:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高中教師工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新與教學效能之徑路模式探析
作者:陳麗玉
作者(外文):CHEN, LI-YU
校院名稱:國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:黃文三
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2020
主題關鍵詞:工作投入情緒勞務教學創新教學效能結構方程式job involvementemotional laborteaching innovationteaching effectivenessSEM
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
本研究旨在探討高中教師工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新與教學效能之徑路關係。本研究採問卷調查法,以高雄市高中教師為研究樣本,並以立意抽樣抽取受試者,總共發出問卷500份,有效樣本436份,有效樣本回收率為87.2%。資料處理採用的統計分析方法,包括項目分析、信度分析、單因子變異數分析、多變量分析、積差相關、逐步迴歸分析、結構方程式等。分析高中教師在工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新與教學效能之現況;不同背景變項在高中教師在工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新與教學效能之差異情形;高中教師在工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新與教學效能之相關情形;高中教師在工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新對其教學效能之預測情形;最後,在以結構方程式分析高中教師在工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新與教學效能之徑路模式。本研究之結論如下:
一、高中教師工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新與教學效能現況均在中上程度。
二、部分不同背景因素在高中教師工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新與教學效能有所差異,其性別在工作投入「工作認同」方面有差異、年齡在工作投入與情緒勞務有差別,擔任職務在工作投入與教學創新方面有差別。不同任教年資、學歷、學校類型、公私立、學校規模等背景變項在教師的工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新與教學效能上無顯著差異。
三、高中教師工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新與教學效能間有正向關聯。
四、高中教師工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新能正向預測教學效能。高中教師的自然流露、教學方法創新、工作專注、教學評量創新、班級經營創新能解釋教學效能。
五、高中教師工作投入、情緒勞務、教學創新與教學效能間有預測徑路關係。高中教師工作投入透過情緒勞務與教學創新預測教學效能。
最後,根據上述結論提出建議,提供教育主管單位及學校行政單位、教師個人與未來相關研究之參考。
Thepurpose of this study was to investigate the path model among teachers' jobinvolvement, emotional labor, teaching innovation, and teaching effectivenessin senior high schools . The method of this study was questionnaire survey. Theinstruments of this study were “Teachers' Job Involvement, Emotional Labor,Teaching Innovation, and Teaching Effectiveness Scale” that were constructed bythis researcher. The participants in this study were senior high schoolteachers in Kaohsiung. Adopting purposive sampling, this study sent out 500questionnaires and the numbers of valid samples were 436. Therecovery rate was 87.2%. The collected data were analyzed by using descriptivestatistics, one-way ANOVA, MANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, stepwiseregression analysis and structural equation modeling. The following 5conclusions were drawn from this study.
1. Thecurrent situation of senior high school teachers' job involvement, emotionallabor, teaching innovation, and teaching effectiveness were all in medium-highlevel.
2.Under some different kinds of backgrounds, there were differences in highschool teachers' job involvement, emotional labor, teaching innovation, andteaching effectiveness. But different years of teaching, education levels, typesof school, public and private school, and school size had no significantdifferences for job involvement, emotional labor, teaching innovation, andteaching effectiveness.
3.There were positive correlations between each two constructs of high schoolteachers' job involvement, emotional labor, teaching innovation, and teachingeffectiveness.
4. Jobinvolvement, emotional labor, teaching innovation were significantly predictedto teaching effectiveness. Among them, “genuine expression” predicts teachingeffectiveness best.
5.There were predictive path relationship among high school teachers' jobinvolvement, emotional labor, teaching innovation, and teaching effectiveness.
A) Teachers' job involvement was one ofthe key causes of teaching effectiveness.                                                                                       
B) Teachers' emotional labor was alsoone of the key causes of teaching effectiveness , and it could be a mediatorbetween job involvement and teaching effectiveness.
C) Teachers' teaching innovation wasalso one of the key causes of teaching effectiveness , and it could also be amediator between job involvement and teaching effectiveness
D) Teachers' emotional labor and teachinginnovation could be two mediators between job involvement and teachingeffectiveness
Accordingto the study findings and conclusions, the researcher proposed somerecommendations for education administration authority , schools administrativeunits, senior high school teachers, and future research.
壹、中文部分
王素貞(2014)。國民小學校長道德領導、教師工作投入與學校效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。
王淑珍(2019)。國民小學教師領導、教師同僚性與教學創新關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北市立大學,臺北市。
江文慈(2007)。「和顏悅色」與「忍氣吞聲」的背後:國小教師情緒勞動的心理歷程分析。教育心理學報,40(4),553-576。
何嘉惠(2018)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師彰權益能與教學創新關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。
吳宗祐(2013)。主管與部屬互動中情緒勞動:回顧、釐清、及前瞻。人力資源管理學報,13(3),57-105。
吳宗祐、鄭伯壎(2006)。工作投入、調節他人情緒能力與情緒勞務之交互作用對情緒耗竭的預測效果。中華心理學刊,48(1),68-87。
吳明隆(2010)。結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
吳明隆(2012)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南。
吳明隆、張毓仁(2010)。結構方程模式:實務應用秘笈。臺北市:五南。
吳國銘(2019)。國民小學校長學習領導與教師教學效能及學生學習成就之關係研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
吳清山(2002)。學校創新經營與策略。教師天地,128,30-44。
吳凱琳(譯) (2000)。創新的兩難(原作者:Christensen,C.M.)。臺北市:商周。(原著出版年:1997)
吳慧君(2016)。高中教師情緒智力、情緒勞務、組織支持、心理資本與工作滿意度關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
吳錦章(2018)。國民小學校長課程領導、教師創新教學與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
吳璧如(2004)。幼兒職前教師效能感之測量。教育心理學報,36(2),165 – 184。
呂晶晶(2009)。國民小學教育人員情緒勞務量表發展及其影響因素之研(未出版之博士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
宋莉萱(2019)。嘉義縣市國小教師倫理意識型態、專業倫理、工作投入與工作適應之建構與驗證(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
李安明、黃芳銘、呂晶晶(2012)。「國民小學教育人員情緒勞務量表」之發展與編製。測驗學刊,59(3),451-486。
李芳齡、李樹田(譯) (2003)。創新者的解答(原作者:Christensen, C.M. & Raynor, M. E.)。台北市:天下雜誌。(原著出版年:1997)
李敏蕙(2020)。技術型高中校長學習領導、教師工作投入與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
李麗雲、李麗日(2014)。教師專業角色知覺與工作投入之關係研究-以台中市國民小學教師為例。區域與社會發展研究,5,65 – 95。
杜佩蘭、張肇松、黃英忠(2009)。Kanungo工作投入量表的重建與測量—以護理人員為樣本。中華心理衛生學刊,22(2),139-159。
沈碩彬 (2014)。高中職教師心理資本、工作價值觀、情緒勞務與學校生活適應之徑路模式探析(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
林宏泰(2019)。國民中學校長正向領導、教師教學效能、與學生學習成效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。
林志成(2016)。行動智慧導向的教學創新。臺灣教育,698,2 – 10。
林秀娟(2013)。轉換型領導對員工創新行為影響之研究:中介與干擾混合模式分析(未出版之博士論文)。私立長榮大學,臺南市。
林尚平(2000)。組織情緒勞務負擔量表之發展。中山管理評論,8(3),427-447。
林芳瑜(2016)。技術型高中教師學習型組織知覺、教師自我效能與創新教學關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。
邱怡蓁(2017)。臺北市國小教師知覺學校創新氣氛與創新教學關係之研究。教育行政論壇,9 (1),28-48。
邱憲義、蕭佳純(2019)。高中教師教學風格與教學效能之相關研究─以教師專業發展為中介變項、學校組織文化為調節變項。當代教育研究季刊,27(1),39-78。
侯勝宗、樊學良、連婉茜(2015)。真心或矯情?情緒勞務和創新行為之關係。臺大管理論叢,25(1),67-100。
施俊名(2011)。國小教師內隱知識、教學效能信念與教學表現關聯性之研究:模式建構與驗證 (未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
柯麗卿(2009)。獨立研究指導教師教學效能量表之發展及其相關之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
洪嘉男(2019)。國民中學教師自我調節學習、驚輸、工作投入與組織公民行為關係之研究-以工作投入為中介變項(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
洪慧芳(譯)(2018)。創新的用途理論。(原作者:Christensen,C.M., Hall, T., Dillon, K. & Duncan, D.)。台北市:天下雜誌。(原著出版年:2016)
范熾文、張阿靈(2013)。桃園縣國民小學教師知識管理與教學創新關係之研究。教育經營與管理研究集刊,9,31-59。
唐錦超(譯)(2006)。創新的擴散-為什麼有些好觀念、好產品會一炮而紅,有些卻流行不起來(原作者:Rogers, E. M.)。臺北市:遠流。(原著出版年:2003)
孫志麟(2001)。教師自我效能與教學行為的關係-實徵取向的分析。國立台北師範學院學報,14,109-140。
孫志麟(2003)。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學學報,34(2),139 – 156。
孫國華(2014)。國小教師心理資本、情緒勞務、實用智能與教學效能徑路模式之建構及驗證 (未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
袁世珮(譯)(2009)。來上一堂破壞課:創新大師克里斯汀的教育新解(原作者:Christensen,C.M., Horn, M. B, Johnson, C. W. )。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。(原著出版年:2008)
張昭陽(2019)。教師工作投入與工作滿意、組織承諾之後設分析(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東縣。
張素花(2012)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師情緒勞務對教師教學效能影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台北教育大學,臺北市。
張進昌(2019)。國民小學校長教學領導、教師工作投入與教學創新關係之研究—以臺北市為例。曾慈慧(主持人)。2019清華教育學國際論壇,國立清華大學,新竹市。
張德銳、張素偵(2012)。臺北市中小學校長轉型領導、教師領導與教學效能之研究。北市教育學勘,41,59-97。
許士禮(2014)。高級中等學校教師情緒勞務、組織承諾、自我效能與知識分享之關係研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
許炳富(2015)。情緒勞務對工作投入之影響:世代差異下知覺「個人─環境」適配之調節效果(未出版之博士論文)。國立雲林科技大學,雲林縣。
許瑞芳(2018)。國民小學教師多元文化素養、跨文化溝通與教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。
許德便(2012)。國民中學校長服務領導、教師教學創新、社群互動與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
許籐繼、倪靜宜(2019)。國小教師領導與教學效能現況及其結構關係模式之分析。臺北市立大學學報,50(2),59-84。
連倖誼、張雅筑(2017)。教師專業學習社群信念與教學效能之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,10 (1),75-104。
郭正忠(2019)。國民小學校長轉型領導行為、教師工作投入及組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。私立長榮大學,臺南市。
郭智玲(2018)。幼兒數學自主學習創新教學模式之行動研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄市範大學,高雄市。
郭福豫(2015)。高職校長課程領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
陳木金(1999)。班級經營。臺北市:揚智。
陳怡昌、陳玲英(2018)。工作投入在組織認同、角色認同與工作績效間關係之中介效果研究—以台南市小學教師為例。全球商業經營管理學報,10,57-69。
陳添丁(2018)。國民小學校長學習領導、學校組織學習與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
游焜智(2017)。國民小學內部行銷、教師工作投入與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
湯志明、陳詩媛、簡宜珍(2016)。國民小學校長空間領導、組織學習與教學效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究,39(1),1-28。
黃文三、沈碩彬(2012)。工作價值觀、工作投入與教學效能關係之研究:以高雄市國中教師為例。課程與教學季刊,15 (4),161-188。
黃文三、沈碩彬(2017)。高中職教師情緒勞務與學校生活適應之關聯模式探。教育理論與實踐學刊,36,47-73。
黃文三、黃馨德、沈碩彬(2019)。高雄公立高中職校長服務領導、教師工作投入與學校效能之徑路模式探析。人文社會科學研究,13(1),49-74。
黃建翔、吳清山(2013)。國民中學教師專業發展、專業承諾與教學效能關係之研究-以TEPS資料庫為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,6(2),117-140。
楊孟華(2015)。雲嘉地區中學體育教師自我效能、工作投入及創意教學表現之相關研究。臺灣體育運動管理學報,15(2),297-330。
葉子明、謝佩伶、巫錦秀(2013)。教師工作壓力與工作投入對教學品質之影響-以人格特質為干擾變項。管理科學研究,9(2),65-87。
詹雅惠(2015)。國民小學組長知覺主任轉型領導、領導者-部屬交換關係對於工作投入影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
蒲逸悧(2011)。臺北市國民中學體育教師教學信念、教學創新與教學效能之相關。臺灣運動教育學報,6(1),15-28。
