:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:居民對都市河岸景觀設計之偏好
書刊名:造園學報
作者:李素馨 引用關係侯錦雄 引用關係陳韻如
作者(外文):Lee, Su-hsinHou, Jing-shoungChen, Yun-ju
出版日期:2000
卷期:6:1/2
頁次:頁55-69
主題關鍵詞:都市河岸設計景觀生態設計民眾景觀偏好Urban waterfront designLandscape ecological designPublic preference
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:62
本研究目的是探討都市河川親水性景觀設計型式與民眾偏好間的關係,作為對都市河川的親水景觀規劃及管理上之參考。研究以臺中市筏子溪為例,將行經臺中市內的流域依沿岸環境分為田園低度、中度、高度開發型、鄉鎮型與都會型等五類;並將現行河川景觀設計工法歸納為工程、生態、遊憩等三種。再利用影像模擬的方式,將五段不同河段類型加以三種設計工法模擬後的影像照片與配合現況照片作為對照組,將二十張照片對臺中市居民進行景觀偏好的問卷調查。 結果顯示河段類型與景觀設計工法的交互作用對景觀偏好有顯著的影響:民眾在田園低度開發型河段中最偏好「生態工法」,田園中度開發型河段最偏好「現況」,田園高度開發型河段偏好「遊憩工法」,鄉鎮型河段明顯偏好「生態工法」,都會型河段則以「遊憩工法」偏好程度最高。本研究提出考量現地自然與人文環境的河段區分型式,及其藉由民眾偏好所得之適合的河川設計工法,不僅適用於不同都市河岸景觀的設計朝向,並可應用於管理上,針對實質現況提出民眾偏好的改善建議。
The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between urban waterfront and public preference and provide recommendation for the planning and management of urban river. This reseach selected the Fa-Tzi River in Taichung city as the site for case study. The whole river was classified into five categories according to the degree of development of surrounding areas, which are low-development rural, mid-development rural, high-development rural, town, and urban river types. By using landscape simulation, the five types of river were represented three constructed methods, engineering, ecological, and recreational approaches, and including existing status, 20 photos were shown to the residents for investigating the preference of waterfront in Taichung city. The result revealed that the interdependence of river types and constructed methods had a significant influence on the public’s preference. In low-development rural area, the ecological construction approach was the most preferred, while in mid-development rural area, people preferred the existing river status, and in high-development rural area, the recreational approach was preferred. The ecological approach in town river and recreational approach in urban river were preferred independently. The classification of constructed approaches concerning both natural and social environment can be adapted to the design and management for specific characteristics of urban waterfront. A further more guidelines and suggestions for the physical planning in responsive of public’s preference were also proposed.
期刊論文
1.李英弘、Hammitt, W.(199712)。景觀美質評估之心理學模式分析。造園學報,4(2),79-99。  延伸查詢new window
2.Aoki. Y.(1999)。Review article: Trends in the study of the psychological evaluation of landscape。Landscape Research,24(1),85-94。  new window
3.Balling, J. D.、Falk, J. H.(1982)。Development of visual preference for natural environment。Environment and Behavior,14(1),5-28。  new window
4.Boothy, J.(1999)。Farming a strategy for pond landscape conservation: Aims, objectives and issues。Landscape Research,24(1),67-83。  new window
5.Gardiner, J. L.(1997)。River landscapes and sustainable development: A framework for project appraisal and catchment management。Landscape Research,22(1),95-114。  new window
6.Herrick, T. A.、McDonald, C. D.(1992)。Factors affecting overall satisfaction with a river recreation experience。Environmental Management,16(2),243-247。  new window
7.House, M.、Fordham, M.(1997)。Public perceptions of river corridors and attitudes toward river works。Landscape Research,20(1),25-44。  new window
8.Kuiper, J.(1998)。Landscape quality based upon diversity, coherence and continuity landscape planning at different planning-levels in the river area of the netherlands。Landscape and Urban Planning,43,91-104。  new window
9.Manning, R. E.、Ciali, C. P.(1981)。Recreation and river type: Social-environmental relationships。Environmental Management,5(2),109-120。  new window
10.Manning, O. D.(1997)。Design imperatives for river landscape。Landscape Research,22(1),67-94。  new window
11.Schroeder, H. W.(1984)。Environmental perception rating scales-A case for simple methods of analysis。Environment and Behavior,16,573-598。  new window
12.Tips, W. E. J.、Savasdisara, T.(1986)。The influence of social-economic background of subjects on their landscape preference evaluation。Landscape and Urban Planning,13,225-230。  new window
13.Zacharias, J.(1999)。Performance for view corridors through the urban environment。Landscape and Urban Planning,43,217-225。  new window
14.Baschak, L. A.、Brown, R. D.(1995)。An ecological framework for the planning, design and management of urban river greenways。Landscape and Urban Planning,33(1-3),211-225。  new window
15.林晏州、陳傳興(19960600)。民眾對自然環境中人為結構物之視覺偏好研究。造園學報,3(1),45-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.KapIan, R.(1985)。The analysis of perception VIA preference: A strategy for studying how the environment is experienced。Landscape and Urban Planning,12,161-176。  new window
會議論文
1.侯錦雄(1995)。溪流空間環保與遊憩利用之設計考量。溪流河川生態設計及績效管理研討會。台中。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.衍生工程顧問有限公司(1998)。台北市親水綱要計畫。  延伸查詢new window
2.衍生工程顧問有限公司(1996)。溪流觀光遊憩發展之研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.Daniel, T. C.、Boster, R. S.(1976)。Scenic Beauty Estimation Model: Predicting perceived beauty of forest landscape。Berkeley, CA:Pacific Southwest For. And Range Exp. Stn.。  new window
圖書
1.土木學會(1988)。水邊の景觀設計。技報堂。  延伸查詢new window
2.吉村元男、芝原幸夫(1988)。水邊の計畫と設計。鹿島出版會。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭瓊瑩(1995)。流域河川生態設計準則。私立文化大學景觀設計系。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top