采用問卷測量、情境啟動與第三方懲罰博弈范式,探討高、低道德公正與不同信息加工方式(理性、經驗與控制組)在不公情境下對第三方懲罰的影響。結果顯示:(1)與低道德公正相比,高道德公正的個體在不公情境下的第三方懲罰更高;(2)在不公平情境下,對于具有高道德公正特質的個體,經驗加工和控制組比理性加工條件下的第三方懲罰水平更高。但在公平情境下,對于具有高道德公正特質的個體,經驗加工比理性加工和控制組條件下的第三方懲罰水平更高。研究說明了認知–經驗過程和情感過程同時影響人們對不公正事件的行為反應,但會隨情境或個體的不同而有所差異。

The present study used questionnaires, situation priming and the third party punishment game paradigm, to explore the influence of the high or low moral justice and information processing methods(rational processing, empirical processing and control group) on the third party punishment under unfair conditions. The results showed that:(1) As the third party, compared to individuals with low moral justice, people with high moral justice individuals reported higher punishment under unfair conditions.(2) For individuals with high moral justice in unfair circumstance, both people using empirical processing and people in control group reported higher punishment than people using rational processing. While for individuals with high moral justice in fairness circumstance, people using empirical processing reported higher punishment either than those using rational processing or the control group. This finding suggests that cognitive-experience process and emotional process affect people’s behavior response to unfair events, but it varies with the change of situations or individuals.