:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:軍隊士氣之研究與測量工具之發展
書刊名:應用心理研究
作者:顏志龍 引用關係
作者(外文):Yan, Jyh-long
出版日期:1999
卷期:1
頁次:頁187-228
主題關鍵詞:士氣軍隊士氣士氣量表MoraleMilitary moraleMorale scale
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:102
     本研究的目的,在探討士氣之本質,並發展一可用以測量軍隊士氣之量表。經由 焦點團體訪談及一般性訪談後,研究者認為士氣為一種「潛伏」的精神力量,此潛伏力量的 本質為一種「團體成員間的關係」;而此潛伏力量則是經由「組織目標」引發而成為組織成 員情緒喚起的外顯狀態。此外,研究者根據文獻及訪談結果編擬士氣量表,並以實徵研究方 法驗證其信度及效度。結果顯示此量表的內部一致性信度介於.95.97 之間,量表與效標 題之相關性( r=.53.94 ),亦頗符合研究者之預期。 此量表在因素結構上為單一因素, 且此單一因素結構經交叉驗證,顯示具有相當的穩定性與一致性。研究者最後亦根據研究結 果,提出軍隊士氣的假設性模式。
     The purpose of this thesis is to explore the essence of military morale and to develop a scale to measure military morale. According to the empirical data from focused group interview and general interview, the author attributes morale as a potential spirit. The essence of the potential spirit is a special type of relationship among group members. The potential spirit can be evolved when the goal of organization becomes obvious. With the results of past morale studies and empirical interviews of this study, the author also developed a morale scale. Two groups of subjects ( formal administration & cross validation ; N=311, 373; separately ) were asked to complete this scale. The empirical data show that the scale is impressive in terms of its internal-consistency reliability and criterion-related validity. After factor analysis, it shows that this scale is a single factor structure. The cross-validation examination shows that the single factor structure of the scale is reliable and consistent. Finally, the author proposes a hypothetical model of military morale in terms of the result of this research.
期刊論文
1.Campbell, D. T.、Fiske, D. W.(1959)。Convergent & Discrimination validation by the multitrait-multi-method matrix。Psychological Bulletin,56,81-105。  new window
2.Gal, R.、Manning, F. J.(1987)。Morale and its components: A cross-national comparison。Journal of Applied Social Psychology,17(4),369-391。  new window
3.Motowidlo, S. J.、Borman, W. C.(1977)。Behavioral anchored scales for measuring morale in military units。Journal of Applied Psychology,62(2),177-183。  new window
4.Schmitt, N.、Stults, D. M.(1986)。Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait-multi-method matrices。Applied psychological measurement,10(1),1-22。  new window
5.Steiner, M.、Neumann, M.(1978)。Traumatic neurosis and social support in the Yom Kippur War returnees。Military Medicine,143(12),866-868。  new window
6.Gal, R.(1986)。Unit morale: From a theoretical puzzle to an empirical illustration-an Israeli example。Journal of Applied Social Psychology,16(6),549-564。  new window
7.鄭伯壎、楊國樞(19770900)。影響工人工作滿足感的因素:領導方式、情境因素及人格特質。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,44,13-45。  延伸查詢new window
8.Brayfield, Arthur H.、Rothe, Harold F.(1951)。An index of job satisfaction。Journal of Applied Psychology,35(5),307-311。  new window
9.許士軍(19770500)。工作滿足、個人特徵與組織氣候--文獻檢討及實證研究。國立政治大學學報,35,13-56。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Motowidlow, S. J.、Dowell, B. E.、Hopp, M. A.、Borman, W. C.、Johnson, P. D.、Dunnette, D.(1976)。Motivation, satisfaction, & morale in army careers: A review of theory & measurement。Arlington. VA:U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral & social sciences。  new window
學位論文
1.李豐章(1987)。縣市教育局成員士氣之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊振昇(1991)。國民小學教師參與學校行政決定與工作士氣關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.江志正(1992)。國民中學組織管理型態與教師工作士氣之關係(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.宋竹瑛(1987)。文化中心組織結構與工作人員士氣之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳榮輝(1994)。當前台灣銀行行員士氣之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.顏志龍(1998)。軍隊士氣之研究與測量工具之發展(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新莊市。  延伸查詢new window
7.林重澎(1989)。國民小學校長領導權力基礎與教師士氣關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.潘文忠(1993)。國民中學組織結構類型與教師士氣關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.許南雄(1980)。人事行政。台北:漢苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.U.S. Army(1983)。Military leadership, Field manual 22-100。Washington, D.C.:U. S. Goverment Printing Office。  new window
3.Harris, O. J. Jr.(1976)。Managing people at work。N.Y.:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
4.沈敬康(1993)。中國軍魂--孫立人將軍鳳山練軍實務。台灣:台灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Blum, L. M.、Naylor, C. J.(1968)。Industrial psychology: Its theoretical and social foundations。Happer & Row:John Weatherhill, Inc.。  new window
6.Maier, N. F. R.(1955)。Psychology in Industry: A psychological approach to industrial problems。Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
7.Stouffer, S. A.、deVinney, L. C.、Star, S. A.、Williams, R. M.(1949)。Studies in social psychology in World War II: Vol.2. The American solider: Combat and its aftermath。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Carlisle, H. M.(1976)。Management: Concepts and situations。Chicago:Science Research Associates, Inc.。  new window
9.Harrell, T. W.(1958)。Industrial psychology。N.Y.:Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
10.Grinker, R. R.、Spiegel, J. P.(1945)。Men under stress。Philadelphia:Blakiston。  new window
11.Smith, P. C.、Kendall, L. M.、Hulin, C. L.(1969)。The measurement of satisfaction in work & retirement。Chicago:Rand McNally。  new window
12.Van Creveld, Martin(1982)。Fighting power: German and U.S. Army performance, 1939-1945。Greenwood Press。  new window
13.林清山(1995)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:臺灣東華書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Organ, D. W.(1997)。Toward an explication of "morale": In search of the m factor。Creating Tomorrow's Organizations: A Handbook for Future Research in Organizational Behavior。England:Jone Wiley & Sons。  new window
2.余伯泉、黃光國(1991)。形式主義與人情關係對臺灣地區國營企業發展的影響。中國人的心理與行為。臺北:桂冠圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Guion, R. M.(1966)。Some definition of morale。Studies in the Personel and Industrial Psychology。Homewood:Dorsey。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE