:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:電腦態度與學習表現的影響因素探討--中學生網頁製作教學的實地實驗研究
書刊名:資訊管理學報
作者:周惠文 引用關係王裕方
作者(外文):Chou, Huey-wenWang, Yu-fang
出版日期:2000
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁103-118
主題關鍵詞:終端使用者運算學習表現電腦態度訓練方式Kolb學習型態實地 實驗法End user computingLearning performanceComputer attitudeTraining methodKolb learning styleField experiment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:32
本文探討不同的訓練方式及學習型態是否能影響學習表現及電腦態度,並研究學習型態與訓練方式對學習表現是否存在交互作用。本研究透過實地實驗法驗證由「Kolb學習型態理論」所定義的學習型態與「教導式」及「範例式」二種訓練方式,對學習表現與電腦態度的影響。研究發現教導式教學法有助於學習效率的提升,而範例式教學法導致良好電腦態度的養成。而學習型態顯著影響學習表現及電腦態度,且不同學習型態的學習者確實存在最適當之教學法,亦即學習型態與訓練方式對學習表現與電腦態度的確存在交互作用。如發散者接受教導式教學法所得到的學習表現提升,比接受範例式教學法的效果較佳,而發散者與收斂者若採範例式教學法則產生顯著較佳電腦態度與較低電腦焦慮。由於每種教學設計必有其預期的訓練產出,教育訓練若要達到效率提升或良好態度建立的目標,最好能考量預期產出為何,並依照個人特質上的差異,以設計適當的訓練方式,方能獲致最佳效果。
The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of different training methods and personal learning styles on learners’ computer learning performance and attitude towards computers. Plausible interaction effects of individual learning style and training method on learning performance and computer attitude were also studied. A computer field experiment on WWW page design training was employed to collect data. It was found that instruction based training contributes more to learning performance whereas example based training enhances better computer attitude. In addition, learners with different learning styles obtained significant differences in learning performance and computer attitude. Learners with different learning style did have their best-fit training method. Divergent learners benefited the most from instruction based method in learning performance. On the other hand, example based method would result in more positive computer attitude and lower computer anxiety for both divergent and convergent learners. It is apparent that in order to achieve learners’ optimal performance, the "traits-training fit" should be taken into account. Plausible explanations about the findings are provided and future implications follow.
期刊論文
1.Kraiger, Kurt、Ford, J. Kevin、Salas, Eduardo(1993)。Application of Cognitive, Skill-Based, and Affective Theories of Learning Output to New Methods of Training Evaluation。Journal of Applied Psychology,78(2),311-328。  new window
2.Mayer‚ R. E.(1981)。The Psychology of How Novices Learn Computer Programming。Computing Surveys,13,121-141。  new window
3.Harrison, A. W.、Rainer, R. K. J.(1992)。The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-user Computing。Journal of Management of Information Systems,9(1),93-111。  new window
4.Loyd, Brenda H.、Gressard, Clarice P.(1984)。Reliability and factorial Validity of computer attitude scales。Educational and Psychological Measurement,44(2),501-505。  new window
5.Bostrom, R. P.、Olfman, L.、Sein, M. K.(1990)。The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training。MIS Quarterly,14(1),101-119。  new window
6.Nelson, R. R.、Cheney, P. H.(1987)。Training end user: an exploratory study。MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems,11(4),547-559。  new window
7.Bozionelos, N.(1997)。Psychology of computer use: XLIV. Computer anxiety and learning style。Perceptual and Motor Skills,84,753-754。  new window
8.Bostrom, R. P.、Robert, P.、Olfman, L.、Sein, M. K.(1993)。Learning style and end-user training: a first step。MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems,17(1),118-120。  new window
9.Gist, M.(1988)。The influence of training method and trainee age on the acquisition of computer skills。Personnel Psychology,41(2),255-265。  new window
10.Gist, M. E.(1989)。The influence of training method and trainee age on self efficacy and idea generation among managers。Personnel Psychology,42(4),787-805。  new window
11.Moran, T. P.(1981)。An applied psychology of the user。Computing Surveys,13(1),1-11。  new window
12.Sein, M. K.、Bostrom, R. P.(1989)。Individual differences and the training of novice users。Human-Computer Interface,4(3),197-229。  new window
研究報告
1.Carrol, J. M.、Olson, J. R.、Anderson, N.(1987)。Mental models in human-computer interaction: research issues about what the user of software knows。Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
2.Gremillion, L. L.、Hopkins, G. N.(1987)。An empirical study of learning style and personal computer use。Boston, MA。  new window
學位論文
1.官振華(1996)。WWW使用者運用電子購物意願之研究--以人格特質、購買涉入與網路使用行為探討(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林曉妮(1997)。電腦態度與電腦素養的影響因素探討--小學生的實地實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝麗菁(1994)。認知特質與訓練型態對資訊系統使用者學習績效之影響--以文書處理系統為例(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊博顯(1995)。從學習傾向探討超媒體在設計資訊提供之應用,0。  延伸查詢new window
5.Borgman, C. L.(1984)。The User's Mental Model of An Information Retrieval System: Effect on Performance,Stanford, CA。  new window
6.Davis, S. D.(1989)。Training Novice Users of Computer Systems: the Roles of the Computer Interface, Training Methods, and Learner Characteristics,Bloomington, IN。  new window
圖書
1.梁定澎(1991)。決策支援系統。臺北:松崗電腦圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hergenhahn, B. R.、王文科(1989)。學習心理學。臺北市:五南出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kolb, David A.(1984)。Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development。Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.(1987)。社會及行為科學研究法。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kirkpatrick, D. L.(1976)。Evaluation of training。Training and Development Handbook。New York, NY。  new window
6.Kolb, David A.(1974)。Organizational Psychology: A Book of Readings。Organizational Psychology: A Book of Readings。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
圖書論文
1.Norman, D. A.(1983)。Some observations on mental models。Mental models。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
2.Young, R. M.(1983)。Surrogates and mappings: two kinds of conceptual model for interactive devices。Mental Models。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE