:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:小班教學「團體學習量表」的探討與評估
書刊名:醫學教育
作者:高美英李宇宙呂碧鴻施子薇李明濱
作者(外文):Kao, Meei-yingLee, Yue-joeLue, Bee-horngShih, Tzu-weiLee, Ming-been
出版日期:1997
卷期:1:4
頁次:頁23-36
主題關鍵詞:團體學習因素量表小組教學確認性因素分析Group learning factor scaleSmall group tutorialConfirmatory factor analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:24
  • 點閱點閱:5
     臺灣目前的小團體教學雖然仍在起步的階段,但是對此種教學方式的評估是刻不容緩的。在重新建構了比較適合於團體學習的量表--團體學習因素量表--之後,本研究即在檢測和評估此量表的運用情形。本研究根據204位參與小組教學的醫學系學生,在經過兩次的測試之後,再以確認性因素分析的方法,重新檢驗團體學習因素的模型與資料配合的程度。結果顯示在控制各因素與指標問項,使其彼此之間互不相關之後,五個次量表中,仿同互動學習、自我揭露、人際關係和參與度比較能正向的代表團體學習因素,而規避╱衝突則受團體學習因素的影響為負向的且程度較低。而對各個次量表而言,前測與後測之間的穩定性都相當的高,綜合這些結果反映出本量表是可以作為一學習團體評量的工具。但是研究結果同時也建議,團體學習因素量表本身仍有一些可以改進的地方。且因研究本身的限制,乃需要更多的實證資料來檢證,特別是應用在具有不同特質的對象上。
     Although the utilization of small group tutorials is only in the initial stages currently in Taiwan, it is necessary to evaluate the effect of this common teaching method on Taiwanese students. This study examined and evaluated the Group Learning Factor Scale following its reconstruction to measure the impact of the small group tutorial on medical students. Data were collected from 204 medical students who participated in small group tutorials in the College of Medicine, National Taiwan University. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test whether the CFA (confirmatory factor analysis) model fit the data. Results showed that for four of the five subscales, including interpersonal learning, self-presentation, interpersonal relationship and engagement, the Group Learning Factor moved in a positive direction; the relationship between the avoiding/conflict subscale and the Group Learning Factor was n the opposite direction. However, after controlling all latent variables and indicators for the lack of relationship to each other, avoiding/conflict was less affected by the Group Learning Factor than the other four subscales. In addition, all the subscales were very stable. The relationships between the pre-test and post-test were highly significant for all the subscales. The results also indicated the Group Learning Factor Scale could be employed to measure the group learning process, but suggested that the scale also needs to be improved due to the limitation of this study. Additional studies are needed, especially involving the application of the scale to various samples to further investigate the accessibility of the Group Learning Factor Scale.
期刊論文
1.李明濱、李宇宙、林信男、謝博生、陳恆順(19970600)。利用小組教學方式實施醫學倫理教學。醫學教育,1(2),63-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李宇宙、高美英、呂碧鴻、施子薇、張宏俊、李明濱(19970900)。小班教學「團體學習量表」之信度與因素分析。醫學教育,1(3),19-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Michael, J. A.(1993)。Teaching problem solving in small groups。Ann New York Acad Sci,701,37-48。  new window
4.Anderson, James C.、Gerbing, David W.(1988)。An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment。Journal of Marketing Research,25(2),186-192。  new window
5.Bentler, Paul M.、Chou, Chih-ping(1987)。Practical Issues in Structural Modeling。Sociological Methods and Research,16(1),78-117。  new window
圖書
1.謝博生(1994)。醫學教育︰理念與實務。台北市:金名圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural equations with latent variable。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.Long, J. S.(1984)。Confirmatory Factor Analysis。Beverly Hill:Sage Publication。  new window
4.Joreskog, K. G.、Sorbom, D.(1993)。Lisrel 8 and Prelis 2 Comprehensive Analysis of Linear Relationships in Multivariate Data。Chicago:Scientific Software International。  new window
5.Yalom, Irvin D.(1985)。The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy。Basic Books。  new window
6.DeVellis, Robert F.(1991)。Scale Development: Theory and Applications。Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wheaton, B.、Muthen, B.、Summers, G. F.、Alwin, D. F.(1977)。Assessing reliability and stability in panel models。Sociological Methodology。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.MacKenzie, K. R.(1983)。The clinical application of a group climate measurement。Advances in Group Psychotherapy。International University Press。  new window
3.Neufeld, V.(1989)。Issues and guidelines for student and program evaluation。New Directions for Medical Education。New York:Springer-Verlag。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE