:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:朱熹「義利之辨」之倫理價值觀探源
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:張永儁
作者(外文):Chang, Jun-chun
出版日期:2001
卷期:28:1=320
頁次:頁1-10+93
主題關鍵詞:道統王道霸道王霸之辨OrthodoxyThe perfect way of the ancient kingsThe way of mightRighteousnessProfitThe distinction between righteousness and profit
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(3) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:142
     本文首從古典經籍,如《詩》、《書》、《易》、《禮》、《春秋》、《左傳》、 《公羊傳》二傳,《論語》、《孟子》、《大學》等,揀摘其重要的有關於「義利之 辨」的言論,扼要的加以詮釋;且從字源學如《說文解字》及段玉裁的注,旁證 義利二字的語源。約略加以現代哲學觀念的疏解。次之,後漢儒董仲舒「正誼明 道」之言,與王充《論衡》中「剌孟」之說,略窺「義利之辨」的歷史衍申。再 次之,據朱熹之《四書章句集注》與朱熹與陳亮的「義利王霸之辨」,進窺宋儒 「義利之辨」之勝義——躋於歷史哲學、文化哲學與本體論的理論高度。以終此 文。
We select important passages about the "distinction between righteousness and profit" from classic texts like Shi, Shou, Yi, Li, Chun Qiu, Zuo Zhuan, Gong Yang Zhuan, Lun Yu, Mencius and Da Xue, and then interpret meaning of the distinction succinctly. The etyma of "righteousness" and "profit" are found in etymological texts like Shuo Wen Jie Zi and Yu-cai Duan's Annotations. We also discuss the historical derivation of the "distinction between righteousness and profit" in Zhong-shu Dong's writing about "The Righteousness" and in Chong Wang's writing about "Sarcasm" in his On Balance. Furthermore, We analyze the meaning of the "distinction between rightenousness and profit" according to Xi Zhu's The Annotations of the Four Books as well as the arguments between Xi Zhu and Liang Chen about "the business of being a king or a ruler." With all the discussion mentioned above, we hope to bring this thesis into the field of historical philosophy, cultural philosophy and ontology.
圖書
1.朱熹。大學章句一卷。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱熹。中庸章句。  延伸查詢new window
3.孟軻。孟子。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(漢)董仲舒。春秋繁露,0。  延伸查詢new window
2.尚書。  延伸查詢new window
3.(南宋)朱熹。通書解。  延伸查詢new window
4.(宋)趙順孫。四書纂疏。  延伸查詢new window
5.(南宋)朱熹。論語集注。  延伸查詢new window
6.古文尚書。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE