:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:用戶著作權侵權之網路服務業者責任
作者:蔡蕙芳 引用關係
書刊名:著作權侵權與其刑事責任:刑法保護之迷思與反思
頁次:183-289
出版日期:2008
出版項:臺北市:新學林
主題關鍵詞:著作權侵權網路服務業業者責任
學門:法律學
資料類型:專書論文
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:9
期刊論文
1.陳曉慧(19990500)。從CompuServe案件看德國網路服務提供人責任。月旦法學,48,109-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王澤鑑(20041100)。特殊侵權行為(4)--僱用人侵權責任。臺灣本土法學雜誌,64,57-69。  延伸查詢new window
3.Yen, Alfred C.(2000)。Internet service provider liability for subscriber copyright infringement, enterprise liability, and the First Amendment。Georgetown Law Journal,88(6),1833-1889。  new window
4.馮震宇、胡心蘭(20071200)。從間接侵權責任論著作權法P2P責任立法之商榷。月旦法學,151,203-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Elkin-Koren, Niva(1995)。Copyright Law and Social Dialogue on the Information Superhighway: Case Against Copyright Liability of Bulletin Boards Operators。CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L. J.,13,345。  new window
6.Dobbins, M. David(1995)。Note, Computer Bulletin Board Operator Liability for User's Infringing Acts。Michigan Law Review,94,217。  new window
7.章忠信(19980200)。網路服務業者之著作權侵害責任。萬國法律,97,39-64。  延伸查詢new window
8.章忠信(19991000)。美國一九九八年數位化千禧年著作權法案簡介。萬國法律,107,25-42。  延伸查詢new window
9.王澤鑑(20040700)。特殊侵權行為(2)--共同侵權行為。臺灣本土法學雜誌,60,65-73。  延伸查詢new window
10.王澤鑑(20040600)。特殊侵權行為(2)--共同侵權行為。臺灣本土法學雜誌,59,59-73。  延伸查詢new window
11.Moohr, Geraldine Szott(2003)。The Crime of Copyright Infringement: An Inquiry Based on Morality, Harm, and Criminal Theory。Boston University Law Review,83(4),731。  new window
12.Berchadsky, Ariel(2000)。RIAA v. Napster: A Window Onto the Future of Copyright Law in the Internet Age。J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L.,18,755。  new window
13.Carmichael, John(1996)。In Support of the White Paper: Why Online Service Providers Should not Receive Immunity form Traditional Notions of Vicarious and Contributory Liability for Copyright Infringement。LOY. L.A. ENT. L.J.,16,759。  new window
14.Bernstein, Robert Jay、Clarida, Robert W.(20061117)。Grokster Remand Clarifies Inducement Liability。New York Law Journal Column,341。  new window
15.Ingrassia, Charles(2005)。A Helpful Loss? The Implication of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., on Future Distribution on Products Capable of Infringing Uses。Journal of Law, Technology & Policy,358。  new window
16.Holmes, Lucy H.(2001)。Note and Comment, Making Waves in Statutory Safe Harbors: Reevaluating Internet Service Providers' Liability for Third Party Content and Copyright Infringement。Roger Williams U. L. Rev.,7,215。  new window
17.Giblin-Chen, Rebecca(2005)。Case Comment, Rewinding Sony: An Inducement Theory of Secondary Liability。E.I.P.R.,27(11),428。  new window
18.Loundy, David J.(1998)。Computer Information Systems Law and System Operator Liability。Seattle Univ. L. R.,21,1075。  new window
19.Morril , Mark C.、Eaton, Sarah E.(1996)。Protecting Copyrights On-Line: Copyrigh Liability for On-Line Service Providers。J. PROPRIETARY RTS.,8(4),2。  new window
20.Myrick, Richard M.(2005)。Peer-to-Peer and Substantial Noninfringing Use: Giving the Term "Substantial" Some Meaning。J. Intell. Prop. L.,12,539。  new window
21.Ravn, Michelle A.(1999)。Navigating Terra Incognita: Why the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Was Needed to Chart the Course of Online Service Provider Liability for Copyright Infringement。Ohio State Law Journal,60(2),755-798。  new window
22.Kirkwood, R. Carter(1997)。Comment, When Should Computer Owners Be Liable for Copyright Infringement by Users?。U. Chi. L. Rev.,64,709。  new window
23.Tickle, Kelly(1995)。Comment, The Vicarious Liability of Electronic Bulletin Board for the Copyright Infringement Occurring on their Bulletin Board。Iowa L. Rev.,80,391。  new window
24.Shulman, Mary Ann(1997)。Comment, Internet Copyright Infringement Liability: Is An Online Access Provider More Like a Landlord or a Dance Hall Operator。Golden Gate U. L. Rev.,27,555。  new window
25.Vassilaki, Irini E.(1998)。Strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit der Diensteanbieter nach dem TDG-Eine Untersuchung unter besonderer Beruecksichtigung der Einordnung des §5 TDG im Strafrechtssystem。MMR,630。  new window
26.馮震宇(20050600)。P2P的挑戰與未來--從Grokster案看P2P法的爭議。月旦財經法雜誌,1,1-23。  延伸查詢new window
27.蔡蕙芳(20001100)。組織體犯罪與組織體罪責--美國刑法上組織體罪責理論的介紹與評析。逢甲人文社會學報,1,325-356。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張淑美(2006)。網路服務業者之侵權責任--以著作權侵權為中心(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.蘇俊雄(1998)。刑法總論II--犯罪總論。  延伸查詢new window
2.Goldstein, Paul、葉茂林(2000)。捍衛著作權--從印刷術到數位時代之著作權法。五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.韓忠謨、吳景芳(2000)。刑法各論。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃榮堅(2006)。基礎刑法學。臺北:元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳子平(20000000)。共同正犯與共犯論:繼受日本之軌跡及其變遷。臺北:五南圖書有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃常仁(2001)。刑法總論--邏輯分析與體系論證。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Dressier, Joshua(1995)。Understanding Criminal Law。New York, N.Y.:Lexis Publishing。  new window
8.Nimmer, Melville B.、Nimmer, David(2002)。3 Nimmer on Copyright。New York, N.Y.:Matthew Bender。  new window
9.Sieber, Ulrich(1999)。Die rechtliche Verantwortlichkeit im Internet。  new window
10.史尚寬(1983)。債法總論。  延伸查詢new window
11.林山田(2008)。刑法通論。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Loundy, David J.。Computer Information Systems Law and System Operator Liability Revisited,http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v1n3/loundy13.html。  new window
2.World Intellectual Property Organization(1999)。Workshop on Service Provider Liability, Online Service Provider Liability for Copyright Infringement,http://www.wipo.int/documents/en/meetings/1999/osp/pdf/osp_lial.pdf,(OSP/LIA/1 Rev. 1)。  new window
3.Derselbe: Strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit für den Datenver-kehrin internationalen Computernetzen,ttp://www.jura.unimuenchen.de/einrichtungen/ls/sieber/article/STVIPDT/SVI02.HTM#Heading17。  new window
4.Information Infrastructure Task Force(1995)。Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: The Report of Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights,http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/doc/ipnii/lawcopy.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.許玉秀(1999)。實質的正犯概念。刑法的問題與對策。許玉秀。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE