:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「兩稅合一」制度對國內經濟與所得之事後影響評估
作者:蘇漢邦
作者(外文):Han-Pang Su
校院名稱:臺灣大學
系所名稱:農業經濟學研究所
指導教授:徐世勳
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2004
主題關鍵詞:兩稅合一資本組成結構所得分配動態可計算一般均衡分析capital structuralDynamic General Equilibrium Model (ROCNM-RD)Tax Reformincome distributionCorporate Tax IntegrationCGE
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
綜觀國內外以計量方法在「兩稅合一」稅制改革之研究,多屬事前之模擬評估,亦即在尚未實施兩稅合一的情境下,進行兩稅合一之衝擊模擬。然我國已於1998年實施兩稅合一制度,兩稅合一制度實施後其政策效果之良窳,實有必要進行事後的檢討與解析。
本研究旨在利用澳洲的ORANI-G模型為基礎,引入所得收支方程式,並擴充企業生產之資本結構及資本利得分配機制,建構出涵蓋投入產出關係、產業結構、所得收支及資本結構調整機制的動態可計算一般均衡模型(ROCNM-RD)。運用動態求解方法,更新我國所得收支及投入產出資料庫,並推估各項外在環境變數(技術及偏好等),真實模擬出「兩稅合一」制度實施時的經濟現況。同時,模型中對產業的財務融通與股利發放決策存在CES之替代機制,致使企業籌資行為具有內生調節功能,因而更能貼切模擬出兩稅合一制度造成稅負改變後,企業資本決策調整軌跡。
研究結果發現:在考慮外在環境的相互影響之下,研究中允許企業資金的籌措可在不同的來源間做調節,亦可在各部門間自由流動,「兩稅合一」制度對於我國經濟面呈現正面的影響,造成國內總供給線及需求線同時右移,致使實質GDP成長了1.35%,其中又以供給面的效果較為顯著,因而使總合物價指物微幅地降了0.25%。實質GDP之份額以出口擴張(X)及實質投資(I)之所占比重最高,分別貢獻1.18%及1.01%之GDP成長。就社會福利而言,「兩稅合一」制度可達到Pareto的改善,若以所得五分位法觀察,則以所得階層三及所得階層四的成長最高,呈現倒U之結構性改變。
Taking a board view of econometric researches on “Corporate Tax Integration”, Most of them are using the ex ante approach, that means those research simulated the impacts of Corporate Tax Integration before it put into practice. In Taiwan, However, we have enforced the Corporate Tax Integration since 1998, so it is necessary to have ex post examination and analysis of the effect.
The main model in this study(ROCNM-RD) is derived from the Australian ORANI-G model, wihich is a dynamic, multisectoral, computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the Taiwan’s economy, developed specifically to analyze the income revenue and expenditure equations. The most significant features that distinguish ROCNM-RD is that it includes input and output relations, industrial structures, income revenue and expenditure, and capital structure adjustment mechanism as well. On purpose of simulating the “Corporate Tax Integration” ex post impact, this study uses dynamically solving method to upgrade the database and estimate the relative parameters. In addition to trace the enterprises’ investment strategies under the tax reform, ROCNM-RD model employs the CES mechanism to deal with Retained Earnings and Dividends Payment Decisions, so comes the consequently endogenous corporation funds raising behavior.
In results we find that the “Corporate Tax Integration” has the positive impacts to our country, and makes the aggregate supply and demand curve shift to the right side when considering the external factor and in the long-term condition. It brings about 1.35% increment of real GDP, and especially affects the supply side, the aggregate price index decrease slightly about 0.25%. Export (X) and real investment (I) contribute 1.18% and 1.01% to the real GDP increase. In the case of social welfare, “Corporate Tax Integration” could improve the Pareto situation. As for the income level, the level III and IV would increase the most, showing the structural changes by the upside down word of “U”.
一、中文部分
江莉莉(2002),「兩稅合一與動態均衡下的所得分配」,《經濟論文叢刊》,30:2,p205-227。new window
林世銘(2002),「兩稅合一前後產業租稅環境與經營績效之比較」,《財稅研究》,34:3,p64-78。new window
林安樂(2000),「我國實施兩稅合一的可既算一般均衡分析」,《經濟專論》,(197)。
林師模(1997),「課徵燃料稅對所得階層及城鄉福利影響之一般均衡分析」。《因應溫室效應之經濟工具及其經濟影響研討會論文集》,民86.04,頁111 – 138。
徐世勳、李秉正、黃宗煌,1998。「開徵碳稅之經濟影響的跨國比較:GTAP多國模型之應用」。《行政院環保署溫室氣體減量之經濟影響評估研討會論文集》,民87.05,頁59 – 83。
財政部(1998),《兩稅合一所得稅法疑義解答》。
許嘉棟(1989),「兩稅合一所得稅制影響之一般均衡動態模擬分析」,《經濟論文》,17:2。new window
郭炳伸(1985),「我國租稅歸宿一般均衡模型之建立與應用」,《政治大學財政學系碩士論文》。
黃宗煌、李秉正、徐世勳、林師模、劉錦龍(1999),「溫室氣體減量成本效益分析」-TAIGEM模型建構即減量策略之經濟評估。《行政院環保署八十八年度研究計劃》。
楊子菡、蘇漢邦(2002),「綠色租稅改革的租稅福利成本與結構效果」,《農業與經濟》第29期,p29-54。new window
劉瑞文(1998),「我國可計算一般均衡模型ROCGEM之建立與應用」。《行政院主計處專題研究報告》。
蕭代基、葉淑琦(1998),「綠色稅制改革-OECD最新環境稅報告」。《台灣地球日出版社》。
蘇建榮、駱聖芬(1997),「實施兩稅合一對產業發展之影響」,《台灣製造業發展升級策略長期研究第五年度工作計劃》。
蘇漢邦、李秉正、徐世勳(2000),「二氧化碳之總量管制與部門等比列減量政策對台灣社經影響之比較」,《台灣經濟學會年會論文集》1999年,p103-130
蘇導民(1986),「我國採行兩稅合一之一般均衡分析」,《政治大學財政學系碩士論文》。
二、英文部分
Ballard, C., Fullerton, D., Shoven, J., and Whalley, J.(1985). “A General Equilibrium Model for Tax Policy Evaluation”. Chicago:University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research
Barrett, S. (1990). “Pricing the Environment: The Economic and Environmental Consequences of a Carbon Tax”. Economic Outlook, February: 24-33.
------(1992a). “Side Payments in a Global Warming Convention”. In Convention on Climate Change: Economic Aspects of Negotiation, Paris: OECD.
------(1992b). “Reaching a CO2-Emission Limitation Agreement for the Community: Implications for Equity and Cost-Effectiveness”. European Economy 1: 4-21.
------(1992c). “Acceptable Allocations of Tradeable Carbon Emission Entitlements in a Global Warming Treaty”. In Combating Global Warming . New York, NY: United Nations.
------(1994a). “Climate Change Policy and International Trade”. Paper presented to the IPCC Workshop on Policy Instruments and their Impacts, Tsukuba, Japan, January 17-20.
------(1994b). “Session Summary: Regional Policies”. In OECD (1994c).
------(1994c). “Self-enforcing International Environmental Agreements”. Oxford Economics Papers 46: 878-894.
Dixon, P.B. and Parmenter, B.R. and Alan Powell A. and Wilcoxen, P.J.(1992). Notes and Problems in Applied General Equilibrium Economics. Monash University and The University of Texas.
Dixon, P.B., Parmenter, B.R., Sutton J. and Vincent D.P.(1982). ORANI: A Multisectoral Model of the Australian Economy . Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dixon, Peter B. and Maureen T.Rimmer(2002). Dynamic, General Equilibrium Modelling for Forecasting and Policy : a Practical Guide and Documentation of Monash. Amsterdam:North-Holland.
Fullerton, D., and Henderson, Y.(1989) “A Disaggregate Equilibrium Model of the Tax Distortions among Assets, Sectors and Industies.” International Economic Review 30:391-413.
Fullerton, D., King, A., Shoven, J., and Whalley, J.(1981) “Corporate Tax Integration in the United States:A General Equilibrium Approach.” American Economic Review 71:677-691.
Goulder, L.H. (1999) “Green Tax Reform: Theoretical Issues, Empirical Results, and Future Challenges”, in R. Brannlund and I. Gren ed., Green Taxes-Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence from Scandinavia, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
---------------- (1995) “Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior Tax Distortions: An intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 271-297.
Hamilton, K. and G. Cameron (1994). “Simulating the Distributional Effects of a Canadian Carbon Tax”. Canadian Public Policy 20(4): 385-399.
Harrison, D., JR. (1994). “The Distributive Effects Of Economic Instruments For Environmental Policy.” Paris: OECD.
Harrison, W.J., and K.R. Pearson(2002), GEMPACK, version 8.0, Center for Policy Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Horridge,J.M., Parmenter, B.R. and Pearson,K.R.(1998). ORANI-G: A General Equilibrium Model of the Australian Economy. Course in Practical GE modelling, 21-29 April 1998, p01 - 62.
Jorgenson D. and K.Y. Yun (1990), “Tax Policy and the Cost of Capital”, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
Jorgenson, D. and P. Wilcoxen. (1994). “The Economic Effects of a Carbon Tax”. Paper presented to the IPCC Workshop on Policy Instruments and their Impacts, Tsukuba, Japan, January 17-20.
Jorgenson, D. W., and P. J. Wilcoxen(1993), ”Reducing US carbon emissions:An econometric general equilibrium assessment”, Resource and Energy conomics 15, 7-25.
Jorgenson, D., D. Slesnick, and P. Wilcoxen(1992). “Carbon Tax and Economic Welfare”. Brookings Papers on Economic Acivity: Microeconomics, 393-431.
Monash CoPS(2003). “ORANIGRD: a Recursive Dynamic version of ORANIG.”
OECD, 1995. “Climate Change, Economic Instruments and Income Distribution”. Report on 1995.
OECD, 1997. “Environmental Taxes and Green Tax Reform”. Report on 1997.
Pereira, Alfredo M. (1993). “A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis of Corporate Tax Integration.” Journal of Policy Modeling 15(1):63-89
Powell, Alan A. and Snape, Richard. H.(1993). “The Contribution of Applied General Equilibrium Analysis to Policy Reform in Australia.” Journal of Policy Modeling 15(4):393-414
Shih-Hsun Hsu, Hsing-Chun Lin, Han-Pang Su(2004). “Updating Input-Output Tables Using a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Model-The Case of Taiwan”. 2004 Taipei Conference on Macroeconomics and Development.
Smith, S. (1994). “Who Pays for Climate Change Policies? Distributional Side-Effects and Policy Responses”. In OECD (1994c).
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE