元好問()19C一1257)字裕之，號迫山。金太原秀容人(今山西炘縣)，祖系 北魏拓拔氏，後改姓元。在金、元兩朝頗負眾望。晚年隱居秀容，著書立說。著 有《遺山集》，頗有《中州集》和《王辰雜編》。元遺山無論在文學創作上，或 者在文學批評上，都可說是金代集大成的作家。好問生長於北方，富衷俠之氣; 又處南北民族爭鬥激烈、戰爭接連不斷之際，故其詩詞悲壯雄健，多傷時感事之 作，充滿反戰爭、反侵略之情緒。他的話論《論詩三十首》，也是他的創作思想 的理論結晶。 宋代詩人陳師道，方回於《瀛奎律骯》卷二十六中推華陳師道為江西詩派的三宗 之一，他不僅是一位富有代表性的詩人，也是一位完成江西派重要文學理論的批 評家。而追山在其《論詩三十首》之二十九，對師道的話風有所評論，他說:「池 塘春草謝家春，萬古千秋五字新。傳語閉門陳正字，可憐無補交精神。」遺山對 陳師道的評論，歷來有見仁見智的不同看法，本文試從陳師道的才思與創造賓踐 過程，來檢驗元道山的評論是否允當。本篇論文綱要: 一、前言:簡介元遺山的生平及著作。 二、元遺山《論詩三十首》之主張及特色:推許建安以來之優良傳統， 鄙棄齊、梁詩派，西崑派與江西派，發揚真淳自然、高風雅調與清剛 勁健之詩風，貶抑模擬偽飾，誹諧險澀與窘人纖弱之陋習。 三、陳師道生平略述及其作品:師道為江西詩派三宗之一，也是完成江 西詩派重要文學理論的批評家。 四、元遺山論師道詩平議:先由歷代各家對遺山論師道詩的觀點加以歸 類，再由歷代對師道詩的評價中，給予適當的平議。 五、結論:對「摘句」批評方式的檢討，並對遺山論師道詩用心所在的肯定。

　　　　　Yi-shan (1190-1257)was born in Chin Dynasty and well-known in both Chin and Yuan Dynasties. Yuan was famous not only was born in the northern area of the Mainland China which embodied his character with chivalry. In addition, he grew up during a time filled with violent fights and continual wars among races; and sentimental, and he is of anti-war and anti-intrusion. "Critiques on 30 Poems" is a masterpiece of his creative thinking theory. Shih-tao Chen, a pote of Sung Dynasty, was considered as not onal a representative of one of three Chiang-lisi Poetry factions, but also an important critic of literature theory. In the 29th critique of "Critiques on 30 Poems,' Yuan criticized Chen's style. This article is trying to examine the process of chen's talent thinking and creative fulfilment and, further, to review if Yuan's critique on Chen is appropriate.File outline of this artical is as follows: I . Introduction: To introduce Yuan's life and works. II .The thought and characteristics of Yuan's "Critiques on 30 Poems": To praise the excellent tradition since Chien-an Period; to discard Chi, Liang, Hsi-Kun, and Chiang-hsi Poety factions; to enhance sincere, natual, elegant style; and to despise mimic, hypocrisy, facetious, and embarrassment. III.Chen's life and works: Chan is the representative of one of three Chiang-hsi Poetry factions and also an important critic of literature theory. IV .Critique on the "Critique on Shih-tao Chen by yi-shan Yuan": To start by categorizing the various views on "Critique on Chen by Yuan,"' and then to provide proper viewpoints based on the historical critiques on Chen.V .Conclusion: To examine the criticism method of "interpreting texts based on fragments, and to praise Yuan's efforts for the critique on Chen.