:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高級文官的政策制定角色認知
書刊名:空大行政學報
作者:賴維堯
出版日期:1995
卷期:4
頁次:頁21-34
主題關鍵詞:政策制定角色認知從屬執行者事實提供者利益平衡者功能整合者政策主導者Policy makingRole perceptionSubordinative implementorFacts providerInterests balancerFunctions integratorPolicy dominator
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(3) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:39
     現代政府的高級文官在事實上已不再是政策外圍者,除了賡續從屬執行者功能外,必會提供決策資訊,參與政策制定,或自身即為決策者。本文為高級文官對政策制定的角色認知,建構了權責由輕到重的五種連續性角色類型:(1)從屬執行者;(2)事實提供者;(3)利益平衡者;(4)功能整合者;(5)政策主導者,並調查了中央部會級機關122名一級業務主管(司處長級高級文官)對此五種角色的意見反應,結果發現我國司處長級高級文官的政策制定角色認知具有豐富的現代意涵:已不接受傳統的從屬執行者角色,非常贊同事實提供者與利益平衡者的重要角色,半數肯定功能整合者虎色,而少數更具前衛觀點,支持政策主尊者角色。
     In the modern government, the higher civil servants are an important actor inpolicy making process. Besides the traditional implementation function, they indeedhave the capacity to provide policy informations, participate policy making, or evenbecome the decision-maker. This article reviews literatures about civil sevice roletypology toward policy making, and articulates five kinds of policy-making roles incontinuum perspective: subordinative implementor, facts provider, interestsbalancer, functions integrator, and policy dominator. Surveyed with the questionnaire, the 122 directors of line authority of ROG'scentral government show significant findings as the following: Directors seem not toaccept the traditional role of subordinative implementor. They locate themselves asthe facts provider and interests balancer. A half agrees the role of functionsintegrator. A few supports the pioneer role of policy dominator.
期刊論文
1.Muramatsu, M.、Krauss, E. S.(1984)。Bureaucrats and politicians in policymaking: The case of Japan。American Political Science Review,78(1),126-146。  new window
2.Wilson, Grahan K.(1991)。Prospects for the Public Service in Britain: Major to the rescue?。International Review of Administration Sciences,57,327-344。  new window
3.賴維堯(19950500)。我國中央高級文官生涯特徵之研究。空大行政學報,3,37-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Barton, Rayburn(1980)。Roles Advocated for Administrators by the New Public Administration。Southern Review of Public Administration,3(4),463-486。  new window
5.Harmon, Michael M.(1974)。Social Equity and Organizational Man: Motivation and Organizational Democracy。Public Administration Review,34(1),11-18。  new window
6.Newland, Chester A.(1983)。The Reagan Presidency: Limited Government and Political Administration。Public Adininistration Reivew,43(1),1-21。  new window
圖書
1.Meltsner, Arnold J.(1976)。Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。  new window
2.賴維堯、夏學理、施能傑、林鍾沂(1995)。行政學入門。台北:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Peter, B. G.(1988)。Comparing Public Bureaucries。Tuscaloosa, Alabama:University of Alabama Press。  new window
4.Aberbach, Joel D.、Putnam, Robert D.、Rockman, Bert A.(1981)。Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies。Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Peters, B. Guy(1989)。The Politics of Bureaucracy。New York:Longman。  new window
6.Dror, Yehezkel(1983)。Public Policymaking Reexamined。New Brunswick, New Jersey:Transaction。  new window
7.Dror, Yehezkel(1986)。Policymaking Under Adversity。New Brunswick, New Jersey:Transaction Books。  new window
圖書論文
1.Headey, Bruce W.(1975)。A Typology of Ministers: Implications for Minister-Civil Servant Relationships in Britain。The Mandarins of Western Europe: The Political Role of Top Civil Servants。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
2.Putnam, Robert D.(1975)。The Political Attitudes of Senior Civil Servants in Britain, Germany, and Italy。The Mandarins of Western Europe: The Political Role of Top Civil Servants。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top