課程管理的策略：以美國聯邦政府為例__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	課程管理的策略：以美國聯邦政府為例
書刊名：	初等教育學刊
作者：	高新建
作者(外文)：	Gau, Shin-jiann
出版日期：	1999
卷期：	7
頁次：	頁267-294
主題關鍵詞：	課程管理；美國聯邦政府
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(2) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:0 點閱:32

本文旨在探討美國聯邦政府企圖治理其學校的課程事務，欲期將意圖的課程和對課程的抱負轉化為學校的譯程實務時，所可以運用的各種管理策略。文中首先簡介課程控制與管理研究的源起與重要性；其次，說明美國聯邦政府教育角色的基礎與轉變，以作為瞭解其課程管理措施的背景；其後，舉例說明美國聯邦政府所可以使用的六項課程管理策略：制度的變更或建立、服務的提供、法律命令的發佈、經費的補助、知識和訊息的發現和散佈、以及忠告善導；最後，由於國內課程學界對課程管理與管理著墨不多，本文呼籲學界關心並探討此一較受忽略的領域。

以文找文

Taking the kinds of curriculum governance strategies employed by the United States' federal government as examples, this study provides an understanding of the strategies for the governance of curriculum. The emergence and significance of studies on curriculum governance and the origin and shifting of federal role in education are briefly delineated first to offer background knowledge for this study. Then, six curriculum governance strategies are identified and arranged roughly in the order of the coerciveness and the degree of intervention that each represents: system changing or building, provision of services, mandates, grants, discovery and dissemination of knowledge and information, and exhortation. Governments may utilize these six strategies to increase the possibility of transferring their intended curriculum and aspirations into classroom reality. Due to the fact that curriculum governance is a field rarely studied in Taiwan, researchers in the field of curriculum studies and educational administration should pay attention to the field of curriculum governance.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	(1994)。Goals 2000 also includes。Community Update，13，3。
2.	Kirst, M. W.(1987)。Curricular leadership at the state level: What is the new focus?。NASSP Bulletin，71(498)，8-12。
3.	(19920907)。America 2000 Library Partnership Announced。America 2000，36，1+4。
4.	Cuban, L.(1987)。State-powered curricular reform, measurement driven instruction。The National Forum，67(3)，22-25。
5.	(1994)。Grant for Museum-School Partnerships。Community Update，12，2。
6.	Hartle, T. W.、Holland, R. P.(1983)。The changing context of federal education aid。Education and Urban Society，15(4)，408-431。
7.	Jung, R. K.、Kirst, M. W.(1986)。Beyond mutual adaptation, into the bully pulpit: Recent research on the federal role in education。Educational Administration Quarterly，22(3)，80-109。
8.	Lagemann, E. C.(1995)。National standards and public debate。Teachers College Record，96(3)，369-379。
9.	Mitchell, D. E.、Encarnation, D. J.(1984)。Alternative state policy mechanisms for controlling school performance。Educational Researcher，13(5)，4-11。
10.	Mosher, Frederick C.(1980)。The changing responsibilities and tactics of the federal government。Public Administration Review，40，541-548。
11.	Salamon, L. M.(1981)。Rethinking public management: Third-party government and the changing forms of government action。Public Policy，29(3)，255-275。
12.	Tyree, A. K.(1993)。Examining the evidence: Have states reduced local control of curriculum?。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，15(1)，34-50。
13.	Wirt, F. M.(1978)。What state laws say about local control。Phi Delta Kappan，59，517-520。
14.	Schwille, J.、Porter, A.、Alford, L.、Floden, R.、Freeman, D.、Irwin, S.、Schmidt, W.(1988)。State policy and the control of curriculum decisions。Educational Policy，2(1)，29-50。
15.	(199606)。Goals 2000 Reviews Two Years of Progress。Community Update，36，l。
16.	李遠哲(19960900)。新世紀的教育方向。教改通訊，24，2-6。延伸查詢
17.	Mcdonnell, L. M.、Elmore, R. F.(1987)。Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，9(2)，133-152。

會議論文
1.	游家政(1996)。國民小學課程的問題及其改進。國立花蓮師範學院八十四學年學術論文發表會。花蓮。延伸查詢

學位論文
1.	高新建(1991)。國小教師課程決定之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations(1981)。Intergovernmentalizing the classroom: Federal involvement in elementary and secondary education. Vol. V. The federal role in the federal system: The dynamics of growth。Washington, DC：Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR)。
2.	Astuto, T. A.、Clark, D. L.(1986)。The effects of federal education policy changes on policy and program development in state and local education agencies。Bloomington, IN：Policy Studies Center of the University Council for Educational Administration。
3.	Clark, D. L.、Astuto, T. A.(1986)。The significance and permanence of changes in federal educational policy: 1980-1988。Bloomington, IN：Policy Studies Center of the University Council for Educational Administration。
4.	Elmore, R. F.、Fuhrman, S. H.(1994)。The governance of curriculum: 1994 yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。
5.	Fesler, J. W.、Kettl, D. F.(1991)。The politics of the administrative process。Chatham, NJ：Chatham House。
6.	Flanders, J. K.(1925)。Legislative control of the elementary curriculum。New York：Columbia University, Teachers College。
7.	Gandal, M.(1997)。Making standards matter, 1997: An annual fifty-state report on efforts to raise academic standards。Washington, DC：American Federation of Teachers。
8.	Ginsburg, A. L.(1993)。Testimony on the national assessment of Chapter 1 final report reinventing Chapter 1: The current Chapter 1 program and new direction。Washington, DC：Office of Policy and Planning, U. S. Department of Education。
9.	Hastings, A. H.(1982)。The strategies of government intervention: An analysis of federal education and health care policy。Alexandria, VA。
10.	Kirst, M. W.(1982)。Teaching policy and federal categorical programs。Stanford, CA：National Institute of Education Program on Teaching Policy。
11.	Neustadt, R. E.(1990)。Presidential power and the modern presidents: The leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan。New York：Free。
12.	Pinney, N.、Twombly, J.(1990)。Presidential persuasion as a "policy magnet": A study of OSHA enforcement and presidential popularity。
13.	Ravitch, D.(1983)。The troubled crusade: American education 1945-1980。New York：Basic Books。
14.	Salamon, L. M.(1989)。Beyond privatization: The tools of government action。Washington, DC：Urban Institute。
15.	Schwille, J.、Porter, A.、Alford, L.、Floden, R.、Freeman, D.、Irwin, S.、Schmidt, W.(1986)。State policy and the control of curriculum decisions: Zones of tolerance for teachers in elementary school mathematics。East Lansing, MI：Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching。
16.	Stoops, E.(1975)。Handbook of educational administration: A guide for the practitioner。Allyn & Bacon。
17.	Stoops, E.(1981)。Handbook of educational administration: A guide for the practitioner。Boston：Allyn & Bacon。
18.	U. S. Department of Education(1990)。Progress of education in the United States of America 1984 through1989。Washington, DC：U. S. Department of Education。
19.	U. S. Department of Education(1993)。Reinventing Chapter 1: The current Chapter 1 program and new directions: Final report of the National Assessment of Chapter 1 program。Washington, DC：U. S. Department of Education。
20.	van Geel, T.(1976)。Authority to control school program。Lexington, MA：Lexington Books。
21.	Wise, A. E.(1979)。Legislated learning: The bureaucratization of the American classroom。Berkeley, CA：University of California。
22.	U. S. Department of Education(1991)。America 2000: An education strategy。Washington, DC：U. S. Department of Education。
23.	Kliebard, H. M.(1987)。The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958。New York：Routledge。
24.	Hood, C. C.(1983)。The tools of government。Chatham, NJ：Chatham House。
25.	Guthrie, J. W.、Reed, R. J.(1986)。Educational administration and policy: Effective leadership for American education。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。
26.	行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。延伸查詢
27.	Combleth, C.(1990)。Curriculum in context。Falmer Press。

單篇論文
1.	Archbald, D. A.(1991)。A description and analysis of the rationales, content, and design of state curriculum guides in mathematics and social studies，Madison, WI：Consortium for Policy Research in Education。
2.	Tyree, A. K.(1991)。The Potential strength of state curriculum control systems: Four case studies，Madison, WI：Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research。

圖書論文
1.	高新建(1997)。美國國家教育目標的推廣策略及其對我國課程行政的啟示。課程改革的國際比較：中日觀點。台北市：師大書苑。延伸查詢
2.	高新建(1997)。美國學科教育標準的訂定與推廣及其對我國課程標準修訂與推廣的啟示。邁向未來的課程與教學。台北市：師大書苑。延伸查詢
3.	Bolin, F. S.(1987)。The teacher as curriculum decision maker。Teacher renewal: Professional issues, personal choices。New York：Teachers College。
4.	Haider, D.(1989)。Grants as a tool of public policy。Beyond privatization: The tools of government action。Washington, DC：Urban Institute。
5.	Halperin, S.(1976)。Federal takeover, state default, or a family problem?。Federalism at the crossroads: Improving educational policymaking。Washington, DC：Institute for Educational Leadership。
6.	Jung, R. K.(1988)。The federal role in elementary and secondary education: Mapping a shifting terrain。Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American Educational Research Association。New York：Longman。
7.	Levin, H. M.(1983)。A challenge for action: National leadership and involvement in education。IFG Policy Perspective。Stanford, CA：Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance, Stanford University。
8.	Pautler, A. J.(1993)。The American curriculum experience。Education and training 14-19: Continuity and diversity in the curriculum。New York：Longman。
9.	Carlson, D. L.(1988)。Curriculum planning and the State: The dynamics of control in education。The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities。Albany, NY：State University of New York。
10.	黃政傑(1985)。我國教育部課程行政的檢討與改進。教育行政比較研究。臺北：台灣書店。延伸查詢
11.	Astuto, T. A.、Clark, D. L.(1992)。Federal role, legislative and executive。Encyclopedia of educational research。New York：Macmillan。
12.	Boyd, W. L.(1992)。Local role in education。Encyclopedia of educational research。New York：Macmillan。
13.	Kirst, M. W.、Wirt, F.(1992)。State role, legislative and executive。Encyclopedia of educational research。New York：Macmillan。
14.	McLaughlin, M. W.(1992)。Educational policy, impact on practice。Encyclopedia of educational research。New York：Macmillan。
15.	Mitchell. D. E.(1988)。Educational politics and policy: The state level。Handbook of research on educational administration。New York：Longman。
16.	Timpane, P. M.(1988)。Federal progress in educational research。Higher education research and public policy。New York：Macmillan。
17.	Walker, D.(1992)。Curriculum policymaking。Encyclopedia of educational research。New York：Macmillan。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	因應課程變革職業學校課程管理者應有之作為
2.	桃園縣國民小學實施教育部提升學生游泳能力中程計畫之現況研究
3.	課程管理的分析架構

1.	國民小學課程經營品質管理指標建構與實證之研究
2.	國民中學推動九年一貫課程的可行模式與相關問題之研究

1.	課程管理 : 理論與實務
2.	課程管理

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