:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:心智圖教學方案對國小五年級學生創造力、學習成就、學習動機之影響--以自然與生活科技領域為例
作者:蔡文山
校院名稱:國立嘉義大學
系所名稱:國民教育研究所
指導教授:鄭麗玉
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2007
主題關鍵詞:心智圖教學方案創造力學習成就學習動機
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
心智圖教學方案對國小五年級學生創造力、學習成就與學習動機影響之研究-以自然與生活科技領域為例
蔡文山
國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所
摘要
本研究係運用心智圖法的規則與步驟,設計一套融入國小五年級自然與生活科技領域之「心智圖教學方案」,探討其對國小五年級學生創造力、學習成就與學習動機的影響。
本研究採準實驗研究設計,受試者是四班共126位國小五年級學生(實驗組兩班64人,控制組兩班62人),他們都接受「Williams創造力測驗」以及「自然與生活科技領域學習成就量表(甲卷)」、「自然與生活科技領域學習成就量表(乙卷)」、「自然與生活科技領域學習動機量表」,實驗組學生於實驗教學結束後並填寫一份學習回饋單。
根據研究結果,本研究主要發現如下:
一、 接受心智圖教學方案的實驗組學生,其創造力表現,優於控制組學生。
二、 不同自然與生活科技領域程度別之受試學生,其創造力表現有顯著差異,
高程度學生優於中、低程度學生;中程度學生表現亦優於低程度學生。
三、 接受心智圖教學方案的實驗組學生,其學習成就表現,優於控制組學生。
四、 不同自然與生活科技領域程度別之受試學生,其學習成就表現有顯著差異,
高程度學生優於中、低程度學生;中程度學生表現亦優於低程度學生。
五、 接受心智圖教學方案的實驗組學生,其學習動機,高於控制組學生。
六、 不同自然與生活科技領域程度別之受試學生,其學習動機表現有顯著差異,
高程度學生優於中、低程度學生;中程度學生表現亦優於低程度學生。
最後,研究者根據本研究結果,對國小實施心智圖法教學方案及未來研究提出具體建議,以供參考。
關鍵詞:心智圖教學方案、創造力、學習成就、學習動機
The Influence of the Mind Mapping Teaching Program on Creativity, Learning Achievement, and Learning Motivation of Fifth-Grade Students — in the Domain of Science and Technology
Wen Shan Tsai
Graduate Institute of Elementary and Secondary Education
Abstract
The purpose of this study was: (1) to design a “ mind mapping teaching program” to be used in the domain of science and technology for fifth-graders, and (2) to evaluate its influence on the students’ creativity, learning achievement, and learning motivation.
The subjects were 126 fifth-graders from four classes with 64 in the experimental group and 62 in the control group.
All the subjects took “Williams Creativity Assessment Packet, ” the pretest and the posttest of “Science and Technology Learning Achievement,” and “Science and Technology Learning Motivation Scale.” The experimental group also took a questionnaire on their learning feedback following the end of the experiment.
The findings were as follows:
1. Students in the experimental group who received the mind mapping teaching program demonstrated a higher level of creativity than students in the control group.
2. Students at various levels of the science and technology ability demonstrated significant differences on creativity. High-level students outperformed intermediate- and low-level students; intermediate-level students outperformed low-level students.
3. Students in the experimental group who received the mind mapping teaching program demonstrated a higher level of learning achievement than students in the control group.
4. Students at various levels of the science and technology ability demonstrated significant differences on learning achievement. High-level students outperformed intermediate- and low-level students; intermediate-level students outperformed low-level students.
5. Students in the experimental group who received the mind mapping teaching program demonstrated a higher degree of learning motivation than students in the control group.
6. Students at various levels of the science and technology ability demonstrated significant differences on learning motivation. High-level students outperformed intermediate- and low-level students; intermediate-level students outperformed low-level students.
Based on the findings, some suggestions were given for teachers and future research.
Key words: the mind mapping teaching program, creativity, learning achievement, learning movitvation.
參考文獻

中文部分
心智圖(2006):心智圖的妙用。線上檢索日期2006年1月10日。網址:
http://netcity6.web.hinet.net/UserData/vincyc/home.htm
心智圖法與放射思維中心(2006)。心智圖背後的原理。檢索日期2006年5月23日。網址:http://www.mindmapping.hk/mmintro.php
毛連塭(2000)。創造力研究。台北市:心理。new window
毛連塭、陳麗華(1987)。精熟學習法。台北:心理。
李茂能(2002)。量化研究的品管:統計考驗力與效果值分析。國民教育研究學報,8,1-24。new window
李德高(1990)。教育心理學。台北:五南。
全中平(1992)。國立台北師範學院非數理系學生對概念圖學習態度之研究。台北師院學報,12,163-172。
余民寧(1997)。有意義的學習-概念圖的研究。台北:商鼎文化。
余學敏(2002)。以心智繪圖應用於創新教學之初探。中等教育,53(4),49-52。new window
沈冠君(2005)。國小資優生心智圖教學之成效研究~以社會學習領域為例。未出版之碩士論文,台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,台北。
林燕琪(2006)。心智圖法對國中學習障礙學生閱讀理解教學成效之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學特殊教育教學碩士論文,彰化。
林菁(1996)。動畫中之顏色和背景與兒童記憶與理解學習之探討,嘉義師院學報,10,37-82。
林慧姿(2005)。新手教師應用繪本結合心智圖法於國小資源班閱讀教學之質性研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台北師範學院特殊教育研究碩士論文,台北。
林意屏(2004)。心智圖思考法應用於電子郵件之編排設計研究以女性保養品面膜為例。未出版之碩士論文,台灣師範大學設計研究所碩士論文,台北。
林嘉玲(2003)。七年級學生健康與體育相關概念之行動研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立體育學院運動科學研究所碩士論文,桃園。
林曉雯(1994)。國中生物教師教學表徵的詮釋性研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台new window
灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文,台北。
林麗娟(1996)。互動式教學環境與科學性知識的學習。教學科技與媒體,16,3-13。new window
邱上真(1989)。知識結構的評量:概念構圖技巧的發展與適用。彰化師範大學特殊教育學報,6,51-67。new window
哈柏潛能開發中心(2003)。超強記憶課程。線上檢索日期2006年1月28日,網址:http://www.happer.com.tw/index3.htm
吳清山(2002)。知識經濟與教育發展。初等教育學刊,12,1-18new window
吳勝福(2004)。應用概念構圖融入高職教學對學生多元智慧表現之研究:以計算機概論為例。未出版之碩士論文,南台科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文,台南。
吳靜吉(1976)。分歧式和連銷式的聯想訓練對創造思考的影響。國立政治大學學報,33,45-71。
孫易新(2001)。心智圖基礎篇-多元知識管理系統。台北:耶魯國際。
孫易新(2002)。心智圖進階篇。台北:耶魯國際。
孫易新(2003a)。英國總公司Buzan Centres。線上檢索日期2006年1月25日,網址:http://www.mindmapping.com.tw/page5-Buzan.htm
孫易新(2003b)。心智圖法Mind Mapping簡介。線上檢索日期2006年1月25日,網址:http://www.mindmapping.com.tw/Page2.htm
孫易新(2007)。心智圖聖經:心智圖法理論與實務篇。台北:耶魯國際。
教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北:作者。new window
教育部國教專業社群網(2006)。九年一貫課程與教學網。線上檢索日期2006年3月27日。址:http://teach.eje.edu.tw/。
涂亞鳳(2006)。心智圖寫作教學法對國中生語文創造力及寫作表現影響之研究。未出版之碩士論文,慈濟大學教育研究所碩士論文,花蓮。
游姮茹(2006)心智圖法提升創造性問題解決能力之探究。未出版之碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,高雄。
陳立行(2001a)。記憶是不斷重複的結果。線上檢索日期2006年1月15日。網址:http://asia-learning.com/action/article/37352361/#note
陳立行(2001b)。中學生心像圖筆記法(經驗修正版)。線上檢索日期2006年1月15日。網址:http://asia-learning.com/action/article/36207261/
陳念南(2003)。引爆A+學習革命。台北:知識風。
陳丁榮(2000)。超覺思考。台北:敬業開發。
陳淑娟(2005)。心智圖融入國小低年級寫作教學之行動研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,台北。
陳盈達(2004)。心智圖法課程之學習成效研究--以南投縣政府社區大學為例。未出版之碩士論文,朝陽科技大學企業管理系碩士論文,台中。
陳龍安(1990)。「問想做評」創造思考教學模式的建立與驗證。未出版之博士論文,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,台北。new window
陳龍安(2002)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北:心理。new window
許良榮(1996)。圖形與科學課文學習關係的探討。教育研究資訊, 4(4), 121-131。new window
黃玉萱(2005)。「整合電腦與心智圖之寫作教學方案」對國小中年級學生寫作成效之影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立台南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班論文,台南。
黃玉琪(2006)。自然科心智圖法創造思考教學方案對國小學生創造力與自然科學業成就之影響研究。未出版之碩士論文,臺北市立教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,台北。
黃俊能(2006)。研究室內透過心智圖活動提高研究互動。未出版之碩士論文,元智大學資訊工程學系碩士論文,桃園。
郭俊賢、陳淑惠譯(1998)。多元智慧的教與學。台北:遠流。
郭柏銓(2001)。應用全球資訊網培養國中學生問題解決能力之實驗研究。未出版之
碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,高雄。
梁祐澄(2003)。幫助孩子學習的好方法「心智圖」。線上檢索日期2006年2月3日。網址:http://www.dsej.gov.mo/caet/100/no2/teach.htm
張玉成(1983)。教師發問技巧及其對學生創造思考能力影響之研究。台北:教育new window
部教育計畫小組。
張世彗(2003)。創造力-理論、技術/技法與培育。台南:久成。
張世彗(2004)。「鑑定與評量心智圖教學方案」的編擬及其實驗成效研究。台南:久成。
張春興(1995)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華。
張春興(1997)。現代心理學。台北:東華。
游自達(1995)。數學學習與理解之內涵—從心理學觀點分析。初等教育研究集刊,3,
31-45。
翁錦瑛(2002)。數學概念構圖教學與診斷效益。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺南師範
學院數學碩士學位班論文,台南。
錢秀梅(2002)。心智圖法教學方案對身心障礙資源班學生創造力影響之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所特殊教育教學碩士論文,台北。new window
戴維思(2002)。戴維思超強記憶訓練。台北:如何。
董 奇(1995)。兒童創造力發展心理。臺北:五南。
鄭麗玉(2005)。認知心理學:理論與應用。臺北:五南。
魏靜雯(2004)。心智圖與摘要教學對國小五年級學生閱讀理解與摘要能力之影響。未出版之碩士論文,台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,台北。
蔡文山(2006)。知識經濟與學校組織變革之研究。國立編譯館館刊,34(1),73-84。
蔡天民(2002)。概念構圖對國小自然科學習成就、學習態度與概念改變之研究。
未出版之碩士論文,臺北市立師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文,台北。
蔡淑如(2005)。心智構圖對增進國小智能障礙學生文章內容記憶之成效。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學中山學術研究所碩士論文,台北。
蔡智燦(2005)。應用心智圖擷取品質系統驗證專家內隱知識之實證研究-以QS-9000核心工具為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立台北科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文,台北。.
謝真華(1999)。概念構圖教學對國小四年級學童在自然科學習成效之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,台南。
謝富榮(2003)。概念構圖策略與認知型態對自然科網路化教學影響之研究。未出版之碩士論文,東海大學教育研究所碩士論文,台中。new window
蔣治邦(1994)。由表徵觀點探討新教材數與計算活動的設計。載於台灣省國民學校new window
教師研習會主編:國民小學數學科新課程概說(低年級)(頁60-76)。台北:台
灣省國民學校教師研習會
羅玲妃(1997)。心智繪圖:思想整合利器。一智出版社。
羅素貞(1996)。問題表徵與問題解決。屏東師院學報,9,149-176。new window
甄曉蘭、曾志華(1997)。建構教學理念的興起與應用。國民教育研究學報,3,179-208。new window

外文部分
一、英文部分
Abbott, R. (1992). MIind Mapping: a new way to think on paper. Fortune,126(22), 12.
Anderson, J. R. (1995). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85( 4), 249-277.
Anderson, L. W. , & Block, J. H.(1985). Mastery learning model of teaching and learning . In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education. New York: Pergamon Press.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ausubel, D. P. , Novak, J. D. & Hanesian, H.(1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Rinehart and Winston.
Bagley, C. & Hunter, B. (1992). Restructuring, constructivism, and technology: Forgoing a
new relationship. Educational Technology, 32(7), 22- 27.
Banks, J. C. (1995). Developing research skills: Independent research projects on
animals and plants for building the research skills of report writing, mind mapping, and investigating through inquiries. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED408565).
Bernhoft, F.O. (1987):Brain dominance and self-actualization. paper presented at annual
convention of the american association for counseling and development (New
Orleans, LA, April 21-25, 1987). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
ED286144).
Block, J. H. (1972). Student learning and the setting of mastery performance standers.
Educational Horizons, 50(4), 183-191.
Brinkmann, A. (2003). Mind mapping as a tool in mathematics education. Mathematics Teacher, 96 (2),96-101 .
Bromley, K.; Irwin-De Vitis, L. & Modlo, M. (1995).Graphic oranganizers. Scholastic.
Brophy, J. E.(1987). How teacher influence what is taught and learned in classrooms. The
Elementary School Journal ,83(1),1-13.
Brown, H. D. (1987). Principles in language learning and teaching. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.
Buzan, T.(1978)。創造力-速讀記憶力(宋碧雲譯)。台北:允晨。(原著出版
於1971)。
Buzan, T. (1984). Make the most of your mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Buzan, T. (1987)。開發你的腦力(詹求孚、陳芳智譯)。台北:遠流。(原著出版於1984)。
Buzan, T. (1991). Use both sides of your brain. New York: Penguin.
Buzan, T. (1996). The speed reading book. UK: BBC.
Buzan, T. (1998)。開動大腦(李水明譯)。北京:作家。(原著出版於1984)。
Buzan,T.(2000a). The mind map book. how to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain’s untapped potential. UK: BBC.
Buzan,T. (2000b).Use Your Head.. UK: BBC.
Buzan, T. (2003a). Definition of mind maps. Retrieved January 28, 2006, from the World Web Site http://www.mind-map.com/mindmaps_definition.htm.
Buzan, T. (2003b). Application of mind maps. Retrieved January 25, 2006, from the World Web Site http://www.mind-map.com/mindmaps_applications.htm.
Buzan, T.& Buzan, B. (1993). The mind map book: radiant thinking—the major evolution in human. UK: BBC.
Buzan, T.& Buzan, B. (2003). The mind map book. UK: BBC.
Byrnes, J. P. (2001). Mind, brains, and learning. Guilford.
Clark, J. (1990). Patterns of thinking: Integrating learning skills in content teaching. Needham Heights, MA: Allny&Bacon.
Callison, D. (2001). Concept mapping. school library media activities monthly, 17
(10), 30-33.
Dansereau, D. F. & Newbern, D. (1997). Using knowledge maps to enhance teaching.
In W. E Campbell & K. A. Smith (Eds.), New paradigms for college teaching
(pp.125-147). Edina, MN: Interaction.
David , P. (2003). Mind mapping your way to a better career. Career Development
International, 8 (5), 253-257.
Dilts, R ., Grinder, J., Bandler, R. & Delozier, J. (1997)。大腦操作手冊─NLP概論(彭真譯)。台北:世茂。(原著出版於1987)。
Dodd, D, W. (2006). Four technologies to gain efficiency and productivity. Science Scope,
29(6), 23-27.
Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practice for developing reading
comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup, & S. J. Samuels (Eds.) , What research has to
say about reading instruction (pp.205-242). Newark: International Reading
Association.
Entrekin V. S. (1992).Mathematical mind mapping. The Mathematics Teacher, 85 (6),
444-445.
Eriksson, L. T. (2004). Mind map marketing: A creative approach in developing
marketing skills. Journal of Marketing Education, 26 (2), 174-187.
Flavell, J. H.(1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving . In l. b. resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Farrand , P. , Hussain, F., Hennessy ,E. M.E. (2002) . The efficacy of the 'mind map' study technique. Medical Education, 36, 426-431.
Gange, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd. ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Gelb, M. (1998). 7 Brains-how to think like Leonardo da Vinci. New York: Delacorte.
Gelb, M. (1999)。7 Brains: 怎樣擁有達文西的七種天才(劉蘊芳譯)。台北:大塊文化。(原著出版於1998)。
Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. (1962). Creativity and intelligence. New York: Wiley.
Goldberg, C. (2004). Brain friendly techniques: Mind mapping. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 21 (3), 22-24.
Goodnough, K & Woods, R, (2002). Student and teacher perceptions of mind mapping: A middle school case study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED470970).
Goodnough, K. & Long, R.(2002). A graphic organizer for the pedagogical. Science Scope, 25 (8), 20-24.
Gross, R. (1993). Your future on one piece of paper: Mind-mapping for personal and professional development. Armed Forces Comptroller,38(3), p19-25.
Guskey, T. R. (1985). Implementary mastery learning. California: Wadsworth .
Heimlich, J. E. & Pittelman, S. D. (1986). Semantic mapping: Classroom applications. reading aids series, IRA service bulletin. International Reading Association, Paper. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED274959).
Hieberrt, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In Grouws, D. A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97). NY: Macmillan.
Higgins, J. M. (1995). Innovate or evaporate. Futurist, 29 (5), 42- 49.
Hofkins, D. (2004). Universe of learning tools in each brain. Times Educational Supplement, 4580, 24.
Homfray, T. (2004). Mind mapping. Times Educational Supplement, 4581, 31.
Hoosain, E. (2004). Mind Map. Mathematics Teacher, 98 (1), 4.
Humphreys, K. (1999). "The Subject Specialist in National and University Libraries,
Library, 17, 31.
Hyerle, D. (2000). A Field guide to using visual tools. (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service, No.ED443784)
Jenkins, A. (2005). Mind mapping. Nursing Standard, 20 (7), 85.
Jensen, E. (2003)。大腦知識與教學(梁雲霞譯)。台北:遠流。(原著出版於1992)。
Jonassen, E. H. (1993). Learning vs. Information, Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
12, 3-5.
Jones, J. & Hutchins, N. (2004). Making schools better places to be—motional intelligence. Management in education, 18 (3), 20-22.
Katz, S; Sutherland, S ; Earl, L. (2005). Toward an Evaluation Habit of Mind: Mapping the Journey. Teachers College Record, 107 (10), 2326-2350 .
Kenny, J. (2004). Mind- mapping: It's totally mental. Times Educational Supplement, 4588, 28-29.
Kesselman, M. (1994). Ideal come from everywhere: Generating creativity for your library. Wilson Library Bulletin, 68 (9), 42-45.
Mansfield, R. S., Busse, T. V. & Krepelka , E. J. (1978). The effectiveness of creativity
training. Review of Educational Research, 48(4), 517- 536.
Margulies, N. (1991). Mapping inner space. Tucson, A.Z.: Zephyr Press.
Mayer, R. E. (1997)。教育心理學:認知取向(林清山譯)。台北:遠流。(原著出版於1987)。
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B.(1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444-452.
Mento, A. J. & Jones, R. M. (1999). Mind mapping in executive education: Applications and outcomes. Journal of Management Development, 18 (4), 390-407.
Mukerjea, D. (1997a). Superbrain. Singapore :Oxford University.
Mukerjea, D.(1997b). Brainfinity. Singapore :Oxford University.
Mueller, A; Johnston, M; Bligh, D; Wilkinson, J.(2002). Joining mind mapping and
care planning to enhance student critical thinking and achieve holistic nursing care. Nursing Diagnosis,13 (1), 24-28.
Nist, S.L., & Simpson, M. (2002). College studying. Reading Online, 5(8). Retrieved May
29, 2005, from the World Wide Web : http://www.readingonline. org/articles /art_ index.asp? HREF=handbook/nist/index.ht ml.
Northen, S. (2003). Age of enlightenment. Times Educational Supplement, 4550, 6-7.
Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge. Concept map as
facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, N. J. : Lawrence Erbium
Associates Publishers.
Novak, J. & Gowin, B.(1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, V. & Buzan, T. (1998)。成功之路(孫易新譯)。台北:一智。(原著出版於1991)
Oldfather, P. & Others.(1994). Drawing the circle: Collaborative mind mapping as a process for developing a constructivist teacher preparation program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(3), 15-26.
Orcutt, D. (1987). World sign exposition. Win law: World sign Communication Society.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. NY: Oxford niversity.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-foster
and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
Pan, W. L. (1996). Role playing and mind mapping issues on nitrate contamination.
Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 25 (1),37-42 .
Peterson, A. R. & Snyder, P. J. (1998). Using mind maps to teach social problems analysis paper . presented at the annual meeting of the society for the study of social problems . (48th, San Francisco, CA, August 20-22).
Petrini, C. M. (1994). Creating creativity. Training&Development, 48 (11),11-16.
Pintrich, Paul R. & Schunk, Dale H.(2002).Motivation in education :theory, research and applications. New Jersey : Pearson Education, Inc.
Pressley, M., VanEtten, S., Yokoi, L., Freebern, G., & VanMeter, P. (1998). "The metacognition of college studentship A grounded theory approach". In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.) , Metcognition in Theory and Practice (pp.347-367). Mahwah NJ: Eribaum.
Pollitt, D. (2003). Mind mapping your way to a better career. Career Development International, 8 (5), 253-257.
Reese, E.B. (1997). Mind mapping texas landscapes: Postmodern pedagogy with or without computers. Art Education, 50 (6), 25-32 .
Richards, R. G. (1993). Learn: Playful techniques to accelerate learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED379071).
Rieber, L. P. (1994). Computers, graphics and learning. Madison. WI: WCB Brown &
Benchmark.
Rico, G. (1983). Writing the natural way. Los Angeles: Teacher.
Rose, C & Nicholl, M. J.著(1999)。學習地圖(戴保羅譯)。台北:經典傳訊。(原
著出版於1988)。
Rosenbaum, A. (2004). Mind mapping: A tool for managing organizational transition. information strategy. The Executive's Journal, 20 (2), 32-39.
Roythorne, P. (2006). ABC of ICT. Times Educational Supplement, 4667, 5.
Ruiz-Primo,M.A., & Shavelson, R.J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept in
science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 569-600.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A. , Shavelson, R. J. , Li, M. & Schultz, S. E. (2001). On the validity
of cognitive interpretations of scores from alternative concept-mapping techniques.
Educational Assessment, 7(2), 99-141.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1988). Representation in memory. In R. C. Atkinson,
R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (eds.), Stevens´ handbook of experimental
psychology: Vol. 2. Learning and cognition ( 2nd ed., 511- 587). New York: Wiley.
Ruffini, M. F. (2004). Designing an emap to teach multimedia applications online.
International Journal of Instructional Media, 31 (4), 383-391.
Schau, C., & Mattern, N. (1997). Assessing students? connected understanding of
statistical relationships. In I. G. a. J. B. Garfield (Ed.), The assessment challenge in
statistics education (pp. 91-104). The Netherlands: IOS Press
Smith, B. (2002). Make link. Times Educational Supplement, 4480, 28-29.
Steyn, T. & De Boer, A . (1998). Mind mapping as a study tool for under prepared students in mathematics and science. South African Journal of Ethnology, 21 (3), 125-132.
Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sze, S. (2005). Math and mind Mapping: Origami Construction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED490352)
Torrance, E. P. & Goff, K. (1989). A quiet revolution. Journal of Creative Behavior. 23(2),
136-145.
Wenger, W. (1990). Toward a general theory of creativity and genius. Aurora, New York: United Educational Service.
Wikipedia encyclopedia (2006). Mind map. Retrieved January 28th, 2006 from http://en.wikipedia-org/wiki/mind mapping.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227-268.
Woolfolk, A. E., (1993). Educational psychology (5th ed), Boston: Allyn and Bacon .
Wycoff, J. (1991). Mind mapping-your personal guide to exploring creativity and problem- solving. New York: Berkley.
Wycoff, J. & Richardson, T. (1997)。轉型思考~組織再造的良方(許舜青譯)。台北:
遠流。(原著出版於1992)。

二、日文部分

恩田 彰(1988)。創造性心理學(陸祖昆譯)。台北:五洲。(原作1980年出版)
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE