:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:和諧中變革:易經與華人的心理輔導
書刊名:本土心理學研究
作者:張包意琴陳麗雲
作者(外文):Cheung, GraceChan, Cecilia
出版日期:2000
卷期:14
頁次:頁199-235
主題關鍵詞:Satir 模式易經華人心理輔導Satir modelI ChingIndigenous counseling
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:96
     在現代香港,來自中國傳統儒家的權威集體主義(authoritarian collectivism )的思想,包括強調犧牲小我完成大我、尊卑有序、克己、以和為貴等思想仍具影響力,規 範著不少家庭成員之間的關係。這些思想,與我們長期在社會工作中學習西方重視平等、突 出個人自由與責任、促進自我滿足、建立信心、面對矛盾的輔導理論,尤其是我們較為熟識 的 Virginia Satir (薩提爾,1993,1994; Satir et al.,1991 )輔導理論,有著顯著 不同。西方輔導理論不會因迴避衝突而壓抑變革,這一關鍵與我們中國人處事作風大相逕庭 ,導致當事人對這種理論與對運用這種理論的輔導員產生懷疑與抗拒。 中國人重視「和諧」,而「和諧」的觀念在<易經>佔有重要位置。譬如:「天地以和順而 為命,萬物以和順而為性」;「調和為吉,不調和為凶」都是來自<易經>的思想。我們最 感興趣的是<易經>談「變革」的部分。易者變也,整部<易經>,就是談變革之道。不單 如此,幾千年來受到集體主義薰陶的中國人,在注釋<易經>當中找到在和諧中進行變革的 方法,並加以發揮。過去一年,我們嘗試在輔導工作中,運用<易經>一些概念,協助深受 中國傳統影響的當事人進行變革,結果令人鼓舞。本文以個案為基礎,結合臨床實踐和理論 反省,把<易經>一些概念與 Satir 模式作比較, 希望有助於心理輔導本土化的課題,並 引發更多討論。
     In modern Hong Kong, the influence of traditional Chinese culture remains strong. Authoritarian collectivism continues to pervade many local families, where people are constrained to sacrifice their small self for the big self, respect harmony and the hierarchical order, and practice filial piety and self-restraint. This pattern of behavior differs markedly from the egalitarian individualist cultures of the West, where people are socialized to value individual freedom, equality, differences and self-actualization, as well as direct expression of self and confidence to face conflicts, and where the therapeutic models we learned emerged. For most of these therapeutic models originating from the West, change occupies a very important position. If there is need to choose between change, which means facing conflict, and harmony, which means keeping the status quo, the choice is often change. From our experience, uncritical application of this strategy with local clients leads to suspicion, resistance, and finally rejection of the counseling process as well as the counselor. Harmony is a focal concern in Chinese community living. It occupies a central position in the I Ching, which captures the essence of Chinese philosophical thought. For the authors of the I Ching, "harmony reflects the nature of heaven and earth"; "harmony is good, disharmony is evil." The fundamental concept of the I Ching is change. "I" means change. The I Ching deals with the Tao (the Way) of change. For more than three thousand years, Chinese have lived within a culture dominated by hierarchical collectivist values, and many among them looked and continue to look to the I Ching for guidance to change without breaking harmony. Over the past year, we have employed certain concepts of the I Ching in facilitating local clients in the process of change, especially those clients who are deeply influenced by traditional Chinese culture. Results have been encouraging. This paper is an attempt to integrate some of these experiences in clinical practice with theoretical explorations, and to compare certain basic concepts of the I Ching with those of the Satir model, in the hope that it will stimulate further discussion on the development of indigenous counseling.
期刊論文
1.段昌明、王力釗(20000000)。Counseling in the Chinese Cultural Context: Accommodating Both Individualistic and Collectivistic Values。亞洲輔導學報,7(1),1-21。new window  new window
2.Lee, W. M.(1998)。Shared reality and dialogic understanding in counselling: An integration of East and West perspectives。Asian Journal of Counselling,5(1/ 2),27-45。  new window
圖書
1.王居恭(1992)。周易旁通。文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.唐力權(1989)。周易與懷德海之間:場有哲學序論。台北:黎明文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Satir, V.、Banmen, J.、Gerber, J.、Gomori, M.(1991)。The Satir Model: Family therapy and Beyond。Science and Behavior Books, Inc.。  new window
4.辛介夫(1998)。周易解讀。西安:陝西師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.張善文(1996)。易經初階。臺北:頂淵文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hofstede, Geert(1991)。Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival。London:Harper Collins。  new window
7.Satir, Virginia M.、吳就君(1994)。家庭如何塑造人。臺北:張老師文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Satir, Virginia、吳就君(1993)。與人接觸。Virginia:張老師文化。  延伸查詢new window
9.Triandis, Harry Charalambos(1995)。Individualism and collectivism。Westview Press。  new window
10.趙志裕、何友暉(1994)。Component Ideas of Individualism, Collectivism, and Social Organization。Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
11.余敦康(1994)。周易與中國倫理思想。易經應用大百科。南京。  延伸查詢new window
12.張仁俐、萬文鵬、張世富、葛志斌、劉克禮、李伯約、劭瑞珍(1990)。中國人的心理。中國人的心理。昆明。  延伸查詢new window
13.周鼎珩(1982)。易經講話。易經講話。香港。  延伸查詢new window
14.周繼旨(1994)。周易與中國傳統思維模式。易經應用大百科。南京。  延伸查詢new window
15.南懷瑾(1997)。易經繫傳別講。易經繫傳別講。上海。  延伸查詢new window
16.唐華(1994)。中國易經歷史進化哲學原理。中國易經歷史進化哲學原理。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.徐志銳(1994)。「易傳」哲學。易經應用大百科。南京。  延伸查詢new window
18.張其成(1994)。「周易」內容與性質。易經應用大百科。南京。  延伸查詢new window
19.張其成(1994)。卦象原理。易經應用大百科。南京。  延伸查詢new window
20.曾文星(1997)。從文化的角度談華人的心理治療。華人的心理與治療。北京。  延伸查詢new window
21.劉坤生(1998)。周易非易。周易非易。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
22.Bond, M. H.(1994)。Into the heart of collectivism: A personal and scientific journey。Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, method, and applications。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
23.Hellmut, W.(1967)。Preface。The I Ching。Princeton。  new window
24.Triandis, H. C.(1994)。Theoretical and methodological approaches to the studies of collectivism and individualism。Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, method, and applications。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kagitcibasi, C.(1994)。A Critical Appraisal of Individualism and Collectivism: Toward a New Formulation。Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications。Sage。  new window
2.Yang, K. S.(1995)。Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis。Chinese societies and mental health。Hong Kong:New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Kim, U.(1994)。Individualism and Collectivism: Conceptual Clarification and Elaboration。Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top