:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:多元與統一:多元主義與自由主義的一項政治議題
書刊名:人文及社會科學集刊
作者:蔡英文 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsai, Ying-win
出版日期:1997
卷期:9:3
頁次:頁45-84
主題關鍵詞:多元主義交疊共識暫訂協議PluralismOverlapping consensusA modus vivendi
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:62
  • 點閱點閱:52
     「多元分歧」與「統一整台」的論述關涉自由主義內在的一項爭議,此爭議的基 本問題在於,如果我們承認自由社會的基本性格之一,乃是價值、生活方式的多元分歧,那 麼,是否可能從這多元分歧中尋求某種「理性共識」,以達成政治社會的「統一整台」? 針 對這項問題,本文闡述約翰.羅爾斯的「交疊性共識」的政治理想,說明他所要解釋的自由 社會之問題,以及解釋他鋪陳之論證; 另一方面,以英國當代三位的政治思想家 -- 艾薩. 柏林、約瑟夫.雷茲與約翰.葛雷的價值與文化多元主義的學說,反省羅爾斯的「交疊性共 識」論證上的問題。在這方面,論述的焦點擺在,個人理性之運用與社群文化之限制、「交 疊性共識」與「暫訂協議」彼此的對立緊張,由此顯現自由主義內在的分歧。理性建立的任 何原則如何跟區域性的、差異有別的價值與文化取得協調,在自由主義的陣營裡,乃是懸而 未解的問題。
     The concepts of "pluralization" and "unification" or "integration" are relevant to one of the basic polemics of liberalism: if we recognize that pluralization, whether it is concerned with values or with ways of life, constitutes a cardinal characteristic of liberal society, then is it possible to erect a certain sort of rational consensus to accomplish a social integration? Concerning this question, this essay proposes to first expound on John Rawls's political ideal of "overlapping consensus" explicates the issues he tries to resolve and the arguments he presents. and then to examine some flaws of this political ideal in terms of the radical pluralism propounded by Isaiah Berlin, Joseph Rat and John Gray. With regard to this, this essay mainly deals with the tension between the individual's practical reasoning and the limitation of a cultural society, between "overlapping consensus" and a modus vivendi. On this basis, this essay tries to explain the difficulty of conjoining universal principles of reason with cultural pluralism.
期刊論文
1.Rawls, John(199503)。Reply to Habermas。The Journal of Philosophy,92(3),132-180。  new window
2.Bader, Vett(199505)。Citizenship and Exclusion: Radical Democracy. Community, and Justice, or What is wrong with Communitarianism?。Political Theory,23(2),211-246。  new window
3.Birnbaum, Pierre(199602)。From Multiculturalism to Nationalism。Political Theory,24(1),33-45。  new window
4.Dauenhauer, Bernard(1995)。Ricoeur and Political Identity。Philosophical Today,1995(Spring),47-55。  new window
5.Holmes, Stephen(1994)。Liberalism for a World of Ethnic Passions and Decaying States。Social Research,61(3),599-611。  new window
6.Honig, Bonnie(1994)。Difference, Dilemmas, and the Politics of Home。Social Research,61(3),563-599。  new window
7.Kateb, George(1994)。Notes on Pluralism。Social Research,61(3),511-539。  new window
8.Kukathas, Chandran(1995)。Liberalism, Communitarianism, and Political Community。Social Philosophy and Policy,12(1),80-104。  new window
9.Kymlicka, Will(1995)。Social Unity in a Liberal State。Social Philosophy and Policy,12(1),105-136。  new window
10.Lukes, Steven(1994)。The Singular and Plural: On the Distinctive Liberalism of Isaiah Berlin。Social Research,61(3),687-719。  new window
11.Miller, David(1995)。Citizenship and Pluralism。Political Studies,43,432-450。  new window
12.Raz, Joseph(1994)。Moral Change and Social Relativism。Social Philosophy and Policy,11(1),139-158。  new window
13.Rawls, John(1980)。Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory。The Journal of Philosophy,77(9),515-577。  new window
14.Raz, Joseph(1990)。Facing Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence。Philosophy and Public Affairs,19(1),3-46。  new window
15.蕭高彥(19960700)。共同體的理念:一個思想史之考察。臺灣政治學刊,1,257-295。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Larmore, Charles(1990)。Political Liberalism。Political Theory,18(3),339-360。  new window
17.Barry, Brian(1995)。John Rawls and the Search for Stability。Ethics,105(4),874-915。  new window
學位論文
1.李國維(1996)。論羅爾斯交疊性共識底理念(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Berlin, Isaiah(1976)。Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas。London:Chatto and Windus。  new window
2.Berlin, Isaiah(1978)。Concepts and Categories: Philosophical Essays。New York:the Viking Press。  new window
3.Berlin, Isaiah(1980)。Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas。New York:the Viking Press。  new window
4.Berlin, Isaiah(1990)。The Crooked Timber of Humanity。London:John Murry。  new window
5.Gray, John(1993)。Post-Liberalism: Studies in Political Thought。London:N. Y.:Routledge。  new window
6.Gray, John(1995)。Enlightenments Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age。London:Routledge。  new window
7.Kekes, John(1993)。The Morality of Pluralism。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Raz, Joseph(1994)。Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
9.Rescher, Nicholas(1993)。Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
10.Taylor, Charles、Gutmann, Amy(1994)。Multiculturalism: Examing the Politics of Recognition。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
11.Williams, Bernard(1981)。Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-1980。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Raz, Joseph(1986)。The Morality of Freedom。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
13.Gray, John(1989)。Liberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy。Routledge。  new window
14.Rawls, John(1971)。A Theory of Justice。The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
15.Berlin, Isaiah(1969)。Four Essays on Liberty。Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Rawls, John(1993)。Political Liberalism。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Taylor, Charles(1990)。Comparition, History, Truth。Myth and philosophy。Albany:State University of New York。  new window
2.林火旺(1995)。政治自由主義與道德生活。哲學與公共規範。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.林火旺(1995)。自由主義可否建立一個政治社群?。政治社群。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.戴華(1995)。羅爾斯與理性直覺主義:對「政治性正義觀」的一項後設研究。哲學與公共規範。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
5.戴華(1995)。羅爾斯論政治層面上的個人與社群。政治社群。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭高彥(1995)。愛國心與共同體的政治認同之構成。政治社群。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
7.錢永祥(1995)。社會整合與羅爾斯自由主義的政治性格。哲學輿公共規範。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.錢永祥(1995)。社群關係與自我之構成:對沈岱爾社群主義論證的檢討。政治社群。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE