臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：羅爾斯與政治哲學的實際任務
書刊名：政治科學論叢
作者：陳宜中 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, I-chung
出版日期：2001
卷期：14
頁次：頁47-74
主題關鍵詞：正義即公平；政治性自由主義；穩定；社會整合；良序社會；省思均衡；重疊共識；政治合理性；憲政政體；Justice as fairness；Political liberalism；Stability；Social unity；A well-ordered society；Reflective equilibrium；Overlapping consensus；The politically reasonable；Constitutional regime
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:110
　　　　　羅爾斯是二十紀下半期的西方思想發展最重要的人物之一，但是在他的早期著作(《正義論》)與晚期作品(如《政治性自由主義》)之間，似乎存在著些重大的轉折變化。雖然旌爾斯並未更動他早所提倡的「正義即公平」此一正義觀的實質內容，但卻大幅度地改變了他的正義理論的性格、對象、訴求、以及証立方式，以至於他最後決定提出一套名之為「政治性自由主義」的新典範。與此同時，他特別強調「政治哲學的實際任務」這個問題為焦點，探討政治性自由主義此一新典範所涉及的邏輯變化、証立策以及弔詭後果，並分析「穩定的社會整合」、「政治層面的省思均衡」、「適合憲政政體的正義觀」、「政治合理性」、「重疊共識」等關鍵概念。此外，作者提出一個自己的詮釋點，認為性自由主義是一套帶有強烈政治使命感與歷史意的實踐性學說，其終極目標在於為(美國)憲政政體開創出可長可久的穩定與和平。
　　　　　Rawls's transition from 'justice as fairness' to 'political liberalism' has aroused intense controversy over the nature of the Rawlsian project. This article takes up this contentious issue and aims to place Rawls's 'political turn' of political liberalism the various dominant readings. It argues that the 'practical task' of political liberalism consists principally in working out the most 'stable' public conception of justice, one, that is, which is most capable of stabilizing the constitutional regime. Towards this end, Rawls has decided to leave behind the three egalitarian elements of justice as fairness-namely, the fair value of political liberties, fair equal opportunity, and the difference principle-for the reason that these egalitarian principles have become too controversial to be stable. Justice as fairness is to be replaced with a more stable conception, that is, a minimum yet reasonable liberal conception of justice covering the constitutional essentials and, with it, the idea of public reason. Political liberalism is no more than a logical working out of Rawls's minimum yet reasonable liberal conception of justice. And if this is the price that Rawls has to pay for his obsession with stability, he has paid it with great willingness and philosophical sophistication. Through a critical examination of Rawls's arguments, this article aims to highlight the irreducibly 'political' character of political liberalism. It suggests that the latter should best be understood as a species of 'justice as stability', in which the stability of the constitutional regime has become an absolute priority.
期刊論文
1.Rawls, John(1995)。Reply to Habermas。The Journal of Philosophy，92(3)，132-180。  new window
2.Tan, K.(1998)。Liberal Toleration in Rawls's Law of Peoples。Ethics，108(2)，276-295。  new window
3.Okin, Susan Moller(1994)。Political liberalism, justice, and gender。Ethics，105(1)，23-43。  new window
4.Cohen, Joshua(1994)。A More Democratic Liberalism。Michigan Law Review，92(6)，1503-1546。  new window
5.Greenawalt, K.(1994)。On public reason。Chicago-Kent Law Review，69，669-689。  new window
6.Waldron, Jeremy(1994)。Disagreements about justice。Pacific Philosophical Quarterly，75，372-387。  new window
7.Scheffler, S.(1994)。The appeal of political liberalism。Ethics，105，4-22。  new window
8.Hill, Thomas E. Jr.(1994)。The stability problem in political liberalism。Pacific Philosophical Quarterly，75，333-352。  new window
9.Rawls, John(1988)。The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good。Philosophy and Public Affairs，17(4)，251-276。  new window
10.Raz, Joseph(1990)。Facing Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence。Philosophy and Public Affairs，19(1)，3-46。  new window
11.Barry, Brian(1995)。John Rawls and the Search for Stability。Ethics，105(4)，874-915。  new window
12.Baier, K.(1989)。Justice and the aims of political philosophy。Ethics，99，771-790。  new window
13.Copp, D.(1996)。Pluralism and stability in liberal theory。Journal of Political Philosophy，4(3)，191-206。  new window
14.Estland, D.(1996)。The survival of egalitarian justice in John Rawls's Political Liberalism。Journal of Political Philosophy，4(1)，68-78。  new window
15.Hampton, J.(1989)。Should Political Philosophy Be Done without Metaphysics?。Ethics，99，791-814。  new window
16.Lehning, P.(1998)。The coherence of Rawl's plea for democratic equality。Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy，1(4)，1-41。  new window
17.Okin, S. M.(1993)。Book review。American Political Science Review，87，1010-1011。  new window
18.William, B.(1993)。A fair state。London Review of Books，7-8。  new window
圖書
1.Pogge, Thomas W.(1989)。Realizing Rawls。Cornell University Press。  new window
2.Rawls, John(1999)。The Law of Peoples: With "the Idea of Public Reason Revisited"。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Rawls, John(1996)。Political Liberalism。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
4.Rawls, John、Freeman, Samuel(1999)。Collected Papers。Cambridge, Mass.：Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Rawls, John(1993)。Political Liberalism。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Rawls, John、Herman, Barbara(2000)。Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy。Harvard University Press。  new window
8.戴華(1995)。羅爾斯與理性直覺主義：對「政治性正義觀」的一項後設研究。哲學與公共規範。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.Cohen, J.(1993)。Moral pluralism and political consensus。The Idea of Democracy。Cambridge。  new window
10.Dworkin, R.(1975)。The original position。Reading Rawls。New York, NY。  new window
11.Hampton, J.(1993)。The moral commitments of liberalism。The Idea of Democracy。Cambridge。  new window
12.Hart, H. L. A.(1975)。Rawls on liberty and its priority。Reading Rawls。New York, NY。  new window
13.Krouse, R.、Mcpherson, M.(1988)。Capitalism, 'property-owning democracy', and the welfare state。Democracy and the Welfare State。Princeton。  new window
14.Rawls, J.(1975)。The independence of moral theory。Collected Papers。Cambridge, MA。  new window
15.Rawls, J.(1981)。The basic liberties and their priority。Political Liberalism。New York, NY。  new window
16.Rawls, J.(1982)。Social unity and primary goods。Collected Papers。Cambridge, MA。  new window
17.Rawls, J.(1987)。The idea of an overlapping consensus。Collected Papers。Cambridge, MA。  new window
18.Rawls, J.(1989)。The domain of the political and overlapping consensus。Collected Papers。Cambridge, MA。  new window
19.Rawls, J.(1993)。The law of peoples。Collected Papers。Cambridge, MA。  new window
20.Rawls, J.(1997)。The idea of public reason revisited。Collected Papers。Cambridge, MA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Rawls, J.(1985)。Justice as fairness: political not metaphysical。Collected Papers。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Rawls, J.(1987)。Preface for the French edition of A Theory of Justice。Collected Papers。  new window
3.林火旺(1995)。政治自由主義與道德生活。哲學與公共規範。臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.錢永祥(1995)。社會整合與羅爾斯自由主義的政治性格。哲學與公共規範。臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Rawls, John(1980)。Kantian constructivism in moral theory。John Rawls: Collected papers。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：559（臺灣：556，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1473665 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67272281
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上