趙美珠(2018)。新北市國民小學校長轉型領導與交易領導對教師教學效能影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
劉秀枝(2012)。幼兒園教保服務人員社群互動、職場希望感與創新教學關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
劉秀枝、黃秀霜(2013)。教師社群互動對職場希望感與創新教學關係之探究:以幼教師觀點為例。教育研究與發展期刊,9(1),25-58。
劉倚禔、吳勁甫(2017)。教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之後設分析。教育科學期刊,16(1),157 – 169。
蔡吉郎(2017)。技術型高中校長學習領導、教師參與專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
蔡俊傑、劉威德、羅鴻仁(2012)。職業學校教導型組織文化與教師創新教學關係之探討。教師專業研究期刊,4,53-80。
蕭文智(2019)。國民小學校長科技領導、學校ICT運用、教師教學創新與學生學術樂觀之關係研究。李元萱(主持人)。2019清華教育學國際論壇,國立清華大學,新竹市。
謝傳崇、王妍蘇(2019)。幼兒園園長/園主任課程領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學創新關係之研究。學校行政,122,82-105。                            
謝傳崇、蕭文智、官柳延(2016)。國民小學校長科技領導、教師教學創新與學生樂學態度關係之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,12(1),71-104。
鍾榮進(2015)。國小教師教學效能自評之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,8(1),69 – 103。

貳、英文部分
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation andcreativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospectivecommentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5),1297–1333.
Ashforth, B., & Humphrey, R. (1993). Emotional labor in service roles:The influence of identity. The Academy ofManagement Review,18, 88-115.
Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement.New York, NY: Longman.
Azad, S. A., & Nataraj, PN.(2018).A study of job involvement amonghigh school teachers. InternationalJournal of Academic Research and Development, 3(1), 671-673.
Bağcı, Z., Kök,S.B., & Bursalı, Y.M. (2014). The relationship between emotionallabor and task/contextual/innovative job performance: A study with privatebanking employees in Denizli. EuropeanJournal of Research on Education, 2(2), 221-228
Baliyan, S., & Moorad, F.(2018).Teaching effectiveness in private highereducation institutions in Botswana: Analysis of students’ perceptions. International Journal of Higher Education,7,143-155.
Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy:The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (1977b). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioralchange. Psychological Review, 84(2),191–215.
Bandura, A. (1986). Socialfoundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Bawuro, F. A. , Danjuma, I., & Wajiga, H.(2018). Factors influencing innovativebehaviour of teachers in secondary schools in the north east of Nigeria. Traektoriâ Nauki, 4(3), 1007-1016.
Bedir, G. (2015). Perception of teaching efficacy by primary and secondaryschool teachers. International ElectronicJournal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 41-54.
Brotheridge, C. M., & Grandey, A. A.(2002). Emotional labor and burnout:Comparing two perspectives of “people work”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 17-39.
Brotheridge, C.M., & Lee, R.T. (2003). Development and validation ofthe emotional labour scale. Journal ofOccupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 365-379.
Brown, E. L. (2011). Emotionmatters: Exploring the emotional labor of teaching. (Unpublished doctoraldissertation). Retrieved from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/7209
Brown, S.(1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on jobinvolvement. Psychological Bulletin, 120,235-255.
Burić, I. , Slišković, A., & Penezić, Z.(2018).A two‐wave panel study on teachers' emotions andemotional‐labour strategies. Stress andHealth, 35(1), 27-38.
Buxton, M., Phillippi, J. C., & Collins, M. R. (2014). Simulation: A newapproach to teaching ethics. Journal ofMidwifery & Women’s Health, 60(1), 70–74.
Chang, S. T., Lin, H. H., & Song, M. M.(2011). University faculty members'perceptions of their teaching efficacy. Innovationsin Education and Teaching International,4(1),49-60.
Cheung, Y. F., & Tang, S. C. (2010). Effects of age, gender, and emotionallabor strategies on job outcomes: Moderated mediation analyses. Applied Psychology: Heathe and Well-Being, 2(3), 323–339.
Chou, M. J. (2013). Kindergarten teachers'information technology teaching beliefs: The critical path toward teaching effectiveness.2nd Cyprus International Conference on Educational Research. Retrieved fromhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813029753?via%3Dihub
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coladarci, T. (1992).Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching.Journal of Experimental Education, 60,323-337.
Cribbs, A. J. (2015). Emotional labor and conflict in schools:Teacherperceptions of the emotional display rules necessary for negativeteacher-student interactions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Availablefrom ProQuest Dissertation and theses database.
Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinativeeffects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinalstudy of service organizations. Journalof Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675.
Danish, R, Jam, M, Asghar, M., Mehmood, T., Ali, Q., Qaseem, S., &Ali, H. F.(2019). Impact of personality characteristics on innovative work behaviorthrough emotional labor in education sector of Pakistan. European Online Journal of Natural andSocial Sciences, 8(2), 70-85.
Denti, L., & Hemlin, S. (2012). Leadership and innovation inorganizations: A systematic review of factors that mediate or moderate therelationship. International Journal ofInnovation Management, 16(3), 1-20.
Diefendorff, J. M., & Gosserand, R.H. (2003). Understanding the emotionallabor process: A control theory perspective.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 945-959.
Diefendorff, J. M., Croyle, M. H., & Gosserand, R. H. (2005). The dimensionalityand antecedents of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 339-357.
Dino, R. N. (2017). Connected but different comparing and contrastingcreativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship. In J. A. Plucker (Eds.), Creativity and innovation: Theory, research,and practice(pp. 23-34). Waco, Texas : Prufrock Press.
Eric, G. L., Kevin, I. M., James, B. W., & Nancy, L. H.(2016).Social support's relationship to correctional staff job stress, jobinvolvement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. The Social Science Journal, 53(1),22-32.
Erickson, R. J., & Stacey, C. L. (2013). Attending to mind and body:Engaging the complexity of emotion practice among caring professionals. In A.A. Grandey, J. M. Diefendorff, & D. E. Rupp (Eds.), Emotional labor in the 21st century: Diverse perspectives on emotionregulation at work (pp. 175–196).New York, NY: Routledge.
Esfestani, Z. N., & Jalal, S. A.(2018) . Relationship between job involvementand personality traits with teachers' job efficiency. Specialty Journal of Psychology and Management, 4 (2), 37-48.
Estes, B., & Polnick, B.(2012).Examining motivation theory in higher education:An expectancy theory analysis of tenured faculty productivity. International Journal ofManagement,Business, and Administration, 15(1), 1-7.
Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Punie, Y. (2009). Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member states:Fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching. JRCTechnical Notes. Publication of the European Community. Retrieved fromhttp://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC52374_TN.pdf
Fives, H., & Buehl, M.M. (2010). Examining the factor structure of theteachers’ sense of efficacy scale. TheJournal of Experimental Education, 78, 118–134
Fu, C. S. (2015). The effect of emotional labor on job involvement inpreschool teachers: Verifying the mediating effect of psychological capital. Turkish Online Journal of EducationalTechnology. 14, 145-156.
Gaan, N.(2012). Impact of emotional labour on teaching effectiveness: A studyof higher education in India. IndianJournal of Industrial Relations,47(4), 673-684.
Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way toconceptualize emotional labor. Journal ofOccupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95-110.
Grandey, A. A., & Gabriel, A. (2015). Emotional labor at a crossroads:Where do we go from here? Annual Reviewof Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior,2,1-27.
Grandey, A. A., Diefendorff, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (Eds.). (2013). Organization and management. Emotional laborin the 21st century: Diverse perspectives on emotion regulation at work. NewYork, NY: Routledge.
Gross, J. J. (2013). Conceptualizing emotional labor: An emotionregulation perspective. In A. A. Grandey, J. M. Diefendorff, & D. E. Rupp(Eds.), Emotional labor in the 21stcentury: Diverse perspectives on the psychology of emotion regulation at work(pp. 288–294). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gross, J. J. (2014). Emotion regulation:Conceptual and empirical foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (p.3–20). New York, NY: Guilford.
Groth, M., Hennig-Thurau, T., & Wang, K. (2013).The customerexperience of emotional labor. In A. A. Grandey, J. M. Diefendorff, & D. E.Rupp (Eds.), Emotional labor in the 21stcentury: Diverse perspectives on the psychology of emotion regulation at work(pp. 127–151). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. (2014). 'I don't think I could, you know,just teach without any emotion': Exploring the nature and origin of universityteachers' emotions. Research Papers inEducation, 29(2), 240-262.
Hall, D.T., & Lawler E.E. (1970) Job characteristics and pressures andthe organizational integration of professionals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(3), 271-281.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). Themanaged heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: Universityof California Press.
Hochschild, A.R. (2012). The managedheart: Commercialization of human feeling (updated with a new preface).Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Hoole, C., & Boshoff, A. (1998). The job involvement construct and itsmeasurement. South African Journal ofEconomic and Management Sciences (SAJEMS), 1, 331-347.
Hsieh, C.C., Yen, H.C., & Kuan, L.Y. (2014). The relationship among principals' technology leadership, teaching innovation,and students' academic optimism in elementary schools. Paper presented atInternational Conferences on Education Technologies (ICEduTech) andSustainability, Technology and Education (STE) 2014. Retrieved fromhttps://www.learntechlib.org/p/158345/.
Huang, S., & Yin, H.(2018) .Teacher efficacy and affective well-beingin Hong Kong: An examination of their relationships and individual differences.ECNU Review of Education,1(2), 102-126.
Huang, W., Yuan, C., & Li, M. (2019). Person-job fit and innovation behavior:Roles of job involvement and career commitment. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1134.
Humphrey, R. H., Ashforth, B. E., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2015). The brightside of emotional labor. Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 36(6), 749-769.
Hung, Y. T., Lee T. R., & Jiang, Y. J.(2019).The effect of teachinginnovation on learning effectiveness among the students of Taiwan and MainlandChina universities. International Journalof Synergy and Research ,7, 111-121.
Kalyani, D., & Rajasekaran, K.(2018). Innovative teaching andlearning. Journal of Applied and AdvancedResearch, 3(S1):23.
Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Rubenstein, A. L., Long, D. M., Odio, M. A.,Buckman, B. R., Zhang, Y., & Halvorsen-Ganepola, M. D. K. (2013). A meta-analyticstructural model of dispositonal affectivity and emotional labor. Personnel Psychology, 66(1), 47-90.
Kanungo, R. N. (1979). The concepts of alienation and involvementrevisited. Psychological Bulletin,86(1),133.
Kanungo, R.N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67,341-349.
Khodabakhshzadeh, H., Hosseinnia, M., Moghadam, H. A., & Ahmadi, F. (2018).EFL teachers’ creativity and their teaching's effectiveness: A structural equationmodelling approach. International Journalof Instruction, 11(1), 227-238.
Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5),622-629.
Kivunja, C. (2015). Innovative methodologies for 21st century learning, teachingand assessment: A convenience sampling investigation into the use of social mediatechnologies in higher education.International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 1-26.
Kleysen, R.F., & Street, C.T. (2001) Toward a multi-dimensional measureof individual innovative behavior.Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2, 284-296.
Lee, Y. J. (2011). A study on the effect of teaching innovation onlearning effectiveness with learning satisfaction as a mediator. World Transactions on Engineering andTechnology Education, 9(2), 92-101.
Li, M., & Liang, L. (2016). Emotional labor between supervisors andsubordinates: literature review and future research. Journal of Business and Management, 4, 130–137.
Liao, Y. H., Luo, S. Y., Tsai, M. H., & Chen, H. C. (2020).Anexploration of the relationships between elementary school teachers’ humorstyles and their emotional labor. Teachingand Teacher Education, 87, 1-9.
Liu, C., Liu, C., & Geng, Z.(2013). Emotional labor strategies andservice performance: The mediating role of employee creativity. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(5),1583-1595.
Lodahl, T. M., & Kejnar, M. (1965). The definition and measurement ofjob involvement. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 49(1), 24–33.
Lunde, J. P., & Wilhite, M. S. (1996). Innovative teaching andteaching improvement. To Improve theAcademy, 15, 155-167.
Mallory, D. B. & Rupp, D. E. (2015). Focusing in on the emotionlaborer: Emotion regulation at Work. In R. Baumeister, & K. Vohs (3rded.), Handbook of self-regulation: research,theory, and applications (pp.323-344). New York, NY: Guilford.
Medley,D. M. (1987). Evolution of research on teaching. In M. Dunkin (Ed.). The international encyclopedia of teachingand teacher education (pp.105). New York, NY: Pergamon.
Money, S. M.(1992). What is teaching effectiveness?A survey of student and teacher perceptions ofteacher effectiveness. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No.ED351056).
Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents,and consequences of emotional labor. Academyof Management Review, 21(4), 986-1010.
Narayanan, S. (2017). A Study on the relationship between creativity and innovationin teaching and learning methods towards students academic performance at privatehigher education institution, Malaysia. InternationalJournal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,7, 1-10.
Narayanaswamy, M. & Rao, S. (2014). Job involvement of secondaryschool teachers and its effect on teaching competency. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 3(2),50-53.
Naz, F., & Murad, H.S. (2017).Innovative teaching has a positive impacton the performance of diverse students. SAGEOpen, 7(4),1-8.
Neben, J. (2014). Attributes and barriers impacting diffusion of onlineeducation at the institutional level: Considering faculty perceptions. Distance Learning, 11(1), 41-50.
Özan, M. B., & Şener, G. (2014). Teaching and emotional labor. American International Journal of SocialScience,3(5), 111-119.
Paneer Selvam, S. K. (2013). Job involvement and teaching experience ofschool teachers:Astudy. Journal of Educational Chronicle,4(1), 37-40.
Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing teachingeffectiveness and student learning outcomes. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20-33.
Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial attitudes andperformance. Homewood, Illi- nois: Irwin.
Rabinowitz, S., & Hall, D. T. (1977).Organizational research on jobinvolvement. Psychological Bulletin, 84(2),265-288.
Ritchhart, R. (2004). Creative teaching in the shadow of the standards . Independent School, 63(2), 32-41.
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations.New York, NY: Free Press.
Roy, R. R., & Halder, U. K.(2018).Teacher effectiveness: A self-reportstudy on secondary school teachers. InternationalJournal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 15(3), 914-919.
Sarraf, M., Talepasand, S., Rahimianboogar, I., Mohammadyfar, M., &Najafi, M. (2017). Emotional labor as a mediator for the structural relationshipbetween emotional job demands, teaching satisfaction and performance: The moderatingrole of emotional intelligence. Internationalof Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 10(4), 137-146.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources andtheir relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25,293-437.
Scott, S., & Bruce, R. (1994) .Determinants of innovative behavior: A pathmodel of individual innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t,and what to do about it? Journal ofResearch in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1) , 4-33.
Sethi, A., & Mittal, K. (2016). A study of job involvement amongsenior secondary school teachers. InternationalJournal of Applied Research, 2(2), 205-209.
Sivasakthi, T., & Muthumanickam, R. (2012). A study the job involvement of school teachers.International Journal of Arts andEducation, 2(2), 3-7.
Stronge, J. H.(2010). Effective teachers=Studentachievement: What the Rresearch says. New York , NY: Routledge.
Stronge, J. H.(2018). Qualities of effectiveteachers(3rd ed.).Virginia,VA: ASCD..
Stum, J.(2009). Kirton’s adaption-innovation theory: Managing cognitive stylesin times of diversity and change. EmergingLeadership Journeys, 2, 66-78.
Sweeney, J. E, (2016). Innovation inthe school context: An exploratory study (Unpublished doctoraldissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and theses database. (ProQuest Number: 10158585)
Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model ofexplaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85,430–471.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. (1998). Teacher efficacy:Its meaning and measure. Review ofEducational Research ,68, 202-248.
Tsai, M. H., Chang, S. H., & Hsieh, M.(2016). The impact of Taiwan elementaryprincipal’s distributed leadership and teacher’s emotional labor on teaching effectiveness.International Journal of IntelligentTechnologies and Applied Statistics, 9(1), 67-88.
Tucker, P. D., & Stronge, J. H. (2005).Linking teacher evaluation and student learning. Virginia : ASCD.
Van Eerde, W., & Thierry, H. (1996). Vroom's expectancy models andwork-related criteria: A meta-analysis. Journalof Applied Psychology, 81(5), 575–586.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work andmotivation. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Wang, C. C., Lin, H. M., & Liang, T. l.(2017). A study on comparingthe relationship among organizational commitment, teachers' job satisfactionand job involvement of schools with urban-rural discrepancy. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(16),762-771.
Wang, M. L., & Chang, S. C. (2016). The impact of job involvement onemotional labor to customer-oriented behavior: An empirical study of hospitalnurses. The Journal of Nursing Research,24(2), 153-62.
Wang, H., Hall, N. C. & Taxer, J. L. (2019). Antecedents andconsequences of teachers’ emotional labor: A systematic review andmeta-analytic investigation. EducationalPsychology Review, 31, 663–698.
Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacyand beliefs about control. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 82, 81-91.
Ye, M ., & Chen, Y. (2015). A literature review on teachers’ emotionallabor. Creative Education, 6,2232-2240.
Yilmaz, K., Altinkurt, Y., Guner, M., & Sen, B. (2015). The relationshipbetween teachers’ emotional labor and burnout level. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 59, 75-90.
Yin, H., Huang, S., & Lee, C. K. (2017). Choose your strategy wisely:Examining the relationships between emotional labor in teaching and teacher efficacyin Hong Kong primary schools. Teachingand Teacher Education, 66, 127- 136.
Zaretsky, R., & Katz, J.Y. (2019). The relationship between teachers' perceptionsof emotional labor and teacher burnout and teachers' educational level. Athens Journal of Educaion,6,127-144.
Zheng, S.L. (2016). Can emotional laborof teachers really improve teaching effectiveness? A study on Taiwanese colleges.Paper presented at 2016 2nd International Conference on Education Science andHuman Development. Retrieved from http://dpi-proceedings.com/index.php/dtssehs/article/view/5179/4803
Zhou, F., Wang, N., & Wu, Y. J. (2019). Does university playfulnessclimate matter? A testing of the mediation model of emotional labour. Innovations in Education and TeachingInternational, 56(2), 239-250.
Zoul, J. (2019). Innovative professional learning.Jimmy, C. , Todd, W., & Jeffery, Z. (Eds.), 10Perspectives on innovation in education (pp.1-23). New York, NY: Routledge.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top