:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小校長的授權行為
書刊名:初等教育學報
作者:李新民
出版日期:1995
卷期:8
頁次:頁299-326
主題關鍵詞:國小校長授權行為
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:24
     過去的領導往往是根植於某些佑定,像是男性主義、象徵性父親、社會交易、階層組、操控、指導、訓示等等。校長領導的實踐被看作就是告訴教師如何實踐而已。然而,近幾年來這種教導式的學校霸權領導形式已經遭受諸多的質疑與批判。授權概念指出了傳統上關於領導見解的狹隘之處,並顯現出教師權力關係的知識性與政治性層面。誠然,授權概念為學校權力關係提出了另一種可行的選擇,讓校長可以重新檢視一下他的「習慣性領導形式」。 本文描述國民小學學校生活中關於知識性與政治性的不平等權力關係。其主要目的在提供一個可以現場實際應用的國小校長授權行為範例。這些範例說明國小校長如何能夠在不必侵害教師的權利與專業的情形之下領導。所謂國小校長授權行為包含?持、助長與實現此三部份。?持意指建構一個適合批判的支持性環境;助長意指鼓勵教師對班級和學校的實際生活提出批判與反省;實現則是指將批判反省的結果具體落實。 本文所發展的國小校長授權行為分類架構,使得授權概念有在國小實地應用的討論空間。而授權的實踐其終極乃在於學校情境中不斷反省批判著:其是否能夠為學校教育所服務的學生提供最大的福址。
     Traditionally, concepts of leadership are based on assumptions: masculinity, symbolic father, social exchange, hierarchical organization, manipulation, direction, and instruction. Principal leadership practice is regarded as telling teacher how to practice. During the last few years there was considerable criticism of the hegemony of school leadership. The concept of empowerment reveals the narrowness of these traditional concepts of leadership and draws attention to the epistemological and political aspects of teacher power relationship. Empowerment provides a alternative framework for a principal to examine his “routine leadership”. This article describes elementary school life, which focuses on the unequal epistemological and political power relationship. The purpose of this article is to provide field-based examples of empowering elementary principal behavior. The examples illustrate how elementary school leaders can lead without violating the rights and professionalism of teachers. The behavior of empowering principal leadership consists of support, facilitation, and possibility. Support means to create a supportive environment for critique. Possibility means to realize the result of critique. The empowerment taxonomy developed in this article represents an attempt to add a field-based component to discussion. However, only when it is placed in the context of critique of practice for the purposes of better serving the needs of students does it become empowering.
期刊論文
1.歐用生(1994)。教師即研究者。研習資訊,11(4),1-6。  延伸查詢new window
2.Reitzug, U. C.(1994)。A case study of empowering principal behavior。American Educational Research Journal,31(2),283-307。  new window
3.歐用生(19941000)。做一個有反省能力的教師。研習資訊,11(5),1-6。  延伸查詢new window
4.余英時、許倬雲(19910600)。重想十年。天下雜誌,121,74-133。  延伸查詢new window
5.Ashcroft, L.(1987)。Defusing "empowering": The what and the why。Language arts,64,56-140。  new window
6.Goldman, P.、Dunlap D. M.、Conley, D. T.(1993)。Facilitative power and nonstandardized solutions to school site restructuring。Educational Administration Quarterly,29(1),69-92。  new window
7.Schwab, J.(1983)。The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do。Curriculum Inquiry,13(3),239-265。  new window
8.Weick, K. E.(1982)。Administering education in loosely coupled school。Phi Delta Kappan,27(2),673-676。  new window
9.Smith, J. K.、Balse, J.(1991)。From empiricism to hermeneutics: Educational leadership as a practical and moral activity。Journal of Educational Administration,29(1),6-21。  new window
10.Lather, Patti(19860900)。Research as Praxis。Harvard Educational Review,56(3),257-277。  new window
11.Prawat, R. S.(1991)。Conversations with self and settings: A framework for thinking about teacher empowerment。American Educational Research Journal,28(4),737-757。  new window
12.Leithwood, Kenneth A.(1994)。Leadership for School Restructuring。Educational Administration Quarterly,30(4),498-518。  new window
13.張錦華(19930300)。從意識形態到權力/知識--福柯的後現代主義與傳播研究。國立政治大學學報,66(下冊),313-347。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Mierse, A. C.(1990)。An instrument to operationize a theory of power strategy styles(博士論文)。Ohio state University。  new window
圖書
1.陳伯璋(1993)。意識型態與教育。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉安彥(1984)。社會心理學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Deal, T. E.、Kennedy, A. A.(1982)。Corporate culture: The rites and rituals of corporate life。Reading, Mass:Addison-Wesley。  new window
4.高雄市政府教育局(1989)。高雄市國民小學常用教育法規彙編。  延伸查詢new window
5.天下雜誌編輯部(1991)。追求卓越。台北:天下文化股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.馬起華(1981)。政治社會學。台北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.洪光遠(1992)。組織領導。台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃宏義(1991)。企業文化。台北:長河出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Aronowitz, S.、Giroux H.(1985)。Education under siege: Conservative, liberal, and radical debate over schooling。South Hadley, Massachusetts:Bergin & Garvey。  new window
10.Gorton, R. A.(1987)。School leadership and administration。Iowa:Wm C. Brown Publisher。  new window
11.Blanke, V. E.(1990)。Coursenote of Educational Change。Columbus:The Ohio state University。  new window
12.Morgan, G.(1989)。Image of organization。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
13.Kreisberg, S.(1992)。Transforming power。Albany:State University of New York Press。  new window
14.Peters, T. J.、Waterman, R. H.(1982)。In search of excellent: Lesson from America's best-run companies。New York:Happer & Row。  new window
15.Yukl, G. A.(1991)。Leadership in organizations。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
16.Sergiovanni, T. J.(1984)。Leader and Organizational culture: Leadership as cultural expression。Illinois:University of Illinois。  new window
17.張潤書(1986)。行政學。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.高宣揚(1991)。哈伯瑪斯論。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
19.林清江(1989)。教育社會學新論。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.Schein, Edgar H.(1985)。Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view。Jossey-Bass。  new window
21.Bass, Bernard M.(1985)。Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations。Free Press。  new window
其他
1.羅虞村(1990)。權力的性質與用法。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉慶中,沈慶楊(1991)。卓越學校行政領導理念研究--文化領導導內涵初探,國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊深坑(1993)。意識型態的批判與教育學研究。意識型態與教育。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Brown, L. D.(1986)。Power outside Organizational paradigms。Executive power。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top