《「西廂學」四題論衡》
本論文之論題主要集中在古代《西廂記》校注本，以及今人校注本，除
此尚涵括幾個具爭議性或無人發掘的問題
《拯西廂》之情節改編及其批語；張深之
本與金批本之關係重探；金批本分節之來
源及金聖歎曲家地位重評。《西廂記》第
五本之完整性。多屬筆者個人之發現與心得。尤其是筆者在深入各相關
版本比較後，卻發現金批本的底本來源，似不只一本，繼而發現金批本
在分「節」上與王驥德本若合符節，間接顯示金聖歎在戲曲評點上受到
王驥德之啟發或影響，那麼，其戲曲「分節」說之涵義與功過就
得重新商榷。這是筆者的一項假說，之於曲界不啻是一大衝擊。如果假
說可以證實，戲曲史對金氏的評價自然得重新翻改。論文最末的兩個附
錄《西廂記論著索引補編》是接續碩士論文＜西廂記研究論著索引彙整＞
新近補充的條目。＜五種西廂記箋注本之注釋條目一覽表
＞則是處理第一章第二節之副產品從中可知
古代《西廂記》箋注之條目大概總目及沿革如何。

Commenting on " Hsi hsiang chi Study " by Subjects
The subjects of this paper focus on the review book of Hsi-hsiang Chi
of ancient times and today , including some controversial or not disclosed
problems :(1) Revised story and comment on " Cheng hsi hsiang " , (2) Re-
disclose the relationship between the Zhang shing zhi''s and Jin''s revision
of Hsi hsiang chi. (3)The syllabication''s origin of Jin''s revision of Hsi
hsiang chi and re-evaluate the drama-tuneist''s status of Jin Sheng tan. (4)
The integraty of the fifth book of Hsi hsiang chi. All the above are writer''s
personal discovery and opinion. Especially after making a comparison of the
relevant adition, the writer discovered that the origin of Jin''s revision
seems not only one,further to find that Jin''s revision book ciosely correspond
to Wang ji de''s book on syllabication. This indirectly showing that Jin sheng
tan is edified and affected by Wang ji de on drama tune. Then, the meaning and
merit fault of his syllabication division on drama tune need to
be re-evaluated.
This is writer''s assumption, and will shock drama tune circle.
If the assumption
is approved to be ture, the history of drama tune may modify
their evaulation on Mr. Jin.