:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以文為詩的觀念嬗變
書刊名:中國文哲研究集刊
作者:吳淑鈿
作者(外文):Ng, Suk-tin
出版日期:2000
卷期:17
頁次:頁237-262
主題關鍵詞:文體觀念詩學觀念本色熟味詩文互涉辨體意識Concept of genreConcept of poeticsSystem of normsTasteInterrelation between poetry and proseConsciousness of differentiating genre
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:74
自《後山詩話》載「以文為詩」一詞以來,後世詮釋不絕於書。直至現代,論者的視點仍主要集中在以散體文為詩的價值認同上,而體認以散文為詩的方式是歷來研究的重心。本文提出的研究進路,是必須將以文為詩的文體觀念與詩學觀念結合,在詩學的發展過程中考察文體的起源與變異的內涵,才能具顯它的意義。意義的構建又關係於唐、宋詩歌風格類型的劃分及中國詩歌本質範間的肯定。本文以為宋代以後對以文為詩的接受過程,標誌著中國詩歌傳統生命的完成,故相關觀念的嬗變實有論述之價值。
Ever since the phrase “prose as poetry” appeared in the Hou-shan shih-hua, many interpretations of it have been offered in various critical studies. Critics have attended mainly to the value of using prose as poetry, and the emphasis of academic research has been on recognizing the ways of using prose as poetry. This paper tries to offer a different perspective on this issue, proposing that the concept of genre in “prose as poetry” must be considered together with the concept of poetics. The meaning of genre can be foregrounded only when the significance of its origin and transformation is investigated in light of the development of poetics. The construction of this meaning is related to the differentiation of styles and forms of T'ang and Sung poetry, and the definition of Chinese poetry also counts in that construction. This paper holds that the reception of “prose as poetry” after the Sung Dynasty marks the perfection of traditional Chinese poetry, and thus the development of related concepts is of paramount importance.
期刊論文
1.羅聯添(1991)。論韓愈古文幾個問題。漢學研究,9(2),288。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張安祖(1998)。韓愈「古文」含義辨識。文學遺產,1998(6),97。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.朱自清(1982)。論「以文為詩」。臺北。96-97。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張宗柟(1971)。帶經堂詩話。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.齊治平(1983)。唐宋詩之爭概述。長沙:岳麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙翼、霍松林、胡主佑(1981)。甌北詩話。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊倫(1980)。杜詩鏡銓。臺北:漢京文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭紹虞(1979)。中國歷代文論選。上海。  延伸查詢new window
6.王運熙、顧易生(1986)。中國文學批評史。上海。  延伸查詢new window
7.姚鼐、劉季高(1992)。惜抱軒詩文集。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.潘德輿(1983)。養一齋詩話。臺北:木鐸出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.方東樹、汪紹楹(1984)。昭昧詹言。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.程學恂(1970)。韓詩臆說。台北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.許學夷、杜維沫(1987)。詩源辯體。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.丁福保(1978)。清詩話。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.何文煥(1980)。歷代詩話。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.惠洪(1988)。冷齋夜話。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.何文煥(1983)。歷代詩話。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.劉辰翁(1973)。須溪集。臺北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
17.胡震亨(19810500)。唐音癸籤。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.嚴羽、郭紹虞(1983)。滄浪詩話校釋。人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.方苞、劉季高(1983)。方苞集。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.錢鍾書(1984)。談藝錄。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.郭預衡(1993)。中國古代文學史長篇(隋唐五代卷)。中國古代文學史長篇(隋唐五代卷)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
22.呂肖奐(1997)。論宋詩的新變和宋調的形成。中國詩學(第5輯)。南京。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳寅恪(1973)。論韓愈。陳寅恪先生文史論集。香港。  延伸查詢new window
24.錢仲聯(1957)。韓昌黎詩繫年集釋(下冊)。韓昌黎詩繫年集釋(下冊)。上海。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)陳衍(1976)。石遺室詩話,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(南宋)劉克莊(1976)。後村先生大全集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)毛先舒(1983)。詩辯坻,上海。  延伸查詢new window
4.(宋)王十朋(1929)。梅溪王先生文集,上海。  延伸查詢new window
5.(清)顧嗣立。韓詩增注正訛十一卷。  延伸查詢new window
6.(清)劉熙載(1990)。藝概,成都。  延伸查詢new window
7.(宋)陳善(1996)。捫虱新話,北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.(清)陳衍(1964)。石遺室文集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.(清)愛新覺羅‧弘曆(1881)。御選唐宋詩醇。  延伸查詢new window
10.(宋)張戒(1990)。歲寒堂詩話箋注,成都。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.程千帆(1990)。韓愈以文為詩說。程千帆詩論選集。太原:山西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top