilities: A position paper。Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling,18(1),12-16。  new window
會議論文
1.刁惠美(1992)。影響民間企業僱用殘障者僱用表現因素之研究--以台北市、台北縣、桃園縣為例。中華民國殘障聯盟第二屆殘障福利論文發表會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳武典、陳榮華、張訓誥、許澤銘、蔡崇健、張正芬(1990)。我國殘障福利法執行成效之評估。台北市:行政院研考會。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳武典、陳榮華、張訓誥、蔡崇健、張正芬(1990)。推展我國殘障者職業訓練及就業輔導之研究。台北市:行政院勞工委員會職訓局。  延伸查詢new window
3.邱滿豔(1990)。美國就業諮詢、職業心理測驗與殘障者就業輔導考察報告。台北市:行政院勞工委員會職訓局。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐道昌(1977)。殘障居民之復健重建與社區服務之研究。台北:榮民總醫院復健部。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳泓洲(1989)。各國殘障者職業重建服務法規概況。台北市:內政部社會司。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳榮華、許水德、毛連塭、林美和(1983)。台灣地區殘障福利措施之研究。台北市:行政院研究及發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃俊傑、市政府社會局、市政府研考會(1987)。台北市肢體殘障者就業輔導與心理復健之探討。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃淑芬(1983)。殘障者的職業復健。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡宏昭(1986)。臺灣地區殘障者職業重建與就業問題之研究。台北市:內政部:明德基金會。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bowe, F.、Rochlin, J.(1983)。The business rehabilitation partnership。Fayetteville, AR:Arkansas Rehabilitation Research and Training Center。  new window
11.Cull, J. G.、Hardy, R. E.(1972)。Vocational rehabilitation profession and process。Springfield:Charles C. Thomas Publisher。  new window
12.Rubin, S. E.、Roessler, R. T.(1978)。Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process。Baltimore:University Park Press。  new window
其他
1.內政部社會司(1994)。殘障福利法執行現況暨修法建議資料。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李瑟、馬立君(1990)。企業政治重整:獨家調查:企業家看未來台灣。職業講話參考手冊。台北市:行政院勞工委員會職訓局。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃文瑞(1991)。發揮民胞物與精神〜踴躍提供殘障者工作機會。社會評論。  延伸查詢new window
3.盤治郎(1989)。從勞力市場需求現況談今後殘障者就業環境面面談。有真情、有活力、促進殘障者無障礙就業方向的開拓。中央日報:台北市政府社會局:財團法人富邦慈善基金會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top