:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導效能、學校組織效能與教師工作士氣之研究
作者:過修齊 引用關係
作者(外文):Guo, Hsiu-Chi
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:教育政策與行政學系
指導教授:楊振昇
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2011
主題關鍵詞:競值架構校長領導效能學校組織效能教師工作士氣competing values frameworkprincipals’ leadership effectivenessschools’ organizational effectivenessteachers’ morale
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:154
本研究旨在探討競值架構在國民小學校長領導效能、學校組織效能與教師工作士氣間之應用情況。針對臺灣地區任職公立國民小學教師進行問卷調查,藉以暸解競值架構應用在校長領導效能、學校組織效能與教師工作士氣之現況,分析不同背景變項之教師知覺上述三者之差異情形,並進一步探析其因果相關情形。
經由相關的文獻分析,建構本研究之理論基礎與研究架構,編製「競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導效能、學校組織效能與教師工作士氣之研究」調查問卷,作為蒐集研究資料的工具。本研究係以臺灣地區公立國民小學教師為研究的對象,於民國99年9月採用「多階段抽樣」的方式選出109所三種不同學校規模之1,286名國民小學教師進行郵寄問卷調查施測,共回收1,097份而回收率為85.30﹪,有效問卷計1,079份而有效回收率達到83.90﹪。調查所得資料以描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數、皮爾遜積差相關、典型相關、迴歸分析與結構方程模式等統計方法,進行分析與討論歸納整理出以下結論:
一、國民小學教師知覺競值架構應用在校長領導效能與學校組織效能及教師工作士氣知覺上均達「中高」程度以上表現
二、國民小學教師於競值架構應用在校長領導效能各模式、層面與整體知覺程度,受到性別、年齡、現任職務、服務總年資、學校規模、學校位置與學校區域等個人背景變項之影響有顯著差異
三、國民小學教師於競值架構應用在學校組織效能各模式、層面與整體知覺程度,受到性別、年齡、現任職務、最高學歷、服務總年資、學校規模、學校位置及學校區域等個人背景變項之影響有顯著差異
四、國民小學教師於教師工作士氣各層面知覺程度與整體,受到年齡、現任職務、服務總年資、學校規模、學校位置及學校區域等個人背景變項之影響有顯著差異
五、國民小學教師於競值架構應用在校長領導效能與學校組織效能及教師工作士氣知覺表現上均呈現相互間高度正向相關
六、國民小學教師於競值架構應用在校長領導效能之「內部過程」模式與「工作配置」層面對於教師工作士氣具有最佳的預測力
七、國民小學教師於競值架構應用在校長領導效能之「內部過程」模式與「和諧共識」層面對於學校組織效能具有最佳的預測力
八、國民小學教師於競值架構應用在學校組織效能之「內部過程」模式與「穩定控制」層面對於教師工作士氣具有最佳的預測力
九、國民小學應用在競值架構校長領導效能與學校組織效能均能正向影響教師工作士氣的表現
最後,根據上述研究結論提出具體建議,提供教育行政機關、國民小學校長、國民小學教師及未來研究者作為參考。
The study aimed at exploring the effects of applying the competing values framework (CVF)to improve principals’ leadership effectiveness, schools’ organizational effectiveness and teachers’ morale in elementary schools. The collected questionnaires are completed by current public elementary school teachers with different background variables in Taiwan. By analyzing the teachers’ perception of the effects that the CVF has on the above three factors, the correlation among them can be further explored and discussed.
After analyzing some related documents, the theoretical basis and framework of the research are established. The questionnaire of the study is also designed based on the analysis in order to collect the data of the research. The subjects of the research are public elementary school teachers in Taiwan. The subjects are selected through “Multistage Sampling” in September, 2010. The subjects are 1,286 elementary school teachers from 109 schools which are categorized into three different school sizes. The questionnaires are delivered through mails. 1,097 copies of questionnaires are retrieved. The returns-ratio is 85.30%. Among the retrieved questionnaires, there are 1,079 effective ones and the effective returns-ratio is up to 83.90%. The collected data are then analyzed, discussed and inducted through methods including Descriptive statistics, T-test, One-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, Canonical correlation, Regression analysis and Structural equation modeling. The conclusions are as follow:
1. The applying of CVF to principals’ leadership effectiveness and schools’ organizational effectiveness perceived by elementary school teachers’ and the awareness of the teachers’ morale are both perceived as “medium-above high” level.
2.Due to the influence of personal background variables such as gender, age, current position, the total number of working years and the size, location and district of the school, the elementary school teachers’ perception of how effective it is to apply the CVF to various models, levels, and the whole aspects of a principals’ leadership effectiveness varies considerably.
3.Due to the influence of personal background variables such as gender, age, current position, highest academic qualification ,the total number of working years and the size, location and district of the school, the elementary school teachers’ perception of how effective it is to apply the CVF to various models, levels, and the whole aspects of schools’ organizational effectiveness varies considerably.
4.Due to the influence of personal background variables such as age, current position, the total number of working years and the size, location and district of the school, the elementary school teachers’ perception of the whole aspects of teachers’ morale varies considerably.
5. The applying of CVF to principals’ leadership effectiveness is related to schools’ organizational effectiveness. Meanwhile, schools’ organizational effectiveness is related to teachers’ morale, and so is the relationship between principals’ leadership effectiveness and teachers’ morale. Therefore, each of them show a highly positive correlation to each other.
6.The elementary school teachers perceived that the application of the CVF to improve the principals’ leadership effectiveness, especially the aspects of the “internal process model” and the “work allocation level” could better predict the effect it has on teachers’ morale.
7.The elementary school teachers perceived that the application of the CVF to improve the principals’ leadership effectiveness, especially to the aspects of the “internal process model” and the “harmonious consensus level,” could better predict the effect it has on schools’ organizational effectiveness.
8.The elementary school teachers perceived that the application of the CVF to improve the schools’ organizational effectiveness, especially the aspects of the “internal process model” and the “stability control level” could better predict the effect it has on teachers’ morale.
9.In elementary schools, the application of the CVF to improve the principals’ leadership effectiveness and schools’ organizational effectiveness shows positive effects on teachers’ morale.
Finally, the study proposes some concrete suggestions based on the conclusions of the research in the hope of providing reference for educational administration, elementary school principals, elementary school teachers and future researchers.
一、中文部份
王文科與王智弘(2010)。教育研究法(增訂第14版)。臺北:五南。
王如哲、林明地、張志明、黃乃熒與楊振昇(1999)。教育行政。高雄:麗文。
王鳳鳴(2009)。會計主管領導風格與領導效能之研究-以高雄市政府所屬機關學校為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所,高雄。
田家綺(2004)。組織文化、決策風格與組織效能關聯性之研究:以軍方及民間組織為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國防管理學院國防決策科學研究所,臺北。
江志正(2000)。國民小學團體動力、組織學習、學校發展策略與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄。new window
江志正(2008)。教育變革時代中談永續領導。教育研究月刊,171,58-67。new window
江岷欽(1993)。組織分析。臺北:五南。
江澈(2007)。私立高級中學校長競值領導、教師專業承諾、組織創新與組織績效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所,高雄。
江滿堂(2008)。國民小學校長多元領導型態、團體動力、學校組織文化特質與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。new window
呂春嬌(2008)。大學圖書館中階主管女性領導特質與領導效能之關係及環境脈絡效果(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北。new window
呂美娥(2007)。公立高級高業職業學校教職員知覺學校組織文化與組織效能之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系在職進修班,臺北。
李安明(2006)。學校領導研究分析。刊載於張鈿富(主編),學校行政理念與創新(68-91頁)。臺北:高等教育。new window
李安明(2009)。發揮領導執行力:建購現代領導的權力與責任觀。於2009年5月16日發表於國立臺灣師範大學教育政策與行政研究主辦,教育行政的力與美國際學術研討會。收錄於教育行政的力與美國際學術研討會論文集(113-128頁)。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學。
沈俊志(2010)。臺北市國民小學創新經營與教師士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所學校行政班,臺北。
沈進成與王銘傑(2007)。工作士氣對工作績效影響關係之研究—以工作壓力為干擾變項。經營管理論叢,3(1),81-98。
何怡欣(2007)。臺南縣市國民小學教務主任服務領導與教師工作士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所,臺南。
何雍慶、楊易淳與周政德(2007)。應用競值架構探討組織文化、主管影響力與新產品發展績效之關係。中華管理評論國際學報,10(3),1-31。
宋雯榮(2009)。高雄市國小校長競值領導行為、組織創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究,高雄。
林文律(1999)。從校長必備能力看校長培育。教育資料與研究雙月刊,28,6-13。new window
林秀玲(2010)。校長策略領導與學校組織效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。
林秀英(2009)。國小女性校長領導特質與領導效能關係之研究—以雲嘉南四縣市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,嘉義。
林明地(2002)。校長學:工作分析與角色研究取向。臺北:五南。
林恒斌(2009)。屏東縣國民小學人力資源管理與學校組織效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。
林海清(1994)。高中教師激勵模式與其工作滿意服務士氣教學效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北。new window
林婉琪(2000)。國民小學教師士氣與學校效能關係之研究-以臺灣北部地區三縣為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院教育研究所,臺北。
林瑜瑩(2008)。不同性別直屬主管之情緒表現及領導風格對領導效能之影響(未出版之博士論文)。元智大學管理研究所,桃園。new window
林慧蓉(2004)。國民中學學校人力資源運用與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學教育研究所,嘉義。
林龍和(2005)。高雄市國民小學校長家長式領導與教師服務士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄。
林鴻明(2009)。臺中縣國民小學校長領行為與領導效能相關之研究。於2009年5月9日發表於國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系主辦,第三屆教育政策與行政前瞻發展研討會暨第十屆研究生論文發表會。收錄於第三屆教育政策與行政前瞻發展研討會暨第十屆研究生論文發表會論文集(250-262頁)。南投:國立暨南國際大學。
吳明清(2009)。校長領導的新思維與新模式。於2009年5月23日發表於社團法人中華民國學校行政學會主辦,學校行政論壇第21次學術研討會。收錄於學校行政論壇第21次學術研討會論文集(3-9頁)。臺北:文化大學。
吳明雄(2010)。國民小學教師知覺校長轉型領導、教師知識管理與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育系,臺中。new window
吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。臺北:知城數位科技。
吳阿理(2006)。國民小學校長溝通行為與主任工作士氣之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所,新北。
吳柏林(2002)。現代統計學。新北:前程企業。
吳清山(1988)。國民小學管理模式與學校效能之關係(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北。new window
吳清山(1998)。學校校能研究。臺北:五南。
吳清山(2005)。學校效能研究的價值。教育研究集刊,51(2),133-139。new window
吳清基(1992)。教育與行政。臺北:師大書苑。
吳勁甫(2003)。校長領導與學校效能關係之探討—研究結果的回顧。學校行政雙月刊,27,52-62。
吳勁甫(2003)。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為與學校組織效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所,高雄。new window
吳勁甫(2006)。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為與學校組織效能關係之研究。教育政策論壇,9(2),155-185。new window
吳勁甫(2008)。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北。new window
邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析—SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析(第三版)。臺北:五南。
侯世昌(2002)。國民小學家長教育期望、參與學校教育與學校效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系,臺北。new window
柯景煌(2009)。臺北市國民中學校長領導風格、教師知識管理與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,臺北。
范熾文(2002)。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學教育學系,臺北。new window
風貞豪與何若湯(2006)。新竹地區高中校長轉型領導與體育教師工作士氣關係之研究。清雲學報,26(1),255-265。
秦夢群(2000)。教育行政:理論部分。臺北:五南。
孫瑞霙(2002)。競值架構下領導型態、組織文化與組織效能之研究—以臺灣地區技術學院為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北大學企業管理學系,臺北。new window
朝倫愛登(2007)。蒙古綜合中學校長多元領導策略與學校組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。new window
曾文鑑(2010)。國民小學校長領導架構取向、教育人員組織認定與學校效能之關係研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所,臺北。new window
黃志豪(2008)。競值架構應用在高雄市國小校長組織變革領導角色與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄。
黃秀琴(2005)。國民中學校長領導行為與領導效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系,彰化。
黃坤謨(2008)。國民小學校長多元智能領導、教師工作投入與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所,臺北。new window
黃芳銘、楊金寶與許福生(2005)。在學青少年生活痛苦指標發展之研究。師大學報:教育類,50 (2),97-119。new window
黃柏創(2009)。國民中學教師知覺校長轉型領導、學校組織氣氛與學校效能關係之研究—以中部五縣市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所,彰化。
黃昆輝(1983)。現階段臺灣省教育行政之檢討與策進。載於郭為藩(主編),當代教育理論與實際(223-246頁)。臺北:五南。
黃昆輝(1989)。教育行政學。臺北:東華。
黃哲彬(2004)。創新管理及其對學校行政的應用。學校行政,34,8-20。
黃書婷(2007)。教育優先區學校行銷策略、組織文化與組織效能關係之研究-以高高屏三縣市國中為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所,高雄。
黃翠玲(2008)。國小教師內部行銷知覺、工作士氣與工作滿意之關聯性研究-以臺中縣為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中華大學經營管理研究所,新竹。
黃馨慧(2005)。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學行政與領導研究所,花蓮。
許惠玲(2007)。桃園縣國小校長競值架構領導型態對教師快樂影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學教育研究所,桃園。
許嘉政(2010)。國民小學校長權力資源運用、學校權力文化與學校組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。new window
許嘉純(2009)。競值架構之校長領導效能與教師工作士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系,南投。
傅如瑛(2009)。桃園縣國民小學組織氣氛與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所,臺北。
游駿弘(2008)。競值架構在軍事訓練組織領導與效能應用之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。大業大學工業工程與科技管理學系碩士在職專班,彰化。
教育部(2010)。國民中小學校概況統計(98學年度)。臺北:教育部。
張玉成(1973)。影響國民小學教師服務精神之因素(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所,臺北。
張其高(2004)。海峽兩岸製造業主管領導風格部屬成熟度工作特性與領導效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系,彰化。new window
張明輝(2001)。學校行政領導。臺北:五南。
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北:東華。
張晃溪(2009)。海岸巡防總局人員工作士氣與組織承諾之研究-以東部地區巡防局為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學區域政策與發展研究所,臺東。
張琦雅(2003)。由競值架構觀點探討新IT系統導入過程及成效與組織文化、管理技能之關聯性:以潤泰集團營造子事業部導入ERR為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北大學企業管理學研究所,臺北。new window
張勉與張德(2004)。組織文化測量研究述評。外國經濟與管理,26(8),2-7。
張裕隆與劉岡憬(2001)。360度回饋與傳統上司評鑑對領導效能預測力之比較。應用心理研究季刊,10,167-197。
張新基(2008)。國民小學創新經營、組織文化與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。new window
張維文(2008)。國民小學內部行銷影響學校效能之研究-組織開放氣氛之中介角色與干擾角色(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學教育經營管研究所,臺南。new window
張潤書(1998)。組織行為與管理。臺北:五南。
張德銳(1994)。教育行政研究。臺北:五南。new window
張慶勳(1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所,高雄。new window
張慶勳(2002)。學校組織行為。臺北:五南。
郭為希(2004)。校長激勵教師士氣作為之研究-以明日國中為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學教育研究所,花蓮。
郭秋勳(1991)。影響高級職業學校教師參與在職進修教育訓練因素研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北。new window
康龍魁、蘇誌誠與過修齊(2009)。學生家長對學校形象期望與滿意度之研究-以臺中縣一所國民小學為例。教育理論與實踐學刊,19,201-228。new window
許惠玲(2006)。桃園縣國小校長競值架構領導型態對教師快樂影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學教育研究所,桃園。
溫水柳(2006)。完全中學校長領導行為、教師參與模式與領導效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系,彰化。
溫明麗(2000)。教育理念與實踐– Q & A。臺北:師大書苑。
翁福元(2007)。教育政策社會學-教育政策與當代社會思潮之對話。臺北:五南。
陳文慶(2008)。競值架構應用在國民小學學校組織文化與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所,臺北。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐與劉子鍵(2009)。多變量分析方法-統計軟體應用(第五版)。臺北:五南。
陳明璋(1982)。組織效能及其決定因素之研究。國立政治大學學報,45,117-148。
陳秀珍(2007)。國民小學女性校長領導行為與領導效能相關之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系,彰化。
陳建仲(2008)。中部四縣市國民小學教師情緒管理與工作士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系,臺中。
陳淑芬(2006)。高雄市中小學女性主任領導特質與領導效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所在職專班,高雄。
陳順宇(2005)。多變量分析。臺北:華泰。
陳慶瑞(1991)。國民小學校長領導效能之分析與評鑑—以闡述模式為例。國教天地,90,37-44。
陳麗玉(2007)。競值架構對我國高等教育評鑑國際化指標之啟示。教育行政與評鑑學刊,3,1-18。new window
楊石欽(2008)。學校團隊學習與組織效能關係之研究-以臺北縣國民小學行政人員為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理研究所,臺北。
楊界雄(2009)。國民小學家長參與班級事務與教師工作士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系,臺中。
楊振昇(1991)。國民小學教師參與學校行政決定與工作士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所,臺北。
楊振昇(2006)。教育組織變革與學校發展研究。臺北:五南。new window
湯發安(2008)。桃園縣國民小學校長服務領導與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學教育研究所,桃園。
葉香汝(2003)。國民小學校長轉換型領導方式對教師服務士氣之影響:以彰化縣國民小學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系在職進修專班,彰化。
葉連祺(1998)。國內有關學校效能研究之後設分析。國民教育研究學報,4,(65-296頁)。嘉義:國立嘉義大學。new window
葉連祺(2004)。鳥瞰教育領導理念之叢林-教育領導理念之初步綜觀。教育研究月刊,124,96-108。new window
鄒惠生(2007)。桃園縣國民小學學校效能與教師工作滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。元智大學管理研究所,桃園。
雷博名(2008)。臺北縣國民小學主任轉型領導與領導效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所,新北。
詹靜怡(2007)。臺北縣市國民小學校長時間管理與領導效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所,臺北。
過修齊、紀佳琪與梅文慧(2010)。臺中市國民小學教師工作時間調查:OECD教師工作時間指標之應用與比較。於2010年12月18日發表於灣教育政策與評鑑學會主辦,2010教育行政創新與組織再造學術研討會。收錄於2010教育行政創新與組織再造學術研討會論文集(295-310頁)。臺中:中臺科技大學。
熊曉鴻(2006)。臺北縣國民小學校長壓力管理策略與領導效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所,臺北。
潘文忠(1992)。國民中學組織結構類型與教師士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所,臺北。
潘慧玲(1999)。學校效能相關概念的釐析。教育研究資訊,7(5),138-153。new window
蔡金田與洪子鑫(2009)。臺北市優質學校與香港傑出學校遴選計劃之比較分析與啟示。於2009年11月22日發表於臺中市政府主辦,2009臺中市校務創新經營與發展學術研討會。收錄於2009臺中市校務創新經營與發展學術研討會論文集(69-81頁)。臺中:中臺科技大學。
蔡明學(2009)。臺灣地區地方教育視導對學校組織效能影響之研究-以績效責任觀點(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所,臺北。new window
蔡炳坤(2007)。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北。new window
蔡進雄(2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。臺灣師範大學教育研究所,臺北。new window
蔡進雄(2004)。學校轉型領導的理論與實際。教育研究月刊,119,53-65。new window
蔡慧雅(2007)。屏東縣國民小學組織創新、組織慣性與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學教育研究所,高雄。
黎珈伶(2004)。國民小學學校本位課程發展下之人力資源管理與教師工作士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所,臺北。
臺北市政府教育局(2004)。優質學校教育指標。臺北:臺北市政府。
趙志楊(2002)。學校效能研究。刊載於張銀富(主編),學校行政:理論與應用(288-310頁)。臺北:五南。
鄭淑娟(2004)。苗栗縣國民小學校長壓力管理與領導效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所,臺北。
鄭彩鳳(1996)。競值途徑應用在高中職校長領導角色、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,臺北。new window
鄭彩鳳(2002)。學校行政—理論與實務。高雄:麗文。
鄭彩鳳(2007)。校長競值領導效能研究:理論、指標與衡量。臺北:高等教育。
鄭彩鳳與吳勁甫(2003)。學校領導研究的新取向:競值架構的領導觀點。教育研究月刊,111,67-83。
劉宜政(2009)。屏東縣國民小學校長多元架構領導策略與學校組織效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。
賴俞岑(2008)。彰化縣國小組織文化與教師工作士氣關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學教育研究所,嘉義。
賴鈴文(2006)。高雄縣市國民小學校長領導行為、學校組織文化與組織變革態度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學人力與資源管理研究所,高雄。
薛仲平(2010)。臺北市國民中學校長競值領導與組織氣氛關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,臺北。
繆敏志(2001)。從組織文化相關量化研究評析競值架構。國立政治大學學報,83(157-195頁)。臺北:國立政治大學。
閻瑞彥(2000)。基層領導型態與組織效能:競值途徑觀點下之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北大學企業管理學研究所,臺北。new window
濮世緯(2004)。國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北。new window
謝文全(2003)。教育行政學。臺北:高等。
蕭國倉、過修齊與王素貞(2008)。當前我國國小校長領導權面臨之挑戰及因應策略:數個案例分析。於2008年12月27日發表於社團法人中華民國學校行政學會主辦,學校行政論壇第20次學術研討會。收錄於學校行政論壇第20次學術研討會論文集(175-197頁)。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學。
蕭燕慧(2010)。臺中縣市國民小學校長人際溝通能力與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系,臺中。
韓楷檉與過修齊(2005)。實施九年一貫課程後國民小學教師生涯自我效能與生涯協助需求相關因素之研究。國民教育研究集刊,13(185-207頁)。臺中:國立臺中師範學院。
顏弘欽(2009)。國民小學組織學習、組織創新與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所,臺北。
顏志龍(1999)。軍隊士氣之研究與測量工具之發展。應用心理研究,1,187-228。new window

二、外文部份
Adams, C. F.(1992). Finding psychic rewards in today’s school: A rebuttal. Clearing House, 56(6),346-347.
Al-Khalifa, K. N., &Aspinwall, E. M. (2001). Using the competing values framework to investigate the culture of Qatar industries. Total Quality Management, 12(4), 417-428.
Anderson, R. E.(1983). Finance and effectiveness: A study of college environ-ments. Princeton, NJ:College and University Programs, Princeton University Educational Testing Service. Retrieved form ERIC database(ED373409 ).
Anderson, M. H.(2000). A comparative analysis of teachers’ individual morale levels and their assessed morale levels of Colleague. Paper presented at the American Education Research Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
Armstrong, D. G., Henson, C. T., & Savage, T. V.(1989). Education:An introducation. New York:Macmillan.
Azzaro, J. A.(2005).Understanding a high-performance unversity development organization: leadership and best practices(Unpublished doctoral dissertation ), Ohio State University, OH.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y.(1988). On the evaluation of structure equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
Baker, F. B.(1985).The basics of item response theory. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Balfour, D. L.(1995).Organizational culture and competing values. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,5,495-499.
Bass, B. M.,& Avolio, B. J.(1997).Full rang leadership development manual for the munltifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood, CA:Mind Garde.
Betsy, S.(1996). Using competingvalues framework to assess cor porate ethical codes. Journal of Business Communication, 33 , 71-84.
Belasen, A. T. (2000).Leading the learning organization: Communication and competencies for managing change. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Belasen, A. T.(2008). The theory and practice of corporate communication: A competing values perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Berrio, A. A.(2003).An organizational culture assessment using the compenting values framework:A profile of Ohio State University extension. Journal of Extension,41(2),24-43.
Bivona, K. N.(2002).Teacher morale: The impact of teaching experience, workplace conditions, and workload. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1a/50/b4.pdf.
Boyd, W. A. (1993). Teacher morale and sense of efficacy as psychosocial variables: Perceptions of social class, occupational status, and occupational prestige (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Northern Colorado, CO.
Boehm, A.,&Yoels, N.(2009).Effectiveness of welfare organizations: The contribution of leadership styles, Staff Cohesion, and worker empowerment. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1360-1380.
Briggs, L. D. & Richardson, W. D.(1992).Causes and effects of low morale among secondary. Psychological Bulletin,120,235-255.
Brown, J.(1993).Leadership for School Improvement. Emergency Librarian, 20(3), 8-20。
Brown, W. F.,& Dodd, N. G.(1998).Utilizing in organizational culture gap analysis to determine human resource development needs. Leadership and in Organizational Development Journal,19(7),374-385.
Bryman, A.(1992).Charisma and leadership un organizations. Thousand , Oaks:Sage Publications.
Buenger,R. L.,Daft, E.,Conlon, J. &Austin, J.(1996). Competing value in organizations: contextual influences and structural Consequences. Organization Science,7,(5),557-576.
Bumham, J. C.(2004). The effects of California Content Standard on teacher morale: A study of perceptions, support, and teaching practices(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), LA Sierra University, CA.
Burns, J. H.(1978).Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
Cameron, K. S.(1984).The effectiveness of ineffectiveness. Research in Organizational Behavior,6, 235-285.
Cameron, K. S.(1986).“Effectiveness as Paradox:Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness”.Management Science,32,(5),539-553.
Cameron, K. S.(2002).The compenting values framework:An introduction. Retrieved form htpp://compentingvalues.com/pdf/CVF%20Introduction%20Article.pdf
Cameron, K. S., & Ettington, D. R. (1988). The conceptual foundations of organizational culture. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research(pp.356-396). New York: Agathon Press.
Cameron, K. S., & Lavine, M.(2006). Making the impossible possible: Leading extraordinary performance — The rocky flats story. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E.(1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E.(2006).Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework(Rev. ed.). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Cameron, K. S., Quinn, R. E., DeGraff, J.,& Thakor, A.(2006).Competing values leadership: Creating value in organizations . Northampton, MA: Edward-Elgar.
Campbell, J. P.(1973). Mangerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Caplow, T.(1983). Managing an organization. New York: Holt, Rinhard and Winston.
Chin, J. M. C. (2007). Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2), 166-177.
Cools,W.,De Fraine,B.,Van den Noortgate,W.,&Onghena,P.(2009). Multilevel design efficiency in educational effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3),357-373
Caruso, D. R.,Mayer, J. D.,&Salovey,P.(2002).Relation of an ability measure of emotional intelligence to personality. Journal of Personality Assessment,79,306-320。
Cheng,Y .C.(1991). Strategies for conceptualizing research on school administration: An effectiveness approach. Education Journal, 19,(1),69-81.
Chin, J. M. C.(2007). Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2),166-177.
Christensen, D. G..(1991).The indicators and factors of teacher morale in selected schools of the state of Utah(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Brigham Young University,.HI.
Davis, H.(1977).Human behavior at work organizational behavior(5th ed.). NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
Davis, G. A.,& Thomas, M. A.(1989).Effective schools and effective teachers. London, England:Allyn and Bacon.
Davis, T.(1996).The ways administrators work:A study of the theorietical frames of leadership used by female and male secondary school principals in Pennsylvania(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Temple University , Philadelphia, PA.
DeGraff, J., & Lawrence, K. A. (2003). Creativity at work: Developing the right practices to make innovation happen. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
DeGraff, J.,& Quinn, S. E.(2007). Leading innovation: How to jump start your organization’s growth engine. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R.,& Quinn, R. E.(1995).“Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership”. Organization Science,6(5).524-540.
Denison, D., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1991). Organizational culture and organizational development: A competing values approach. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 1-21.
Durocher, E.(1996).Leadership orientations of school administrators:A survey of nationally recoghized school leaders(Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University), Teachers College, New York, NY.
Edmonds, R. R.(1997).Effective school for the urban poor.Educational Leadership,37,15-27.
Egley, R. J., & Jones, B. D.(2005). Principals' inviting leadership behaviors in a time of test-based accountability. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 3(1), 13-24.
Evans, L.(1997). Teacher morale, job satisfaction and motivation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Faerman, S. R., & Quinn, R. E.(1985). Effectiveness: The perspective from organizational theory. The Review of Higher Education, 9(1), 83-100.
Federman, M.(2006). Towards a valence theory of organization. University of Toronto.
Fiedler, F. E., & Garcia, J. E. (1987). New approaches to effective leadership: cognitive resources and organizational performance. New York.: John Wiley and Sons.
Fiol, C. M.(1991). Managing culture as a competing resource:A identity-based view of sustainable competing advantage. Journal of Management,17(1),191-211.
Fleming, N. J. B.(2003). A study of principal and teacher judgments of principal leadership orientations(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Maryland, MD.
Fowler, D. O.(1996).The relationship of shared decision-making on teacher morale: Implications for middle school administrators. Dissertation Abstracts International,57(6), 2290A.
Fowler, W. J. Jr.(1991).What are the characteristics of principals identified as effective by teachers? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association,Chicago,IL. Retrieved form ERIC database(ED347695 ).
Fuller, B.,&Clarke, P.(1994).Raising school effects while ignoring culture ?Local conditions snd the influence of classroom tools, rules and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research,64(1),119-157.
Gamble, C. J. W.(2001).The impact of principal leadership style and gender on elememtary school climate:A case study(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of South Alabama, AL.
Gepford, J. D.(1996). The relationship between school success and the leadership style of the principal in low social-economic schools(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of South Carolina, SC..
Gewirtz, S.,Ball, S. J.,&Bowe, R. (1995).Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Gray, J. H., Densten, I. L.,& Sarros, J. C.(2003).Size matters:Organizational culture in small,medium,and large Australuan organization. Paper presented at the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Gregory, S. T.(2003).Leadership styles and characteristics of effective principals in high-povert public schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association,Chicago,IL. Retrieved form ERIC database(ED 478741 ).
Griffith, J.(2003). School as organizational models: Implications for examining school effectiveness. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1),29-47.
Groff, M. L.(2002).Elementary instructional leadership:Factors that affect performance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO.
Glickman, C. D. (1990).Supervision of Instruction.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Goleman, D.(1998).Working with emotional intelligence. New York,NY:Bantan Books.
Goodman, P. S., Atkin, R.S.& Schoorman, F.D.(1983).On the demise of organizational effectiveness studies, In K. S. Cameron & D. A. Wetten(Eds.).Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple model(pp.121-135). New York: Academic Press.
Goodman, E. A., Zammuto, R. F.,&Gifford B. D.(2001).The competing values framework:Underatanding the impact of organizational culture on the quality of work life. Organizations Development Journal,19(3),58-68.
Guldemond, H.,& Bosker, R. J.(2009). School effects on students' progress -- A dynamic pPerspective. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20 (2),255-268.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C.(1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hallinger, P.& Heck, R.(1998).Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,9(2),157-191.
Hart, S. L.,& Quinn,R. E.(1993). Role executive play:CEOs, behavioral complexity, and firm performance. Human Relations,46,543-574.
Henderson, C.(1984).Perceptions of the effectiveness of women as public school administrators(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
Holder, J. R.(1993).Leadership effevtiveness of college and university presidents:A study of the application of humanistic leadership and Machiavellian management theories (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Saint LouisUniversity, St. Louis, MO.
Hooijberg, R.&.Choi, J(2000).Which leadership roles matter to whom? An examination of rater effects on perceptions of effectiveness.Leadership Quarterly, 11(3),341-364.
Hooijberg, R.,Denison, D. R.(2002).What majes leaders effective?A Stakeholder approach to leadership effectiveness. Retrieved form
http://www.denisonculture.com/eimages/Leaders_Effective.pdf
Hooijberg, R., & Petrock, F. (1993). On cultural change: Using the competing values framework to help leaders execute a transformational strategy. Human Resource Management, 32(1), 29-50.
Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1992). Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers. In R. L. Phillips & J. G. Hunt (Eds.), Strategic leadership: A multiorganizational-level perspective(pp. 161-176), New York, NT: Quorum.
Howard, M. P.(2004). A study of the relationship between transformational leardership and organizational culture(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Education administration:Theory, research,and practice(7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Houchard, M. A.(2005).Principal leadership, teacher morale, and student achievement in seven schools in Mitchell County, North Carolina(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), East Tennessee State University, NC.
Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N.(1982). Toward a Macro-oriented model of leadership: An odeyssey. In J.G. Hunt, U.Sekaran and C.A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Leadership: Beyond establishment views(pp.220-264). Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.
Jefferson, B.(1981).A study of the relationship between teacher morale, elementary school principals’ philosophies of haman nature and teachers’ involvement in eductional decision making. Dissertion Abstracts International, 42(4),111.
Jennings, K.,&Lomas, L.(2003).Implenmenting performance management for headteachers in English secondry school:a case study. Educational Management and dministration,31(4),369-383.
Johnson, M. E.(2000).Reliability and validity of the leadership selfefficacy scale (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, PA.
Johnson, S. E.(2003). The relationship of personal values and leadership behavior among first-level supervisors(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ.
Johnsurd, L. K. (1996). Maintaining morale: A guide to assessing the morale of midlevel administrators and faculty. Washington: College and University Personnel Association. Retrieved form ERIC database(ED 399908 ).
Jones, K. R., & Redman, R. W.(2000).Organizational culture and work redesign:Experiences in three organziation. The Journal of Nursing Administration,30(12),604-640.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D.(2001). LISREL (Version8.51)(Computer software). Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Keely, M.(1984). Impartiality and participant interest theories of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 1-25.
Lawlees, D. J.(1979).Organizational behavior:The psychology of effective management. NJ:Prentice Hall.
Lawrence, K. A.,& Quinn, R. E.(2003).Behavioral complexity in leadership:The psychometric properties of a new instrument. Retrieved form
http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/plenk/Behavioral%20Complexity%20in%20Leadership.pdf
Leithwood, K. A.(1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly,30 (4),498-518.
Lucas, M. S.(1999). Adult csreer changer: A development context. Journal of Employment Counseling,36,115-118.
Lussier, R. A.,& Achua, C. F.(2001).Leadership:Theory, application, and skill development. Cincinnati, OH:South-Weatern College Publishing.
Lynch, G. J.(2000).Effective leadership behavior:Competing value and objective outcomes in selected municipal department (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY.
Mani,R. S.,&Uma Devi N.(2010). ‘Teacher Morale’ – the magic behind teacher performance. Retrieved form
htpp://www.academicleadership.org/emprical_research/Teacher_Morale_the_magic_behind_Teacher_Performance.shtml
Marzano, R. J., Waters, T.,& McNulty, B. A.(2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Mattera, J., & McConnell, D.(1991).Speaking of morale. Clearing House, 64(6),403-411
McGraw, R. B.(1993).Union-management interface:Using the competing values framework as a diagnostic tool to bring increased involvement at the plant level. Human Resource Management, 32 , 51-74.
McManus, M.(1996).The need to maintain morale: A morale issue.In V. A. McClelland&V. Varma(Eds.).The needs of teacher(pp.113-123), London:Gloucester.
Michael,L C. K.(1993).Principal’s leadership style, teachers’ morale and school effectiveness: perceptions of teachers in aided secondary school(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Middlewood, D.,& Bush, T.(2005).Leading and managing people in education. London:Sage.
Miller, W.C.(1981).Staff morale, school climate and educational productivity. Educational Leadership, 38(6), 483-486.
Mootheril, F.(2008).Achieving organization effectiveness with B2E E-Business mode. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of RMIT, Melbourne, Australia.
Newman, C. B. (2001). The perceptions of elementary principals regarding the relation- ship between leadership and school culture(Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University dissertation), Saint Louis University, MO.
Ogawa, R. & Bossert, S.(1995).Leadership as an organization quality. Educational Administration Quarterly,31(2),224-243.
O'Neill, R. M., & Quinn, R. E.(1993).Editor's note: Application so thecompeting values framework. Human Resource Management,32,1-7.
Opdenakker, M. C.,& Damme, J. V.(2005).Differences between secondary schools: A study about school context, group composition, school practice,and school effects with special attention to public and catholicschools and types of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,17(1),87-117.
Owens, R. G.,& Valesky, T. C.(2011). Organizational behavior in education:Leadership and school reform(10th ed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education.
Palardy, G. J.(2008).Differential school effects among low, middle, and high social class composition schools: A multiple group, multilevel latent growth curve analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(1),21-49.
Pierce, J. L.& Newstorm, J. W.(2003).Leaders and the leadership process:Readings, self assessment and application(3rd ed.).Boston:McCraw-Hill.
Pinter, N. J. (1988). The study of administrator effects and effectiveness. In N. Boyan(Ed.), Handbook of research in educational administration(pp.99-122), NewYork: Longman.
Podorf, F. M.(1993). The relationship between participatory management and teacher morale at the primary level in selected school districts in the state of New Jersey. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(9), 3072A.
Pounder, J. (1999). Organizational effectiveness in higher education: Managerial implications of a Hong Kong Study. Educational Management and Administration, 27(4), 389-400.
Poole, M. E., &Van de Ven, A. E.(1989).Use paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4),562-578.
Price, J.(1972).Handbook of organizational measurement. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Quinn, R. E.(1996). Deep change: Discovering the leader within. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Quinn, R. E.(1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of Hing performance. San Francisco CA: Jossey-bass.
Quinn, R. E. (2004). Building the bridge as you walk on it: A guide for leading change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Quinn, R. E., & Andersen, D. F. (1984). Formalization as crisis: Transition planning for a young organization. In J. R. Kimberly & R. E.Quinn(Eds.), Managing organizational transitions(pp.11-28), Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. S. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33-51.
Quinn, R. E.,&Cameron, K. S.(1988).Paradox and transformation:Toward a theory of change in organization and management.Cambridge,MA:Ballinger.
Quinn, R. E., Faerman, S. R., Thompson, M. P., McGrath, M. R., & St. Clair, L. S.(2007). Becoming a master manager: A competing values approach (4th ed.).New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Quinn, R. E., & Hall, R. H.(1983). Environments, organizations, and policymakers:Toward an integrative framework. Organizational theory and public policy(pp.281-298),San Francisco, CA:Sage.
Quinn, R. E.,& Hart, S. L.(1993). Roles executives play:CEOs, behavioral complexity, and firm performance. Human Relations,46(5),543-574.
Quinn, R. E., & Kimberly, J. R. (1984). Paradox, planning, and perseverance: Guidelines for managerial practice. In J. R. Kimberly & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Managing organizational transitions(pp.295-313). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Quinn, R. E., & McGrath, M. R. (1985). The transformation of organizational cultures: A Competing Values Perspective. In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg & J. Martin(Eds.), Organizational culture (pp. 315-334), San Francisco, CA:Sage.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J.(1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria:Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377.
Quinn, R. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1991). The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on quality of life. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore(Eds.), Research in organizational change and development(pp. 115-142), London: JAI Press.
Rantz, L. D.(2002). A syudy of the characteristics of the effective school principal as perceived by teachers.(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Saint University, St. Louis, MO.
Reardon, S. F,& Raudenbush,S.W.(2009). Assumptions of value-added models for estimating school effects. Education Finance and Policy,4(4),492-519.
Redshaw, B.(2001). Evaluating organisational effectiveness. Measuring Business Excellence, 5,(1),8-16.
Reid, K., Hopkins, D., & Holly, P.(1987). Towards the effective school: The problems and some solutions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Remple, A. M., & Bentley, R. R.(1970).Teacher morale: Relationship with se-lected factors. The Journal of Teacher Education, 21(4), 534-539.
Reynolds, D., Teddlie, C., Creemers, B., Scheerens, J., & Townsend, T. (2000). An introduction to school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds(Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp.3-25).New York: Falmer Press.
Rice, R. E., & Austin, A. F.(1988). High faculty morale. Change,20(2),51-58.
Robbins, S. P. (1998).Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, and application(8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N J: Prentice-Hall.
Robbins, S. P., & Barnwell, N.(1998). Organizational theory: Concepts and cases. Prentice-Hall Australia Pte Ltd, Brookvale.
Rogers, P. S., & Hildebrandt, H. W.(1993). Competing values instruments for analyzing written and spoken management messages. Human Resource Management, 32(1), 121-142.
Ronald, L.M.(1994).The identification of underlying cultural assumptions an effective school, 16-18. Retrieved form ERIC database(ED 374522 ).
Rowe, J.(2003).The myth of target-setting. Primary Headship,11,2-3.
Rowland, K. A.(2008). The relationship of principal leadership and teacher morale. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Liberty University ,Atlanta, GA.
Sanderson, D. M.(2006).Using a competing values framework to examine university culture (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Scheerens, J.(1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice. London:Cassell.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. New York: Pergamon.
Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (3rd ed. ). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Scullen, S. E., Mount, M. K.,& Goff, M.(2000).Understanding the latent structure of job performance rating. Journal of Applied Psychology,85,956-970.
Sergiovanni, T. J.(1995).The principalship:A reflective practice perspective(4th ed.).Needham Heights,MA:Allyn and Bacon.
Shelton, M. M.(1987). The identification of principal and teacher perceptions: The development of improvement strategies for faculty meetings. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(4),690A.
Silva, H. N. S.(1996). Shared decision-making, teacher morale, and pupil performance in public schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(8), 2692A.
Simpson, G. W.(1990).Keeping it alive: elements of school culture that sustain innovation. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 34-37.
Simon, H. A.(1976).Administrative behavior: A study of decisionmaking processes in administrative organization. New York:Free Press.
Skelton,I.(1999).Military retention intangibles:Esprit, morale and cohesion. Military Review,79,2-7.
Smart, J. C. (2003). Organizational effectiveness of 2-year colleges: The centrality of cultural and leadership complexity. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 673-703.
Smart, J. C., Kun, G. D., & Tierney, W. G.(1997). The roles of institutional cultures and decision approaches in promoting organizational effectiveness in two-yearcolleges. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(3), 256-281.
Smart, J. C.,&St. John, E. P.(1996).Organizational culture and effectiveness in higher education: A test of the “culture type” and “strong culture” hypotheses.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(3), 219-241.new window
Smith,K.R.(1966). A proposed model for the investigation of teacher morale. Journal of Educational Administrative,4,143-148.
Spector, P. E.(1997).Job satisfaction :Application, assessment, cause , and consequence, Thousand Oaks. CA:Sage.
Stark, J. S. (2002). Testing a model of program curriculum leadership. Research in Higher Education, 43(1), 59-82.
Steers, R. M.(1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46-56.
Surm, J. A.(1989).Relationship between teacher morale and court-mandated school desegregation in Benton Harbor elementary school(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Wayne State University, MI.
Tsui, A. S.(1984).A role set analysis of managerial reputation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,34,64-96.
Tsui, A. S.,& Ohlott, P.(1988).Multiple assessment of leadership effectiveness:Interrater agreement and consensus in effectiveness models. Personnel Psychology,41, 779-803.
Thakor, A. V. (2000). Becoming a better value creator: How to improve the company’s bottom line—and your own . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Thomas, D. E.(2000).The meaning of leadership and its relationship to organizational effectiveness:The perspectives of exemplary leaders in education and athletics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA.
Thompson, M. P.(1993). Using the competing values framework in the classroom. Human Resource Management, 32(1), 101-119.
Thompson, M. D.(2002).Gender, leadership orientation, and effectiveness:Testing the theoretical models of Bolman & Deal and Quinn. Sex Roles,42(11/12),969-992.
Umbach, H. N.(1994).Effects of Sex, Leadership style, and Task Structure on Leadership Effectiveness. Dissertation Abstracts Ondisc,AAC1355299.
Van de gaer,E.,De Fraine, B.,Pustjens, H.,Van Damme,J.,De Munter,A.,&Onghena,P.(2009). School effects on the development of motivation toward learning tasks and the development of academic self-concept in secondary education: A multivariate latent growth curve approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,20(2),235-253.
Webber, R.W.(1998). The effects consideration and initiating structure exhibited by principles on teacher morale in selected Louisiana secondary schools(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Louisiana Tech University, LA.
Wentworth, M.(1990). Developing staff morale, The Practitioner, 16(4), 12-18.
Wey, S. D.(1990). Teacher morale and teachers perceptions of principal leadership style and power(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Houston , Houston.
Wilcox, H. D.(1993).The relationship between the teacher’s perception of the high school principal’s leadership style and the correlates job satisfaction and morale. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(9), 30-79.
Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J.,& Krüger, M. L.(2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398-425.
Yang, S. C.(2005). Competing values leadership behaviors as a critical indicator of school performance for private kindergartens in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Spalding University, Louisville, KY.
Yukl, G.(2006).Leadership in organizations(6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Yukl, G., & Lepsinger, R.(2004).Flexible leadership. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Zafft, C. R., Adams, S. G., & Matkin, G. S.(2009). Measuring leadership in self-managed teams using the competing values framework. Journal of Engineering Education, 98 (7),273-282.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE