臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：課程管理的分析架構
書刊名：教育研究集刊
作者：高新建 引用關係
作者(外文)：Gau, Shin-jiann
出版日期：1999
卷期：42
頁次：頁131-154
主題關鍵詞：課程行政；課程相關政策；課程管理；Curriculum administration；Curriculum governance；Curriculum related policy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(4) 專書(3) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:121
本文旨在探討美國聯邦政府及州政府進行課程管理時，其所頒布的課程相關政策、所運用的管理策略、及其課程管理的機制，進而根據對此三個層面分析所得的內容及我國課程行政的作法，建構一個課程管理的分析架構，以作為探討我國課程管理實務的參考架構。全文的結構分為五節，分別為課程管理的緣起、課程相關政黨、課程管理的策略與機制、課程管理的分析架構、以及結論。由於國內課程學界對「課程管理」著墨不多，本文呼籲學界關心並探討此一較受忽略的領域。
The purpose of this study is to construct a framework for the analysis of the governance of curriculum. To provide background knowledge, this paper began with a version of the origin of curriculum governance. Then, literature pertaining to the fields of public policy, educational policy, and curriculum were reviewed and synthesized in order to define the three fundamental aspects of the governance of school curriculum. The analytic framework constructed in this study interwove the following three aspects: curriculum related policies promulgated by governments, curriculum governing strategies employed by different levels of government, and the overarching mechanism of curriculum governance. Finally, since curriculum governance is a field rarely studied in Taiwan, this study encouraged researchers to devote more attention to it.
期刊論文
1.Wirt, F. M.(1978)。What state laws say about local control。Phi Delta Kappan，59，517-520。  new window
2.高新建(19980300)。課程統治的策略與機制：以美國州政府為例。臺北市立師範學院學報，29，55-72。  延伸查詢new window
3.Tyree, A. K.(1993)。Examining the evidence: Have states reduced local control of curriculum。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，15(1)，34-50。  new window
4.Peterson, P. L.(1990)。Doing more in the same amount of time。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，12(3)，261-280。  new window
5.Cohen, D. K.(1990)。A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，12(3)，311-329。  new window
6.高新建(19990200)。課程管理的策略：以美國聯邦政府為例。初等教育學刊，7，267-294。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Schwille, J.、Porter, A.、Alford, L.、Floden, R.、Freeman, D.、Irwin, S.、Schmidt, W.(1988)。State policy and the control of curriculum decisions。Educational Policy，2(1)，29-50。  new window
8.李遠哲(19960900)。新世紀的教育方向。教改通訊，24，2-6。  延伸查詢new window
9.Mcdonnell, L. M.、Elmore, R. F.(1987)。Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，9(2)，133-152。  new window
學位論文
1.高新建(1991)。國小教師課程決定之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kirst, M. W.(1982)。Teaching policy and federal categorical programs。Stanford, CA：National Institute of Education Program on Teaching Policy。  new window
2.McNeil, L. M.(1988)。Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge。New York：Routledge。  new window
3.Fesler, James W.、Kettl, Donald F.(1991)。The politics of the administrative process。Chatham House Publishers。  new window
4.教育部國民教育司(1988)。國民中學設備標準。台北：正中。  延伸查詢new window
5.Van Geel, T.(1976)。Authority to control school program。Lexington, MA：Lexington Books。  new window
6.U.S. Department of Education.(1990)。Progress of education in the United States of America 1984 through 1989。Washington, DC：U.S. Department of Education。  new window
7.Schwille, J.、Porter, A.、Alford, L.、Floden, R.、Freeman, D.、Irwin, S.、Schmidt, W.(1986)。State policy and the control of curriculum decisions: Zones of tolerance for teachers in elementary school mathematics。East Lansing, MI：Institute for Research on Teacmng, Michigan State University。  new window
8.Porter, A. C.、Schmidt, W. H.、Freeman, D. J.、Floden, R. E.、Schwille, J. R.(1986)。Content determinants (with research instrumentation appendices)。East Lansing, MI：Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University。  new window
9.Kliebard, H. M.(1987)。The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958。New York：Routledge。  new window
10.Flanders, J. K.(1925)。Legislative control of the elementary curriculum。Columbia University, NY：Teachers College。  new window
11.Elmore, R. F.、Fuhrman, S. H.(1994)。The Governance of Curriculum: 1994 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。Alexandria, Virginia：ASCD。  new window
12.教育部國民教育司(1981)。國民小學設備標準。臺北：正中。  延伸查詢new window
13.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
14.Combleth, C.(1990)。Curriculum in context。Falmer Press。  new window
15.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
單篇論文
1.Tyree, A. K.(1991)。The Potential strength of state curriculum control systems: Four case studies，Madison, WI：Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research。  new window
2.Archbald, D. A.(1991)。A description and analysis of the rationales, content, and design of state curriculum guides in mathematics and social studies，Madison, WI：Consortium for Policy Research in Education。  new window
其他
1.游家政(1996)。國民小學課程的問題及其改進（國立花蓮師範學院八十四學年學術論文發表會）。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bolin, F. S.(1987)。The teacher as curriculum decision maker。Teacher renewal: Professional issues, personal choices。New York：Teachers College。  new window
2.Jung, R. K.(1988)。The federal role in elementary and secondary education: Mapping a shifting terrain。Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American Educational Research Association。New York：Longman。  new window
3.高新建(1997)。美國學科教育標準的訂定與推廣及其對我國課程標準修訂與推廣的啟示。邁向未來的課程與教學。台北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.Smith, M. S.、O'Day, J.(1991)。Systemic school reform。The polities of curriculum and testing。New York：Falmer。  new window
5.Porter, A. C.、Smithson, J.、Osthoff, E.(1994)。Standard setting as a strategy for upgrading high school mathematics and science。The governance of curriculum: 1994 yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
6.Haider, D.(1989)。Grants as a tool of public policy。Beyond privatization: The tools of government action。Washington, DC：Urban Institute。  new window
7.黃政傑(1990)。課程。教育概論。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
8.高新建(1997)。美國國家教育目標的推廣策略及其對我國課程行政的啟示。課程改革的國際比較：中日觀點。台北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
9.Carlson, D. L.(1988)。Curriculum planning and the State: The dynamics of control in education。The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities。Albany, NY：State University of New York。  new window
10.黃政傑(1985)。我國教育部課程行政的檢討與改進。教育行政比較研究。臺北：台灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
11.Kirst, M. W.、Wirt, F.(1992)。State role, legislative and executive。Encyclopedia of educational research。New York：Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1097（臺灣：1088，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67500809
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上