:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:談韓愈以文為戲的問題
書刊名:中國文哲研究集刊
作者:方介 引用關係
作者(外文):Fang, Chieh
出版日期:2000
卷期:16
頁次:頁65-93
主題關鍵詞:古文遊戲演戲戲謔滑稽聖人之道Ku-wenThe classical style of writing essaysPlaying gamesPlay actingMaking fun of each otherMockingHumorousJocularTeachings of the ancient sages
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(7) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:120
     韓愈提倡古文運動成功的關鍵,不能只從「文以明道」的角度觀察,而應重視他「以文為戲」在當時與後世文壇所造成的影響。但是,過去學者往往忽略這個問題,而未予深究。本文則根據韓愈的創作理論與實績,指出他處在一個以文學共娛的時代,有鑑於六朝以來為文者多拘偶對、唯務綺靡之弊病,而改變了遊戲招式,大力提倡「古文」,一方面以散易駢,另一方面以古道為依歸,於是把遊戲提昇到藝術的境界,並且與道德相結合,而發揮了改革文風的作用。他以遊戲傳聖道,使文章內外全面翻新的苦心,雖然在當時與後代都遭到了誤解和譏評,但是,因為他的文章能以遊戲出之,娛樂效果特佳,流傳特廣,所以還是帶動了風潮,而完成了「興存聖人之道」的大業。此一論點之提出,當可釐清前人誤解,一新韓文研究之視野。
      Why could Han Yu succeed in promoting the Ku-wen (Classical Style) Movement? We cannot discuss the question solely from the viewpoint of “writing essays to expand the teaching of Confucius and Mencius.” We should pay attention to his demonstration of “writing essays as playing games,” and its influence on his contemporaries and on future writers. Most researchers, however, have ignored this problem. This paper points out that Han Yu lived in a time in which the literary men often amused themselves with their works, and that he changed “the rules of the game” on them by vigorously promoting “ku-wen.” By doing this he substituted a more classical style instead of continuing the special euphuistic style consisting of antithetical or parallel constructions of four and six characters. Furthermore, he followed the teachings of Confucius and Mencius, adding a moral sense to his writing; in this way he turned the game into art. Though his attitude of taking writing essays as playing games gave rise to much controversy, it provided his works with a strange recreational effect, and became widely known. That's why Han could create a new literary atmosphere and preach successfully the teachings of the ancient sages.
圖書
1.吳文治(1984)。韓愈資料彙編。韓愈資料彙編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.錢基博(1975)。韓愈志。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.元好問、姚奠中(1990)。元好問全集。山西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.柳宗元(1974)。柳河東集。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.董誥(1979)。全唐文。大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.左丘明、楊伯峻(1981)。春秋左傳注。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉昫(1976)。舊唐書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.錢穆(1991)。雜論唐代古文運動。中國學術思想史論叢(四)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.郭紹虞(1985)。中國文學批評理論中「道」的問題。照隅室古典文學論集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.朱光潛(1987)。藝術的起源與遊戲。文藝心理學。合肥。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1977)。韓愈與唐代小說。陳寅恪先生全集(下冊)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.王夢鷗(1987)。從士大夫文學到貴遊文學。傳統文學論衡。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(宋)謝枋得(1991)。文章軌範,鄭州。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)馬其昶(1975)。韓昌黎文集校注,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(梁)蕭統(1987)。文選,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.范文瀾(1970)。文心雕龍註,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(西漢)司馬遷(1975)。史記,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(唐)孔穎達,(漢)鄭玄(1965)。禮記注疏,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(漢)毛亨,(漢)鄭玄,(唐)孔穎達(1965)。毛詩注疏,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.錢鍾書(1984)。宋人論韓昌黎。談藝錄。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE