:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用多準則決策分析方法於再生能源排序之比較分析
作者:李幸珍
作者(外文):Hsing Chen Lee
校院名稱:長庚大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所博士班
指導教授:張錦特
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2017
主題關鍵詞:再生能源多準則決策分析排序比較分析敏感度分析Renewable energy sourcesMulti-Criteria Decision MakingRankingComparative analysisSensitivity analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
一、中文文獻
刁培正(2014)。多準則非凌越解評選方法之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。東吳大學,台北市。
北極星電力網(2016)。全球可再生能源發展現狀與趨勢。取自http://news.bjx.com.cn/html/20160607/740230.shtml
台灣電力公司(2015a)。重要能源議題管理-再生能源極大化議題。
台灣電力公司(2015b)。國家再生能源未來展望。取自http://www.taipower.com.tw/content/new_info/new_info-b34.aspx?LinkID=8
台灣電力公司(2016)。再生能源發電簡介。取自http://www.taipower.com.tw/content/new_info/new_info-b36-3.aspx?LinkID=8
再生能源網(2016)。水力能知識館。取自http://www.re.org.tw/Knowledge/Index/2
呂錫民(2011)。我國未來的能源結構。科學發展,464,60-65。
科技部(2004)。科技大觀園。生質能源化腐朽為能源。取自https://scitechvista.nat.gov.tw/zh-tw/articles/c/0/1/10/1/512.htm
科技部(2007)。科技大觀園。二氧化碳減量:二氧化碳與地球暖化。取自https://scitechvista.nat.gov.tw/zh-tw/articles/c/0/1/10/1/882.htm
能源資訊平台(2015)。台灣地熱發電之展望。取自http://eip.iner.gov.tw/
能源資訊平台(2016)。淺談間歇性再生能源之開發對我國電力供應的影響。取自http://eip.iner.gov.tw/
張宗翰、史弼中(2013)。以Entropy-Based TOPSIS評估台灣食品公司經營績效。國立虎尾科技大學學報,31(2),7-25。new window
張紹勳(2012)。模糊多準則評估法及統計。台北市:五南。
陳常青(2005)。一種基於ELECTRE排序的簡化方法。取自http://www.paper.edu.cn/
經濟部能源局(2007)。2007能源科技研究發展白皮書。
經濟部能源局(2014)。2014能源產業技術白皮書。
經濟部能源局(2015)。103年能源統計手冊。
經濟部能源局(2016a)。能源統計月報。取自http://web3.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/web_book/WebReports.aspx?book=M_CH&menu_id=142#L
經濟部能源局(2016b)。我們有取之不盡、用之不竭的能源嗎?綠色能源。取自http://www3.nstm.gov.tw/green/01_about_a.html
環保署(2016)。溫室氣體排放統計。取自 http://www.epa.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=10052&ctNode=31352&mp=epa

二、英文文獻
Abu Taha, R., & Daim, T. (2013). Multi-Criteria applications in renewable energy analysis, a literature review. In T. Daim, T. Oliver, & J. Kim (Eds.), Research and Technology Management in the Electricity Industry: Methods, Tools and Case Studies (pp. 17-30). London: Springer London.
Ahmad, S., & Tahar, R. M. (2014). Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia. Renewable Energy, 63, 458-466.
Akash, B. A., Mamlook, R., & Mohsen, M. S. (1999). Multi-criteria selection of electric power plants using analytical hierarchy process. Electric Power Systems Research, 52(1), 29-35.
Akella, A. K., Saini, R. P., & Sharma, M. P. (2009). Social, economical and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems. Renewable Energy, 34(2), 390-396.
Amer, M., & Daim, T. U. (2011). Selection of renewable energy technologies for a developing county: A case of Pakistan. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(4), 420-435.
Amponsah, N. Y., Troldborg, M., Kington, B., Aalders, I., & Hough, R. L. (2014). Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: A review of lifecycle considerations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 461-475.
Ayoub, N., & Yuji, N. (2012). Governmental intervention approaches to promote renewable energies—Special emphasis on Japanese feed-in tariff. Energy Policy, 43, 191-201.
Beccali, M., Cellura, M., & Mistretta, M. (2003). Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology. Renewable Energy, 28(13), 2063-2087.
Büyüközkan, G., & Karabulut, Y. (2017). Energy project performance evaluation with sustainability perspective. Energy, 119, 549-560.
Chang, C. T., & Lee, H. C. (2016). Taiwan's renewable energy strategy and energy-intensive industrial policy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, 456-465.
Chatzimouratidis, A. I., & Pilavachi, P. A. (2008). Sensitivity analysis of the evaluation of power plants impact on the living standard using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(12), 3599-3611.
Chatzimouratidis, A. I., & Pilavachi, P. A. (2009). Sensitivity analysis of technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy, 37(3), 788-798.
Chuang, M. C., & Ma, H. W. (2013). An assessment of Taiwan’s energy policy using multi-dimensional energy security indicators. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 17, 301-311.
Dinçer, F. (2011). The analysis on photovoltaic electricity generation status, potential and policies of the leading countries in solar energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 713-720.
Demirtas, O. (2013). Evaluating the best renewable energy technology for sustainable energy planning. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 3, 23-33.
4C Offshore (2016). Global offshore wind speeds ranking. Retrieved from http://www.4coffshore.com/windfarms/windspeeds.aspx
Georgopoulou, E., Lalas, D., & Papagiannakis, L. (1997). A multicriteria decision aid approach for energy planning problems: The case of renewable energy option. European Journal of Operational Research, 103(1), 38-54.
Goumas, M., & Lygerou, V. (2000). An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(3), 606-613.
Hwang, J. J., & Chang, W. R. (2011). Policy progress in mitigation of climate change in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1113-1122.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2016). Renewable Energy and Jobs annual review 2016.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/zh/faq-7-1.html
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2016). Renewable Capacity Statistics 2016.
Kabak, M., & Dağdeviren, M. (2014). Prioritization of renewable energy sources for Turkey by using a hybrid MCDM methodology. Energy Conversion and Management, 79, 25-33.
Kahraman, C., Kaya, İ., & Cebi, S. (2009). A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy, 34(10), 1603-1616.
Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2010). Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul. Energy, 35(6), 2517-2527.
Keyuraphan, S., Thanarak, P., Ketjoy, N., & Rakwichian, W. (2012). Subsidy schemes of renewable energy policy for electricity generation in Thailand. Procedia Engineering, 32, 440-448.
Klein, S. J. W., & Whalley, S. (2015). Comparing the sustainability of U.S. electricity options through multi-criteria decision analysis. Energy Policy, 79, 127-149.
Kumbaroğlu, G., Madlener, R., & Demirel, M. (2008). A real options evaluation model for the diffusion prospects of new renewable power generation technologies. Energy Economics, 30(4), 1882-1908.
Liou, H. M. (2015). Comparing feed-in tariff incentives in Taiwan and Germany. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1021-1034.
Lotfi, F. H., & Fallahnejad, R. (2010). Imprecise Shannon’s Entropy and Multi Attribute Decision Making. Entropy, 12(1), 53-62.
Mainali, B., & Silveira, S. (2015). Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1351-1365.
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E., Cavallaro, F., & Khalifah, Z. (2015). Sustainable and Renewable Energy: An overview of the application of multiple criteria decision making techniques and approaches. Sustainability, 7(10), 13947-13984.
Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Maliene, V. (2016). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega, 59, 146-156.
Nigim, K., Munier, N., & Green, J. (2004). Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources. Renewable Energy, 29(11), 1775-1791.
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
Real Statistics (2014). Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance (W). Retrieved from http://www.real-statistics.com/reliability/kendalls-w/
REN21. (2016). Renewables 2016 Global Status Report. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century.
Ren, H., Gao, W., Zhou, W., & Nakagami, K. i. (2009). Multi-criteria evaluation for the optimal adoption of distributed residential energy systems in Japan. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5484-5493.
Ren, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2015). Prioritizing low-carbon energy sources to enhance China’s energy security. Energy Conversion and Management, 92, 129-136.
San Cristóbal, J. R. (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in spain: The Vikor method. Renewable Energy, 36(2), 498-502.
Şengül, Ü., Eren, M., Eslamian Shiraz, S., Gezder, V., & Şengül, A. B. (2015). Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 75, 617-625.
Shen, Y. C., Chou, C. J., & Lin, G. T. R. (2011). The portfolio of renewable energy sources for achieving the three E policy goals. Energy, 36(5), 2589-2598.
Shen, Y. C., Lin, G. T. R., Li, K. P., & Yuan, B. J. C. (2010). An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4604-4616.
Shmelev, S. E., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016). Optimal diversity of renewable energy alternatives under multiple criteria: An application to the UK. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 679-691.
Stein, E. W. (2013). A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 640-654.
Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., Krisciukaitienė, I., & Balezentis, A. (2012). Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 3302-3311.
Štreimikienė, D., Šliogerienė, J., & Turskis, Z. (2016). Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania. Renewable Energy, 85, 148-156.
Troldborg, M., Heslop, S., & Hough, R. L. (2014). Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy technologies using multi-criteria analysis: Suitability of approach for national-scale assessments and associated uncertainties. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 1173-1184.
Tsoutsos, T., Drandaki, M., Frantzeskaki, N., Iosifidis, E., & Kiosses, I. (2009). Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete. Energy Policy, 37(5), 1587-1600.
Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple Attribute Decision Making : Methods and Applications. Boca Raton, US: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Wang, J. J., Jing, Y. Y., Zhang, C. F., & Zhao, J. H. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), 2263-2278.
World Nuclear Association (2012). Comparison of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various electricity generation sources, WNA Reports. Retrieved from http://www.world-nuclear.org/WNA/ Publications/WNA-Reports/Lifecycle-GHGEmissions-of-Electricity-Generation/
Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Fouladgar, M. M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Moini, S. H. H. (2013). Selecting the optimal renewable energy using multi criteria decision making. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(5), 957-978.
Ye, J. (2010). Fuzzy decision-making method based on the weighted correlation coefficient under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(1), 202-204.
Zanakis, S. H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998). Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(3), 507-529.
Zou, Z. H., Yun, Y., & Sun, J. N. (2006). Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18(5), 1020-1023.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top