:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:問題基礎學習小班教學可行性之先驅研究
書刊名:醫學教育
作者:陳震寰郭英調蕭光明劉秀枝林孝義王署君陳曾基黃信彰石宜銘陳素真李壽東何橈通張茂松
作者(外文):Chen, Chen-huanKuo, Benjamin Ing-tiauShiao, Guang-mingLiu, Hsiu-chihLin, Hsiao-yiWang, Shuu-jiunChen, Tzeng-jiHwang, Shinn-jangShyr, Yi-mingChen, Su-janeLee, Shou-dongHo, Low-toneChang, Mau-song
出版日期:1998
卷期:2:4
頁次:頁32-42
主題關鍵詞:醫學教育問題基礎學習小班教學Medical educationProblem-based learningSmall group tutorial
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:12
     本研究目的旨在探討醫學系推行「問題基礎學習小班教學」之可行性。共有25名臨床主治醫師擔任小班老師和40名醫學系三年級的學生參加本研究。學生分成5組,每組7至8人,實際小組討論在暑期進行,連續5週,每週討論一個個案,每個個案分三次討論完畢(每週一、三、五下午)。每個老師只需指導一組學生討論完成一個個案。每個個案討論結束時,老師和每位學生均立即填寫評量問卷,同時學生接受臨床知識筆試。本研究老師出席率為96%,問卷回收率為96%;學生出席率為77%,問卷回收率為68.5%。68.4%的學生自認為能夠自動自發地完成討論議題;75%的學生在討論上充份發言;74.3%的學生認為,經過這門課後,對課程中討論的主題有深入的了解;75%的學生對課程中討論的主題很有興趣;高達87.5%的學生贊成繼續小班教學。79.2%的老師認為學生討論時能明確地抓住討論重點;87.5%認為學生在課堂上討論熱烈;66.7%認為在討論時學生的發言平均;91.6%認為學生對討論主題的觀念正確;95.8%均贊成繼續實行小班教學。臨床知識筆試除最後一週回收率低無法準確評估外,其餘4週之成績均達及格標準。本研究認為臺灣醫學院醫學系學生的適應力強,足以接受「問題基礎學習小班教學」之新的教學方式。
     The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a problem-based learning small group tutorial (PBL) in the Faculty of Medicine. Twenty-five attending physicians and 40 third-grade medical students participated in this study. Students were divided in 5 groups of 7-8 members. Tutorials were conducted in 5 consecutive weeks during summer vacation. Each case was discussed in three separate sessions in a week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday afternoons). Each tutor only tutored for a one-week session. At the last session for each case, both tutor and students would complete evaluation questionnaires. Students also took written examinations at the same time. 96% of tutors tutored the tutorials and 96% completed the questionnaire. 77% of students attended the tutorials and 68.5% completed the questionnaire. 68.4% of students thought they could direct and complete the discussion; 75% of students thought they could express freely in the tutorial; 74.3% of students thought they understood in depth the topics of the case after the tutorial; 75% of students were interested in the topics of the case; 87.5% of students approved of the PBL. 79.2% of tutors thought students had grasped key points about the topics; 87.5% of tutors thought the discussion was full of energy; 66.7% of tutors thought each member contributed equally to the tutorial; 91.6% of tutors thought students learned correct concepts about the topics; 95.8% of tutors approved of the PBL. All students passed the written examinations for the first 4 cases. The test for the last case was not assessable due to a low completion rate. In conclusion, our results suggest that medical students in Taiwan will benefit from this PBL tutorial.
期刊論文
1.李澤生、關超然(19970600)。The use of Problem-Based Learning in Medical Education。醫學教育,1(2),11-20。new window  new window
2.Patel, V. L.、Groen, G. J.、Norman, G. R.(1991)。Effects of conventional and problem-based medical curricula on problem solving。Academic Medicine,66,380-389。  new window
3.Norman, G. R.(1988)。Problem-solving skills, solving problems and problem-based learning。Medical Education,22(4),279-286。  new window
4.Walton, H. J.、Matthews, M. B.(1989)。Essentials of problem-based learning。Medical Education,23,542-558。  new window
5.梁繼權、王維典、陳慶餘、謝博生(19970300)。Evaluation of Medical Education Reform at National Taiwan University College of Medicine。醫學教育,1(1),21-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Schmidt, H. G.、Dauphinee, W. D.、Patel, V. L.(1987)。Comparing the effects of problem-based and conventional curricula in an international sample。J Med Educ,62,305-315。  new window
7.Schmidt, H. G.、Machiels-Bongaerts, M.、Hermans, H.(1996)。The development of diagnostic competence: comparison of a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum。Acad Med,71,658-664。  new window
8.Kaufman, D. M.、Mann, K. V.(1996)。Comparing students' attitudes in problem-based and conventional curricula。Acad. Med.,71,1096-1099。  new window
9.Neufeld, V. R.、Barrows, H. S.(1974)。The McMaster Philosophy: an approach to medical education。Journal of medical education,49(11),1040-1050。  new window
10.Albanese, Mark A.、Mitchell, Susan(1993)。Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues。Academic Medicine,68(1),52-81。  new window
11.Moore, G. T.、Block, S. D.、Style, C. B.(1994)。The influence of the New Pathway curriculum on Harvard medical students。Academic Medicine,69(12),983-989。  new window
12.Wetzel, M. S.(1996)。Developing the role of the tutor/facilitator。Postgrad Med J,72,474-477。  new window
13.Neufeld, V. R.、Woodward, C. A.、MacLeod, S. M.(1989)。The McMaster M. D. Program: A Case Study of Renewal in Medical Education。Academic Medicine,64(8),423-432。  new window
14.Newble, D. I.、Clarke, R. M.(1986)。The approaches to learning of students in a traditional and in an innovative problem-based medical school。Medical Education,20,267-273。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE