臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：屬性化概念圖的模糊評量
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：張國恩 引用關係／林水成／潘宏明／陳世旺
作者(外文)：Chang, Kuo-en／Lin, Shui-cheng／Pan, Hung-ming／Chen, Sei-wang
出版日期：1998
卷期：6:1
頁次：頁81-94
主題關鍵詞：概念圖；屬性化概念圖；模糊評量；Concept map；Attributed concept map；Fuzzy assessment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:35
　　　　　摘要：一張概念圖是由許多命題(propositions)所組成，而每個命題包括兩個概念(concepts) 及他們之間的聯結語，因此一張概念圖描述著某一知識內容中概念間的相互連結關係。然而不同的概念與聯結語在一知識主題(knowledge domain) 中扮演著不同的角色，其重要性當然會有所不同。因此本文提出一種屬性化概念圖 (attributed conceptmap)的觀念，也就是對概念圖中每一概念及聯結語給予一權值代表其重要性。假設專家或老師已經建構好一張屬性化概念圖，我們稱它為專家概念圖。我們提出一種以模糊集合理論為基礎的評量方式(或稱模糊評量)，將學生建構的概念圖與專家概念圖比對，來評估學生對某－知識主題的了解程度。實驗顯示以屬性化概念圖為主的模糊評量在合理性、穩定性上均有顯著的改進，結果也顯示此方法是可行的。
　　　　　A concept map consists of a collection of notions interconnected to each other that collectively delineate a significant branch of knowledge. The notions and elationships constituting a map play distinct roles during restating the subject portrayed by the map. The notions and relationships are assigned associated weights by experts to indicate their relative degree of importance in the conceptual context. The resulting map is called the expert concept map. During the evaluation of the prototype maps, students were asked to build a map. The maps were compared with the expert concept map using a technique conceptualized in terms of a fuzzy discipline. The maps and techniques were developed and tested against data. The results revealed that approach was feasible.
期刊論文
1.Shavelson, Richard J.(1974)。Methods for Examining Representations of a Subject-matter Structure in a Student's Memory。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，11(3)，231-249。  new window
2.Friendly, M. L.(1977)。In search of the M-Gram: The structure of organization in free recall。Cognitive Psychology，9，188-249。  new window
3.Johnson, P. J.、Goldsmith, T. E.、Teague, K. W.(1994)。Locus of the predictive advantage in pathfinder-based representations of classroom knowledge。Journal of Educational Psychology，86(4)，617-626。  new window
4.Beyerhach, B. A.、Smith, J. M.(1990)。Using Computerized Concept Mapping Program to Assess Teacher's Thinking About Effective Teaching。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，27(10)，961-971。  new window
5.Herl, Howard E.、Baker, E.、Niemi, D.(1996)。Construct Validation of an Approach to Modeling Cognitive Structure of U.S. History Knowledge。Journal of Education Research，89(4)，213-230。  new window
6.Kruskal, J. B.(1964)。Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonnumeric Hypothesis。Psychometric，29，115-129。  new window
7.Shavelson, R. J.、Stanton, G. C.(1975)。Concept Validation: Methodology and Application to the Three Measures of Cognitive Structure。Journal of Education Measurement，12，67-85。  new window
8.Fisher, Kathleen M.(1990)。Semantic Networking: The New Kid on the Block。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，27(10)，1001-1018。  new window
9.Fisher, K. M.、Faletti, J.、Patterson, H.、Thornton, R.、Lipson, J.、Spring, C.(1990)。Computer-Based Concept Mapping。Journal of College Science Teaching，19，347-352。  new window
10.Goldsmith, T. E.、Johnson, P. J.、Acton, W. H.(1991)。Assessing structural knowledge。Journal of Educational Psychology，83(1)，88-96。  new window
11.Noavk, J. D.(1991)。Clarify with Concept Maps: A Tool for Students and Teachers Alike。Science Teacher，58(7)，45-49。  new window
12.Markham, Kimberly M.、Jones, M. G.、Markham, J. J.、Mintzes, M.(1994)。The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: further evidence of validity。Journal of research in science teaching，31(1)，91-101。  new window
13.Rumelhart, D. E.、McClelland, J. L.(1985)。Distributed Memory Representation。Journal of Experimental Psychology, General，25，1-75。  new window
14.邱上真(19890600)。知識結構的評量：概念構圖技巧的發展與試用。特殊教育學報，4，215-244。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Novak, J. D.(1990)。Concept maps and vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning。Instructional Science，19(1)，29-52。  new window
圖書
1.Lowe D. C.(1985)。Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition。Hingham, Massachusett：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Ausubel, David P.、Novak, Joseph D.、Hanesian, Helen(1978)。Educational psychology: A cognitive view。New York：Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
3.Zimmermann, H. J.(1991)。Fuzzy set theory and its applications。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
4.Ebel, R. L.(1979)。Essentials of educational measurement。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
5.Paivio, Allan(1986)。Mental representations: A dual coding approach。Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Anderson, John Robert(1983)。The architecture of cognition。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Klir, George J.、Yuan, Bo(1995)。Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications。Prentice-Hall。  new window
8.Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Rumelhart, D. E.、Norman, D. A.(1985)。Representation of knowledge。Issues in cognitive modeling。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1014（臺灣：1005，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67638415
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上